InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 208
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/20/2016

Re: JW4 post# 30052

Thursday, 08/31/2017 9:44:32 PM

Thursday, August 31, 2017 9:44:32 PM

Post# of 32167
If Amy Boylan is acting as the President of Saleen Motors International (SMI) and as Chief Operating Officer of Publicly Traded Saleen Automotive (SLNN) and there is a Licensing agreement that pays SMI (Steve Saleen CEO of Saleen Automotive) for cars sold in China, Europe or the USA that is the definition of "Conflict of Interest".
Who is protecting the SLNN shareholders interest? Not Amy or Steve can be relied on to maximize profits for Saleen Automotive if the proceeds from the sale of cars is going to SMI (Steve Saleen & Amy Boylan) rather than to Saleen Automotive (SLNN).
Put another way, if this was an honest business deal between GTA and Steve Saleen then why create a SEPERATE entity called SMI to collect royalties? Why not have the proceeds from GTA sales in China, Europe & the USA go straight to Saleen Automotive where the SLNN shareholders could/should benefit?
This is a highly IRREGULAR in my opinion for cash earned from royalties to be diverted from publicly traded Saleen Automotive (SLNN) to SMI and paid directly to Steve Saleen & possibly Amy Boylan, in my opinion.
Why would anyone invest in a publicly traded company whose CEO, COO & President are working for a Different Private Company in the same industry and getting paid for their time & effort away from the Publicly traded company? That is not ethical in my opinion.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.