Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hi Allie,
Thanks for putting that list together.
Can you please send me the list too when you get a chance?
esorensen2002@hotmail.com
Thanks!
We're still around guys...
But unfortunately, we don't have too much to add at this point. There was a time where the mods might have had the ear of Paul and gang to help facilitate discussions and clarifications on information given out in PRs and SH meetings but that has seem to go by the wayside. I would love nothing better than to share some great news with everyone here but obviously, there hasn't been any good news as of late. We are all in a waiting game and there is absolutely nothing we can say or do to convince anyone on this board that things are real and there is still a chance. And because of that, I'm just sitting back and waiting. I'm not going to jump in on pointless jabs - especially from those who haven't done any digging or DD in the years before now (not talking about you in this).
The mods will continue to be here but don't expect too much from us. We are all a bit disappointed right now and don't have too much of value to add to the discussions right now - at least I don't.
That being said - there does seem to be enough confirmation of (and from) BB of a deal with Spooz - aside from several websites that still reference Spooz. This is enough for me to stick around with but not enough for me to really promote Spooz to other people. Even if it turns out we get a crappy deal from Kiatrade are far as profit sharing, it's enough to bump this stock up to a point where I would at least break even - probably a whole lot more. There is no point on selling now and more reasons to think the BB deal will/is happening.
I was at the offices when they were moving into 141 back in Sept I think. I might try taking another trip over there sometime soon - have no idea when. I will relay any info they want to give to me at that time.
GLTA
Thanks Klon, I'm glad to have some info out there...
Looks like we got a few more months. I know I'm getting a bit tired of the 'few more' timeframes so I hope this one finally pans out.
GLTA
I'm here as well Boca. Got my 2 cents in the
other day so I'm good till news. No use drumming up old stuff.
Boy - wish I could answer those questions Nice
but I have no idea. I haven't heard anything as of late on anything at Spooz. Other than my trip up there in Oct., not much have I found out (a little Yoda talk for you lol)
There are many questions to be answered and until Paul speaks out - it's a guessing game.
Wish I had better info for you.
Traderfan, I personally have no idea what it means
about the lack of trading going on. I've seen plenty of pennies at this low volume with the company doing nothing and lots of trading going on. What do you make of that? I guess I look at the fact that the people that have shares are holding on to them for the time being. The argument could be made that it's not worth selling at these levels but some could also make the argument that this is a lotto play and there is still a chance they can pull this out. With the several separate confirmations of a deal with Bloomberg, this has as big of a chance as any thing out there to make something happen - that's my thought as to why people aren't selling. It's a wait and see. In addition, enough things have gone wrong in the past that there isn't any new money wanting to jump in. Most of us here already have a large amount of shares and have bought up what we want. I even have an order in at .0001 for the last few weeks now without getting filled. I've reached my risk factor limit right now and I'm happy whether or not I get the 1's so there's no point in raising my bid right now.
With no buying pressure, the price has crept down from around .0006 on relatively low volume -- which to me means one of two things: either there isn't that many shares out there freely floating (as in they are parked somewhere) or people didn't think .0006 was a good price to get out at either. With this deal happening, this could shoot up big time if it pans out and that's what people are waiting on. It's a gamble and I think the majority are satisfied on waiting it out. If everyone really thought this was dead, we would have plummeted to .0001 right after the recent small rise.
I'm optimistic but a realist. I know there is a chance this may not happen. Kinda sucks being pessimistic about something you have quite a bit invested in. I choose not to go that route and be optimistic. Nothing wrong with that.
As I don't know exactly how this works - maybe you can fill me in... can Bloomberg employees even buy this stock right now if the deal hasn't been PR'ed? Wouldn't that be insider trading? They may not even have the product yet so they may not know if it's worth buying the stock. Obviously, the higher up people that signed the deal saw that it was a good product but that doesn't mean the masses know about it yet. Lots of reasons why there's no trading going on. I can only guess why.
GLTY
My mistake - should have said "We get this deal going - we good".
I have no doubt that the deal was signed - it's already been seperately confirmed. It just has to be delivered and working by Kiatrade for the deal to be "good". I have no "if's" on the deal being signed in my mind. It's being delivered that I'm looking forward to confirmation on.
Didn't really think we needed too.
If we're mods, we probably have a more optimisitic view than most here. We can be optimistic but have a realist view. All isn't great here but there is still hope.
