Wednesday, July 30, 2014 12:03:57 AM
Quite obviously, there is no evidence of tortious interference as, if there was, a lawsuit would have been filed long, long ago alleging that to be the case. Any responsible CEO would have done so. In fact, a CEO's fiduciary responsibility would have required them to do so.
** Bear in mind that relating a fact or facts to a customer which results in the customer severing business ties with another is NOT tortious interference. Just keep that little nugget in the back of your head for future reference.
"Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt"
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM