Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
just plain do not understand how we are expected to abide by the rules but ADMIN does not have to do their part.
i just wish ADMIN would accept their responsibility also.
Great post but unfortunately full of wishful thinking... Ihub Admin have no interest in "doing their part".. If you knew what "their part" really was you'd probably be shocked.
Here are the FACTS as I know them Dave..and they will be the basis of my chargeback through VISA. Watch and Learn. You see, I am no longer requesting a refund, VISA will simply take it back for me. LOL.
On 11/14/07 full privileges were restored to me after a suspension and serving the required "jail" time for alleged violations which are still under dispute.
Since 11/14/07 I have not been notified of ANY infractions of TOU.
On 11/17/07 I was banned from the FCCN board. That same day I sent a PM to Shelly, because Matt had me blocked from sending PM's to him, requesting the reason for the ban and no response was received.
On 11/17/07 I posted to the parking lot board. This was the ONLY board that I posted to that day and subsequent to these postings was put back in jail. None of these postings violated the board rules and I was offered no reason for this removal of privileges.
On 11/18/07 I requested the restoration of my privileges or a full refund given that I had not been notified of the reasoning behind the suspension or subsequent removal of all privileges and believe it to be unjust. In reponse, Ihub Admin (you) replied citing a number of infractions which bear no relation to what has transpired since 11/14/07 when Ihub restored my privileges in full. The alleged infractions you stated, would have taken place BEFORE 11/14/07 or you would not have restored my privileges on that date. In fact, your decision to reinstate me on 11/14/07 shows that after reviewing the evidence, you believed me to be in the right.
It is my understanding that I posted on a board (the Parking Lot) which has very few rules.. in fact, even violations of TOU are allowed as long as the rules of the board aren't violated. I know this because I was verbally attacked by other members in the parking lot and nothing was done to them.
I violated none of the rules of the board and therefore I believe that I have been unjustly placed in Jail.
Because of this unjust deprivation of privilege I would like to request that either:
a) My privileges be restored immediately.
b) I receive a full refund of my 3 year membership.
I will await your reply.
Thanks,
Todd
P.S. I understand that you will respond that you do not provide refunds however I am doing this solely as a formality to prove to VISA that I have done everyting within my power to negotiate a settlement with you.
Wick.. Matt could care less about the rules. He's shown repeatedly, time and time agin, that he will selectively enforce them as he sees fit.. I'll leave it to your imagination why that is.
Ihub is such a joke Wick.. they make up the rules as they go along.. they create boards like the parking lot so that people can speak their mind.. and then selectively enforce their own rules.. e.g. it's ok to insult somebody and call the a worthless POS, idiot scumbag..which is a violation of TOU.. but say ANYTHING about Ihub Admin and that is just toooo close for comfort for them. Makes sense, doesn't it??
Phil is a highly ejumucated and impotent person.. so I don't doubt for one second that EVERYTHING he says is completely factual and beyond reproach...lolol
ROTLMFAO..LOLOLOL.. yeah, but cut Phil some slack.. his biggest challenge each day is trying to figure out which workboot goes with which foot..lololol.
Leigh.. I could care less what you think of me.. care even less whether or not you read what I post..lol..who the fuck are you anyway?? Again, this only further serves to strengthen my original point. Point out some rancid cheese.. and the rats come out to defend it.
Phil.. I've already looked into this..spoken with VISA and you are wrong.. Ihub won't have that choice.. when they signed their 3rd Party agreement with VISA they also agreed to guarantee customer satisfaction..and provide the goods and/or services as advertised.. and that supercedes (I know, big word for ya sorry) any agreement they might have with members.
Sorry, but you are wrong. Trust me.
LOL.. You don't get it.. I am EXPECTING the boot. That is just what is done here to silence those who speak out. Anyway, I have already processed the form to send to VISA for the chargeback of my 3 year membership. Money back in my pocket.
btw, you have hurled insults right from the start.. and come at me with aggression in your words.. in a matter that does not concern you in the least.. can you explain that? Why are you SO upset about something that has NOTHING to do with you?
No Guy.. I was just under the mistaken impression that only "investors" would be posting in this forum. After all, this is the "investors" hub. And believe me, I'm not even talking from a subjective viewpoint because you yourself have said you are not an investor.