I am still a Yes here.
Things are slow and we really need to hear updates on the Bloomberg deal. This is make or break as far as I'm concerned. We get this deal - we good. if not - we not good. It's either up up and away or crash and burn.
Hey Trader,
My visit was about 3 weeks ago now so I couldn't tell you at the time if the decision about Jim was made before or after that. I didn't know about it till it was posted. However, you have to know that not all info that is found out by people on the board is passed on to everyone on the board. Darryl, I, and a couple others talked about several things related to business. But, as you may have seen on this board before, that when someone relays some amount of info, especially if it's not great news, it is scrutinized, blown out of proportion a great deal, and ends up putting all the optimistic people on the defensive. We have not the time nor the inclination to let ourselves become a target for pessimistic antagonism. We're not company PR people so a lot of times it's our impressions from conversations that we relay to the board - not a lot of direct quotes or detailed information. That's just covering our butts. We do what we can for the board because we want to see Spooz succeed - as well as investors - but we can only say/do so much.
The subject of Jim's employment didn't come up when we talked - nor did I even think of it as an issue - that his employment changed. I just knew they consolidated people and offices with 141. Heck, I didn't even see the new office. We just happen to catch Darryl in the hallway as he was moving some items from the old to new offices. He stopped and we talked for a good amount of time before we had to go. There was no one else in the office at that time otherwise we would have tried to talk to them too.
I'm not terribly happy in the way things have turned out so far but I'm certainly not going to complain about it to everyone on the board and expect them to convince or cheer me up. I've done my research and talked directly with the Spooz and while my current enthusiasm is not sky-high, I do still see the potential. I certainly don't want to come across as a blind pumper on the board and I also don't want to have to defend Spooz all the time from the bashers either. Everyone needs to do their own DD and decide for themselves if they want to invest or not.
Once the Bloomberg deal comes to fruition, most of the negative talk should go away and we can have some good conversations. Overall enthusiasm on the board will skyrocket too at that point.
Endub, It's a done deal. The 'final bridge'
is the API connecting ST to Bloomberg. Bloomberg wants the software as soon as possible but Paul and Ulwin want to make sure the API is sweaky clean before they roll it out. There can be no mistakes on this one - a lot is riding on it. Get it done, get it done right, and get the money coming it. It's all good after that IMO.
Couldn't tell you catani, I didn't do it.
I don't know the current holdings either otherwise I would put it back up.
Hey Peeved,
Nothing that hasn't really been talked about here before. They have consolidated to 141 in ordere to save money and are just waiting on the final bridge to be built by Ulwin to start the revenue stream from Bloomberg. Once that starts, I think we'll see many interesting things happen here. Next year will be exciting IMO. Revenues coming in and shown in the Feb financials, stock buyback, uplisting, more deals...all good stuff. Financing would have been good earlier this year but things just didn't turn out that way so they settled on waiting for Bloomberg. We could always wish things are/went better but for now, I'm holding strong.
Bloomberg is the key and they are concentrating fully on taking care of them. We should know soon if this is going to take off or tank. Dec is getting closer by the day.
You are exactly right Gmenfan,
I'm on the board every day reading up on what's being talked about. It's just not worth trying to explain the same ole same ole to same ole doubters. I've talked with Darryl recently - went to the office a couple weeks ago - and I'm still good with what's happening right now. Do I wish things were better? - of course. Right now we are in another waiting game and I'm just letting things play out. Still happy with my long term investment here.
Hope we can get going sooner rather than later though!
GLTA
Regarding the API...
According to Darryl, the API is being written now. He didn't say anything about needing to improve the software. The contract is signed and the API +testingis all that's left. John is working as fast as he can to get this part up and going. Darryl hoped that the API would be done within 6 weeks. They have 60 days to deliver the goods.
Correct IW. They are going all out
to have this up and going as soon as possible. They already have a support structure in place to handle tech support for when Bloomberg comes online. They want to knock this contract out of the park to bring credibility and exposure to the product.
Thanks Birdito, np on posting it.
I do want to stress that these were my impressions - my "IMO". Darryl couldn't give out the details of the contract yet as Bloomberg still wants to be the one to put out the PR. Basically what I'm getting at is that all things point to a bright future once the juice starts flowing from Bloomberg. lol
Peeved good DD, I think you are on the right track.
