Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
https://www.corporationwiki.com/California/Cupertino/phoenix-digital-solutions-llc/46968116.aspx
KINDA; Like an OLD 'OVERGROWN' Vietnamese Temple with The roots
represented by 'our friend'...
There's always one who is loose in the grey matter, to a degree
that would be considered unhinged. The cause of that derailment is
usually that they lost the greater part of their fortune when they
stayed too long in a particular position, with no thought toward a
back-up position, until it was un-salvageable.
Therefore, , it is only possible for them to affect those who are as far as they can determine, to be swinging from the branches, while believing, in their depressed, despondent,
delusional, and downright, dense, decrepitude,that their only saving grace is through demonstrating that they are safe and secure in a little leaking dingy.
Is this just too much?
That is fun exercise..
bye !!!
""PTSCs PATENTS HAVE EXPIRED! Worthless for the most part friends. Even the company says in their 10Q. It is over friend even the company says so! :"".
If the quote written above is true,
It follows that:NO MORE POSTS by Neverending,
(Except of course "VANITY POSTS", are needed.
We are ALL anticipating that a few of those will be forthcoming.!!
When the money runs out,,The BoD will quit!!!!!
And NOT before.!!!
Another source of pertinent information, for arbitrage activity..
https://au.finance.yahoo.com/q?s=EURUSD=X
Have fun...
More help in your Arbitrage efforts..
http://www.ariva.de/patriot_scientific-aktie/kurs
Good luck!!!
Try your luck...
https://au.finance.yahoo.com/q?s=EURUSD=X
Some post that there is never any value in certain posts.
It would appear that it has the same value as USED toilet paper.!!!
NEV loves REDUMB DANCY...
Neither will your REDUNDANCY.......
.Thank you LARGE.!!!!
It is a mystery to me, why you insist on laying the blame for the ills that we are saddled with, on the one who is doing the heavy
lifting for Patriot, rather than the person who controls the
direction Patriot is taking..
Since the person who was an Employee, of the recipient, of the
largest portion of the early windfall from Licensing the Patents,
is NOT CLIFF..
The 'POHL---JOHNSON' team orchestrated that RIP-OFF,
before Cliff was --HIRED--,YES Cliff is an employee of Patriot
and NOT the POWER behind the Company.
Since POHL'S departure from Patriot, CJ has run the show..!!!IMO
Peace..
''"I am just a messenger"..
Do you mean like Mohammad???
...So!! You are working to protect those who are driving by the house which is on fire, while completely ignoring those people
inside the burning house who are at risk of injury or death from the fire, by warning those driving by, of possible harm if they attempt to AID those inside...
..."LAUDABLE"...
Apparently you believe that, none of the present S/H's can read.
Which, if you give it a little thought, you can conclude that you
are insulting the intelligence of those S/H's..
At the least, it is ,"RUBBING" it in, and NOT at all, helpful..
You MUST be a DEMOCRAT/Communist.
ie; Gov't must tell us how and when to think..
Just as YOU are doing now..
And there is a Santa Claus.???
Along with the, tooth fairy..
And let us not forget the, Easter Bunny.
Certainly don't leave out the, YETI.
And then there is the, SUPREME ALTRUIST,,,NEVERENDING...
I believe in them all..
..."Time to take my advice (this time) and sell this junk folks there is simply no upside that I have heard articulated"...
...Since you continue to "EXHORT" any S/H's who still own shares
,,'to 'SELL',,YOU must believe that there is still VALUE remaining in the Patents..
Otherwise what is the sense in YOU pounding the SELL, DRUMS??
.It is nice to learn that someone has an inside line to the BOD.
Could you ask them when the next License will be signed, and how
many can we expect to see, in the NEAR future..
While you're a it, ask them when they will pay the next dividend,
and how much will it be for...
Thanks loud and clear...
Cheers
.
..."If PTSC even exists then they will have over a billion shares
outstanding"...
..In order to raise the Share Price,, it will be necessary to
make a 'REVERSE SPLIT',So that there will be a lesser number of
shares outstanding, valued at the same price in total, as they
were worth before the R/S.
Therefore there will NOT be any reason for the total shares outstanding to increase to over what are at present outstanding...
ONLY the Price per share will change, and that will be to a higher value.
...(Someone is getting a little confused in his/Her exuberance)...
If one truly believes that:
This horse is DEAD,,,,
Then continuing to BEAT it, is an example of mental deficiency,
perhaps,Alzheimers..!!!IMO
So sad..
http://agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/topics/658693-10-q-license-income/messages/2067152#message
These licenses are NOT; Any one involved in the appeal..
...,There are more to come....IMO
Peace..
