"My research shows that while WSGI/Eastcor applied for a patent, they received a response back that the ARGUS was not patentable and the intellectual property claimed in their application belonged to others."
"I also know that the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority is the primary document referred to when a patent granting authority such as the US Patent Office is determining the grant of a patent."
" WSGI had two months after receiving the International Search Results to amend their claims. They didn't respond. The patent application has been, in effect, abandoned."
"WSGI made their claims to USPTO who completed an international search and reported their results. The results were not favorable to WSGI as virtually every claim was found to lack novelty or an inventive step over the intellectual rights of Kroplin and others."
You have been feeding the board your BS legal mumbo jumbo without understanding what you are actually talking about. Or you are intentionally misleading to cause a change in share price? The company filed a document with the pct based on the uspto pending patent application to allow for priority of filing in other countries. All the letter says is that the Dr or others may have claims to certain parts of the technology in certain limited countries. either know what you are talking about or be quiet. it only makes you look worse.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.