After talking with Darryl recently, my impression is that we're looking at some sort of minimun amount per month for this contract and then some additional target licenses of 3,000 to 5,000, at $400 - $500 a piece. The cost of SpoozToolz on their website is now $489 per month. Then you have a profit margin of about 40-50%. So I think Traderfan's number would be closer to the actual PPS. But just imagine if it's true about the 10 or so additional contracts they mentioned at the SH meeting. Say just 2 or 3 additional contracts of the same value are done. By the end of next year, we could be looking at a PPS of .10.
There are a lot of 'if's out there and right now their sole purpose is to make Bloomberg happy. Once Bloomberg is going, this company has an extremely bright future - one I will be glad to wait around for. They have about 6 more weeks to deliver the product per the original news. However, without a PR from Bloomberg, we may not know the extent of the profits till 4th quarter financials.
I care not what the naysayers say. My DD is solid and if my suspicions are correct, this lotto play will be the single best play I've done in my life. Only time will tell.
You are very right MC -
I don't think any of the longs are the least bit surprised that things are looking up and that the Bloomberg contract is a done deal. Those of us who have done thier DD over the years always knew the potential of this stock - if only they got that first mega-deal. I don't think I could have asked for anything more. Now it's time to sit back and enjoy the show about to unfold in the next few months. Should be a wild ride for everyone on this story book stock.
And "Welcome!" to all the newcomers to the board. Please add value to our little home here and do some DD whenever possible!
GLTA
iBox updated. Getting Shuttle soon!
Hey Nice, I never left.
I have held strong and backed the truck up. I'm all set to sit back and let this thing ride!!
Woot!! This is it guys...
The start of something wonderful! This validates not only that the Spooz guys have indeed been working behind our backs on something great, it also validates:
1. The validity of the product
2. The road to uplisting
3. The buyback could/is on track
4. That 141, utilizing ST, is a valid and emerging company.
All in all, let's finally change the tone of this board and talk about the real stuff ST might be able to accomplish in the future!
Congrats to all longs for sticking it out!!!
Thank you Bylosellhier. That was by far the best
post of the last few weeks. If people just stop by and talk to the Spooz team, they will immediately know this isn't a scam. I'm not saying it's not high risk - but the returns could be immense with only a little success. The constant postings of all that has gone wrong can easily be overlooked - if you take the time to meet Spooz - as a small business looking to make it big in a huge market.
Again, for those of you just starting to look at this stock...
Have things gone wrong? - YES
Could things have been managed better? - YES
Have deadlines been missed? - YES
Do we wish we had more upfront information (even though legality might have prevented it)? - YES
Is this high risk? - Absolutely YES
Is there a potential for a huge return? - Absolutely YES
Is the product real? - Absolutely YES
Is the Spooz team doing all they can to get this off the ground? - Absolutely YES
I've been to the SH meeting, talked with management, used Spoozcharts, and seen Spooztoolz. I'm perfectly content with my investment here as anyone that reads my previous posts knows. I won't get involved with all back and forth from bashers and such because is pointless. Unless someone takes the time to actually go to Spooz and see for themselves, they will never take anyone's word for it. And the question I have to those that bash is this... Since you are being the vigilante on protecting people from this stock, will you also take the blame for stopping someone from investing in this stock IF it does happen to take off? Probably not as you won't be around after that happens.
This is an 'IF' stock and well worth the risk - but it has to be everyone's own decision. If you want to take the time to go to the offices and check out the management and software, you will be more than convinced. If you don't have the opportunity to get to the offices, you will just have to take other people's word for it. It's your decision on who you believe is posting legitimately and truthfully. You don't see me posting fluff (or often for that matter). I post my own experiences and knowledge after talking to management and seeing the product. The 'pumpers' of this stock have done an excellent job of providing info to everyone in order to make their own decisions - and the 'bashers' have provided their side. I am happy with my position and would look to add more if I could.
I look forward to the day where the board topics change over from whether this is real or not to all the things Spooztoolz can do and what other markets we can use this software in.
GLTA
ITGuy
"When we are able to put aside our differences, only then may we say we've evolved."
Hi Shine, needed to chime in here.
The answer I gave was directly from Paul's mouth. The JV is not a revenue play. HOWEVER, the last part of my statement is maybe what needs clarification - and maybe that clarification needs to come from Paul. My understanding is that the JV won't give any sort of compensation from anyone (like payment from SFB Market Systems or otherwise) right off the bat - it's what will come out of the JV if the SMCC proposal is accepted.
