Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
USWF being heavily pumped in spam mail this night..
---
Disclosure..:
Growth Report (the spammer) announce they received 100,000 free trading shares for sending out the profile.
Third party delivered the 100K shares.
Third party is Momentum Traders.
Kr
Jens
gartfam.. H.C.Oersted may be of great help to your research.
That one was at least to confirm..
--
http://www.iwsinc.com/News/SDGL.cfm
Source.:
http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/acms/MOTN/CV0390W0E.ASP
Chose: HUNTERDON in upper left box
Enter: Digital in Party-Company
Click submit.
So the suit to chill free speech is finally moving..
---
Venue HUNTERDON Docket # C -014001-04 Court CHC
Proceeding Date 3/5/2004 Proceeding Time 900 A M Court Room N/A
Proceeding Status COMPLETE
Calendar Type MOTION HEARING Judge Name ROSEMARIE R WILLIAMS
Caption DIGITAL BROADBAND NETWORKS INC VS DBBDISFUNNY
Motion Type MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
Motion Status GRANTED Scheduled Hearing Date 3/5/2004
Oral Argument Requested N Granted N Granted Date
Motion Comment TO CONDUCT EXPEDITED LIMITED PRETRIAL DISCOVERY TO ASCERTAIN IDENTITIES OF DEFS IN ORDER TO SERVE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atty Name Party Name Party Type Filing Party
SICHENZIA ROSS FRIEDMAN &F LLC DIGITAL BROADBAND NETWORKS PF F
(ATTORNEY REQUIRED) DBBDISFUNNY DF
SICHENZIA ROSS FRIEDMAN &F LLC PATRICK S. LIM PF
(ATTORNEY REQUIRED) DALILAMA DF
(ATTORNEY REQUIRED) STOCK_PICK DF
(ATTORNEY REQUIRED) SMOOTHER_1999 DF
(ATTORNEY REQUIRED) WNSFR DF
(ATTORNEY REQUIRED) MRWRIGHTAIDE DF
(ATTORNEY REQUIRED) PSEEKER DF
--------------------------------
Yahoo group..:
Group Settings
· Listed in directory
· Open membership
· Unmoderated
· All members may post
· Archives for members only
· Email attachments are permitted
Unmoderated... Yet...
"You have been banned from this group by the group moderator (Yahoo! ID banned: tingleff). You may not join this group dbn_inc."
= limitation on free speech with regards to a public entity
Republishing..:
Posted by: Tingleff
In reply to: None Date:2/26/2004 7:00:20 PM
Post #18 of 23
So, the DBBD board was removed from Ragingbull...
I wonder if it goes to show how much the company dislike free speech?.
Well.. SDGL is a publicly traded entity. As a such they have to accept public participation in their doings and analysis of their publication, PR's etc.
When they don't, IMO they do not deserve the right to be publicly traded.
They are dually quoted on both pinksheets and OTCBB, so if you miss the yahoo chart, it is available at pinksheets:
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/chart.jsp?symbol=SDGL&duration=2-6-8-0-0-77
Kr
Jens
---------------------------------------
As said.. BS, as it wasn't removed from RB..
Yet.. The remainder certainly still valid as they are suing participants on public boards, thus trying to silence critical voices.
Kr
Jens
Right, as said.. no need to publish BS..
But, if you want it, I can repost it and explain why I at the time had the opinion stated there. The suit they are doing towards board participants speaking their voice do indeed give weed to the fire that is in that message.
Kr
Jens
You know, There's no need to publish BS, when one realize it is such..
The message was about DBBD board being removed from RB. Within time of possible removal of message, I realized it was changed to SDGL.
Everyone have 15 minutes to amend a message, if they want it removed completely later than that, then just e-mail or PM me, and if I see it within 24 hours I can remove it, if later you can have the IHUB manager remove it.
Kind regards
Jens
WorldWide pumping going on..
STINKS !! JMO
more on RB board: http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CHWT
Kr
Jens
Whether the name "Amove Resources", which is the one bought, does cover the other "Amove Logistics" too, I can't say.
