InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 105
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/24/2014

Re: Pyrrhonian post# 33583

Tuesday, 04/21/2015 11:10:24 AM

Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:10:24 AM

Post# of 693644
Question for Pyrr

These information arm data are simply unsubstantiated without a concurrent control group. It doesn't matter if the ePD mOS is 20 months, neither the market nor the greater health community will credit DCVax-L with the ability to procure a survival advantage unless such data comes from a randomized trial.

The "indeterminates" showed 25% increase (from slight residual tumor--see criteria) or any size new lesion at baseline, but who after being followed up 2 months later showed either regression of either or stable disease in either, or a little growth in either. I said, well, if they scanned them again at 6 months like is often done in studies to determine psPD, then many of those indeterminates would no longer be indeterminate but properly split into ePD or psPD.

I assume L had proper guidance on structuring the trials. Then what is the possible explanation for not performing a randomized trial and scanning the "indeterminates" again at 6 months if such would lead to a definitive conclusion?

Incidentally - I'm lightening up my position in the stock.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News