Close My Account
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Let's see how much longer??!!
Assuming that BZ, MG and MF manage to keep the company afloat, dealing with all the issues pertaining to JG may take several years.
If is my understanding that from the last day of an event that is in question, which could lead to legal action, a party to the conflict has two years to file in court. After that, it will be at least two years before the first trip in front of the judge, unless there is a discovery period. The taking of numerous depositions could clearly increase this window of time. In the meantime, as information becomes available through the process, existing legal action may be dropped, amended or consolidated, and new action with additioanl parties may arise. In other words, unless everything is dropped becaue no one sees a reason to continue, five to ten years is possible.
I was a party to a civil case once, which was far more simple, and it took two and a half years, and it was resolved without a trial.
I avoided being a party in another case when I resigned my position and turned information over to the office of the district attorney for possible criminal charges. They decide not to pursue it, but I covered myself.
After I left, the situation deteriorated rapidly. It has led to multiple legal actions. The business doesn't exist anymore. Not to go into details, it has been five plus years since the whole thing got started, and it is a long way from being over.
So, depending on what the likes of JG and MF and others think they can gain or keep from losing on account of RLTR, this process could easily extend until 2015 without any doubt.
I never liked the deal that was made with JG, and I tried to put doubts in MF's mind without being obvious. As it turns out, my assumption back in April that JG was backing down because of the bad financial situation of ReelTime turned out to be nothing but a game on his part carried out in order to talk MF into giving him a better deal. And MF fell for the con. JG neither had the money nor the intention of investing it if he did.
I firmly do not believe in "services rendered". I cannot recollect an instance in which doing that didn't turn out to be highly beneficial to the parties offering the services. And that is the catch around which JG is going to do battle to regain control of the company.
My concern is that I do not know the details of the agreement even in generalities. Thus, I cannot possibly have an opinion as to whether JG even has a case to assert that he did meet the requirements of the contract.
I do believe that the con game started long before the deal was signed, and that JG never had any intention of making the company profitable in any short run, but that his only objective was to let time elapse until he had firm control thereof. However, from his standpoint, he had to give exceedingly optimistic expectations in order to get control, and that these would obviously clash with his ability to cement control of the company as he would be unable to meet the optimistic projections without getting an outside party to put up the money.
An honest person would have invested some money in consideration for a set number of shares, taken a salary and proceed to fullfill the program that was in place. But he neither had the necesary financial resources, expertise or good intentions.
Now we are much deeper in the hole and our investment is worth a lot less. The company, however, can still survive if an influx of capital can be obtained.
JG has no morals and no brains. He is wasting his time coming here, and he might be wasting his time trying to get something back that is worth nothing. Nothing is what ReelTime is worth at this juncture. He first destroyed whatever little value was left in the company, and then, when the people who put their money, time and effort into it take it back, he wants to fight about it in court.
But I saw it coming all along. The worst of my suspicions. What was the deal? Cash, acquisiton of a loan and services rendered? I think so. We just don't know how much each one was, and how the deatils were worked out.
But it is quite obvious to me now that JG's idea was to take over the company an build it into a stock mill. Based on all the details that keep coming out, nothing else makes sense.
I said it here, and I told MF a year ago (or so) that I do not believe in the "services rendered" type of the deal. Horswe trading in this manner, which is equivalent to some sort of barter, doesn't work. I can't remember it ever working for anybody at any level. Y:ou want shares; you pay for them. You provide services; you get pay for it with mone, real money; not with shares.
I go as far as saying that such horse trading should be illegal in the public corporations sector. It is a way for the stockholders to end up being disenfranchised.
BH is out of the picture, but JG is not. He might be stupid enough to take this to court. But the cost would be greater than the value of the company even if he ended up with all of it. It is not worth anything. Maybe Bev, MG and MF can turn it around. But I have my very grave doubts. In order to succeed, they have to make all the right moves from now on.
The stock would have to be close to 2.75 by then for the options to be a better deal.
Undear james,
Why don't you just get lost James? I can't believe that you are bothering with this at all. Go back in time and read some of the post here just after Mark put you in charge. You will see that in less than a year you destroyed all the goodwill investors had towards you. They placed their faith on you or kept silent about their misgivings because of their appreciation for Mark--and you managed, in less than a year, to turn that good will into a thorough dislike.
Not only that, but you have certainly proven yourself incompetent on top of being of poor character.
