InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 104
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/02/2017

Re: splithappens post# 173000

Sunday, 07/16/2017 1:07:26 PM

Sunday, July 16, 2017 1:07:26 PM

Post# of 235078
My concern isn't if SFOR is going to make any money off of ACS deals. My concern is that ACS is making the most money off SFOR products, more than SFOR itself. From an investor's standpoint, I'd rather invest in the company that is directly connected to big names than the manufacturer of the products of that company. It's like ACS being Apple and SFOR being the company that makes the chips inside Apple phones.

SFOR should have never sold their patents to ACS because ACS will be bought out and SFOR will only be left with 15-20% of the buyout amount, if that even. Don't get me wrong I'm LONG on SFOR and want it to succeed, I just think ACS should be giving SFOR more credit, mostly since they haven't even paid them the $20 million yet.

My biggest worry is SFOR isn't the real business anymore, it's just the penny stock business where the company gets a little bit of stockholders money here and there. SFOR is also just the company that deals with the lawsuits because if they lost the lawsuits, SFOR tanking is less of a concern. And the true business, the one they all care about and are more invested in and where all the revenue is recorded, I'm worried that business is ACS and the "channel partners". I hope I'm wrong and SFOR is the true money tree and not ACS.