Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[biowreck]

HD, I am at a loss as to what you mean by factual Because, through the Internet, one can easily find the 8k filed by Amarin announcing the FDA's decision to rescind the SPA which clearly describes the reason for rescindment being "substantial scientific evidence"' which then is described as outside studies involving the lowering of tg's not resulting in a decrease of cv events...and the subsequent appeals. Is this not factual? Why would a judge not see this and not concern himself as to a pattern of FDA animosity (for lack of better words) toward Amarin?