Amove logistics links from the address:
http://www.google.dk/search?q=%22Prai+Industrial+Estate%22+%22Solok+Perusahaan%22+961&num=20&...
AMOVE Resources.. The name is also Asiaco Movers..
ASIACO MOVERS SDN BHD
961, SOLOK PERUSAHAAN 1,
PRAI, PENANG 13600
MY
Source: net registration on amove-my.com http://www.netsol.com
--
Asiaco Movers Sdn Bhd
(231829-V)
961, Solok Perusahaan Satu, Prai Industrial Est
13600 Prai, Penang, Malaysia
Tel :04-398 3120 / 04-398 3121
Fax :04-398 3122
Director
Lee Boon Huat
Business
Office & household removal, packing, rigging, machine fabrication, warehouse space rental, logistics-door to door, exhibition, custom consultation, head counts supply, insurance consultation, chemical handling.
Email: amove@po.jaring.my
URL: http://www.amove-my.com
Category
Products and Services Providers
---------------Source: http://www.smibusinessdirectory.com.my/business_advertise.asp?action=A click asiaco movers.
-------------------------------
I'd say when it is presented like that in the PR, it should be true. The audited books in the 10KSB should confirm those figures. But also true, as you imply, in general much OTCBB PR stuff does stink.
Kr
Jens
They should have earned 157K$ net in 4th quarter 2003 in order to bring it to the 850K$ mentioned here:
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040114/145275_1.html
--
Revenue in 4th quarter should be 5.250.000 to the total of 16.000.000
But IMO the results from the acquired Asiaco companies should also be a part of the 10KSB. That is what causes the uncertainty.
Hard to say until we know the outcome of 2003.
It is an EPS of around 2.5 cent.
Meaning that an investor today at 40 cent would pay 16 times the profit for the shares.
Equal to earnings are 6,25% of invested capital.
So if the full earnings was paid out as dividend, then it could be OK. But.. eh.. not likely, is it?
The book value is also a point.. Thus we need to know the outcome of 2003.
Kr
Jens
VaAu.. Those earnings are the Yahoo update due to name change. They cover the 10Q 3rd qtr. - Next report is the audited 10KSB.
New board here, because there's no SDGL board at RB.
Also because this board can be moderated. And I would'nt have someone with a limited view of free speech to take the opportunity to police an IHUB SDGL board.
The general OTCBB is IMO less than 5% fully ligit companies.
Until now I haven't seen anything that makes me believe it belongs in that group - When I can check that what they do and what they are paid for, in 3rd hand information, then the opinion may be subject to change.
--
Just to make it clear.. this board holds the most up to date information about SDGL There's a board in the yahoo area about a company ( apparently producing suspenders with numbers on them), claiming to be the same company Digital Broadband.. (Very flexible) It may be the same, but they seem to rely on suspenders only on that board
Just kidding here of course.
Kr
Jens
More Business strategy information:
POSITION OF DBBD BY 2004
Leading broadband access provider
Holding strategic equity in broadband networks regionally
Holding majority equity in:
•supply chain management services companies
•secured shipping services companies
Source: http://www.digitalapps.net/downloads/CorporateObjective.pdf
From the company web-site.. Business strategy:
Deliver value-added compelling applications and services
Can someone expand on what that means?
Now, with the name change, will it be easier for the company to do the much needed reverse or raise of authorized shares?
The company seem to overstate projections, change business course frequently, and having outdated inaccurate information on their web-sites. Further it seem impossible to discover where the company revenues are coming from.
Anyone who have precise third hand or direct information, that can change the above opinion is most welcome to to publish messages here.
Kr
Jens
Suit information here:
http://www.bymarked.dk/dbbdsuit.pdf
10K..
Business Development.
---------------------
On May 21, 2003, the Company filed an 8-K Current Report regarding the
signing of a Plan and Agreement of Reorganization (the "Agreement") with G
Media Network, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("G Media"). The completion of the
transaction was subject to the satisfaction of conditions of closing set forth
in the Agreement. Subsequent to the date of this Report, G Media had not
provided the required due diligence to complete the closing and the Agreement
was deemed abandoned. For additional information regarding this Agreement,
see our 8-K Current Report dated May 21, 2003, which was filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2003. See the Exhibit Index,
Part III, Item 13.