The appeal effort pertains to a small number of infringers.
There is a larger number of accused infringers who have been notified, (If we are to believe what has been stated)..
The fly in the ointment is,(as been the case from the beginning)
.."Leckrone"..
Take a break for a while, 'Anylist'..
So!! Anylist is back pimping for ES.
NOW bashing, so ES can gather shares, to sell when the tide turns..
Same game,
Same players different day..Nothing NEW.!!!IMO
A majority of infringers said basically the same..
even those who later capitulated and paid for a License..
It is a clear case of SEMANTICS..
Judge Grewel is an engineering, as well as a Legal diplomate..
Therefore he would use succinct and 'directly to the CRUX of the
subject', language that would convey the meaning clearly and concisely.. IMO...As he did,in this instance)..
We have been BAFFLED by BS, by so many individuals that, it has
been extremely difficult to separate the FACTS from the FICTION.
The stipulation you cite was made 'in haste',and might be revised..
Abstract...From Patent accepted by USPTO
A high performance, low cost microprocessor system having a variable speed system clock is disclosed herein. The microprocessor system includes an integrated circuit having a central processing unit and a ring oscillator variable speed system clock for clocking the microprocessor. The central processing unit and ring oscillator variable speed system clock each include a plurality of electronic devices of like type, which allows the central processing unit to operate at a variable processing frequency dependent upon a variable speed of the ring oscillator variable speed system clock.
-------------------------------------
Grewel's decision..
Because these statements would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art as disclaiming certain scope of the disputed “entire oscillator” term, the court RECOMMENDS construction of the term to reflect this disclaimer, as follows: “an [oscillator] located entirely on the same semiconductor substrate as the [central processing unit] that does not require a control signal and whose frequency is not fixed by any external crystal.
-
-----------------------------------
My comments of Grewel's decision..
I believe that the CC recommended by Judge Grewel is a much more focused and narrowed rendition of the specific 'novelty', of the "336" patent,which distinguises it from any and all previous inventions "AND", is being copied by the infringers..
Judge Grewel saw through all the semantic decorations hung onto
the simple and unique operation of the "336",and trimmed away all but the essentials..IMO...
Therefore I believe Patriot will prevail in Court,, IMO
PS;
Especially if a trial is held before 'JUDGE GREWEL'..
..."AGAIN"...
Have a pleasant day..
Well all of these disheartening factors will be of no importance to Lecrone after March of 2016..
According to the forecast,,HE IS DUE FOR A MASSIVE "HEART ATTACK",
ON OR BEFORE THAT DATE..
It has been rumored that he has been using DRUGS, for a long time.
That has been eroding his heart muscles, to the point that he has
lost his ability to continue his nefarious pursuits much longer.
Hopefully his son will 'take a lesson', from these events, and
"DO THE RIGHT THING"..
IT is SO SAD that he was not satisfied with the money he would
make HONESTLY...
Greed is a KILLER...
PS;
His actions to preclude anyone else from a fair recovery in this
situation, demonstrates his loss of perspective, showing mental
deficiency has already started to cloud his judgement.
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/155919-overview
From Agoracom..
http://photos.imageevent.com/banos/tplbk/Declaration%20Of%20Clifford%20Flowers%20In%20Support%2010-29-15.pdf
Read it and weep..
Weakeepeedia
We have a reliable source of distorted information.
Called weakeepeedia,,it is fascinating..
All the NEWTZ about Patriot...
I wonder who might be following a PECKSNIFFIAN pathway..???
There MUST be some reason to exhort so incessantly,,To SELL...
Anyway thanks But,,NO THANKS..
From Agoracom by leopard.
-------------------------------
Where is YOUR patent, ?,,,,,infringers
posted on Oct 02, 15 12:19PM Use the IP Check tool [?]
Since you guys claim that, your products do NOT infringe on our patent..
Please produce the patent number given to your patent,,so that we can take a peek at it..
We would like to see for ourselves, where the two patents differ..
It looks like your product uses our patent,,with some, "Window dressing",to confuse, and camouflage your infringement..
AND, your Lawyers further the deception by introducing the fallacious argument of,..."ENTIRE OCILLATOR"..(Clearly a RED HERRING IMO)......
Which is an attempt to demonstrate that you use an ..OFF chip..oscillator to achieve the GENERATION of the signal,,
When in fact your OFF CHIP Oscillator simply modifies the signal That 'OUR' on chip ring oscillator generates/ORIGINATES....
If you remove, 'OUR on chip ring oscillator', from your product,,,"IT WILL NOT WORK"..!!!
YOU gave it a 'NICE',, try...'BUT',,NOT A true version of the FACTS...
