Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Post removed WHY???
Federal Judge Tells SEC Lawyer “Sit Down, Shut Up”
October 26, 2007, 2:17 pm
Posted by Peter Lattman
Judge Graham Mullen on Wednesday dismissed part of an SEC civil lawsuit alleging that a former executive at Friedman Billings Ramsey engaged in illegal conduct related to a securities offering. The claim alleged that John Mangan Jr. committed a so-called Section 5 violation involving a Pipe, or private investment in public equity. Representing Mangan: George Covington of King & Spalding in Charlotte and James Wyatt at Wyatt & Blake. Said Wyatt to the Observer: “We firmly believe (the case) will be resolved in his favor because we believe he has done absolutely nothing wrong.”
While the case is interesting — especially for those of you obsessed with the controversy surrounding Pipes and naked short selling — what’s interesting to us is this excerpt from the transcript of Wednesday’s oral argument on Mangan’s motion to dismiss.
Judge Mullen: Naked shorts are not legal, are they?
SEC lawyer Amy Greer: No. No, they’re just very risky, Your Honor.
SEC lawyer Catherine Pappas: And Your Honor –
Judge Mullen: They’re not illegal; they’re just risky.
Greer: Correct. Naked short sales are not illegal; they’re just risky, Your Honor.
Judge Mullen: Why in the world don’t you all make them illegal? Don’t you understand what happens in the market when you allow naked short selling to attack companies? I mean, do you understand that?
Greer: Your Honor, I think that that’s an issue for the United States Congress. I appreciate your concern –
Judge Mullen: Well –
Greer: — and I –
Judge Mullen: — the answer to my question is, yeah, I understand it or, no, I don’t.
Greer: I do understand your –
Judge Mullen: Do not try — okay.
Greer: I do understand, Your Honor.
Judge Mullen: Thank you for understanding it.
Covington: Your Honor, one thing –
Judge Mullen: Excuse the interruption.
Covington: No, sir.
Judge Mullen: Sit down, shut up, let the man talk. I’m not going to let him introduce (sic) you. Last warning.
Pappas: I’m sorry?
Judge Mullen: Sit down –
Pappas: Yeah, I got that.
Judge Mullen: — shut up, let the man talk. Last warning.
Pappas: Okay.
Judge Mullen: Understood?
Pappas: Okay.
Judge Mullen: Excellent.
Covington: With all due respect, Your Honor –
Judge: And you don’t interrupt her when she’s talking.
Covington: Yes, sir.
Judge: Proceed.
“Sit down, shut up, let the man talk”?
Wow. Readers, what do you make of the exchange?
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/10/26/federal-judge-tells-sec-lawyer-sit-down-shut-up/
Sec suks! imo lazy slow and masters of deception.
They do not answer questions and let statutes of limitations run out.
THEY SUCK. They are not above the masses. jmo
The spooks run the show in this case...
QBID/CPPC
I have mentioned before how I felt defrauded when you would not accept my certificates. Now I thank you for offering to take them. I guess I will take them in but I want this on record with you.
I have asked for documentation of this reverse merger from you to protect yourself from aiding the defrauding of me (as I believe you are)
I am so confused and frustrated with all parties involved. I have mentioned to you how it is on public record that you have the phone number of Wash. SOS and I informed you that they stated this reverse merger never happened. The dual name deception is at play. lawless behaviour.
I have stated to you there are dual companies with crossover directors and we have two overseeing companies the DTC (which have many disclaimers) and the Washington Secretary of State that have filed and documented PROOF this merger is not as it appears to be. You know of the public company and of the private company with the same name. I asked you to verify this merger as I did. I asked for you to inform me and you advised me to research this issue. I did.
I am cautious to give you the hard asset to what looks to be some kind of three card monte deception. I have TALKED DIRECTLY with others involved with this stock and I have given you phone numbers and corporate information to verify what I am saying to you.
I honestly do not know what to do. This company lied, you never got my shares and you blocked for months and months my certificates from re entry. Now you will accept them but there are facts and documents that point to deception and fraud. You will allow me to enter my certificates in for a deemed fraud per the corporate records and documented filed records? (As per my research)
There is proof, phone the Washington S.O.S you say you trust what is posted on the DTC website but they are just re-hashing what the company said. All the disclaimers and double speak void anything said at the DTC anyway (imo)
So you can go to the source and get hard information, file numbers incorporation numbers etc. But you would rather ignore me. Toe the line? Stay the course? WTF!? It is deception.
PROVE ME WRONG.
If this is fraud, do you believe you are innocent? I gave you numbers and statements with data to back up my claims. You give me disclaimers, and tell me to do my own research.
I have, I believe this is fraud and you are involved.
So now you will take my shares that were claimed to be massively oversold and give me shares in a new public company pretending to be another of the same name yet is a private Canadian corp? This is fraud, GET IT?
It is you duty to phone the Wash. S.O.S. and either correct your mistake, or prove to me what I am saying to you is wrong. I have heard now the legal council is involved at Wash. This is a nightmare.