From the May 25th PR -
“These new developments in no way signal a change in the direction of our company,” stated Paul D. Strickland, Jr., the Spooz CEO. “Our new joint venture simply illustrates the flexibility of SpoozToolz and, in reality, shows how SpoozToolz is applicable to hundreds of transaction processing and messaging revenue streams besides trading.”
There could be huge revenues from the exposure SMCC will give SpoozTools - that's where the money is.
Again, maybe a clarification from Paul is in order but he and I had a small one on one talk about some of the questions and this was one of his answers.
ITGuy
"When we are able to put aside our differences, only then may we say we've evolved."
iBox share count updated
ITGuy
"When we are able to put aside our differences, only then may we say we've evolved."
Done. Again. lol
Done. Thanks.
They feel they will have money in the bank very soon.
Deals are in the works.
I can reply to that Trader,
The JV is not a revenue play because they won't get any money from SFB. The whole point is for the credibility of SFB to 'sell' the idea of their SymbologyDNA in order to fix the problem of the symbol translation. However, in order to use the translation, the trader will need some software to do that - that's STv2. That's where the revenue will come from. So it's how you look at the question of whether they get money from the JV or the exposure of getting STv2 into trader's hands. Paul was being honest in saying they won't get money from SBF - they won't - it's from the subscriptions that will be generated from the JV through SymbologyDNA.
Hope that clears things up.
Page 4 of questions/answers:
27. Are there any details available for the potential 'partners' for distribution of STv2?
Answer: There are several different partners for distribution. Many are in talks currently.
28. What are the status of the offices in NY and London?
Answer: No current office in NY but are looking to distribute the software in Q4 to NY firms. Virtual office in London and looking to start distribution in Q1.
29. Correct me if I am wrong. Going back to the deal that was alleged to have been brokered by the Kauderer Group, the principal investor in "141 Capital" was to invest 3 million of which 1.5 million was to be paid to Spooz for the licensing of "SWARM". My question is, is the deal with this investor still intact? Has the 3 million been paid to "141 Capital" and is there 1.5 million available to cover the "SWARM" licensing fee?
Answer: They don't know where the 3 million dollar number came from. The licensing from SWARM is on hold due to litigation.
30. With the stock being so cheap right now, is there any insiders buying, if so how much, if not why?
Answer: No. They were jokingly laughing about it saying "with what money?" They don't pay themselves enough right now to afford buying more is what I think they meant. If they were to buy, they become restricted.
31. Has there been any insiders selling?
Answer: There has been no insider selling at all.
32. How close is the company from attaining significant revenues?
Answer: Q3 or Q4
33. What is the status of the Interactive Brokers relationship and how long will it last until we hear definite agreements between SPZI and those bigger brokers?"
Answer: I have questions on whether I got this right but I believe the IB Open API is going to be completed in the July time frame. They are already part of Ameritrade's "Partner Program".
And that's all the questions I had down. Thanks again to CapnDon for sharing his notes.
Page 3 of questions/answers:
19. Specifically, what did those two yahoos that were dismissed last fall take away from Spooz Inc, if anything?
Answer: Trade secrets regarding SWARM. It's in litigation in Kane County Court with the most recent judgement in Spooz's favor.
20. Spooz's O/S has increased approximately 1 Billion shares since April 1st. What have these shares been used for and how have they benefited the shareholders? Do you feel it will be necessary to increase once again the number of A/S over the next 52 weeks? Is an R/S still out of the question?
Answer: No R/S! Dilution will only occur to keep the company up and running while sustainable revenue is attained.
21. Please provide additional information on the arrangement with 141 Capital regarding "investment recommendations". Will 141 use these recommendations for internal trading? What is the technology for Spooz and 141? What is the start-up timing?
Answer: There were several answers to this and I don't know if I understood them all. There was talk of using cell phones to trade as one possibility. The use of Algoserver was another. 141 will use other trading systems besides SWARM. 141 should start trading in the next few weeks and the web site should be updated with 5 weeks. Sorry - I know I didn't get all the questions answered.
22. How many of the original 4 brokers/investment houses in the Chicago rollout in 2008.1 are currently paying revenues to Spooz. How many additional brokers/investment houses are paying revenues to Spooz at this time?