Peace..
Are you referring to the TITANIC...??? lol,..
OR the QUEEN MARY..???
unawares:
http://www.poemhunter.com/poem/angels-unawares/
---------------------
Lift up your gaze,and join us..
A WASP was seen lurking around the area, waiting for an opportune
moment to catch someone unawares, so that it can swoop in and STING..
OR, 'So I've heard from the grapevine'...
The University of Maryland,US ARMY Mil Ext in Germany..1958...
Evening classes..
Glass tubes were in vogue at that time.
Soon to be replaced by transistors..
Theory did NOT change,only the hardware changed..
I kept up with the changes with in service training updates..
Do you wish to impugn my credentials further?
YES!!!
I believe that the CC recommended by Judge Grewel is a much more focused and narrowed rendition of the specific 'novelty', of the "336" patent,which distinguises it from any and all previous inventions "AND", is being copied by the infringers..
Judge Grewel saw through all the semantic decorations hung onto
the simple and unique operation of the "336",and trimmed away all
but the essentials..IMO...
I look forward with optimism..
PS I took advantage of the downturn to enhance my portfolio...
Have a nice day...
..."Now the judge is focusing on the additions to the patent that make it the actual accused infringing chips work in the real world."...
Please explain that to us in real English..
AND could you include the Patent number that covers it..
Thank you much..
Hi.! big
I agree with that surmise...
It is getting down to the wire..
I wonder if the buying momentum will exceed the dumping momentum, once it is revealed that the,--NEW-- CC encompasses all elements
required to prove infringement..
PEACE..
Hi.!pankajanc
All is NOT lost IMO.
The Request for SJ by Infringers is standard procedure..
Patriot is preserving their right to object,..IF..it is granted..
I don't believe it will be granted..
Grewel did NOT,,IMO "Reverse himself",,he worded his recommendation to conform to the patent, 'AS issued'..
He did so to get right to the heart of the case..
(All of the intervening BS,,notwithstanding)...
Remember that the CRUX of the infringers argument was that
Patriot, 'disclaimed' , the patent,,"AS ISSUED",while defending
it before the USPTO.(Which is FALSE)....IMO
Compare the abstract from the patent, as issued, with the CC wording by Grewel..
Abstract
A high performance, low cost microprocessor system having a variable speed system clock is disclosed herein. The microprocessor system includes an integrated circuit having a central processing unit and a ring oscillator variable speed system clock for clocking the microprocessor. The central processing unit and ring oscillator variable speed system clock each include a plurality of electronic devices of like type, which allows the central processing unit to operate at a variable processing frequency dependent upon a variable speed of the ring oscillator variable speed system clock.
-------------------------------------
Because these statements would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art as disclaiming certain scope of the disputed “entire oscillator” term, the court RECOMMENDS construction of the term to reflect this disclaimer, as follows: “an [oscillator] located entirely on the same semiconductor substrate as the [central processing unit] that does not require a control signal and whose frequency is not fixed by any external crystal.
I Know this case has strayed far from the fundamentals of the patent, into a messy symantic morass...
schadenfreude
http://www.google.com/webhp?nord=1#nord=1&q=schadenfreude
Why would a SANE person feel that way?
Nice try at explaining,, but you got it wrong..
"""Note the underlined buddie. ADJUSTS THE OSCILLATOR. The PLL is an off chip CONTROL SIGNAL mechanism to adjust the on chip oscillators frequency and this is not at all allowed under Judge Grewal's new claims construction.
This is how all the defendants chips function at all they have the PLL modulating the frequency of the on chip oscillator. Read what the judge said below yesterday in his Markman ruling and weep!"""
---------------------------------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_oscillator
Ring oscillator
Ring oscillators fabricated on silicon using p-type MOSFETs.
A schematic of a simple 3-inverter ring oscillator whose output frequency is 1/(6×inverter delay).
A ring oscillator is a device composed of an odd number of "NOT" gates whose output oscillates between two voltage levels, representing true and false. The NOT gates, or inverters, are attached in a chain and the output of the last inverter is fed back into the first.
Because a single inverter computes the logical "NOT" of its input, it can be shown that the last output of a chain of an odd number of inverters is the logical "NOT" of the first input.
The final output is asserted a finite amount of time after the first input is asserted and the feedback of the last output to the input causes oscillation.
A circular chain composed of an even number of inverters cannot be used as a ring oscillator. The last output in this case is the same as the input. However, this configuration of inverter feedback can be used as a storage element and it is the basic building block of static random access memory or SRAM.
