InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,360.96
(
0.18%
)
Post# of 96904
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

sexysamir

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 26
Posts 2161
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/19/2017

sexysamir

Re: I_Am_Ram post# 36427

Tuesday, 08/01/2017 12:48:08 PM

Tuesday, August 01, 2017 12:48:08 PM

Post# of 96904
If you look at the PR's about the first IPR loss from Cisco, it shows that they already tried this defense.


"The PTAB concluded that the term “RF channel” as used in the ‘679 patent “does not include code channels – for example data streams created by CDMA– but instead refers only to frequency bands, such as those created by FDMA.”


Cisco tried the exact same argument in this appeal. I don't think that is going to work out too well for them.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up