Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The MMs that consistently play with this stock should be shut down. To constantly repress such an obvious winner is a crime.
Or someone simply sold a 1000 shares and it was broken up into two lots. There is no need for the MMs to encourage selling, GTEM manages that on their own.
This simply shows a maturing company. New management, new direction. IMHO, GTEM's future is brighter than ever, and I think the SEC charges are simply another stepping stone in the process. Very excited about the future here.
double ouch Mr. Bigsky...have not seen your face in a while. Down 99% now instead of 97%? Oh wait, you can't lose if you don't sell...I forgot the mantra of the GTEM long.
...kudos to you for sticking to your guns.
Very intriguing post Mig - could you provide some insight into why you typed those words?
the most shocking part of this lawsuit is the fact that GTEM actually had something to ship overseas.
Has anyone had experience with the SEC revoking a stocks registration and what would happen to the shareholders if this were to happen to GTEM?
Finally! Some good news.
Stock are rising due to a positive report from Microsoft. Since so many here have mentioned that GTEM is the next Microsoft, I expect GTEM will experience a nice increase in stock price because these two firms are so closely tied together.
I never got a thing although my holdings are small. It is hard to imagine that in this forum nobody would mention getting a package from GTEM.
"poor lockheed"
why? are they under SEC investigation also?
"it's a campus."
Crash, I think you meant to say "it's a scampus."
"There is alot of information in the header that we have nothing to do with anymore...."
Why, does the header mention revenue?
How does the format of the photo change the image that we already viewed? They could sell signed lithographs of that image on their website and it still would show the ledge of the building the photo was taken from.
Agreed Sharklady. While working for GTEM Joe did a lot of bad things (allegedly). This looks pretty bad for GTEM, and even worse for its major shareholders, like yourself. So I agree with you 100% that this should be a good discussion topic.
disappointed with the small drop today. I figured the fact that GTEM has the capability to get onto the roof of a building and take a picture with a handheld camera would propel us into the 20 cent range. Shoot.
Good PR. Finally we are rich...
Cole, please remember that GTEM has other money making segments of which the Strat is simply just one. The icing on the cake, if I may quote about two dozen posters from this board, is obviously GTEM's cash cow, Centerline. But GTEM's streamlined staff have their hands in numerous money making opportunities, such as printing shares of stock.
I agree with you 100%. The expenses of a company are not important. This has been discussed ad naseum on this board. Waht really matters is revenues. Even if they are completely fabricated.
"it's about re-establishing credibility within the investment community by demonstrating real progress". Oh, they did that? It seems like nobody has notcied, hence the current share price. But you knew that anyway.
Doesn't get any sweeter? I don't know about that...I wonder how too many longs agree with you that $0.115 is "sweet".
probably, a reverse split will allow them to hit that mark fairly easily.
Yes, market reaction does indicate that this PR meant virtually nothing. good call. No change in stock price.
Your memory is indeed faulty. Seth wrote an article AFTER GTEM told him to stop. Their response was silence. We have not heard from Seth since GTEM went to the pinks, MF does not bother with pink sheet stocks. Your attempt to rewrite history is full of holes.
There is no light to be seen. Your stretch to find a conspiracy here is laughable at best. Most of the info Seth used was posted on uncensored message boards by investors who have figured out how to use Google search. Of course, the simple fact that GTEM never sued Motley Fool for slander, pretty much sums up what GTEM thought of Seth's claims.
No financials, no contracts, no money, trading at about 10 cents a share...yup, you were right, I won't be showing my face around here anymore. How much you down on GTEM now? 100k?, 200k? Ouch.
if they did lend out your shares for someone to short there must have been a boat load of money made on them...
Don't worry about how the Pink Sheets designate this stock...to any real investor, simply being on the Pink Sheets is a "cross bones and a skull".
"Could this be something related to the Strat?"...possibly, but it sounds more like the Zephyr from Monday's news. Link below.
http://www.mercurynews.com/healthandscience/ci_6853539
Gary...follow this link
http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/Holdings.asp?FormType=institutional&symbol=GTEM&selected=GTEM
someone invested almost $2,000 in GTEM...that may not sound like much, but trust me, to the longs on this board it is a lot.
The Redchip link is interesting. I spoke to someone at Redchip in July and they said that a bird in hand is better than two in the bush. Connect the dots and there is your answer.
I finally agree with you Mig...the new managment has done very well...If old managment had been left in place this thing would probably have plummeted into the mid 17 cent range instead of the lofty 18-19 cent range we are very pleased to currently have. Very pleased indeed.
I think the reason he got dumped is still open to interpretation.
-----------------------------------------------------
You will only fall into a ditch if you are clumsy.
A stone will only roll back over you if you are weak.
GTEM 0.03 BY AUGUST 15TH 2007.
I am still waiting for the end of May, 2005 demo.
Who needs Bleckman when we have your solid info? You have provided excellent data from cousins and friends of uncles and maids of neighbors step-grandchildren who all apparently travel extensively throughout Mexico looking for Hotzone solutions. I applaud your diligence.
why would he need to make a phone call when he can simply read official documents?
"WHY WOULD ANYONE SPEND SO MUCH TIME AND EFFORT TO
BASH A 0.215 STOCK.."
you might want to ask yourself a slightly different version of that question..."why would a stock trade at $00.215?" the answers you uncover will be more useful to your investment portfolio.
ahhh....centerline....
GTEMs cash cow, and, if previous posts can be believed, the reason most longs invested here to begin with. I seem to recall the Strat simply being the icing on the cake. I must admit, this is not a cake I would enjoy eating.
they were an R&D company 10 years ago as ADGI. That craker can only fill your belly for so long.
I agree that the company has chosen not to file. But GTEM is not delinquent on anything and are under no obligation to file financials at all anymore. This is not a requirement of the pink sheets.
Who said anything about calling subscribers?
I think the request was simple enough...if subscribers do exist, that would be a very positive event so why not a little offical PR announcing the fact, or a blurb on the website even. Or should I rely on the 27 people who post on here that claim to speak to bleckman 3 to 4 days a week?