out of the loop for a while...what needs to happen here before we see the before we see the .14 level again?

I've been gone for a while...where's the news all you people in the know?

no need to tell me...i had thought you were still on the fence.

i didnt know you were in.

even the misspelled words? :)

I've heard that before. :)

I've about 800k left avearged at .02

with the dollar value of what I have left I dont think I could afford flowers.

i agree with you in principle...if this was purely a from a market perspective id average down...however, add the seemingly inconsistent and unprofessional behavior of the management here, in terms of meeting their responsibility to shareholders, I just dont have the confidence to do that.

...and, I'll add that until management makes moves to shore that gap I won't buy anymore regardless of what the price is; I just dont like grasping around in the dark.

Nope, I'll hold until either they start doing it right or until they shut their doors as an operating company.

...to far in the hole already to get out now...but I will say I am very disappointed int he wat things are running currently.

i dont...however, imho - these guys are going to somehow to show through those prs that theyre running a real public company (and that theyr just no 49ers) and that they actuall give a $hit about their shareholders. :)

...lets see how the story unfolds. :)

true...

....imo, in addition to gold, it would take them announcing that they had moved to a better board and already had verified audited financials.

I doubt that we'll get an upward trending pps out of this company upon release of a PR.

IMHO - We might get a spike on news followed by a plummet back down to the old support. Investor confidence, given the slience and percieved apathy of managment, has degraded. They would have to re-establish their credibility by issuing a consistent chain of progressive PRs.

Im awake, Im awake!!! What happened?

my fault...you are right about the explicit direction provided regarding the forms.

js -

call your boys and ask them wtf is goin on. :)

CIDD:

Just trying to add some parity here. I'm a holder and I have faith in the long term.

However, this PR gives us/tell us little to nothing new. Further, it adds no more credibilty than he already had to MT. He's pretty much saying the same thing he said before...so we're pretty much at par with the release of this PR.

IMHO - This PR probably wasn't even necessary?

So...first post has to happen somewhere...wait till midnight either way.

well...is what he said inaccurate?

So boys and girls...are we getting news...or perhaps some of us are being a little overzealous...driving the price on the expectation and then dumping.

interesting...mms saying he dumped nearly half the volume today...and we start uptrending. :)

very little volume today.

can anyone see the l2s on this?

...any speculation as to what causing the price action?

ha...its almost a 10 bagger here for me to break even.

Hi 4g-

Based on your relationship w/ MT you think you could help facilitate trix's daughters taking a peek at the PYPR Panama Operations.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=15750257

...this third party validation would bolster confidence significantly.

FWIW - Here's my two cents (and Ill try not to prostelityze here):

...the pps is directly proportional to the value of a company; that value is inherent to it's percieved potential and to its realized productivity.

1.) This "potential" is a function of investor perception (i.e. confidence)and reflected in the PE multiplier. In my opinion if MT wants to enhance this perception he has to keep things simple and straightforward. If things become too complex or too convoluted they become difficult to understand/grasp and if its to difficult to understand it inherently breeds investor suspicion and degrades confidence. Things such as the PDR; an instrument that's distributed in the form of a divy that denotes ownership of land in a foreign jurisdiction. This is complex, confusing, and well outside the norm. IMO, I think that MT was well meaning with regard to the spirit of this divy, however, in the end it is just so complex that it acheives a result counter to its intent and actually degrades confidence.

MT needs to keep this stuff simpler...just pay out a cash divy (even if its .0001) cents per share...thats simple and normal; people understand that...and the intent of that action is very clear...expose the shorts...no confusion and straightforward...bolstering confidence. In a word KISS

2.) From a "realized productivity" standpoint we can push out all the numbers we want in terms of revenue...until they're audited it won't make a bit of difference to the PPS...if the stock is short the MMs will have their way with it regardless of what revenues/profits are PRd...its the pinks (we cant do S$#T about it). We will only see fair market pps value based on "realized productivity" in two situations: when we move to a better regulated board and/or when we audit the financials.

IMO - I'm pretty comfortable with MTs approach with regard to this. It seems that he's got both things in mind and I hope he follows through and keeps the investment community appraised of progress on these two fronts through regular PRs on the topic. Long story short, IMO, pps value will only uptrend as PYPR shows evolution towards the two aforementioned gates.

...just my two cents.

yup...me too...averaged in at .13...what a deal. :)

So Ladies and Gentlemen,

Whatre we dealing with here...is this a POS or an undervalued gem?

is that 82K or 82M shares shorted?

?

Ease up Ground...they may not be dishonest...sometimes things go off course and delays occur that are outside our control.

You might want to just call their office and see what the fold up is. :)

You say that everyday.

...if you dont know...dont speak.

How do you feel about it at .07.

Further info...

Reinstatement form list is required to lista ll directors


http://www.sunbiz.org/COR/2006/1017/360700D9.tif

Called the Florida Dept. of State and they verfied that the information listed on the website is correct.

...they added as a caveat that if the company did add additional directors, they have not filed,prior to two weeks ago, with any official amendments that add directors. If somethin has been filed within the last two weeks it may not have been processed yet.

Call the Florida department of State and ask.

Howard -

Why would the Florida Department of State website only have Dror and not Gerald and Dave listed?

Yup...Dave's information is verified...please see...


http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&n1=P96000018229&n2=NAMFWD&n3=0003&...

understood...however, they are saying that dnnys info is inaccurate and indicating that we can validate through the sunbiz.org site.

check the site I listed and let me know what you get.

...havent had a chance to do it yet myslef.