What do you need from me? I gave you phone numbers, I gave you the misleading information I explained the 'trick' to you. I informed you of my rights as a shareholder. What information do you need for me to prove to you this is fraud?
Are you just going to ignore this letter? I want my money back plus interest plus pain and suffering. This is fraud, you are involved. (imo)
So you will trade my shares to something that I have informed you is not what it appears to be. You have phone numbers and can ask me to verify my information you told me I HAD TO GET.
I am pissed right off!
Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: �� is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement� The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment� Source: Steven H. Gifis, �Law Dictionary�, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron�s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: �Fraud�.
Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:
� �ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scienter] when it causes injury to another��. Source: Steven H. Gifis, �Law Dictionary�, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron�s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: �Fraud�.
� �THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT� The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury��. Source: Steven H. Gifis, �Law Dictionary�, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron�s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: �Deceit�.
Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:
THEFT BY DECEPTION:
� �FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT� The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose��.
� �The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual �fraudulent concealment���.
� To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent��.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black�s Law Dictionary�, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. �Fraudulent Concealment�.
FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:
� �FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE� A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach��.
� �Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer��.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., �Black�s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. �Fraudulent Conveyance�.
Naked short manipulation.
Short and distort? Creative destruction? Bash and sell then destroy?
Do you do this? That is wrong. Do you remove posts that speak the truth? Do you manipulate people and lie? Do you blame the company or the very exchanges rules while you steal and lie?
Grandfather clause affecting this? This is killing cures, solutions, destroying jobs and robbing from innocent investors.
www.businessjive.com/nss/darkside.html
www.investigatethesec.com
I have been banned at the Cmkx and Qbid boards forever. I think because I speak the truth.
Can you leave a message at Qbid/CPPC? Please, tell them the reverse merger has not been approved as per WA. SOS. SO NOW WHAT?
Here is truth exposed.
wa sos....(360) 753-7115 (option 5)
tmm ubi 601 047 757 [now CINEMAX]
qtn ubi 602 391 767
Ask for proof and documents.
Then GFY!
Grandfather clause affecting this?
I have been banned at the Cmkx and Qbid boards forever. I think because I speak the truth.
Can you leave a message at Qbid/CPPC? Please, tell them the reverse merger has not been approved as per WA. SOS. SO NOW WHAT?
Here is truth exposed.
wa sos....(360) 753-7115 (option 5)
tmm ubi 601 047 757 [now CINEMAX]
qtn ubi 602 391 767
Ask for proof and documents...
Proof! Just go to www.thesanitycheck.com and on the front page click on this:
How big is the delivery failure problem? Try $67+ billion as of Q1, 2007, for just NYSE member firms - and that is at today's mark to market value, not the price at which the sales were made - likely 5-10X or more higher. See the totals for yourself in the Securities Industry Association's own summary of NYSE member firm financial performance, and contrast that to the DTCC/SEC's $6 billion fairy tale. Lines 69 and 103.
Or you could watch the Bloomberg thing or watch www.businessjive.com/nss/darkside.html or go to www.investigatethesec.com
Or just look at history.
Does this have anything to do with scammy pink companies? NO! This is a seperate issue that may have happened within possible scammy pinks.
Dual fraud against the common investor.
Ya puppy you are lame. In Securities Industry Association's own summary they admit to 67 billion in fails. Just watch the rats scatter off the sinking ship (SEC) Or look back into history 1929. It exists, it is real people are getting in trouble for it Reg Sho is not working for some.
Your argument is week. Just look at the sanity check site's first page there is a ton of info for you.
It does exist. How much here? Who knows. I don't care.
Do you think going to a certless exchange will fix this NSS/FTD/PHANTOM FRAUD?
Nope.
It would make it easy to steal and oversell more companies that pump and dump then you would just short and distort into destruction and blame the scapegoat.
Oh puppy, are we rubbing your nose in it?
Jobs for your country, taxes for your people, innovation for the world! IT DOES MATTER!
Proof for you!
Do not remove please this is verification of truth. Thanks Ihub for keeping a clean and unbiased board free from MANIPULATION!
None will accept your hard assets in otcbb or pinks!!!
Hard asset!*CERTIFICATES!!! Ask Alice she's only 10 ft tall
Bzzzzzzz!
Fence Post.
Broker: BMO InvestorLine
Phone: 1-800-387-7800
Email: info@bmoinvestorline.com
Broker: CIBC Investor's Edge
Phone: 1-800-567-3343
Email: feedback@cibc.com
Broker: Disnat
Phone: 1-800-268-8471
Email: disnat@vmd.desjardins.com
Broker: eNorthern
Phone: 1-888-829-7929
Email: customersupport@enorthern.com
Broker: E*Trade Canada
Phone: 1-888-872-3388
Email: service@etrade.ca
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Phone: 1-877-745-4222
Email: help@interactivebrokers.com
Broker: Merrill Lynch HSBC
Phone: 1-866-865-4722
Email: info@mlhsbc.ca
Broker: National Bank Discount Brokerage
Phone: 1-800-363-3511
Email: Web.trad@bnc.ca
Broker: Qtrade Canada
Phone: 1-877-787-2330
Email: info@qtrade.ca
Broker: Questrade
Phone: 1-888-783-7866
Email: info@questrade.com
Broker: Royal Bank Action Direct
Phone: 1-800-769-2560
Email: Contact Form
Broker: ScotiaMcLeod Direct
Phone: 1-800-263-3430
Email: smdirect@scotiamcleoddirect.co...