We don't want you. Not only do the posters here don't want you, but other investors that do not post here don't want you. As long as you insist in trying to hold on to power or get back at our new management, this company will go nowhere. You might also find yourself with having to answer several legal actions taken against you by investors like me. You could spend years in court and lose a lot of your money and your precious time in a battle that is going to do nothing but make your life a nightmare.
So, go away. Just go away. If you did put some money in this outfit, you can keep a few million shares as far as I am concerned. But these shares will have to be based on some realistic assessment of the money you put into this company.
And go away, and sit on them. And don't bother us anymore. Don't post here, and in a couple of days, you will be nothing more than last night's nightmare. Then maybe Bev, Michael and Mark can turn around this company and make it work for us. I, personally, will hate to see you benefit from it--and we all know you don't deserve it--but sometime one has to make concessions to move forward.
So, just go away. Don't let your inflated ego get in the way.
Reel Time King
Get lost! Whatever is wrong with you is worse than being a drunk. The ex-CEO of the company should have enough class to at least not be posting here.
BRAVO! BRAVO! BRAVO! WE DID IT! HE COULDN'T TAKE THE HEAT! THANKS, MARK! I BELIEVE IN YOU, BEV AND MICHAEL! LET'S GET BACK TO THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT OF PPV VOD. I DO BELIEVE WE HAVE A REAL CHANCE TO TURN THIS AROUND IF WE DO IT RIGHT!
This is the time to get ready to help the company by further investing directly into it if one has the means.
BH had every intention of making this company profitable. If he didn't, he wouldn't have bothered with the Sony deal.
He indulged in nepotism and in other unethical practices, but he always thought this would work. He was inept more than anything else. that is the reason for the failure under his management; not his crookedness.
If he were just strickly crooked, he would have sat on the money, draw dividends/interests from it, and could have spend twenty years making believe that he was heading somewhere. I've believe for more than three years that he is highly incompetent, and I have no reason to believe otherwise.
JG has had plenty of time to straighten out the books. He knew what the situation was long before he took over. He made promises that he didnt/couldn't keep. Yet now he fails to let go of the reins. Within three months of taking over a business, one knows all the pertinent problems. I've been there before. In three months time, I solved all the back issues for a business with about 25 employees. Had to re-enter tens of thousand of entries in the books, and talk to hundreds of vendors and customers. And had to do three tax returns. Much bigger business than ReelTime. While at the same time take care of all the current things.
JG is not only unethical, but he is down right incompetent. He don't even know how to be a good crook. People like him depend onthe likes of MF, who has a good heart, to get over. It is well past due to time to take action against him.
We are going through the BH kind of nonsense all over again. Stop looking at thing as if they were black and white. BH is not as despicable a character as he is now painted by many who until relatively recently praised him. JG is not a man in an impossible spot due to the doings of BH. Forget it. It is not realistic. He is worst for the welfare of the company and the stock holders than BH.
A guy walks into a bar with his pet monkey. He orders a drink and while
he's drinking, the monkey starts jumping all over the place. The monkey
grabs
some olives off the bar and eats them, then grabs some sliced limes
and eats them, then jumps up on the pool table, grabs the cue ball, sticks
it
in his mouth and swallows it whole.
The bartender screams at the guy, "Did you see what your monkey just
did?"
The guy says, "No, what?"
"He just ate the cue ball off my pool table - whole!" says the bartender.
"Yeah, that doesn't surprise me," replies the patron. "He eats everything
in sight, the little twerp. I'll pay for the cue ball and stuff."
He finishes his drink, pays his bill, and leaves.
Two weeks later he's in the bar again, and he has his monkey with him. He
orders a drink and the monkey starts running around the bar again. While
the man is drinking, the monkey finds a maraschino cherry on the bar. He
grabs it, sticks it up his butt, pulls it out, and eats it.
The bartender is disgusted. "Did you see what your monkey did now?"
"Now what?" asks the patron.
"Well, he stuck a maraschino cherry up his butt, then pulled it out and
ate it!" says the barkeeper.
"Yeah, that doesn't surprise me," replies the patron. "He still eats
everything in sight, but ever since he ate that cue ball he measures
everything first..."
THAT MONKEY HAS MORE BRAINS THAN MOST HUMANS!
