InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 132
Posts 30425
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/10/2006

Re: Eagle1969 post# 2279

Sunday, 04/23/2006 10:35:16 AM

Sunday, April 23, 2006 10:35:16 AM

Post# of 28884
Eagle, I'm no lawyer, but it sounds like you informed on this topic. Have you emailed the company expressing this? They may be acting on advice from their lawyers which is not in their best interest. ie: A lawyer who couldn't care less about the stock price and has a particular legal tactic that relies on surprise.

re: Recovering assets from Stocklemon, agreed that Bill Harris may not have much to seize. But, imo, the real point of such a lawsuit would be to put Harris out of business permanentless, plus make an example of him via liens against his future income (damage award), to discourage other would-be Stocklemons from copycatting his tactics.

If nothing else, a formally filed lawsuit would clarify STTK's position on the topics of doubt raised by Stocklemon.

I'm going to try to meet with STTK IR in person this week, and will express these concerns directly. Time will tell how this plays out.

99.99% of all pinks are scams. Best to assume the other 0.01% are as well.