How original.
Your crazy NSS does not exist, there are no conspiracies nothing to see here.
OMG
First off, I will let you know you are attacking air. It is pointless, this is my AKA and my opinion.
Next, you are just making a fool of yourself. It is obvious there were some lies here. Are you debating that? Are you debating that the Pinks are in a world of hurting exposure?
What about the new Bank/broker policy changes regarding pink and otcbb share certificates? They just wake up one day and make this a certless exchange? COME ONE MAN!
I will agree with you pump and dump exists but you can not fool anyone here by saying short and distort is a wacky theory. It makes money it is sometimes done and the only real escape is to destroy the company and blame the scapegoat. Wonder if you can do that to a country?
Your the one that needs meds, posts removed, loopholes, trust accounts, offshore havens, sub companies, war, lies, coverups, media control, phantom shares, DUI, WMD, ...
jmo
What if it is real? Hung for treason?
Patrick Byrne of Overstock has a jury of 12. Lets see where this goes.
This has happened in the past and it is not to unbelievable. Some stocks have been on reg Sho since the very start.
It tells a thinking mind something.....
SOMEONE IS TELLING A LIE.
Same as Qbid, Cmkx, it is the loophole! Lies deception misdirection misinformation confusion. Like some sick and twisted carney trick.
This is what they do.
You will have the 'Scapegoat' think secret society Blaphomet
Just like Enron
CREATIVE DESTRUCTION!!!!!! America is next.
Follow the money (as usual)
jmo
Same game to the fine details. Even the same promoters (Willy)
Robert "Mahue's" (son?)Global Intelligence.
Cmkx and Qbid sponsered Connie Coen in the races.
Peter Mahue worked at Valcom (where assets shifted to)
Just so everyone understands the BIG GAME.... Look into the historic psy ops and the Satan connection.
No joke (it is there)
Lies from the librarian, a man in a suit, a banker or two (all the same) Sub companies, unrelated companies promoting other assets, unrelated sites with great news, offshore, trustfunds, slight of hand, misdirection, blind faith...
Welcome to Pinky hell. Assets stolen from investors shifted from one shell to another billions of shares lies and more lies.
jmo
Wow! I can post just not on Qbid.
Can you tell the moderator there to quit manipulating the board.
The movie they promote (Jack Black) does not look like it is owned by them (Qbid) well that is obvious because Cinemax claims to own or produce it even though other info exists and the MERGER has yet to continue.
So just like CMKX things are held in other companies and promoted by other unrelated entities.
What a scam! The only ones making money are the brokers selling endless shares. This is fraud and the banks ihub and the S.E.C are involved.
If you hold certificates you can not place them back in to trade. There has been a nation wide policy change. So all this FTD and NSS talk if it is true has been quietly swept under the carpet by voiding your real certificates.
Nice eh?
Everyone involved in all of these Pinks/otcbb knew the goal was not to finish a project but to sell and destroy the company until time to shut it down r/s and do it again.
jmo
I will phone up Leo Wanta and have a meeting call between him Maheu and Patrick to find out for you.
You are going to be rich all you have to do is believe.
Or, I don't know
Pick one.
This has been going on for a long time. Lots of companies are involved, individuals inside and out imo.
There are about 9 tricks that could be played on the markets and all target one group, the individual investor.
It could be insiders claiming NSS without NSS/FTD/PHANTOMS
(Pump and dump)
It could be insiders dumping AND NSS. (Pump Bash)
It could be just heavy manipulation (short and distort)
It could be short distort and destroy (NSS and bashing)
It could be short distort destroy and orchastrated poor management.
Insiders could be aware or unaware, there could be some insiders manipulating with brokers/mm's.
It could be a poorly run company with a great pump.
It could be a profitable company with a dump.
on and on....
Anyone that thinks about this knows. Will it be fixed? I doubt it.
Overstock is profitable and has been oversold. Patrick is a man of great integrity, is he human and prone to all our little issues. Heck ya! But you know what, I thank God there are people out there like him to set your moral radar straight.
Life is a gift.
jmo.
I hear he is in Langley B.C. and he is easy to spot because he looks like Mr. Dressup.
Why can't you track him with his sin card number? Cell number? Drivers licence? Wife? Friends? Sisters, brothers.
Mark Faulk called him.
Give up Mr. Dressup.