Unfortunately, I was mistaken. You yourself have said that you do not think FCCN/AERO is a good investment.. It doesn't take a master of logic to figure that out after reading your literally hundreds of posts dating back to early 2007.. in fact, it's more than hundreds.. I'm quite certain that your posts number into the thousands by now.. ALL on one message board!!! On certain days you've posted almost 24/7.. endlessly.. So that begs the question, at what point does Ihub no longer consider you an "investor"?? Apparently, their criteria places you into that category even though your posting history is self-evident.. on the other hand, many other investors who have congregated to discuss this stock are met with a barrage of SPAM postings of the same bs.. over and over, hour after hour, day after day, week after week, month after month. And this is not SPAM?? Ihub TOU gives them the right to ban people whose clear intent is to disrupt the board.. which is obvious in your case.. yet they allow you to remain.. so why is that?
Obviously when I ask these questions it ruffles many feathers.. wonder why.
It is fucking amazing to me that I come here with advice to keep your stupid ass from getting booted, and you start attacking me.
Again with the attacks and insults?? Please explain this agression. You did not come here in a friendly manner to help me.. please.. right from the start you were calling me an idiot.. is that how you HELP people??
Guess I hit a nerve. Go figure.. If the shoe fits.. or in your case if the "Workboot" fits.. right Phil?? Come on, I know you drive the dumptruck.. you certainly have the intelligence of one..LOLOLOL.
I am not defending anyone
Uh.. ok Phil.. you came at me with aggression and hurled insults.. again, I ask why?? have I hurt your personally in some way?? I think I've hit a nerve of yours.. and perhaps I am too close to the truth for your liking?? Again, why get so upset about something that really doesn't concern you?? Please indulge me.
Btw, from your diction it's obvious you're not a Nobel Laureate.. Bullrider makes sense.. but perhaps also Sanitation Engineer.. Vertical Transport Assistant?? Which is it, help me out.
There is no such thing as "free speech" on Ihub.
EXACTLY!! Opinions are silenced of those that conflict with their objective.. which is to make money. I thought only violations of TOU were removed??
My point is this, either by incompetence or intent, there are boards on Ihub where manipulation is allowed and condoned. This is being done under the watchful eye of Ihub Admin. You can make your decision why that is.
Anyway, I see you know where your "friends" are.. go figure.. another acquaintance come to defend their honor.
LOLOLOL.. Yeah OK Phil.
I would suggest that those with the strongest opposition.. Who resort to denegrating others to make a point.. are most likely the same individuals involved in this suspicious activity.
Why else would somebody react so strongly? Have I hurt you in some way Phil?
And btw, I find it odd that you would suggest the possibly that I might get "the boot" for exercising free speech on a board in which I've violated no rules.. seems likes an odd threat to me.
Kind of like a bully in the school yard.. eh? Seems like you're perhaps all braun and no brains.. but what's new on the "investors" hub.
Yet ANOTHER defender of Matt steps forward.. I think everybody should be wary of these members who are "Grandfathered" in..
Has anybody noticed how Matt gives MORE leeway to many with free memberships than those with Paid memberships?? Why is that? Again, the answer is clear IMO. Would be interesting to get a look inside his account. I'm sure one day the SEC/DOJ will.
Not sure I understand your logic Susie.. on the one hand you basically admit that you don't know what they SEC is doing.. on the other you admit the problem is very big.. Perhaps that is why they are focusing on it?? lol. I'm not saying they will fix this overnight, but if you can't speak with any kind of authority, then why speak? At least I have had contact with them, and we have seen more focus as evidenced by the suspensions and civil and criminal lawsuits in the past year. What do you have to support your "opinion" or is it nothing but wild ass conjecture?
Btw, I see you were granfathered into Ihub.. which IMO automatically discounts your "opinion" in this matter. As I've said, I think that clearly Matt is abusing his privilege for monetary gain. And any acquaintance of his from the early beginnings of Ihub will naturally want to defend him. Perhaps you are involved as well?? Hmmmm..
