InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 4170
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/11/2003

Re: player1234 post# 238763

Saturday, 09/27/2014 12:01:38 AM

Saturday, September 27, 2014 12:01:38 AM

Post# of 249147
and as far as "causing"

the tape:

On July 30 WAVX closed at 1.37

at the open on Jult 31 wave released the Bell_ID PR, and closed that day up 2 cents to 1.39 on modest/light volume

the next day they gave up the 2 cents plus a penny to close at 1.35 (volume and price movement all consistent with my interpretation of the SP consequence of the future project "Bell-ID") It seemed to me then (and now) and sensibly I might add the market, for the most part, could not give a flying monkey about Bell in the near term.

On Aug 7th Wave closed at 1.31 on higher volume (now off 7 cents from the Bell_PR of a week ago). The next day they close at 1.17 (the Q2 report and no new sales). It was not reported on Aug 7th and Wave failed to reach a definitive agreement with Bell-ID, what happened is they reported the previous quarters sales. The future project Bell thingy having all the consequence of, well, nothing?

the price recovered a dime over the next week and drifted sideways with some variation for a month. In the last two weeks Wave has stair cased itself down on light volume to the Aug8 level.

In the face of the tape, is it really your argument that Bell_ID is "causing" the recent SP behavior of WAVX? or am I just misunderstanding what you are saying?


The above content is my opinion.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.