The stages of the ring oscillator are often differential stages, that are more immune to external disturbances. This renders available also non-inverting stages. A ring oscillator can be made with a mix of inverting and non-inverting stages, provided the total number of inverting stages is odd. The oscillator period is in all cases equal to twice the sum of the individual delays of all stages.
A real ring oscillator only requires power to operate.
Above a certain threshold voltage, oscillations begin spontaneously.
To increase the frequency of oscillation, two methods are commonly used.
Firstly, the applied voltage may be increased. This increases both the frequency of the oscillation and the current consumed. The maximum permissible voltage applied to the circuits limits the speed of a given oscillator.
Secondly, making the ring from a smaller number of inverters results in a higher frequency of oscillation given a certain power consumption.
Operation
To understand the operation of a ring oscillator, one must first understand gate delay. In a physical device, no gate can switch instantaneously.
In a device fabricated with MOSFETs, for example, the gate capacitance must be charged before current can flow between the source and the drain. Thus, the output of every inverter in a ring oscillator changes a finite amount of time after the input has changed. From here, it can be easily seen that adding more inverters to the chain increases the total gate delay, reducing the frequency of oscillation.
A transistor level schematic of a three-stage ring oscillator with delay in a .25u CMOS process.
The ring oscillator is a member of the class of time delay oscillators. A time-delay oscillator consists of an inverting amplifier with a delay element between the amplifier output and its input. The amplifier must have a gain greater than 1 at the intended oscillation frequency. Consider the initial case where the amplifier input and output voltages are momentarily balanced at a stable point. A small amount of noise can cause the amplifier output to rise slightly. After passing through the time-delay element, this small output voltage change will be presented to the amplifier input. The amplifier has a negative gain of greater than 1, so the output will change in the direction opposite to this input voltage. It will change by an amount larger than the input value, for a gain greater than 1. This amplified and reversed signal propagates from the output through the time-delay and back to the input where it is amplified and inverted again. The result of this sequential loop is a square-wave signal at the amplifier output with the period of each half of the square wave equal to the time delay. The square wave will grow until the amplifier output voltage reaches its limits, where it will stabilize. A more exact analysis will show that the wave that grows from the initial noise may not be square as it grows, but it will become square as the amplifier reaches its output limits.
The ring oscillator is a distributed version of the delay oscillator. The ring oscillator uses an odd number of inverters to give the effect of a single inverting amplifier with a gain of greater than one. Rather than having a single delay element, each inverter contributes to the delay of the signal around the ring of inverters, hence the name ring oscillator. Adding pairs of inverters to the ring increases the total delay and thereby decreases the oscillator frequency. Changing the supply voltage changes the delay through each inverter, with higher voltages typically decreasing the delay and increasing the oscillator frequency. Vratislav describes some methods of frequency-stability and power consumption improving of the CMOS ring-oscillator.[1]
If 't' represents the time-delay for a single Inverter and 'n' represents the number of Inverters in the Inverter chain, then the frequency of oscillation is given by
f = {\frac{1}{2*t*n} }.[2]
Jitter[edit]
Period of ring oscillator vibrates in a random manner T=T+T' where T' is a random value. In high-quality circuits, the range of T' is relatively small compared to T. This variation in oscillator period is called jitter.[3] Local temperature effects cause the period of a ring oscillator to wander above and below the long-term average period.[4] When the local silicon is cold, the propagation delay is slightly shorter, causing the ring oscillator to run at a slightly higher frequency, which eventually raises the local temperature. When the local silicon is hot, the propagation delay is slightly longer, causing the ring oscillator to run at a slightly lower frequency, which eventually lowers the local temperature.
Applications[edit]
The voltage-controlled oscillator in most phase-locked loops is built from a ring oscillator.[5]
Jitter of ring oscillators is commonly used in hardware random number generators.[3][4][6]
A ring oscillator is often used to demonstrate a new hardware technology, analogous to the way a hello world program is often used to demonstrate a new software technology.[7][8]
Many wafers include a ring oscillator as part of the scribe line test structures. They are used during wafer testing to measure the effects of manufacturing process variations.[9]
Ring oscillators can also be used to measure the effects of voltage and temperature on a chip.[10]
-----------------------------------------
There is NO OFF CHIP devise controlling the ring oscillator..
It is .."SELF", regulated by, simply, feeding the output of the 'RING' back to the input, in what is called a feedback loop,
...(Phase lock loop)...[= PLL]
The post I included will explain it nicely, if you ,"GET" it..
You are not the only one to , 'get it mixed up'..
Hopefully you will 'LEARN'something here..
PS FYI
http://www.google.com/webhp?nord=1#nord=1&q=MOSFET
Do you wish to call a friend.
"OR", Is THIS your final answer?