Is there something wrong with purporting in retrospect that a quarter earlier release of the new version of an important product might have resulted in an internal target being met? Not excuse making for the company, just a simple proposition.
Perhaps you have an issue with the target being cited as "internal" when your contention is that Solms publicly stated a BE date when he became CEO and repeated it every CC?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.