With my funny money... I would invent a new kind of money based on nothing and let people borrow as much as they wished as long as they agreed to pay me in gold. They would have to leverage their houses and assets but if they paid me interest and in real 'hard assets' I would run this scam until I pulled the plug.
I would make everyone take a card with a biometric and facial scanning software with RFID (RADIO) scanning devices so I could track the little monkies anywhere. They would have to take this card if they wanted to enter any building I owned or if they wanted to work or have a bank account.
Then I would make the people eat and drink flouride and aspartame approved by me because it causes all kinds of mind stuff that is documented.
Then I would start a war with either Iran or Pakistan and make money because we are using my companies planes, oil and everything else.
Then everyone would worship me. No, thats evil.
Coke and hookers it is!
Word Wise
The governments can be very "tricky" in their wording of things. Something to make yourself aware of and wise to very quickly if you want to gain the upper hand. Armed with the information here, all American visitors are challenged to search their own laws and see how much of the data provided here applies to them in their country - as well as all other western nations. Only by searching out the truth of the laws and your original rights and freedoms yourselves, will you be empowered to protect your 'natural person' as a human-being.
Here's 4 tricks outlined below:
FIRST TRICK:
The first "trick" of the government is the re-definition of certain critical words in each Statute(Act). They(the government) want you to assume the ordinary meaning of the word so as to trick you into reading and interpreting the Statute in their favour. Two key words that are re-defined in almost every statute are the words "person" and "individual". There are at least two "person" in law:
A 'natural-person' is a man or woman, created by God.
An 'artificial-person' is a corporation, created by Man.
Here are the exact definitions from Barron's Canadian Law Dictionary, 3rd edition:
natural person. A natural person is a human being that has the capacity for rights and duties.
artificial person. A legal entity, not a human being, recognized as a person in law to whom certain legal rights and duties my be attached - e.g. a body corporate.
You will observe that the natural-person has the "capacity"(ie ability) for rights and duties, but not necassarily the obligation. The artificial-person has rights and duties that may be attached(ie assigned) by laws.
SECOND TRICK:
The second "trick" of the government is to use the Interpretation Act to define words that apply to all Statutes, unless re-defined within a particular Statute. Without this knowledge, you could assume the ordinary meaning for the words you are reading, not realizing that they may have been re-defined by the Interpretation Act. Unless these words have been re-defined in another Statute, the underlying definitions for the two most important words still apply, either from the interpretation Act, or the Canadian Law Dictionary. Basically they are defined as follow:
from the Canadian Law Dictionary we find that:
INDIVIDUAL means a natural-person.
from the Interpretation Act we find the re-definition:
PERSON means a corporation(an artificial-person).
from the Income Tax Act we find that:
INDIVIDUAL means an artifitial person.
PERSON means an artificial person(amongst other things)
In the Canadian Human Rights Act you will see how INDIVIDUAL and PERSON are used and how they apply to natural and artificial persons.
THIRD TRICK:
The third "trick" of the government is to use the word "includes" in definitions instead of using the word "means". They do this in some critical definitions that they want you to mis-interpret. If they used "means" instead of "includes" then their deception would be exposed, but by using "includes" they rely upon the reader to assume that "includes" expands the definition, whereas in reality it restricts the definition in the same manner that "means" restricts the definition.
Here is a "means" definition of the word "person" from the Bank Act:
PERSON "means" a natural person, an entity or a personal representative;
Here is an 'includes' definition of the word "person" from the Interpretation Act:
PERSON, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, 'includes' a corporation.
To expose their deception, substitute the word 'means' and you have PERSON, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, 'means' a corporation.(viz-artifitial-person)
Both "means" & "includes" are restrictive in scope because they only encompass a part of the whole. Typically they are used in the following form:
person 'means' A or B or C(and nothing else)
person 'includes' A and B and C(and nothing else)
There is a Legal Maxim that supports the restriction of "includes":
Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius...The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another.
The definition of the word "include" is key to understanding your potential loss of natural-person. This is the major trick used by the government in an attempt to take away your natural-person rights. Unless you know this, you will voluntarily forfeit your rights.
FOURTH TRICK:
The fourth "trick" of the government is to modify how the word "includes" is used in order to make an EXPANSION in the definition when such expansion is required. This "trick" helps add confusion to the use of "includes" convincing the readers that "includes" is modified to become expansive rather than restrictive:
also includes
and includes
includes, without limitation
including
the expansive definitions usually take the following form:
PERSON means A or B or C and includes D.
DEFINITIONS:
Barron's Canadian Law Dictionary does not provide definitions for "include" or "means" therefore we have to look in the next 'source' for the definitions.From Black's Law Dictionary, 4th edition, here is the definition for the word "include":
include. To confine within, hold as in an inclosure, take in, attain, shut up, contain, inclose, comprise, comprehend, embrace, involve.
including. may, according to context, express an enlargement and have the meaning of 'and' or 'in addition to', or merely specify a particular thing already included within the general words theretofore used.
inclose. To surround; to encompass; to bound; fence; or hem in, on all sides.
