Appreciate the questions Cynomus. I had to wait from yesterday, as this is my 1 post today.
1. What is the purpose of comparing the shares outstanding and Market Cap of nFusz with HubSpot, SAP, Salesforce, Oracle, and Microsoft? I fail to see the relevance, yes all are tech companies but VERY different. Certainly nFusz agreements with them are likely to have more correlation with revenue than say the landscape company(s) that have agreements with these companies, but it's not like these agreements suggest they will be anywhere near as successful simply due to these agreements. Different businesses with a segment of overlapping interest. For example, How much of Oracle's DB business, their flagship, is nFusz going to earn revenue from? How much of MS Office needs CRM via interactive video? MS Word, Excel? I think there is bigg opportunity in ways, not often discussed for sure, but simply having an agreement with them doesn't guarantee any particular revenue other than at least one (1) Notifi subscription.
Answer: Great point. While true they are different, they are also peers in the CRM vertical. Understanding market cap and shares outstanding is important due diligence for anyone interested in possibly investing here. Investing is about current vs. future growth opportunity.
There is a huge DELTA not only in reported sales, but outstanding market cap. I can tell you from my experience, many other securities I’ve held have had significantly higher market caps, pre-revenue.
And, while you are right about being different also, nFusz can and is branching into other areas of business that CRM just doesn’t work in. CRM CAN’T create engagement in and of itself.
In my opinion, the Network Marketing Space will be a huge vertical for nFusz. Over 100,000,000 network marketers and growing.
With Microsoft, Outlook (email) in my opinion, will be the the best opportunity for nFusz out of the gate.
NotifiEDU, NotifiMed, NotifiAir, NotifiTV are all expanding and solidifying their positions IMO. I can’t wait until Facebook Live and others start presenting our technology and see the benefits.
2. When talking about Rory's wild success with Telx, why does he mention and everyone keep parroting that AFTER he sold the company for $200M, YEARS LATER it was resold for $1.9 Billion. Was that additional value add of $1.7 Billion due directly or indirectly to Rory, or was it due to the new management? I'm a long, but this seems like a massive pump due to something someone else did. Am I missing some data on this?
Answer: Rory was offered and accepted a yearly multimillion dollar consulting contract after the sale of Telx. His impetus helped drive strategic growth for the firm for some time after the 2006 sale. How long and how much I am uncertain, but if you look back this quote was telling
3. When Rory got to convert $788,538 into shares WAY below market value ($0.07 I think), didn't that instantly generate a massive positive value for him? By my calculations the 2 transactions of $582,333 into 407,226 Restricted Shares @ $1.43 & $788,538 into 11,264,828 Restricted Shares @ $0.07 means he Netted $3,619,606.65 at today's share price of $0.36. I don't see how this is something to brag about. He averaged down below market value. This cuts both ways, yes he took $788,538 off the books, and converted it into value in his own pocket. Honestly, I don't see how that was good for OTHER shareholders, outside of reducing an hindrance to uplisting.
Answer: You forget however that Rory is the single largest nFusz shareholder, and as such only currently has nFusz common stock wealth on paper. He couldn’t sell any substantial position in nFusz without causing share price to drop precipitously. What he is doing is building future value for all of us. Honestly, everything he is doing benefits us shareholders more than himself currently, as we can buy/sell shares without FINRA/SEC reporting requirements. His eye is on the prize in the future, not now. Does that make sense?
I appreciate the honesty and questions & am not offended if we don’t see it the same way.
Best.
