InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 677
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2017

Re: rakp post# 3190

Saturday, 09/02/2017 2:09:15 PM

Saturday, September 02, 2017 2:09:15 PM

Post# of 5507
I am starting to agree with you on that. When I first invested, prior to the caveat emptor, I saw huge potential in this company. I got a very large number of Maryland people to invest as well. Now I see several other large players are streaming live tv. As far as I am concerned, CCLX is just about out of time. I really do hate to say that. Seems like there's no rush on their end, and in the meantime, this stock can't even crawl its way up to a point where it can be traded regular. Either hold it or lose money seems to be the only option for everyone but the MM's. Unfortunately if I pull out so will a large number of other investors. Mark Bayliss did more damage,as I believe was his intention, than I believe people realize. Why would the average person invest based on this year's tumultuous history? If I weren't already invested and saw the history of this year I wouldn't buy in now. A wise, seasoned investor I know often points out that the market doesn't like uncertainty. The market likes earnings or expectations of earnings, neither of which cclx seems to provide at this point. So sad. Infuriating to know that Bayliss' need for petty retribution was achieved by him jerking off using our shares, or money, as his catch. We should have collectively gone after him personally, for breach of fiduciary responsibility, and taken his 20 million shares away from him, along with his other assets. I know a person who sold all of their shares, at bids, the morning of Bayliss announcement. If not for that announcement, he had no intention of selling. There's the proof of the harm Bayliss did.