Great defense! Take all the government benefits you can and help break it. They force us to pay, so take back whatever you can and more. It is your duty to take all you can and put it on your side of the table. That's free enterprise. Show the government why their share-and-share-alike philosophy is corrupt and doesn't work.
I was complaining about Barry's behavior while you were still supporting him one hundred percent. Asus has nothing to do with this discussion. What he thinks is irrelevant to our discussion.
The attempt to ridicule me by suggesting that I should go out and buy a shell company is meaningless. Why don't you refute my arguments with solid counterpoints. The fact is that there are none.
And if I had the money to buy a shell company, I certainly wouldn't go out and buy something like ReelTime. Instead, I would buy something without debt or start acompany from scratch. And I wouldn't buy or start a public company in order to run a shell; I would have every intention of creating a real busines.
There is no point for one person to put to million dollars into this. It makes no sense. JGs deal never made any sense to me. But it wasn't long before I started seeing that it was a con-game. He cannot be that ignorant, incompetent and lacking in common sense to put two million into this company, and no one will loan him the money.
The only thing that could work here would be for ReelTime to sell shares in the open market to people willing to risk a few thousand dollars on the outside chance that this company would take off.
I will be waiting to read your reasoning for my being wrong. What proposals would you make. I can't remember you ever making one. But the past is water under the bridge. What would you do from the current junction? My opinions on the matter, I have already stated. My opinions in what should have been done three plus years ago is in record here for anyone who cares to go back. There is no doubt that, if Barry had done what I proposed, ReelTime would now have between 10 and 20 million in assets and no debts. And that is a fact.
I am not surprised you do not take my posts seriously. After all, what can one expect of someone who believes a business can make it under current circumstances.
1.) One million in debt, with 220K to the IRS on overdue payroll.
2.) Practiaclly no liquid or hard assets.
3.) No source of Revenues.
4.) No plan.
5.) the knowledge that running a bare bones RLTR website will cost about one million a year.
6.) A stock price well under a penny.
7.) Based on current stock price, it will take over 100 million shares to raise 200K.
8.) Thus, to pay the debt and have one year operating revenues will cost 2 million, which would require at least the sale of one billion shares of stock.
No, of course I do not expect you to understand, and thus, you will not take my post seriously.
You also backed BH almost to the bitter end, and for a long time you criticized the likes of me when we pointed out to some problematic issues even before the likes of me really turned against Barry. And, of course, now you can't see that JG is even worst then Barry.
A while back, when I wanted to sell shares, you didn't want the AS expanded. But, heck, what is wrong with giving them away to JG? So, of course, I do not expect you to understand.
And, of course, I do not expect you to understand now anymore than I expected anyone here to understand when I made my proposal to raise capital in late 2006 by selling enough shares to invest and develop the company from the interest and dividends on the investment.
No, I certainly do not expect you to take me seriously.
First, some here have to become honest with themselves. Until those investors do that, they will be helping to forestall any action that might be taken agains JG. These investors need to overcome the emotional stranglehold of BIS (see: gaucho).
Our investment is, for all practical purposes, lost--even if JG resigned and returned those shares. This does not mean that the company has failed; it only means that, for the company to move forwards, millions of shares will have to be sold, that the AS will have to be expanded and that a reverse split will be necesary. Thus, our investment is gone although the company is not.
We may have to issue over one billion shares, and then conduct a 1 for 10 or 1 for 20 reverse split. Then, we have to go back to square one. Build a website such as the one that was up at the beginning of last year, and go to a strict PPV VOD format.
Then we need to make deal with content providers who are willing to work in a format that allows us to succeed with them. Let's say, a 60/40 split on the favor, with all content priced at .25 interval, starting at .25. They give us the content they want. We use it if it is suitable. They get their cut eery three months. They choose the price level at which it is sold. Free content is free. Anybody can watch it anytime they which. For example, a show like Bonanza would be free of charge.
The home page is simple, and there is a link on it to the "Catalog". The catalog is divided into hundreds of sections and sub-sections, and the customer could spend hours looking at the available titles. It doesn't matter what softwares runs the website as long as these are user friendly and the product is high quality.
It is as simple as that.
Someone in the Seattle area who is a big stockholders needs to initiate court action. That's the only way we will get this company back. First, one has to get a copy of all the relevant documents, and then, or simultaneously, get an injunction. No one like me, who is on the East Coast and doesn't have a lot of money can do it.