It is stated in the above definition that the verb INCLUDE only has limited scope. On the other hand the participle, INCLUDING(but not limited to) enlarges the scope. When used in a definition, INCLUDE does not expand the existing definition of the word. It is easy to confuse because we naturally assume the existing definition of the word, then assume INCLUDE means to add this new interpretation to the existing assumed definition of the word. Our assumptions fail us in this case. From now on, when you see the word INCLUDES, mentally substitute the word MEANS and you will not be "tricked" by this definition anymore.
FOR THE DOUBTING THOMAS:
If you look into any statute, you will be able to find a definition that uses the word INCLUDES and when you attempt to broaden the scope of that word, the statute will break down because it will not be able to support the inclusion of the ordinary meaning of the word.
Today we live in a world where we are told that our fundamental rights still exist, but there are times when we wonder how this can be so. For example, we can have the full force of the law brought down upon us with a traffic violation, income tax regularity, refusing to fill in census forms, etc. These offences do no harm to another human being and in no way violate any individuals fundamental rights and freedoms, so we ask "how can this be?"
The answer is that your fundamental rights and freedoms are still intact as a natural-person, but you have been tricked into believing that you have to follow the Laws created for the artificial-person.
Following the Second World War, the United Nations Assembly prepared the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.The assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."
I have never seen this done in any school. Have you?
In order to impliment SLAVERY of it's citizens and control them according to its whim, the government had to invent a system that would not violate a human-being's fundamental rights, but would allow the government to "own" everything produced orgained by its citizens.The technique used by the government was to create a CORPORATION for every human-being in Canada. As creator of a CORPORATION, the government can demand anything it wants from the CORPORATION. As a legal entity, a corporation does not have feelings and cannot be hurt. It can be subject to slavery and complete domination by it creators and the corporation must obey its creator. These corporations must then have a business number and so one is assigned to each PERSON it creates.
Such a number is called a S.I.N.(Slave Identification Number aka Social Insurance Number)
Finally, the government needs to appoint an Officer of the CORPORATION to run the day-to-day activities. Such a position requires a contract since the Officer will be held accountable for the actions of the CORPORATION. So, the government tricks John Doe to become the Officer for the JOHN DOE corporation by signing such contracts as Driver's Licence, BankAccounts, Citizenship Cards, Passports, etc.
In the 'Income Tax Act', the government just decrees that John Doe is the legal Representative for the Officer of the JOHN DOE Corporation and the only contract involved in the annual Income Tax Return(yes it is a contract for one year) wherein John Doe gives his aggreement as Officer of JOHN DOE for the previous year. Unfortunately John Doe does not know that he is an Officer for the JOHN DOE corporation and must therefore follow the rules imposed upon JOHN DOE. Hence the confusion sets in because John Doe believes that he is JOHN DOE and therefore has to forfeit his rights and duties upon demand by the government and its officials.
CAPITALIZATION:
There are five different levels of capitalization used in names of "persons";
human-being: john doe
natural-person: John Doe
quasi natural/artificial-person: John DOE
corporation/artificial-person: JOHN DOE
Nomme de Guerre: DOE, JOHN
Here is a summary of the rights and freedoms of the above "persons":
The 'human-being' has all the unalienable rights and freedoms as provided by GOD.
The 'natural-person' has all the rights and freedoms as provided by man with the Magna Charta and Canadian Bill of Rights.
The 'quasi natural/artificial-person has lost some rights, but not all rights. At this time it is not evident how to quantify which rights have been lost.
The 'corporation/artificial-person' has limited rights and freedoms as provided by the creator of the Corporation.
The' Nomme de Guerre has no rights and freedoms and is a complete slave to the Admiral.
There is so much more than what I have just shared here. It is only the tip of the iceberg. But it is also enough to make you aware of what you are up against and the deceptions built into our system of rule by governments.
Somethings to think about.
I have no ID, no drivers license, no passport, no bank accounts, no address.
I AM, a human being. I require no such things.
Free yourselves now.
your humble servant,
ancient clown
24 October, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further reading:
Paradigm Education Group - An exploration of the scam which is income tax.
Natural-Person - A non-profit site educating Canadians and Americans about the differences between human-beings, natural-persons, and artificial-persons. How the Government created your new identity and how you can reclaim your unalienable rights.
DetaxCanada - Income Tax is slavery.
Hack Canada - Freedom, privacy, hacking, phreaking, ...
Float on the pinks.
What is the float on CMKX? QBID? PAIM? TASR?
This exchange was built to defraud investors. You will never know the total float.
It is built that way.
Insiders profit, SEC profits, Brokers/MM's profit
INVESTORS LOSE.
QBID Hundreds of millions traded, WITH NO T.A.
How is that even possible? On a company that hired Global Intelligence to investigate stock manipulation.
So if you bought shares recently and asked for your certs THEY COULD NOT, I REPEAT "NOT" GET YOU SHARES.
They just sold you air. NSS, counterfiet, phantoms.
SHUT THE PINKS DOWN!
UC is in Langley B.C. Canada.
