InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 14210
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/27/2014

Re: None

Wednesday, 02/03/2016 12:46:21 PM

Wednesday, February 03, 2016 12:46:21 PM

Post# of 37504
Paul's Purposefully Deceptive PR IS RELEVANT and NOT a moot point

Thank you for confirming that there are NOT 95 salesman who contract directly with MCIG. It was implied in the quote below that MCIG had 95 salespeople contracted directly with MCIG. It's NOT a moot point because it's another example of how Paul purposely deceives shareholders.

In addition, it DOES make a difference who those salespeople actually work for - because if they are for companies like security grade or emotek or madhatter - sorry, but they shouldn't count; especially if they no longer have a partnership (like security grade or CAFS).

It was purposefully deceptive by Paul.

Just like it is very deceptive of Paul to imply that there are 300 wholesale distributors in the USA

Again, you missed the point of the question about MCIG's "marketing". Why haven't they posted names of all their US Based Wholesale Distributors on their website?


Why haven't they posted names or POC for any salesman that are actually contracted with MCIG? I mean, they do have someone directly contracted with MCIG, don't they?

So, yeah - it's clear that there are likely very, very few USA based wholesale distributors. And it explains why in all likelihood, they have not actually sold many cannapods. My guess is ZERO cannapod sales.

It also shows that they are terrible at marketing. Why wouldn't you want to provide this kind of info to prospective wholesalers, brick and mortar retailers, and customers in general??


MCIG can learn from a company like Virgin Vapor
http://www.virginvapor.com/apps/store-locator

You don't think this is important to grow revenues? Oh, my...




http://www.marketwatch.com/story/mcig-introduces-kavva-vape-high-grade-cbd-vape-juice-line-2016-01-04
“We currently have more than 3000 clients who have tried our different CBD products and more than 300 open wholesale accounts that are pushing our different product lines to consumers”
No, it’s not a moot point. It’s extremely important as it relates to growth of the top and bottom lines for both MCIG and VTCQ


http://seekingalpha.com/article/3499716-an-exclusive-interview-with-mcig-ceo-paul-rosenberg

Rosenberg: We are a sales channel for innovative products. We have 95 boots on the ground, a developing call center, and yes they are segmented. Grow services and consumer products. We have a developing high tech sales segmentation (currently 10 reps) and a small pharma sales segmentation (currently 5 reps). The most skilled cross all sales efforts.



http://www.marketwatch.com/story/mcig-introduces-kavva-vape-high-grade-cbd-vape-juice-line-2016-01-04

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=120277248

BTW, the company has never claimed that 95 reps work directly for mCig, only that 95 sales reps are selling mCig products. This is a straw man argument. It makes no difference whether mCig contracts directly with a rep or with a sub-distributor that employs that rep. Either way, they're selling mCig products. This argument makes no sense.