Obama's biggest mistake is his claim to be in the process of fxing things, and that his programs are already working. All this talk about green shoots is so hoaky. Like some others we know (i.e. James Green), he surely knows how to build expectations and then fail to deliver. Any wise politician would have painted a picture claiming that his programs would take more than two years before they would start showing any impact on the economy. That way, he could have been clear of being attacked for the delays. He surely knows how to stick his foot in his mouth.
Drugs would become legal?
So where we you back in late 2006, all of 2007 and early 2008 when I was pointing out all the things that were wrong with ReelTime? It was not until sometime in 2008 that I finally gave up completely on Barry's management, but throughout 2007, I constantly complained about the things that were wrong, not only here but directly to the company, to no avail.
I complained about the things I saw wrong long before ReelTimer or Bev realized what was going on. They should have figured it all out long before I did.
Vut you were no where criticizing Barry's management. Now, you are still supporting James Green, months after it is obvious that he is even worst than Barry. You must be one of those people that do not think that hundry tigers are dangerous until they attack you personally.
Get with it. I am not happy with what has transpired, but you share a great amount of blame for your support of those who have been in charge long after you should have given up on them.
As far as being band, so what. I am only allowed to post once a day, and that has been going on for almost six months. And who was responsible for automatically complaining about every post I made, and got me banned. Yes, every post. Who did maliciously start doing that even though my post were simply discussing the issues.
For the welfare of the large stockholders here, this issue needs to be clarified. Can anyone provide links to the actual paperwork?
This is the coldest winter I have ever experienced, and I am an old man. And the same thing is said by all of my old friend.
But remember the movie: tornados in LA; huge winter storms with people hiding in the NYC Library throwing books in the fireplace and millions of Americans going down to Mexico to escape the bitter cold caused by global warming.
What more prove do you want?
Almost a year ago, I read a release from RLTR that said that, but I cannot find it. I was also told that by MF, if I remember correctly. Or maybe he said it in an e-mail he sent to me or an that was forwarded to me. I would need to go back, but I have thousands of these, and hundreds in the time period where it would have been said.
But it really doesn't matter. Nothing can be locked up forever. The idea would be inimical to the system, and the system would collapse if certain investment just had to keep someone locked to it perpetually.
Add "carajo." At least in Cuba it is typical to use both expletives at once.
I take some issues with this article. First, there is no "Commie China". Anyone who believes that hasn't got any idea what communism is, and, basically, doesn't have anything to communicate. It is only someone who needs to be brought out of their ignorance and brain-washing. The claim is so absurd I wouldn't know exactly how to begin to dispel the myth in the context of this board.
The second thing it the "buy American" crap. That is nothing more than a catch phrase to get people to surrender their wealth to those in certain positions. I buy the best deal for my money. Period. That is what keeps me as economically sound as I can possibly be. Instead, they should be saying: "take a fifty percent cut in pay for America."
The United states is not in competition with China or any other country. Businesses and people are in economic competition with each other.
The reason why so much manufacturing has gone overseas is because hour for hour those in Third World countries produce much more that we do. And they buy their home made products cheaper, and they are more frugal. We tend to buy crap, misuse it, and it last much less than it should.
If I buy a toaster made in China for 10 dollars, why would I buy the equivalent made in America for 20? There is ten dollars gone from my pocket to pay the overpaid American worker. There is ten dollars gone from my pocket that I cannot spend on something else. The labor/production equation is out because of something called "dollar imperialism". The final outcome of it, and of our behavior that keeps this alive is eventual downfall of the American economy.
The part with which I agree is the part of the government interference in the market place. If we don't stop this madness, we will become a second rate economy in fifty years, and our standard of living will decline vis-a-vis other countries, and maybe even relative to the present.
But she is hot.
Chico, you've got the wrong guy. What ever is not my opinion is feces. LOL LOL
Just thought I lighten things a bit.
True, there are Muslim groups that are extreme. The failure of Al Qaeda to have hundreds of millions of supporters, for example, it their pathological cruel nature. Their attacks on some segments of the Muslim population has kept them from developing a wide following.
