If they used shares towards purchasing a chunk of another company in an acquisition for strategic purposes, it's not the same as if they just sold some shares to raise cash to pay their bills. It means you now own a piece of a bigger company, and if the acquisition helps the original company to succeed, then the piece you owned of the original company is going to grow better than if the acquisition never happened. Remember that Scott Vanis is a huge shareholder himself, and he's not going to want to do something stupid that decreases the value of his holdings in the long run.
If the original company just kept selling shares for no reason, then yes, that would be a bad thing, making your shares worth less. But now you not only own shares in the original company, but you now own shares of a larger combined company, with a better chance at succeeding than before, and with higher sales, and higher revenues, and with those revenues coming sooner than maybe we could have done on our own. It's a pretty bold move that they made, but I think in the end it will turn out to be a very smart move.
It's a big growing pain, kind of like if you were say a contractor, and you bought an expensive tool like a Bobcat excavator that allows you to save tons of time and make money faster. It's a pain buying that tool at first, but in the end it allows you to increase your business and make money faster and easier going way into the future.
I don't think they would even contemplate such a bold move unless they foresaw it making their future much more rosier. Neither Minerco nor Avanzar would even think about it unless they both saw really promising growth in the sales of Vitamin Fizz and all of their other products for it to make sense.