Except as indicated above and in our Company's 10-SB Registration
Statement, as amended, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 16, 1997, which became effective on or about February
14, 1998, and which is incorporated herein by reference, and the Company's
10KSB for the year ended June 30, 2002, and which is incorporated herein by
reference, there have been no other material business developments regarding
our Company. See the Exhibit Index, Part III, Item 13.
Business.
---------
We have no material business operations for over five years. We may begin
the search for the acquisition of assets, property or business that may
benefit our Company and our stockholders, once our Board of Directors sets
guidelines of industries in which we may have an interest.
We are unable to predict the time as to when and if we may actually
participate in any specific business endeavor, and will be unable to
do so until we determines the particular industries of interest to us.
I'll cease participating here.
Many of you know that I for years have been looking at Netsol, participating here in various debates/discussions. You also know that I at an early stage found Netsol to be a real and interesting business, that should not be tampered with by odd parties in the financial world.
Through the years, I haven't been in contact with the company management or IR. The reason for that is that I don't believe such contact brings more information than what is already public knowledge. Therefore my DD have always been based on information that could be obtained in other ways - through customers or contacts of mine that are also in the industry, or "simple" research via what is available on the net in general.
Due to having been working as a supplier of solutions to the leasing industry here in Denmark since the middle of the eighties, I have been able to understand/comprehend Netsols public available information about their products better than most. Due to having worked in many areas of the world, I have been able to assess the attitudes in the company better than some. That, together with the general DD and my admiration for people who work as hard as I can see the Netsol management must do and have been doing during the odd events 2 years back, have been the basis for my continued positive view of the company.
All of above lead to me approaching the company with ideas of cooperation 2 months back. We have met and made agreements so that I'm now a part of the Netsol team. I have some marketing tasks to perform here in the Scandinavian region. This is not news for the wires as such, as it is merely a normal "day to day" procedure to establish contacts and partners who work to discover markets and assist in the same markets.
BUT it will mean that I work with and inside the company, and therefore obviously cannot participate here anymore.
I have enjoyed participating here and wish everybody the best.
Of course I can be contacted by e-mail, and I don't mind. Questions to clarify existing public information coming from the company or others will be answered or redirected to the IR. (I'm not paid for such services)
Kr
Jens
You may want to ask how Aron got that story in the first place
Wasn't allowed in Yahoo.Finance messageboard:
Was looking at the leasesoft web-site...
The address of the UK office is there.
http://www.leasesoft.biz/ "Locations"
The zip code is EC4N 5BN - In London anything within the first part (2 characters) is in walking distance within few minutes.
EC EAST CENTRAL - includes City of London, Clerkenwell, Blackfriars, Temple.
111 Links including the word Bank on the web within the full zip code (just a part of Cannon Street):
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=EC4N+5BN+bank
You will understand that it is the finance center based on this one: http://www.investukjapan.org/reasons/banks.htm
There are around 480 FOREIGN banks in London - That's more than any other city in the world. The majority of them all are concentrated in the area EC. That was Banks alone - Then there's all other kind of finance.
--
The recent news Habib - Found them to be in Cannon Street as well: (The trademark/patent registry:) http://www.patent.gov.uk/tm/tmj/journals/6479/domestic/2322797.html
---
So, it isn't all Pakistan development, as one here said - Quite contrary it seems that they are very well situated in London to get in contact with a lot of international banks of all sizes.
Apart from the leasing software, I'm sure that what they are developing in PK to Banks there (mentioned on their normal web-site)is also being developed in ways that makes it standard that can work across borders and languages.
---
I'd also like to point out that the many many millions in funding currently going from US to PK due to PK's cooperation in the war against terrorism very well may make software developments within PK very profitable plus in sizes far beyond what was possible earlier.
Almost needless to say that Netsol may be first in line to be a part of it.
Of course it is not very likely that any single project overnight would make Netsol profitable, but in the light of what I see here, the direction is clear.