We know that even organizations like Hamas are not pleased with such extremism. Likewise, there are Jews that disavow Zionism. I knew an "orthodox" Jewish fellow (and I put it in quote since I do not necessarily mean by it why they mean) who married a Jewish woman from some very minor sect. When I met her, she was dressed in a fancy black dress similar to one of those costumes that Muslims wear except her face was not covered. When I went to shake her hand, she looked at the ground and folded her hands by her belly. The husband (the fellow I knew) immediately interceded: "She belongs to XYZ group and she is not allowed to talk or shake hands with strangers." He gave me a short explanation and I let it go at that. They acted more like Muslims.
Later, I talked to a mutual friend who is also Jewish, and he explained to me about these small groups. He added that this guy with his five kids, all under six or seven years of age, including a couple of baby twins, was planning of migrating to the Holy Lands. When I question my Jewish friend further, he said: "Forget it. They are really out of their minds. They will never do anything sensible."
I have never seen this Jewish fellow again, and none of my Jewish friends and acquaintances know anything about his whereabouts. Last time this guy was even mentioned in my presence was more than five years ago, and no one hard heard anything about him for nearly ten years.
I do believe that man has an impact on climate change.
About 0.000000000000000000000000000000000001 of a percent.
Do I have enough zeros?
Just think of how and why you tolerated the BH bull for such a long time, and you have your answer.
Arabs are white. They are Semitic and Hamitic. They tend to be stout, have black hair and heavy beards. The European Jews have a more fair skin and in some rare cases even blond hair. The European Jews are not Semitic; they are mongrels. They have more Latin, Celtic, Germanic and Slavic blood than they have Semitic and Hamitic blood.
The Romans, when they conquered a people, destroyed many of their cities if the conquered people did not agree to be part of the Empire. The Israelites, like the Carthagenians, were among the groups that opposed the Roman conquerors the most. As a result, many of them end up with no choice but to leave the region. But others left the region to take advantage of the potential for improving life that was possible within the Empire.
In the beginning, the Christians saw themselves as Jews. But they saw themselves as Jews who had to spread the word to everybody. They succeeded because to the majority of inhabitants in the Roman Empire, they were just talking bout another god. With so many gods around, to the ignorant masses, adding just another one was meaningless. Meantime, other Jews saw their god as their god, and had no intention to share it, keeping it to themselves.
In time, most of the Jews in the Middle East became Christians. But the religion was certainly not monolithic, as we think of such things nowadays. Most people never traveled more than a few miles from their homes, and they could not read or write. IT was all by word of mouth.
After the roman Empire split, the Eastern half, the Byzantine Empire was ruled by the Greeks. The Eastern Orthodox Church, deeply vested in the liturgical tradition of the pagan ancestry was in sharp contrast with the non-representational traditions of the Semitic people. The Byzantines, ruling from Constantinople, not only tried to impose their particular branch of Christianity, but also treated the Middle East inhabitants as second class citizens, taxing them heavily in order to feed the needs of the Empire. When Mohamed came out of the desert, he did not conquer the lands. The inhabitant rebelled against the corrupt Byzantinians, and through out the yoke. That is why the first Islamic Empire made it all the way to Spain within less than one-hundred years.
Meantime, the Jews in Europe were divided into two groups. The Christians, who did not think themselves as Jews any more, and who had so much merged with the locals that they were not distinguishable in any way.
And the Jews that insisted in keeping their Jewishness. But although they insisted in keeping their Jewishness as a religious tradition and a cultural tradition, they will still living in the midst of another people and by intermarriage, rape or whatever, they lost their racial uniqueness. In the early days, this didn't matter. Until well into the Middle Ages most Celtic, Germanic and, later, Slavic people retained their pagan roots. But as they were Christianized, they were not only fed the principles of that faith, but also the hatred for Jews as the murderers of Christ. In essence, transforming the struggle between the two Jewish groups (the Christians and the Traditionals) into a larger conflict in Europe. Thus, the Jews did not only want to keep themselves separate, but the Christians didn't like them either.
This conflict was not taking place in the Middle East because the Muslims did have a beef with the Jews. They didn't see the Jews as the murderers of their leader. Their conflict was with the Christian, the Byzantine Christian, and later, when the Western Christians came to the aid of the Byzantines, with the whole Christian world.
As the followers of Mohamed came out of the Arabian Desert, the Semitic Christian became Muslims. That was easy enough. Their religious tradition was much more in line with that of the followers of Mohamed than with the Orthodox Christian of Byzantium, with whom they have always been in conflict. Thus, the Muslims of Palestine nowadays are the descendants of the Jews of yesteryear during the time of the Romans who stayed in the region along with other inhabitant of the region.