Answer: None are currently paying revenue as pricing is still being discussed.
23. What is AlgoServer's main function and how is it priced?
Answer: This was a long answer - many aspects were over my head in understanding. The one I did understand was this: Say someone develops a trading algorithm in STv2. They could run that algorithm on their home computer and trade as they want to. They can export that trading algorithm and Algoserver allows them to import it onto a server closer to the Exchange for fast and automated execution. It also allows the user to remotely manipulate their algorithm for fine tuning.
24. Does 141 Capital plan to have a share holders meeting this year?
Answer: I have down next fall (as in 2009) but I've heard fall of 2008 from others.
25. What is the latest deal (if there is any) between SPOOZ and TDAmeriTrade?
Answer: The deal with Ameritrade is still intact. Spooz has written to their API for execution. Ameritrade has an old API so there are constant updates to continue to have things work.
26. What is the status of Spooz relationship with Trading Technologies?
Answer: Everything is still in place. Same as last year.
Page 4 coming...
ITGuy
"When we are able to put aside our differences, only then may we say we've evolved."
Page 2 of questions/answers:
9. Please update us on the 3-4 major brokerages that were demoing/implementing that product. Are they paying for STv2 yet?
Answer: Not paying yet. Price negotiations in progress.
10. When will we see advertising and marketing for Spooz products?
Answer: Approx. fall time frame.
11. Are the ads produced by Trungale that we have seen going to be used?
Answer: Possibly. Darryl likes the racecar idea and might reuse that.
12. Will we see Spooz products reviewed in the professional journals of the trading industry?
Answer: Yes. Probably in "Active Trader", Futures & Options Trader (I think). (there were more but couldn't write them down fast enough.)
13. In regard to the payments from 141 Capital that Spooz is suppose to be receiving. Are they being deferred until profits from 141 trading are being generated? When is revenue supposed to start for them?
Answer: Yes - deferred as SWARM is in litigation. Revenue should start in the next few weeks as a new trading system is brought online.
14. Is there an R/S in the works within the next year?
Answer: No
15. When do you expect the uplisting to be completed?
Answer: There can't be an increase in capital during the uplisting progress. Uplisting can take up to 120 days so they need enough money in the bank to sustain for up to 120 days. They are ready to start the process now - just waiting on money.
16. Please update us with Spooz's revenue projections for 2008.2, 2008, and 2009 and the major sources of the revenues for each time period
Answer: I don't have the breakdown of where the revenue is coming from but:
1 year - $9.70 Million
2 years - $36.40 Million
3 years - $58.54 Million
17. What is a "best case" and a "worst case" estimate on how soon until Spooz becomes cash-flow positive?
Answer: Best case - This quarter. Worst case - Q1
18. Are there any lawsuits that are hindering the forward progress of the Spooz business?
Answer: SWARM is in litigation. Info can be found in the Fed (I think) court in Kane County.
Ok. That's it for page 2. Page 3 coming up...
Ok - here are a few answers.
Remember, this is not going to be word for word as I can't write as fast as they talk so some paraphrasing is going to be involved. Unless I put it in these quotes("), don't quote me (Paul) in your posts. I would like to thank CapnDon for sending me his notes on these questions so I could combine them to get the best possible answer for you guys.
Here we go:
1. Spooz talks about preserving and creating shareholders value. What are you going to do to compensate the shareholders who bought his stock's company at 0.01 and above when dilution is still going on and their shares keep being diluted? As dilution has occurred, the pps has plummeted to record lows in spite of good news and progress. Why in your opinion has this happened, and when do you see this alarming trend reversing?
Answer: Dilution has occurred to keep the company up and going. Without it, shareholder value would be 0.00. Reversal will happen when revenues start coming in.
2. How will Spooz generate revenue from the joint venture with SFB, and how soon will revenues start coming in from the JV?
Answer: The JV is "not a done deal yet". It's not necessarily a revenue stream - more of a exposure play. Revenue could come from it in different areas which marketing is exploring.
3. Can we get any details about the financial arrangements involved in the SFB deal? What does Spooz give, and what does Spooz get?
Answer: Basically the same answer as #2. There is a free component as well as a paying component. As an example - this is like giving away Adobe Reader but if you want the full usable version you have to buy Adobe Acrobat.