JMO
Kr
Jens
OT - A little something for cowboys..
http://www.bestcreatives.com/MadCow.swf
Kr
Jens
This is how it works - Matt claim that Errol had a gross of accounts, therefore he has taken it upon himself personally to delete every message posted by Errol.. See e-mail exchange below
Errol, is it true that you had a dozens and dozens of accounts?
I count 15 with errol prefix, but as the 13 of them are kicked, it isn't possible to see if it really was you.
What I can see is that you used 4 AKA's on Accesstel board, but I can also see that the content of the deleted posts here IMO is not at all content that should have been deleted.
Kr
JEns
--
Here's the e-mail conversation with ihub management ---
Reply from me to matt...
---
Well, one just have to ask oneself how many people bought shitty shares because they didn't get a chance to read errol's most often correct content calling the scams..
Quite a mess when it isn't annonced or otherwise clear why messages disappear !!
Kind regards
Jens
------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Brown" <matt@investorshub.com>
To: "Bob Zumbrunnen" <si_admin@techstocks.com>
Cc: <jti@quattro-it.dk>
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 3:14 AM
Subject: RE: Hi Bob, there's a problem at IHUB
> Anything posted by errol will get removed by me, when I see he has posted.
> Nothing to do with content. He's had dozens and dozens of accounts. Once I
> boot you off, that's it. No coming back. If you do, all is toast. I don't
> want people even thinking they have a chance of using the RB suicide alias
> mentality here.
>
> ------
> Matt Brown
> Site Administrator
> Investors Hub
> http://www.investorshub.com
> Email: matt@investorshub.com
>
----------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Zumbrunnen [mailto:si_admin@techstocks.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 5:07 PM
> To: matt Brown
> Subject: Fwd: Hi Bob, there's a problem at IHUB
>
>
>
> >From: "Jens Tingleff (jti)" <jti@quattro-it.dk>
> >To: <si_admin@techstocks.com>
> >Subject: Hi Bob, there's a problem at IHUB
> >Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 20:35:44 +0200
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> >
> >You remember I got the chairman rights on the ATEL board there...
> >
> >Today someone removed a legit message posted by errol, and the 48 hours
> >mark must have been moved.
> >
> >Now, who has such rights, and who asked for it to be removed - Could it be
> >that there are access rights hanging from old boys like FG or Jerome, Or
> >that someone at a time gave such right on, Or someone at a time hacked my
> >accesskeys ?
> >
> >Please investigate the matter
> >
> >Kind regards
> >Jens
>
OT: On second thoughts you should wait until further notice. Reason is that if the administrator passwords are compromized, then the users table is still wide open and can be copied again until the hole is closed.
Kr
Jens
OT: The incident of a deleted message (1008) here may be due to someone outside IHUB having a (illegal) copy of the users table.
I therefore recommend that users do change their password to IHUB, as such possible holder of the users table are able to both post messages in other users name and read private exchange of messages.
Kind regards
Jens
Welcome - This board will not be regulated apart from the deletion of of-topic spam and advertizing.
Kr
Jens
Errol, you asked,
congrats tingleff for aking over the board...can you tell me how many shares markow controls in the shell..and how is the sec investigation into his stock manipultion going?
For both questions - I don't know.
---
Now I'll have to spend time finding out who else, but I, are able or requested to delete posts on this board. tsk tsk
http://www.cutestuf.com/flash_1002/bluemoon.swf
Kr
Jens
Minimum 22MM shares OS now.
What is the status of returned stock - free trading?
History lesson...:
--------------
By: myDDdotcom
Date: 12/18/2000 2:47:14 PM (ET)
OK, the tally is in. We are at ~35 shareholders holding 3.3M shares for approx. 80% of the 4.26M in the float.
From what I understand, the float is going to be this amount for quite while. The debt consolidation through PP's and restricted shares was, from my understanding, less than 1M in shares, but these are still restricted as well. All of AccessTel's shares will be restricted for a year from their final share structure agreements.