Meantime, the European Jews mingled in the Western World until their Semitic blood was so watered down that racially they are no different than most European. They are no the descendants of a people who once inhabited the Middle East. The whole Zionist movement is based in historical hocus pocus.
Years ago, I discussed the issue of the Israeli government building walls to keep the Palestinians on one side with a low-level operative, or someone who claimed to be so. I told him again and again:
"You want Israel to survive. Do not continue building those walls. Use that money to build houses and to incorporate the Palestinian population into the framework of the society. Surely, you will continue having bombers, but after ten years or so, the process will die down. The very Palestinians will turn in those who want to fight because they would want to live peacefully."
The only problem with that is that the Zionists do not want to share the land with the rightful owners thereof; they want it to themselves. Until they get rid of this mentality, there will be no peace. And since they are greatly outnumbered, they can't win.
Prior to World War I, Muslims, Christians, Jews and other religious group were living peacefully within the Ottoman Empire. The Ottomans allowed thousand of European Jews to come into the country and settle there. It was only after the Ottoman Empire disintegrated and the Zionist movement showed its ugly face that conflict started.
In that group, for certain, Hitler was not an atheist. No one knows what he was. He was most likely a pagan. He was, certainly a confused man.
Castro did not kill a million people. Didn't even get close. If the numbers for the others are anywhere near as bloated, you can easily take one zero out of the equation.
I do not know for certain what the religious believes of some of these people. One thing is very clear: they were all very much against organized religion. They saw it, and rightfully so, as a tool that could be used to oppress the people.
But the issue here is not their religion in the more traditional sense of the word: a believe in a metaphysical world. In a sense they all have a secular religion. Most of them also have another thing in common: they came to power during a period of upheaval. They did not come to power in a time of peace. Their excesses were only possible because of the abuse that took place while the prior establishment was in place.
So you have made your point. You have found the exceptions that can be claimed not to have a believe in god. Does this means that the number of murderous tyrants who have ruled the world out number the "atheists" by one thousand to one? You don't have to answer. We know the truth.
Nonsense.
No, I am not. It is you.
You have a strangely twisted mind, and let me explain why.
For a long time, I complained about BH and you could never see anything wrong with him until his behavior struck you on the side of the head like a hammer.
Then it was JG. The very same thing. You do not want to see the truth until it burns you.
Now in politics, you claim to be for free enterprise and all that, but you support those with a neo-con mentality. We are you going to see that they are nothing more than a bunch of fascists.
And you also want to defend the Zionists when they falsely claim that those lands are there, but they are actually responsible for stealing the lands of others in a process that is on-going, and they cannot win. The Zionists think they are the Chosen people with special rights and privileges on these earth. Well, they are not. If they had the power to do what they wished, they would be like Hitler was. The only problem they have that keeps them from completely dispossessing the Palestinians is that they are too small in number. Do they have to use nuclear weapons before it his you in the side of a head like a hammer and you realize that they are not what you fantasize they are.
I am not full of hate. I am one of the few in this country that cares and wants to see and end to this madness. We would already be involved in a worldwide conflagration were it not that the opposition to Western imperialism in the region is led by a group just as barbaric behind whom the Muslim masses will not fight. But it will be just a matter of time before such a group arises. And that group may be led by someone who is relatively enlightened, like Benito Juarez, for example, or someone who knows how to play his cards and only show his face after he has taken over, like Mao, for example.
Imagine, the Israeli government's solution to solving the crisis of a few bombings was to erect huge walls. Those walls were not erected to stop a few bombings; they were erected to little by little push the Arabs out of the way. The solution to the bombings was to build the infra-structure of the country, and to provided the economic means to integrate the Palestinian population into the fabric of the society. But they don't want that; they want the Palestinians to leave, and the Zionists will keep the Palestinians in these ghettos until they give up. But they have no place to go.
And don't tell me why don't other Arabs countries not take them in. If you get kicked out of your house by a well armed family, you wouldn't want me to take you in and share my house with you. You will want me to help you kick out the thief. And that is what the neighbors would do: help to kick out the thieves. But they won't be able to kick out the thieves until the West stops backing them.
No hate in my words. Just the plain truth. The plain truth. And I know that you are one of those persons that doesn't want to see the truth until it kicks out your teeth.
