Friday, August 04, 2006 7:21:34 AM
Why did Paim/Paiv run like it did. Revenues, or other strong fundamentals or technicals. NO. Naked shorts had to cover, period.
The play here is the naked shorts have to cover and the short squeeze price is .00015 per buyins.net. SMMW hiring Donnelly Assoc. is not cheap and the purpose is to nail the naked shorters period. 11Billion to date buy back and continuing with CEO of SMMW pushing to acquire as many shares back as possible. Sun-Mon will see big PR addressing hiring of Donnelly Assoc. and the kick ass of the naked shorts. PAIM sat for weeks @ .0001 and then suddenly everyone said how great it was and talked about, top IHUB board blah blah and was a 8X bagger. Why. Naked shorts had to cover.
The traders selling at .0002 did exactly what there loser Teach me to trade seminar doughboy taught them. OH, the song of the truly desperate. So many sheep in this country.
I'm curious why you have posted on this site first time now?
If you don't own any shares, why take the time to post?
Not a buy or sell recommendation.
Best Regards
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM
Bemax Inc. Positions to Capitalize on Industry Growth with New Improved Quality of Mother's Touch® Disposable Diapers • BMXC • Jun 24, 2024 8:00 AM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM