InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 7675
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 09/29/2011

Re: r4pt0r post# 16158

Thursday, 06/23/2016 4:03:20 AM

Thursday, June 23, 2016 4:03:20 AM

Post# of 30926
Also, allowing CDNL to use the proceeds of selling shares to do a share buyback is idiocy.

Investor bought 51% for $7.5m. That is ~$147k per 1% in ownership.

If CDNL spends $500,000 cancelling shares at the current ~$3m market cap, that means ~16.7% of the shares are cancelled. The remaining shareholders' ownership all increase ~20% due to the reduced O/S.

i.e., the Big Investor who bought 51% ownership will now own 61%.

If the Big Investor had held back that $500k, and invested only $7,000,000, then at the same $147k/1%, they'd have purchased 47.6% of the company.

They could then use that $500k and buy the exact same 16.7% of the shares on the open market. So their total ownership is now 64.3%. I.e. the company still has the exact same amount of capital for debt repayment + investment, but the Big Investor has 4.3% more ownership for the same price.

So according to the public terms of this deal:

1. Investor gave CDNL more cash than CDNL needs to actually grow the business, so CDNL is distributing the excess back to shareholders via a buyback

-and-

2. The multi-million dollar investor will essentially give away 4.3% of its potential ownership in the company.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.