There was no frugality. BH signed contracts that required RLTR to make content payments even if there were no rentals. That was madness. He had the offices of the company in an expensive downtown building when there were no revenues. He traveled all over the places, often making deals that he obviously had to know some of them would lead no where.
On the other had, he never bothered to develop a relationship with the local market. The company could have broken even if he had gotten 20,000 customers in the Seattle area, and he never tried to tap into that market.
And when the fire was hot, he did not go out in the market and sold 100 to 150 million shares to develop a war chest. Had he done that in late 2006 and early 2007, he would easily have had somewhere between10 and 20 million dollars, which he could have invested and run RLTR from the interest and dividends until the company started generating revenues.
You should not write such garbage.
The Jews are interlopers that went and stole the lands that belonged to other people. They are still in the process of stealing these lands, and placing hundreds of thousands, if not more than a million people, in gulags. They turned the Gaza strip into a giant ghetto as bad as any Hitler every was responsible for creating.
The West didn't want the Jew, or should we say, the Zionists, in their midst, so they helped the Zionists create a country in the Middle of a desert in another people's lands.
Some talk about suicide bombers as crazy and mad, and I am sure they are, but most of them are deeply depressed people whose lives were shattered. After the Zionists created Israel, and even before, the well-to-do Palestinians left the region whenever they could, but the average Palestinian got stuck in the murk, having to live in refuge camps, knowing that many Westeners helped the Zionist destroy their lives. I can understand the feelings of a person that saw members of their family die and their lands stolen, and their hatred is clear.
What I cannot understand is why a Jew of Western background, who has European features, will move to the land of Palestine based on a book of mythology written a long time ago to live in a desert surrounding by people who hate them for their crime.
Picture this. An American Jewish family. A couple in their thirties with five little kids, leaving their comfortable lives and nice jobs in the United States to go live in a pre-fab house on a patch of hot sandy soil, surrounded by the prior owners of that land who were forcefully dispossessed thereof, and who now wish you dead. And to do all this because an old book told them so, and that they are the chosen people of a god that gave them that land, a very powerful god, who could have easily taken out the enemy completely just by wishing it so, and yet does not, but allows this huge struggle to go on.
All those Zionists are mad, crazy barbarians, crazier than the craziest Muslim. But what bothers me the most is that, for the sake of pleasing these savages, the whole world could come to an end, and the likes of me, an atheist, may have to suffer the consequences of a holocaust like this earth has never seen before. Do you have any idea how angry that makes me? I don't think so.
The Zionists need to go back to Europe. Most of them carry little Semitic blood. They are European. They need to go back to Europe.
During the late 19th century, many Jews from Europe, Zionist Jews, started heading to the Middle East. They were welcomed with open arms in the Ottoman Empire. They bought properties in the region and got along with their neighbors of other religions. When the Ottoman Empire collapse, and the French and British took over much of the Middle East, the Zionist saw their chance to begin the process of creating a religious Jewish state. This process was a terrorist process that slowly grew and grew, and the rest is fairly well known.
What Sherman says is true. Reagan was a cruel joke on this nation. He was a combination of fascism, populism and socialism, and he spoke with one of the most forked tongues in the history of this nation. A man who truly set back the cause of freedom and free enterprise. He lied, and lied, and lied, and took us in the direction of a totalitarian state. At least the likes of FDR and Obama are telling us that they believe in big government that controls our lives. The right is more dangerous than the left because they tell bigger lies.
The truth of the matter is that it has been the West the ones that have wrecked the most havoc around the world over the last few centuries. Had the power been on the other side, they would have done the same, but that is no excuse.
The enemies we encounter around the world is enemies of our own making. Had we treated others fairly, we would not have the problems we have. At the end of World War II, the United States, for the most part, was looked at in good stay around the world, and our government has send then managed to destroy most of the goodwill.
They don't hate us for what we are; they hate us for what we have done. There is only one real solution to the problem: change our ways. We will not win the battle from a barrel of a gun.
But it certainly seems like you are saying that you would like to be able to put the blame on atheist. I read it and read it and read it, and I paraphrase and this is what I come up with: "I wish you were an atheist because that way I can blame it on atheists."
Maybe I am not reading it right or maybe you didn't express yourself right, but that is what I get from it.
King Abdullah's Essay:
http://www.kinghussein.gov.jo/kabd_eng.html