A PR is expected out shortly, confirming a JV that has been rumoured about quite a bit. Hopefully that will relieve any concerns folks have about the recent price drop, which is partly attributable to the whole mkt decline (which we had avoided), but also due to the lack of information from AccessTel
Actually, I don't think it is so much the lack of info, as the lack of follow through from the timetable set forth in the recent Conference Call:
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=24186
But i did DD call quite a bit this weekend, and am satisfied to continue holding, patient for their plan to become widely known. Today I just bought a whopping 250 shares in my son's (Jackson) educational IRA that I just set up for the toddler, hope it grows as much as he is.
Happy holidays all, best way to reach me is on the PM of ihub, Jerome
To unsubscribe from this email list, return to 'AccessTel (SHPS)' and select 'Remove ChairMail Subscription'.
--------
Rescind dispute settled out of court.
Result on shares:
11,356,782 of the Surrendered Shares have been delivered to counsel for prior management of the Registrant and will be duly canceled and returned to the authorized but unissued common stock of the Registrant. An additional 5,361,981 of the Surrendered Shares are to be transferred to a private third party unrelated to the AccessTel Parties pursuant to a confidential settlement of a separate legal action involving a legal debt owed by one of the AccessTel Parties to the private third party.
Or is the number of total surrendered shares in total undisclosed? - The text is a little unclear IMO
Result on Management:
David C. Merrel again in charge.
Seems that this board is still being kept "straight" - messages are being removed.
VanIsland don't care about it, I don't think RClark reads it anymore, so that leaves Jerome in charge.
Rescission done? eom
Transcript of interview:
http://news.stockselector.com/newsarticle.asp?symbol=NTWK&article=30947280
CEO discusses the size of the marketplace for NetSol International in Wall Street Transcript InterviewNAEEM GHAURI is CEO of NetSol International, Inc.
New York City, New York, Oct 16, 2001 (The Wall Street Transcript via COMTEX) -- Four analysts and top management from twelve sector firms examine the Payment & Financial Processing sector in this special 65-page issue from The Wall Street Transcript, available at (212/952-7433) or http://www.twst.com/info/info432.htm
TWST: Could you begin with a brief historical sketch and overview of NetSol International, Inc. (Nasdaq:NTWK)?
Mr. Ghauri: The company is into the software products and services businesses; we started about five years ago. Our initial focus was writing customized software for clients that were mainly in the automotive leasing business. We picked up clients like Daimler Chrysler very early on and using those as our base clients, we then grew the business into products. The products, the main knowledge came with our relationship with Daimler Chrysler, that we picked up a lot of business knowledge as a base for leasing finance and services business.So if you look at our business model, it’s very simple. We sell asset-base leasing finance products and services. Our main clients are in the finance industry as well as health care, so those are our core competencies. We write customized software as well as we write asset-based leading software/products.
TWST: But you focus on the automotive business in the broad scope?
Mr. Ghauri: That’s right, but, automotive business from a leasing perspective, from the finance side rather than on the logistics side.
TWST: How big is that market? Can you define that marketplace?
Mr. Ghauri: The leasing market in this country is about $200 billion a year or plus.
TWST: How about the software?
Mr. Ghauri: The software side of it, in the US alone, is about $300-$400 million a year.
TWST: Why is it that big? Why is there that much software required for this?
Mr. Ghauri: There are many components to this space. For example, there’s a front end where if you, as the recent customer, go to a dealer and lease a Ford or a Dodge or whatever. From a customer perspective, they give you a proposal, they check your credit and then they tell you "yes" or "no." There’s a middle part where they basically check your credit and the application goes through a number of different checks until they say "yes" or "no." There’s the backend, where after you have been given a lease contract, then it has to run over two or three four years to generate payments, receivables and payables. This is quite a complex accounting system. Finally, there’s a fourth piece where the dealer you go to get the car from, they actually finance their inventory also through banks. So there’s a wholesale side of the financing.These four different pieces are critical for any leasing and finance business to stay in operation. It’s a full ERP type of a solution. Then there are enhancements and then things change, technologies change, requirements or enhancements change, the way people do business changes and so there’s an ongoing requirement to enhance and support our products. We generate quite a bit of revenue from a services side.
TWST: Are you participating in all four of those market segments?
Mr. Ghauri: We are. We are the only company that has a fully integrated solution for all four of the components. Our competitors have either one or two solutions or they have older technologies. We use Web-based front-end and we have client server solutions for the middle part.
