CUIN2, Thanks for the thoughtful response, much appreciated. I'm not one to assume everything I think is the conclusive truth, because 99.9% of the time, there is additional detail to be factored in, that I either have not considered, or am unaware of for a variety of potential reasons. I try to take in everything and sort through it, including the negative and distasteful. The pumpers, IMO, are too often blinded by hope, and vice versa with the bashers. I'm way in the RED with FUSZ, but I own my part of insufficient DD to have bought some of my shares at $2.72 and have been trying to average down since, so that it will take less upward movement to recover, or gain. At this point, I've done enough DD, to be moderately comfortable staying strong, despite the serious errors in judgement both I and nFUSZ leadership have made.
Answers to Questions #1 & #2 help me understand your perspective.
Answer to Question #3, In no way did I forget the relevance that Rory is the largest shareholder, or that him trying to cash out would demolish the current pps, so yes I do see that he "took one for the team", sort of, but at a MUCH, MUCH lower risk level than the rest of us, while recognizing that it could be argued that when the options were established, his risk was higher, albeit, he was in the driver's seat. However, I don't agree with your statement, "Honestly, everything he is doing benefits us shareholders more than himself currently" accurately represents his level of risk, nor motivation, he is in it for himself, like every other human being, but he knows that requires the resources of others that he needs to help him, so he must share the wealth if he expects others to share the cost. Thanks again.