I think they claim it is not.. but I either way, that's not my biggest concern.. my concern is that Matt knows what is going on with these organized groups and is allowing it to continue. You have to ask yourself why does he allow this to happen? TOU allows him and other ihub admins to subjectively enforce the rules and eliminate this disruption as they see fit.. it's in the TOU.. so why do they selectively decide to enforce that in certain cases and not in others? As I said, I think the answer is simple. It's all about the green.
Hasher.. Unless you've been stuck in a closet the last year you probably should have noticed that the SEC has become much more concerned about taking out the garbage down here in this mirkly underworld where some choose to run wild. That includes not just the Mgmt of the companies who are defrauding investors, but also any other entities who are trying to profit from the lack of supervision and enforcement. I can assure you that the SEC is taking action and will listen to complaints.. I know this from experience having spoken to them directly a number of times.. Think what you will, but I would expect to see many more civil and criminal suits involving both the company executives that perpetrated the frauds.. in addition to charges against those who have attempted to organize for the purpose of manipulating the price of securities. GLTY
Cruz.. I think Matt is VERY aware of it.. I think he permits it for a reason, if you know what I mean.
Don't you think it is odd that he and other Ihub Admin subjectively enforce TOU on certain boards, and then on others all of a sudden it is black and white?? Come on, Matt knows what's going on and it's all about the green.
They are just a tad bit too obvious about it..aren't they? Btw, Goldenstar = Iceman.. and you should probably throw in Downwithpumpers into this gang as well. You've got mostly C and D class bashers in that group so I'm not too worried.
What IS disturbing is that Matt allows this activity.. wonder why.. well, that's not too hard to figure out. Everybody trying to cash in.. soon the SEC will come a knocking.. can't wait for that day.
I am not as well versed in the inner workings of the engine to respond to you.. I'll leave that to others on this board.
But again, you have not produced anything with scientific evidence to refute what AERO is claiming.. You're stating things matter of factly when I've read many articles to contradict what you are saying..And btw, I suppose I trust the Morgan McClure racing team when they say it does what AERO claims it will do.. much more quickly than I will trust you.. No offense.
The link below is to the AERO website and provides a good explanation of the technology. Quite remarkable actually. There's also alot of other neat stuff on the website if you navigate around.. they've got tons of customer reviews.. Sound snippets for you to actually hear the muffler on your vehicle or one similar.. Not to mention the pics of those shiny stainless steel, high tech, patented products.. really cool stuff.
http://aeroexhaust.com/aero_performance_exhaust.html
So much to look forward to in the next 6 months..
1) Definitive with Dr. Gas - expected within the next week
2) Closing of transaction with Dr. Gas - My estimate is that this will be 1 month away.
3) More distributors added. My understanding is that they are waiting on signing the largest distributor due to supply issues. Once the integration with Dr. Gas kicks in we should be ready to fly!
4) Q1 Financials. This should show the true strength of the AERO/Dr. Gas merger.
These are definitely exciting times!
I see that somebody was dead set on painting this up to .12 today..there were two attempts.. and they were saved by a BIG buy at the end.. 12,000 shares for a whopping $1,440.. and a whopping 2.7k traded the entire day..lol..this will be sub .10 soon. What out for the form 4 filed by Nick for 10,000 shares.. surely that's his next trick since he saw it work before..lol.
What does this have to do with Sequiam? Apparently Fujitsu has biometric technology. Does Sequiam own ANY rights whatsoever to ANY of the technology they employ OR are they a 100% reseller? The margins would tend to point towards the latter.
Sounds good Dr.. I too am grateful to whomever created this Pro-Javelin board.. gives us yet another place to congregate and dicuss all the potential that exists!! Cheers!
4.I have made sure it is known to Shelly and others that you are openly attempting to disrupt the Javelin board.
LOL.. ok now THAT is a joke. Who is openly trying to disrupt what?? Spreading FUD is your middle name you POS. You, DWP, Goldenstar(Iceman) and the rest of your pathetic clan are sorry excuses for human beings.
Guess I will have to continue posting the TRUTH on the SQUM board. I was going to take a break, but the TRUTH must be known.
IMO definitive will come within the next week..close within the next month.