It has been posted many times before. There was even a map to his house floating around from Google video.
Look up all the connections, and the sub companies if you want his address. What do you want to tell him?
Don't be a jerk GIVE OUR MONEY BACK.
The RCMP know where he is, he thought he got away but he can not run forever. HE KNOWS THAT.
The victory is not so sweet when you know the pain caused EH URBIE???
Yes, we know you visit here.
They should just shut down the pinks. Unregulated and almost uncertable.
If your ask for your certs in a Pink, if that is a big IF they can get the shares(certs) for you.
Then you can not place them back into the system as per MOST brokers NEW* policy changes!
Oversold watered down lies form insiders and outsiders!
EVERYONE PROFITS BUT THE INVESTOR!!!
The sheeple spokesperson.
The Pinks should be banished! You can not get certificates from most brokers for the pinks now. There has been a huge problem with counterfieting and overselling. They hide this problem between brokers and in repo agreements.
To run a pink and to destroy innovation is pure profit for everyone but investors and those that would benifit from the innovations.
Sometimes insiders and outsiders are crooked sometimes just insiders sometimes just outsiders.
It is a complicated mess but without the option to obtain real certs in a unregulated exchange it is nothing more than a carney con game.
Only fools and thieves.
NEVER AGAIN!
I bet Qbid has more. Think about it, what would you short? Some diamond mine or a gay media company? Uranium or Charo? CIM or Dr. Zulu? A teleport system with a two billion dollar library or Debeers is in the area?
I would naked short both these crappy companies and all the lies.
They both have Mahue and Wizard in common along with the track.
There is more but you are not going to believe it.
Lets just say you were part of a giant mine game. Psy Op.
jmo
QBID and Mahue
Massive volume with no trading (so the bashers say) No certs or transfer of ownership for three months while T.A. put halt on all work.
Global Intelligence hired and the rumor is this was the largest naked short in history. We will know soon. Lots of Wizard connections along with the racetracks etc...
Think about it ... a GAY media company.
I hear right winged Christians and Hedge funds hate anything gay. Enough to break the law? To bend the rules?
lol
JMO
Most investors are sickend by the rollercoaster, and hags with yellow teeth and fingers and crusty PJ's.
QBID?
Who knows? They hired Peter Mahue IBM's kids company investigating NSS and stock manipulation. (Global Intelligence) That is in a P.R. somewhere.
Tons of bashers on a subpenny POS company. WHY???!! Possible merger in effect SOON!
NO Transfer Agent in place (they halted ALL action!) YET Hundreds of millions of shares in volume. Bashers claim this is not trading!!? WTF IS IT THEN? COUNTERFIETS?
Best of all posts a many removed constantly. Manipulating the comments and thinking of the crowd.
jmo.
I am not buying more.
You NEVER debated me. You called things I posted theories and whatnot. I gave you some links to what could be call 'proof', sure some of them may be questionable
(like the library worth 2 BILLION) That is not me saying that that is the link stating that. How the heck do you know? HOW DO YOU KNOW? I don't.
Some of this NSS stuff going on behind the curtain is very cutting edge world important stuff. That proof is hard to debate when some of it comes right from the source. I understand you may question some website but to question the MAN? Closed door meetings, Oklahoma bill, Grandfather clause, investigatethesec...
So just ignore me, serious I do not want to talk to you anymore. You have your proof and you links if you don't like them or refuse to debate, thats fine. Just don't talk to me.
Easy peasy!
You never proved a thing wrong, are you all knowing? Do you know everything? I don't.
You see this is JMO.
Don't talk to me. Use your ignore button.
The library was estimated to be worth 2 billion.
1st Gay TV Network to be worth Billion$ per Summer Redstone (QBID) Remember that statement? You can see it at IHUB.
This may be of interest...
Gentlemen:
IN REFERENCE TO THE ABOVE AMENDMENTS, the SEC appears to have engaged in treason against the people of the United States. The actions of the SEC could be construed as a financial act of war against other countries whose investors invest in the US Capital Markets.
NONETHELESS, AT A MINIMUM, the SEC is liable for negligence and at most organized crime charges could be argued. The SEC has demonstrated an abysmal failure to oversee the clearing and settlement systems for stocks and options.
THE SCALE OF ABUSE IS UNPRECEDENTED in scope. The financial damages caused directly or indirectly by the SECs failure to follow the law, whether by inaction or complete awareness, are astonishing. The SEC facilitated theft, which by some estimates amount to trillions of dollars. Trillions of dollars stolen from investors throughout the world via the SEC's failure to supervise settlement and clearing of securities traded in the US national market system.
THE SEC IS IN VIOLATION, has been in violation and remains in violation of the Securities Processing Provisions of the 1975 Amendments. This is evidenced, not only by the illegal felony grandfather clause, but is evidenced by the SHO list of fails, where some fails persist beyond any reasonable time frame-- some as many as 180 days without proper delivery and some are likely decades old.