This special issue includes:
1) Payment & Financial Processing - In an in-depth (x,x00 words) Analyst Roundtable, Patrick Burton, Director at Salomon Smith Barney, Andrew Jeffrey, Principal at Robertson Stephens, Wayne Johnson, Senior Vice President at SunTrust Robinson-Humphrey, Tim Willi, Senior Analyst at A.G. Edwards & Sons, examine the outlook for the sector including outlook for debit cards , economic outlook and share specific stock recommendations.
2) The TWST confidential Off-The-Record survey of management performance at twenty-one sector firms asked market insiders about the ability of management teams to create shareholder value.
3) CEO and Sponsored interviews (average 2,500 words). Top management of twelve sector firms examine the outlook for their firm and the sector.
This interview is a small excerpt from a comprehensive interview published in The Wall Street Transcript on 10/15/01.
Naeem Ghauri
CONTACT: The Wall Street Transcript Corporation
67 Wall Street, 16th floor, NY, NY 10005, USA
(212) 952 7433
(212) 668 9842
info@twst.com
URL: http://www.twst.com
Kr
Jens
NetSol International Inc. To Host Conference Call To Discuss Earnings for Fiscal 2001
CALABASAS, Calif., Oct 15, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- NetSol International Inc. (Nasdaq:NTWK), a software development company, announced today that the Company will release its financial results for the year ended June 30, 2001 on Oct. 16, 2001.
The call to discuss year-end earnings will begin promptly at 4:15 p.m. Eastern Time (1:15 p.m. Pacific Time) on Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2001. To participate, please dial 800/273-9672 for the U.S. and Canada, or 416/695-5806 for international callers, at least ten minutes before the conference call is to begin. The call will also be available via webcast at http://www.viavid.com/detailpage.asp?sid=984.
A digital playback of the call will be available until midnight of Oct. 17, 2001. The playback dial-in numbers are 800/408-3053 for the U.S. and Canada, or 416/695-5800 for international callers. Participants dialing into the playback must give the passcode, 938073, to enter the call.
Questions regarding the conference call can be directed to Judy Kim at 213/488-0443.
About NetSol International Inc.
NetSol International, Inc. is a leading global software developer and information technology consultant to blue-chip corporations worldwide. The Company has developed a complete suite of products for the finance and leasing industry. The entire suite is the first end-to-end solution that encapsulates the core business requirements of any type of finance or leasing company. The Company employs over 250 software developers, engineers, and marketers worldwide.
Forward Looking Statement
This release contains forward looking statements relating to the development of the Company's products and services and future operation results, including statements regarding the Company that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. The words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," variations of such words, and similar expressions identify forward looking statements, but their absence does not mean that the statement is not forward looking. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Factors that could affect the Company's actual results include the progress and costs of the development of products and services and the timing of the market acceptance of those products and services. A more detailed description of certain factors that could affect actual results include those factors discussed in the Company's filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, including its annual report on Form 10-KSB and quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB. NetSol International, Inc. undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, events or circumstances after the date of this release or to reflect the occurrences of unanticipated events. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this release. The company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or for any other reason.
CONTACT: Magnum Financial Group, LLC
Michael S. Manahan, 213/488-0443
mike@magnumfinancial.com
10K - Better than I expected.
Mainly that they were able to keep the revenue up while having the silly action going.
Quick calc appx book value 0.90/sh, burning 1.35/sh, with only a decline of some 0.50cent in book value.
IMO Means that financing have been good!!
Intangible assets though provides for round 70% of the book value.(Not a bankers dream) - But still leaves 25-30cent what I call raw book value.
!Could have been much worse.!
Click http://www.alertwizard.com/display.php?link=4215681 to view the filing!
Kr
Jens
Short positions:
The short position was only little lower as per Sept 14. - The last selling of BW seems the be that day with 1.4MM shares traded Sep.17. Pretty difficult to assess whether the short position is gone by the end of that day. But my bet is that it is.
http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/quotes_full.asp?kind=shortint&symbol=NTWK%60&selected=NTWK%60
Kr
Jens