I am not trying to hide anything.. why do you keep saying that??? lolol.. all I'm saying is that you have yet to prove to me that there is any other company out there that has the potential of AERO. You're welcome to keep trying.. but posting a link to a website of a private company does nothing for me. Again, if they're private there is no way to know how large they are.. how financially stable they are.. how wide their distribution network is.. what their plans are for the future.. you can't get any of that info.. Why? because they don't have to tell you. AERO is telling us everything..complete transparency.
And regarding AERO's products.. I've searched high and low for anybody who will give a negative comment on them and I just can't find one. Call a few dealers.. there's over 1000 of them.. and tell us what you heard. I did. Nothing but glowing reports on the products. And the best part of all, they are patented and have been proven to not only reduce gas consumption, BUT increase HP. Works for me!
Further, your dd only serves to lend even more credibility to our CEO's comments regarding the fragemented industry that exists. This state of affairs fits perfectly with AERO's plans for the future.. and I am just excited that I can come along for the ride.
Bottom line.. I would like to talk about FCCN/AERO.. and the potential that exists within the company as it stands right now.. and the potential that exists in the future as it continues to execute its rollup strategy.. including first the acqusition of Dr. Gas.. and then many others. I believe we have a bright future ahead. What do you want to talk about?
Thanks for that DC.. some very good reading.
this company is not fully reporting so they don't file 10Q's.. I would expect at some point we'll see their Q3 2007 unaudited fins.. and perhaps some audited fins prior to uplisting.
I had an online chat with customer support yesterday (and posted it).. and according to them.. the new version of realtime should be out within the next week.
ifinix Trader is Q1 2008 from what I've heard.
It drifted UP today!! Good luck to you EarnestDD or Guy42i..On a side note, it sure takes alot of fortitude for somebody to post on the SMB of a company he/she dislikes for over 10 months. I just find that VERY impressive. Anyway, GLTY Guy and Good luck to all shareholders of record! time to get out and enjoy the day.. and what a beautiful day it is!! Catch up with y'all later!
Intangible assets are not contributed equity
LOLOLOLOL.. Intangible assets are not equity at all!! They are assets!!!
And I'd love to bet you that we will not see a write down on the intangibles.. in fact, I think their value will go up with the acquisition of Dr. Gas. As will revenues, assets etc. IMO
So you're saying that everybody who is going to buy into this stock because of Dr. Gas has already done that?? Doubt it. We don't know the structure of the deal, the rev's of Dr. Gas, and the impact to AERO's current rev streams from Dr. Gas.. And on top of that, we don't even have a definitive agreement yet.. which I do expect very soon btw.
But as these pieces come together.. one by one.. many more investors will come in. IMVHO.
Earnest.. I'm still waiting for that link.. If I asked ANY analyst what the components make up a company's debt to capital ratio I'm quite certain that none of them would mention backing out Intangible assets..lol
Earnest.. show me a calculation for debt to equity that excludes intangibles.. please, provide a link that you don't create yourself..lol..Equity is Equity.. it does not "include" intangibles.. it offsets assets on the balance sheet.. lol.. WOW.. business 101.
here is a reference for you..
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/debt-to-capitalratio.asp
Todd, do you really think what ur saying does make sense?
Uh.. what I'm saying is what companies have used for years to evaluate where they stand from a leverage standpoint. I don't make this stuff up, you know.
Of course you think that.. btw, AERO/FCCN mgmt showed very impressive cost control in the third quarter. That tells me they are very conscious of their cash flow situation... I think we'll see even further improved performance going forward now that they have a CFO on board...IMO he will be critical to performing the assessment of ROI's ROA's.. and assist the company in prudent expenditures of their marketing dollars going forward. Again, I cannot stress this enough.. I think this will be a completely differnt company a year from now.
Btw, you never answered my question.. several months ago.. and for months on end.. you told us that the AERO/FCCN deal was not done until it was closed.. it could fall apart at any moment.. do you remember that?? So using that logic, why would you think that Dr. Gas is factored in now?? Just curious. Really just trying to clear up this inconsistency.
Earnest.. there are no intangibles in Equity..lolol.. again, I also asked DWP this same question.. but I really am curious.. Which business school did you attend?