is exploring the universal mind
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
How bout an iPhone app? I play around on the site with the iphone sometimes, would prolly be better with a more formatted look.
Then again, demand may not be there, so whattya do.
Geez, ugh.
I am 110% positive of it, LOL
Weeeeeeeeeeeeee from da iPhone
How can you compare initial DD findings of support of certain items that either were outed as falsehoods after continual digging or ones that turned out to be a ruse, to the continual promotion of a company for the last 2 years with a Rah-Rah approach that denied the facts as they were discovered?
DD is a process, you never stop digging. When you think you know it all and stop listening to new facts, you set yourself up for a disaster.
Who would not go back in time right now and take the prices that doog got out at in 2007?
Since 2007 there has been lots of litigation, more lies, and more litigation.
Ever change your mind after you looked more into something?
I have always been fond of this one personally.
Twas a sad thing to watch, I think it is internationally acceptable for a head of state to pimp slap a foreign nations underlings for such behavior.
You can also go one step further and make this statement so they all know where you stand.
[Suppressed Sound Link]
Oh no, LOL, not mine. Lurker approved, YES.
pwned!
This cat is a chump and treated as such. Sad.
http://premium.fileden.com/premium/2007/12/18/1651938/ObamaHandshakeSnubbed.wmv
LOL, good point, I prefer the whole enchilada the way it is.
I might have to ban you if you keep it up. LOL
Throw in a few ShamWows and I am in.
NP, it is sad. I got mighty putty and oxyclean at the house, good products.
Life is short, take that fish oil.
Cardiovascular disease actually.
They said that was the cause, not a contusion.
LMAO at this pic......
Enforcement@sec.gov
I know which one you are talking about, hoping for weeeeeeeeeeeeee! LOL
Battle is fine with me.
Disgusting
Yes, you could have, at the lows after the R/S to the highs, had a 30 bagger, which is always good!
In that situation, one could have purchase almost double a position in the months following the R/S. As well, that select story stock did perform well, before crashing.
Point is, buying post-RS for months after the R/S would have yielded better returns. And those examples are far and few between relative to its run.
Head on up there buddy! He may take you out for a meal and you also get to see the priceless photos of RH standing next to Bill Gates and Steve Jobs.
That makes absolutely no sense. Explain to me how buying pre R/S is advantageous over buying post R/S when the pps does come down? If you have seen prior R/S situations where the pre-R/S crowd did better, I would like you to point it out to me because i have never ever ever seen it.
The pps only increases as a multiple of the R/S on the first day of trading, then the other factors come into play such as the selling of freshly minted shares. R/S usually gives a small window for bouncing at certain times.
And that is usually the window by which the pre R/S shares have not been swapped with the brokers and YOU cannot sell, but the new crowd (and management) can.
Simple.
All the "longs" here think you at scum Raphael!!! LOL, payback is a........
GM dancy and all. Let's go green.
You said there was a law for upper limits of 250million in Delaware. That is a falsehood. I know a thing or two about this stuff, LOL
When retired, they are taken out of the o/s so the can be re-issued at any time since the a/s is not reduced
Yeah, tons of delaware pinks with more than 250 a/s
You just finished telling the board it was because of a law that does not exist in Delaware?
LOL
There is absolutely no such law in Delaware rose. Do some research, you are wrong, fact
Bologna.... Is that the same Delaware law that let rh up the a/s from 100-150 million then from 150-250 mllion?? Or was that a different Delaware law? LOL
You seem like a nice person, but you should believe what jermart is telling you. It has been stated that financing is needed to complete field testing, etc.
An R/S will free up shares for issue for them to have a majority and for financing deals, that is necessary to avoid you all throwing them out like Huppe (which by the way I still believe is all a ruse anyway for RH to attempt to distance himself from the lies he has spewed and give a short term pump possibly or make you all more understanding of the need for an R/S).
But regardless, when you do an R/S, it automatically elevates the pps by reducing the o/s and float. They need a higher price because you cannot sell much here and it does not sound like they have many anyway. The pps usually goes up after an R/S at first (this is the time that common shareholders CANNOT sell in because the share swaps with the brokers take a few days, but insiders get new shares the first day), then it always falls after, usually because insiders or financiers with fresh shares start dumping.
Maybe it ends up right back here, but in the meantime they can raise money, pay all 5 salaries.... Rinse and repeat... Commoners always get the hose.
It really is that basic, hope you can understand it.
I would say you will get a minimum of a 5 for 1 R/S here, possibly a 10 for 1. Either way, your common ownership will get diluted.
Upper left hand of the screen says "show Ibox", you must have it hidden.
Only one way to find out....
enforcement@sec.gov is the email that works.
There has to be a current board of directors, so I would be curious to know who that is.
And since they were appointed, surely RH has sway with them and they can currently approve and/or vote on any number of things that could curtail the current dilemma
I am no fan of RH, so I do understand that point you make. GLTY
Some of the things shareholders would need to consider and ask themselves regarding this scenario playing out would be:
1. Amount of "active" board members. if this action is successful, would be increasing from RH (only active I know of) to 5. Those board members will surely "elect" themselves into the hierarchy of the corporate structure, ie. CEO, CFO, C**, C**, C**. That being said, the monthly drag of expenses will be increasing as salaries will go up..
2. Sounds like the A/S is maxed or close to. They state a need for "bridge loans", etc, to continue the research and development. There is no bank or investors that will fund such items without being in a key position to recoup EVER, especially with the stuff that has gone on in this shell. This will mean that either a massive increase in the A/S needs to happen, or a large R/S, which would effectively allow the company to secure either treasury shares or provide convertible debentures (never a good thing) to the private placement or investors for the additional funds.
This means that the current shareholders will be diminished with further dilution no matter how it plays out.
That is what shareholders should be concerned with, and that is not bashing, that is laying the cards out for everyone to see honestly.
Maybe after a r/s just for a flip on a bounce
R/S or increase in A/S coming soon, fact.