IN FACT, THE SHO list should not exist if trades clear and settle in accordance with the Securities Processing Provisions of the 1975 Amendments.
UNDER SECTION 17A, the SEC was given authority to facilitate establishment of a National System for prompt and accurate clearance and settlement in securities.
A KEY COMPONENT OF SEC supervision of the securities clearance settlement system is its AUTHORITY to REGULATE clearing agencies.
THE SEC HAS EXPOSED ITSELF TO trillions in punitive effects, in my opinion, for this egregious, horrific, criminal act, demonstrated by its abysmal failure to carry out the mandates of the Securities Processing Provisions of the 1975 Amendments to the Securities and Exchange Acts.
IT IS ALSO TIME TO ELIMINATE ONCE and for all, the equally illegal felony grandfather clause that the SEC claims is being eliminated for the past year.
YOU MEN OVERSEE THE running of one heck of a scam of a securities market, in my opinion. I have to shake my head. The entire government needs to be replaced. You have even allowed the executive branch to merge with the Judiciary branch.
THE ENTIRE US NATIONAL MARKET SYSTEM IS CORRUPTED, and by all accounts you have managed to kill the Constitution of the United States by not carrying out your public duties. You serve at the pleasure of the people. You do not serve at the pleasure of the Business Roundtable.
Sincerely.....
jmo
It's not slander,
slander is spoken, libel is written.
Worst case I voice my opinion of you, an Internet AKA. Tell me who you are and where you live. Then we can talk.
Just ignore me cheese head.
You have been trying to get me to leave out my JMO, and IMO and to be honest, I do believe you are the type of person that is looking for that.
Why else would you be here?
I say you are a NSS guy because you do not look at the information I give you. When it comes time to debate you say stuff like 'I prooved you wrong' or those are 'wacky theories'. Only someone with an agenda would stoop to the level of mind games instead of a real debate.
JMO
There is a closed door meeting planned about Reg Sho and the grandfather clause. Do you want more information? It may change things in a big way. Do you want proof for that?
How about proof for the Oklahoma bill? SB797 I believe.
Do you think I am pumping? Or do you think I am bashing?
The answer is neither.
Just ignore me, it is better for the final act. SHHHHHHHhhhh
Got Popcorn?
Oh Strider, you know I am protected by free speech. You were just waiting for me to not put in the JMO so you could tell some connected crook to 'get me'?
I do have a letter from my broker stating that the Pinks and OTCBB are fraudlent and they are still trading on these exchanges. To me that seems like they are 'partners' So is that proof? I think it is (imo)
There is a meeting discussing reg Sho and the Grandfather clause on June.14/07 they are going to talk about the granfathered FTD's. Now if this stock was NSS's like it was rumoured to be it is possible Qbid could have a massive short squeeze.
Of course on these public message boards everything is IMO and even if I forget to write imo or jmo I don't want to listen to Strider because I think he is a naked short crook.
jmo
gfy
Prove it wrong Ned. You can not. That is a MAJOR RED FLAG! In this age of 'terrorism' we have billions of American investor money stolen and nobody says boo?
Come on.
There was BILLIONS of dollars, assets etc. Can you tell this board where all the money went? Why did investors money leave the company? Can you tell us why the SEC never got involved?
You know I am right.
The loopholes were written by our 'protectors' imo.
JMO
Why is it garbage?
We have a meeting about Reg Sho and the grandfather clause on June 14/07 we have a planned merger comming soon or never.
If this is a lame duck stock we know billions of dollars were earned and churning and burned selling a scam. The SEC did nothing to protect investors the brokers and MM's were a part of the whole thing. Assets left the country were shifted and hidden from the taxman and the investor. Who knows where that money went God only knows what it will be used for. Jobs lost on and on.
It's not garbage, it is the truth, WELCOME TO THE PINKS.
LOL nice hate post.
They are into movies now. With blockbuster names.
Why don't you pay attention?
I hate lots of stuff and people.
I may even hate you if I got to know you. We may never know.
Good!
I would like to beat 'them' up for stealing all our money.
Hey Duke, GFYL.
There is way more of 'US' than 'THEM'.
We will know an answer.
Either we walk in disgust at this American exchange and the unbelievable amount of fraud ignored by the 'protectors'.
This company alone stole HOW MUCH? How much did the MM's generate? Money used to finance God only knows what? Terror?
Or we become rich.
Thats how I see it.
Lies, misdirection, false leads, double agents, priests, Mahue, Global Intelligence, NSS, counterfiets, missing assets, Jack Black, M. Perry, Susan Surranden, Micheal Cain, coochie coochie THAT IS QBID.
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.
An example of a lie/misdirection is Jersey Joe. He said OTR has been contacted. Other posters say otherwise I did my own DD. We are not talking a lot of money here. With OTR in place as the T.A. and a new one said to be in place. Right now is possibly the smoking out of all the rats that were feeding illegaly.
Did Jersey leave a false lead? A misdirection? Does he work for Fan? I think he is Strider.
