Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Stick with the facts.Tony never paid for control and the 250 mil shares that were mine.Nobody can show proof of payment because it never happened. If I'm lyin he can sue me now,no? IF I damaged him then why didn't he sue me then?
Did I have a problem at the time with a totally unaffiliated company where I said something on the phone and for that I pled and did a yr probation and a 2500 fine over 10 yrs ago.Ya think the timing and why I didn't sue matters?If I bring an action you can bet this stock will be gone due to the Sec being noticed in the action.Lpok around its happend many times in disputes such as this. Again nobody can prove payment for my 250 mil shares and the control stock.Dont play games with fake noise..
Leaving for a long holiday weekend, but I'll leave you with this question as it's the only one I have at this point and I will get the answer.Did the company know that Tony didn't pay me for control?I know that a certain atty said she would write the opinion letters for the stolen shares to clear,they were never cleared so why not lol?Could it be that pesky rule called proof of purchase?. Soon come..
Nobody cares what happened to the assets and $$$ that were listed in the filings prior to the company going quiet?After getting rejected by finra the company goes quiet then files zeros?Some pump site comes out saying this is a blank check company when they fought to be called a nonshell?Then they come out with filings showing no $$ and no assets or lookin like a blank check company .Yall still think they have legitimate control but then why do they act like they know they dont .We shall see tick tock lol goes the clock..
The company applied to Finra to do a reverse which I hope they get done and got turned down when they did not supply Finra with certain information. What could that information be that the company couldn't supply that would give them the corporate action they so desired?
BTC is digital gold halving coming no later then 5/24 and BTC will make new highs before halving..
Do tell me why Finra denied the reverse split application and why the company didn't produce the documents that Finra requested to approve it? I wonder if the company knew that the control shares plus my 250 mil shares were not paid for by Tony? Discovery is a bitch and I'm not talking about spaceships.
Over the years Tony promised to pay what he owed me when he sold it and I have emails not only from him In this regard. .The fact of the matter is there is a contract,down payment and no performance or proof of performance with emails saying he was gonna give it back.You see once he sold the control shares,he started the clock again.Tony screwed others in this deal that I have emails from I bet they'd have no problem being depo'd.I tried to do what I do which is negotiate..
Lawyer up, Civil theft equals treble damages and I'm owed over $100k plus interest ..I've got the dp check,the contract,emails from Tony,Dan and others.Anybody have proof of payment for the control shares, that Tony sold via a fraudulent conveyance?lol..
Ok we shall see,being the clock began anew when Tony sold what he never paid for which is civil theft,fraud and a number of other lovely issues lol...I actually hope they put the cash and assets back in for good reason lol.But if they pulled the assets out like Tony did with ES because he knew he didn't control it, Houston we have a problem lol..I'll say it again I'm the one who last had legitimate control,I sold that control to Tony who never paid for it.
..
What about the lack of financial information?Where's the $$$ and assets, that were listed in the last q filed?This could get very interesting from a legal standpoint..
What about the lack of financial information?Where's the $$$ and assets, that were listed in the last q filed?This could get very interesting,
Management I'm willing to help fix your problem.. jbdeals.357@gmail.com
"Blank check company",either this is old news or if there ever were real assets they're gone and this rag knows it.I think old news. You do know the new shell rule is going into effect,which sends shells to the expert .I am willing to still help them fix the control problem. Jbdeals.357@gmail.com
BTC is trending down so goes alts,regardless of any launch.When Btc halving is the news,so will alt crypto be the news
BTC is trending down so goes alts,regardless of any launch.
265 million shares rotflmao,if true which I highly doubt you're correct fools are born everyday.
Have you read the disclisures for UCIX? I think anyone that owns shares in CCAJ should go read them in the context of what the same group disclosed here.
Can someone point me to the filing for a change in control by any Ceo of this company that is required by Otcmarkets to stay listed on the pinks?Do we know if they paid the $4700 or are they going with the stop sign around 6/20?
In addition, to maintain Limited information status, a company must subscribe to the OTC Disclosure & News Service with an annual fee of $4,200 and a one-time set-up fee of $500
We shall see
I posted here because I reached out to the company via email and Twitter to no avail. However when they reached out to have certain people vote their shares for the reverse they had no problem talking .That in itself is interesting.We shall see whats up if and or when the delinquent filing happens
You rolled in here around the time this deal got done and only post on this board,no problem. But why does the company include the control chatter if there is no problem?Why has finra not approved the corporate action requested?Why has the company gone delinquent on unaudited financials ?The clock to a stop sign is ticking,if a stop sign happens the company has chosen to take the loss on the $300,000,rather the negotiate a solution ..
Another fact is Dinarcia never paid for control,nobody can produce a satisfaction with my name on it.The second fact is he sold control he knew he didn't have for $300,000 and kept 150 million shares he didn't pay for.Neither the 150 million shares Dinarcia kept or the 100 million he sold to the new guys has been freed up and can't be because there is no proof of payment to me.
I have reached out to Dinarcia since I found out Dinarcia sold it,no reply back.I reached out to the company not wanting to cause an issue with the stock by disclosing the situation to the sec,finra and otcmarkets in a lawsuit,but so far no reply back.Im kinda surprised I've not heard back being it seems these guys had an issue like this with an acquisition just prior to them buying Coastal and that one was a total loss to them not long after buying it.
