InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 2779
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: loophole73 post# 34552

Saturday, 06/28/2003 11:04:02 AM

Saturday, June 28, 2003 11:04:02 AM

Post# of 432754
Loop:

"I cannot think of one reason why the 2 new analysts would initiate coverage at this time on IDCC if the slightest chance for arbitration with Nok still exists."

I completely agree with you. Why would they take the chance of IDCC dropping if arbitrations was a concern (concern 2 ways--1.it will not happen, 2.Even if it does happen it will not effect the price much because of other factors---good 2nd quarter results--3g contract with ERICY, Mot etc.)

The next question is how did they reach this decision following the FD regulations. I don't believe that IDCC gave them the wink and nod, but more likely adding the facts up, don't the 2 big guys also follow Nok? A question put to IDCC might be of great importance to IDCC which would make it a FD violation, but a similiar question put to NOK or ERICY might be considered totally unimportant and might get the needed response.


The 50-50-90 rule: Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News