How can you compare initial DD findings of support of certain items that either were outed as falsehoods after continual digging or ones that turned out to be a ruse, to the continual promotion of a company for the last 2 years with a Rah-Rah approach that denied the facts as they were discovered?
DD is a process, you never stop digging. When you think you know it all and stop listening to new facts, you set yourself up for a disaster.
Who would not go back in time right now and take the prices that doog got out at in 2007?
Since 2007 there has been lots of litigation, more lies, and more litigation.
Ever change your mind after you looked more into something?
Everyone has an opinion, this is mine. Refute it, agree with it,
or whatever..
Lurkers have homes
#board-8733
