No, remember they closed the deal on the 1st CA opportunity.
Until they later didn't really.
The only thing that gives them any cred in my book is showing a profit, or at least CFP from ops. They've had more than a decade to do that and even several years from MJ now and all we see is larger losses, more dilution, more toxic notes and more "great new opportunity" announcements. When you've had a decade of opportunities and not capitalized on a single one, even in a small way, it makes the pump and dump rather obvious.
One "closed deal" isn't going to undo that as they've had many such "closed deals" in the past. Let's see the financial results (and no, I don't mean "we have record revenues, but we lose money on every sale we make in direct costs" results. I mean strong gross profit and CFP, if not net income.
"There's a sucker born every minute, 2 to take him and 4 to lend him toxic debt" PT Barnum's investment advisor.