4. When will SpoozToolz 2.0 be available for independent traders?
Answer: Right now it's institutional investors with a target subscription price of $500- $1,500 per month. Independent traders can expect something around fall timeframe. Q3 - Q4.
5. What kinds of feedback is Spooz getting from those who are involved in the testing of Spooz software?
Answer: Feedback is more of 'add content' instead of 'does it work'. STv2 works - no doubt about it - they are just providing feedback on enhancements. It's mostly about templates and more and more templates.
6. How did Spooz and SFB connect -- what was it that got SFB interested in Spooz technology?
Answer: Was initiated by a sales call by Jim Hensel (Fedfunz). When SBF saw what SPv2 could do in Excel, SBF said that's exactly what they needed. SBF wanted to build something exactly like SPv2 but saw a more direct path to market with what Spooz already has. It was the "right timing" in contacting SBF.
7. Are there any custom modules being developed for applications other than investing and/or does Spooz see the possibility of any such use in the future?
Answer: CMCC is one. Binaries is another. There are “hundreds of potential applications”. 3rd party trader/developer programs. Institutional algorithms, etc.
8. Does Spooz have any plans, after the company is more financially secure, to consider a stock buyback plan?
Answer: "Yes." "No R/S"
Ok - here is page one of the questions. If anyone else at the meeting has things to add or correct - please feel free to do so.(That goes for you too Paul!)
More to come...
ITGuy
"When we are able to put aside our differences, only then may we say we've evolved."
Hi Everyone, Sorry for the delay
in posting all the answers. I've had very little time at home but I plan on spending an hour tonight to at least get something out to you.
ITGuy
"When we are able to put aside our differences, only then may we say we've evolved."
I'm still working on posting all the answers
but a quick answer to your question is 'no'. The Kauderer Group is out of the picture.
Here is the handout from the meeting:
Go to ftp://76.208.29.104 and download the file called "Spooz 2008 SHM Handout.pdf"
and here is a quick photo of the front office:
ITGuy
"When we are able to put aside our differences, only then may we say we've evolved."
OK - General overall impression...
It was a good meeting. We did get a lot of answers to questions. Overall, I'm still optimistic about being a shareholder as we should know a LOT more in the next 30-90 days in regards to subscriptions and revenues. Some huge deals are in the works which could get PR'ed at any time. But till those are out, there will be additional name calling of the company. There is no R/S foreseen and a buyback is planned (i.e. They believe the money will available to do so).
Revenue projections are as follows:
1 year - $9.70 Million
2 years - $36.40 Million
3 years - $58.54 Million
Uplisting will be done once they have a sustainable amount of capital to survive 120 days. There will be more about this as it seemed rather complicated. This is how long the process may take to do and there is a requirement of not increasing capital during this time (at least that was my understanding).
141 should be up and going in the next few weeks. SWARM can't be used right now because of litigation (see previous posts from others) but they have another trading solution set to go. I saw the results of that and it's in the 85% success rate range. Turned 10k into 33k in about 2 months time. 141 will probably have a SHM in the fall.
I do wish there was some great news to give out to everyone and to put all this success/don't believe it exists/failure ideas to rest but not as of yet. I do believe it is coming soon based on some things I heard. They are being prevented from saying anything till others give them approval. (BTW - we had this some thing before with TT and a PR did come out once it was approved by the other company).
I had a friend there - another IHubber "enforcer57" - he told me tonight that if yesterday the shareprice price hit a certain value, he would have sold but after the meeting - he wouldn't sell and hold out for more. He's a great read of character and was able to find out little things that solidify the products and people behind Spooz are real and on the level. They are working their butts off to get this out there for all of us. If the SMCC deal going through, I believe - as was said before - that this is beyond huge. SFC has some serious credibility and Spooz being in this JV will be very interesting.
OK guys - that's about all for now as I'm wiped. I would be buying more shares tomorrow if I had the powder to do it. I will be posting the handout they gave us as well - just give me till tomorrow to do it.
ITGuy
"When we are able to put aside our differences, only then may we say we've evolved."
Hi Everyone,
I just got home and reading all the posts up to now. I will try to post a summary tonight but will probably write up all the questions and answers tomorrow. Stay tuned...
hi guys. just got done with the meeting . shinebox and capndon will.definitely get home before I do so they can start off the review. lots of answers but no earth shattering news - yet! I will post answers as soon as possible.
ITGuy
here at the meeting. will post when I can.
ITGuy