InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 190
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/16/2013

Re: rafunrafun post# 67148

Friday, 12/18/2015 12:29:47 PM

Friday, December 18, 2015 12:29:47 PM

Post# of 426561
I am getting very frustrated with the cone of silence that has descended over these legal issues. I realize we're not entitled to an explanation of what's going on. If we were, don't you think the institutions with vastly larger holdings would be making demands?

Let the big holders do the work here, folks, and trust that management, after some substantial wins, is finally turning this team around.

That said, JT didn't help us with his Anchor response, and he may be regretting that one. However, it does seem completely unlikely that anchor indication is part of the negotiations. I agree with others who feel it's strictly about what communication is permissible and what is not.

If the FDA is supposedly trying to force AMRN to disclose failures by Niacin, fibrates, etc., I say hoo-ey -- a judge would toss that immediately. Their attorneys must realize this.

JT said their efforts were to "completely" resolve issues. That means leaving nothing open to FDA interpretative games. It's probably easier to wrestle a greased pig. And maybe more dignified, too.

Now that I think of it, I think the eventual resolution of this matter will be a letter that says "THIS is what we agreed to, and THIS is what we couldn't agree on," and then toss it back to the judge for an ultimate decision.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News