Tuesday, November 10, 2015 8:09:47 PM
A majority of infringers said basically the same..
even those who later capitulated and paid for a License..
It is a clear case of SEMANTICS..
Judge Grewel is an engineering, as well as a Legal diplomate..
Therefore he would use succinct and 'directly to the CRUX of the
subject', language that would convey the meaning clearly and concisely.. IMO...As he did,in this instance)..
We have been BAFFLED by BS, by so many individuals that, it has
been extremely difficult to separate the FACTS from the FICTION.
The stipulation you cite was made 'in haste',and might be revised..
Recent CPMV News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/02/2023 05:17:22 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/03/2023 06:44:38 PM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM
Avant Technologies to Implement AI-Empowered, Zero Trust Architecture in Its Data Centers • AVAI • Apr 29, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • BLO • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM