InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 740
Posts 61486
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 10/05/2009

Re: tdtcal post# 28348

Friday, 10/31/2014 2:42:00 PM

Friday, October 31, 2014 2:42:00 PM

Post# of 85904
Then go back and do some DD, read the 2012 PR that reported a 10X increase in the MVTG ERC... based on breakthroughs in the lab at MVTG

Go back and read the 2008 report that claims it is commercially viable as of 2008 based on the market price of $1,400/ton for existing sales of Formic acid.

READ MY LIPS!!!!!

The MVTG ERC is commercially viable, it has no "unit" that wears out. Every piece of equipment in the world needs maintenance. Hell I-phones get scrapped once a year for the new model, not because they wore out. Gesh!!!!

Show me a better solution to the CO2 problem than what MVTV has?????

Right, there is none.

The biggest issue with commercial viability is the demand and price of competitive materials, like H2 and we already know that is a Hindenburg disaster.

Not the MVTG ERC itself, it is a shinning white light in the darkness.

The real key is power cost, power input cost versus sold product cost. You have not even asked the right question yet.

CO poisoning (the Ballard-Plug H2 from methanol CO byproduct reformer problem) is not an issue with the MVTG systems because MVTG does not use Platinum or methanol and is not affected by CO!!!!

Ambition with out knowledge is like ship in dry dock, going nowhere FAST!
Please Check out my Favorites DD page here:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/Ecomikes-Favorite-stock-picks-and-Stock-DD-topics-26971/