The fact is Finra did not approve the rs,why?The company said Finra asked for more information
from the company what couldn't they give to Finra? Another fact is Dinarcia did not pay for the control block,so there is no satisfaction for the note that bought the control block.The company thought they took control over a year ago,so why is it an excuse to not file on time now?Why did Dinarcia pull Earth Surfaces out right away after he knew he was gonna not pay the note?Finra checks everything including control as part of thier dd prior to approving corporate actions another fact.These are facts that add up to the reason why a corporate action was denied imo.Yall can have your own opinion lol,but mine is based on fact not just observations..
How did you get screwed?Did you put up any capital?No.So do tell how you got screwed?
It should be in the filings.But the fact remains the company disclosed there is a control issue in its late filing notice,its obvious from the filings who had rightful and legitimate control prior to this control issue
It should be in the filings.But the fact remains the company disclosed there is a control issue in its late filing notice,its obvious from the filings who had rightful and legitimate control prior to this control issue
I await the company's response to my email that they asked for on their very first post on this thread..
Think about what you said,the company just found this out when they tried to get a corporate action through the Finra. The Finra doesn't rubber stamp corporate actions like they used to they do the due diligence..
Appreciate the considerate thoughts,you do have a diplomatic way with words.So with that said I'm not going to discuss on this forum what I'm looking for or how I plan to handle this, other then to say that the clock on the statute of limitations began again when Dinarcia
sold the company and I found out about it .I was the Ceo that took over the company said I would negotiate the debt with Cornell
Capital and get it paid albeit I didn't cause or benefit from said debt when it was incurred.But I did make a deal, raised the Capital and paid the debt to Cornell when I said I would. I was also the Ceo that had a shareholder meeting/ bbq at my house and invited all shareholders in this company to attend. I was also the last person who had legal,rightful control of the company, the new guys don't ,Dinarcia didn't because he defaulted on said note.Im willing to be part of the solution, the second part of this phrase I'll withhold for now.
The word "if" is na here, I did.As you know I had a legal problem the same year this happened. Dinarcia heard about it called me up asking me if I was OK and told me when he sells the shell he would pay the note and told me that a few times over the years.I certainly am considering litigation and do have counsel.But the reality is if I bring an action ccaj will get the skull and cross for the control issue and by the time its settled we will be on the expert market system which is ng for anyone.
Dinarcia knew his consultant Barry for over 15 yrs and screwed him out of money Barry lent Dinarcia .Barry also had a good deal for ccaj and Dinarcia walked away from that because these guys offered $300,000 Dinarcias biggest payday of his thieving life. I mean you don't go bk twice without screwing people..
Maybe your reading comprehension skills are off a little,I never said I invested $100 mil,that figure was shares.Nothing I said was bs,it's all factual being this could go legal and trust me when i say shareholders don't want a control issue litigated the sec,the finra and otcmarkets have big problems with control issues especially when they're cut and dry.The blame lays solely on the guy that has not paid many people all through his life and played victim all the while.
Also you poo poo'd the 25 mil shares bought in the open market by the chairman, that's more shares then you own I'm sure and he spent over $25,000 for his shares that he cannot sell like you can but is going to be reversed like all of us
That's a simple answer. The new guys raised millions of dollars from their own investors and that was paid in capital to them.Not one dollar of any share that is bought in the open market goes to the company as paid in capital So to protect those investors they tried to do a minimal restructuring 1 for 10 and don't forget that includes the chairman of the boards 25 mil shares bought in the open market
I sold Dinarcia 250 million shares and the control block.He put down $7000 gave me a personally signed note for $107,000 and he never made a payment.He tried for yrs to sell this and told me he would pay me when he did.Well when I heard he sold it for $300,000 I wondered how with the control issue called counsel who told me the statute of limitations clock began again when the fraud was discovered.
Why would the chairman of the board buy over 25 million common in the open market if he knew they didn't have control?The answer is he wouldn't..This is why I believe these guys were victimized by Dinarcia like Darrell was,Tracy was,I was etc etc etc
I wrote the company like they asked me to and being I believe they are a victiim as well of Dinarcia, I want to work something out with them that gives them control and that works for all shareholders.I expect them to huddle with counsel as I have once I found out Dinarcia sold this and wouldn't take my calls.
No sir it was raised from a group in Atlanta all of it..
I'm of the opinion that these guys are victims not crooks and that Dinarcia never told these guys about the control issue he wanted the money.He actually told them that Brenda would write the opinion for the 100 mil he stole from me and sold to them which was to get the $$ no opinion was written nor could it be without proof of payment.
Who is this certain investor?
What about that phony
$75,000 note Dinarcia conjured up with no proof of expenditures?Let's not forget Ez2 had a toxic deal with Cornell Capital that yours truly signed personally for, negotiated and paid with real capital expenditures.The difference between my personally signed note to Cornell Capital and Dinarcias personally signed note to me is I paid he didn't he led me on and lied I have the emails from Dinarcia ,Dan and the good guy in the deal Barry..