Everyone is aware of the massive amount of volume recently. If this is such a dog why millions of shares and so much interest on the board from bashers pumpers and stuckers?. We see past employees showing up something has peeked interest.
From: thoughtpolice
Jun 7 2007
Msg: #of 68979
It is B.S.! NO CONTACT! NO CONTACT NUMBERS!
Lies, misdirection, B.S., theft, nss, spooks, pinksheet crappppppp!
Contact OTR Transfer
Outstanding service is the most important benefit we can offer you. There are many ways to contact us, choose the one that's most convenient for you.
OTR, Inc.
1000 SW Broadway
Suite 920
Portland, OR 97205
Phone: 503 225-0375
Fax: 503 273-9168
E-mail: OTR@transfer.com
Who is 'we'?
You have proof NSS does not exist? Are you saying it does not exist on QBID? Why did they hire Global Intelligence? How do you know this? Can you prove there are no counterfiets in QBID. See the totals for yourself in the Securities Industry Association's own summary you may change your mind.
My shares can not be certed in my account or yours!!!. I can trade them but if they can not be certed how can they be real? What is my proof this stock was not watered down with many 'shares in accounts'? Changing the supply and demand driving this company to near bankruptcy.
Its not like I can call the company and verify my shares. That is the issue! How many shares can not be certed? This is not a certless exchange. It is your right and your only protection against the fraud of counterfieting with bank/broker reciepts. Add the fact all certificates are not allowed back into the system and we have a certless counterfiet exchange.
You can't even call it a stock market you are not selling stocks but blips.
Here is proof NSS exists. Do you understand UNDISPUTABLE PROOF!
Well you can not say that after all how big is the delivery failure problem? Try $82 billion as of Q4, 2006, for just NYSE member firms - and that is at today's mark to market value, not the price at which the sales were made - likely 5-10X or more higher. See the totals for yourself in the Securities Industry Association's own summary of NYSE member firm financial performance, and contrast that to the DTCC/SEC's $6 billion fairy tale. Lines 69 and 103.
jmo
gfy
Ok so that is 'Papy' he is the guy in JMCP and Obion I believe. I will go check that out.
It doesn't mean anything unless it is in a news release. If I made up some crappy website and stated that QBID is the largest naked shorted stock in the history of the stockmarket.
That would not make it true.
The change of transfer agents and a count of shares could prove this.
I hate this company for how it treated us. I hate my broker.
SOMEONE TELL THE TRUTH!
Who are you Doublek? I have never seen you. Are you new?
Do you think it is odd to question everything in this stock? Have you been paying attention? Have you seen funny trading going on? Tons of unexplainable volume WITH NO T.A.?
Investors are well aware of the missing assets and funds.
They are aware of the misleading news and deadlines.
Do you find it odd I called OTR transfer and they told me there has been no contact and there are no contact numbers for QBID. Do you find it odd that they say NO WORK has been done for months!! Do you understand what that means? If broker A (Lets call them R.B.s.C.) sells to MM B (Etrator)NOTHING MOVES until the T.A. records ownership change. That is their job. Do you find this regular?
Does anyone agree in America it is ok for billions of dollars in our investment money disappears without a trace? What if this money was used to fund terror with biological weapons?
Would you still find that entertaining? Do you find it amuzing all shares sold and remaining in accounts CAN NOT BE CERTED? You must trust you broker to verify that are a shareholder. The T.A. does not know you are a shareholder nor does the company.
Have you heard about the stuff going on behind the scenes in NSS? Overstock suit? Investigatethesec? sanitycheck? Oklahoma bill? Maheu? Global Intelligence? Grandfather clause?
This stuff is real it is not made up. Everything can be verified. If you want to debate that is fine. If you want to ignore, that is fine. If you mock, I will tell you the truth.
Of course it could be the poster. Stockup?
Is this misinformation?
Just give me my money back.
I hope I invested in pbid instead of qbid. I hear Olsen is at Olson's house. Otr Ocr OCC what's the difference comming from the president?
Lets name names is FAN a big fat lier or is it OTR? Is this a lie by stockup? Lets find the answer to this one question.
Who is telling a fib.
"TMM still has an obligation to pay OCR, the previous transfer agent, and that is in process, but not our responsibility."
Who is OCR? This mistake by Fan is questionable! It is OTR transfer. There has been NO CONTACT to OTR Transfer. OTR has tried to contact 'the company' and THERE IS NO PHONE! I don't know if it is his responsibility. I would love to hear the reasoning why they do not have to pay for services.
There is a T.A. for QBID it is OTR TRANSFER. They have not been paid or contacted, you can verify this with a call yourself. No TRANSFERS NO WORK DONE SINCE? My guess three months! ALL THIS VOLUME IS BOGUS.
I hope this was a ploy to 'catch' something, if not...
This is still a chitty company with massive counterfiets sold. The 'good guys' the 'bad guys'working in tandem. Lies promises and B.S.
The investor is the one slaughtered misdirected and lied to.
SHUT THIS EXCHANGE DOWN!
JMO