Yeah, you gott that wrong. The DOJ had to ask the court to grant leave to travel for Marty. Just as I stated.
And one doesn't "squash" a subpoena, one moves to quash it.
And you cannot move to quash a Congressional subpoena, as it doesn't come from the judicial branch. Well, I suppose you could move for it, but an Article III court likely would nott quash a Congressional subpoena.
As I've stated before, a Congressional subpoena is NOT a court subpoena. It comes from the legislative branch, nott the judicial branch nor the executive branch and it does nott arise from a pending court action (i.e, drug pricing does nott arise from Marty's fraud case for Ponzi scheming).
So there's that.
Thanks for the 'advice' though! :)
Perhaps you can give us your opinion of Vosburg v. Putney or International Shoe also?
