Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I was referring to a discussion between Ruud and Jeunke where it seemed that Ruud is of the opinion that 6/30 the final decisions on which companies are taken up in the Russell index will be announced. However from what I know is that these decisions are taken much earlier in order to make sure index funds can adjust their holdings.
I hope I made myself clear now.
Wake up guys (Ruud) that is not very probable.
Market cap is not the only measurement. E.g. debt, progress, innovation etc are also part of decision making in whether or not a company will be kicked out of an index. What is more interesting though is whether or not an SP increase will force the MM’s to also cover the naked shorts. So if the longs and institutions can make sure the SP drop will be halted till where we are now, it very well might turn in the opposite direction, however the best remedy is a deal. And as far as I know final decisions on whether to change the companies in the index will be taken not at the last day, otherwise index funds cannot act timely. JMO
Hi H, laat m ff w8, ik ben nog niet klaar, doe er 5-10k per x. Bewust ned taal tegen de muppets hier
Don’t do that mate as I expect JM to hold up the news of the Tier -1 till 3.51pm that day😜
Don’t do that mate as I expect JM to hold up the news of the Tier -1 till 3.51pm that day😜
Could it be that interested parties in LWLG are in war mode to suppress the share price to benefit?
LWLG!?
The tier 1’s have a number of engineers but not all of them are qualified for this type of work. So they have limited resources and that makes that things take longer. At LWLG they all are100% dedicated and of high knowledge in this field. Clearly the tier 1 ‘s are different from ours. That is not a big deal as in the end they will have tested everything but it takes longer than expected. Maybe the fact that we now have a foundry deal, they will try to speed up things at the end of the tier 1’s (note multiple!)
KCC, let them talk as they have no clue, do not waste your time answering them. As I told you and J yesterday after the lab tour and after talking to all the engineers, they are world class and you have seen with your own eyes what they have accomplished. Wafer 2-2, giving 40k minimum at a price of 280, margin 85-90%. I give these numbers and only the ones on the tour know what I mean and only we know how much money that represents. I had a good sleep in the Hilton and overall satisfied with yesterday. Maybe our expectations were too high for the ASM, in terms of new contracts.
One take away for the longs who could not join the lab tour. When I asked one of the team members why the tier 1’s seem not be interested, one of them replied: sir, we are working with them at this very moment. One of the rooms you just visited is actually getting results for them. The major issue is that the tier 1’s have a shortage of engineers and they do not work 60 hours a week. That makes that things take longer than we anticipated……
Imagine banks on stand by, so no further dilution, what would you think now if you were short LWLG?? Not to mention what ML said in Belgium: sure the stock price has our attention and the only thing I have to do is concluding deals and there goes all my attention at the moment, to the Tier 1’s, after that the share price takes care of itself… or something like that!
If I can be your Dutch friend😉, since there were many Dutch investors as well, then you will recall his answer to my question for sure. When I asked whether the products were ready and if any issues were outstanding, he clearly said that everything was ready (stability, scaling etc) and the time line was fully intact and there were no changes to that. Tier 1’s are very interested and the number of them significantly increased after OFC demo’s. Well that is the advantage to go out and talk to the ones who know best. In this case the representatives from LWLG. Not just the words but the slides, the body talk, the glinstering in their eyes, that makes me feel more confident then ever. O yeah I am still nibbling day after day thanks to the shorts.
He just finished. Important take away we are working with multiple tier ones, tripled since a few weeks after OFC , wow we are golden. He showed a slide of the “ eyes” will be on the site as well. This was a real promising speech! Reliability is NOT an issue! Look at the eyes!
Do not agree, all orders filled, but all small quantities 100-500 per trade. X told me a while ago do it in small portions and that works better than 5,000-10,000 per trade. So if you want to accumulate do it in small quantities. 2 out of 4 filled today already, oh and they won’t come back until we hit $100 a share.
You must be joking, this should be 210+4= 215….
A small order just filled, how are we on the sell/buy side. I expect some 15k more sells than buys, correct? Might throw in another order when the numbers suit me.
Lew, have you considered that companies like LWLG are valued 5-20 times sales? So whether or not you have a loss per share that doesn’t matter as this will be valued in another way. And yes from 2030E onwards. Oops these are big numbers. And yes I do know what I am talking about, as I was office managing partner (CPA) as well at the Big-4, (Amsterdam-Netherlands) like Walter was, so he might confirm my view, and yes I have audited blue chips in this type of industry, even one that is mentioned here regularly. And thank you for your hard work and valuable contributions
Wow that is a lot of wash trading! And they still believe we are stupid?
Haha you did better then I did, right at the opening at $ 800 they were gone never thought they opened this high this morning. Anyway bought at $ 420 end October so a very nice profit, and have the possibility to buy some more LWLG as it approaches an acceptable PPS. How are the shorts doing, digging deeper?
Haha you did better then I did, right at the opening at $ 800 they were gone never thought they opened this high this morning. Anyway bought at $ 420 end October so a very nice profit, and have the possibility to buy some more LWLG as it approaches an acceptable PPS. How are the shorts doing, digging deeper?
I disagree with you as in the MD&A part of the FS there is a possibility for forward looking information. This section provides management’s analysis of the financial statements, highlighting trends, challenges, and strategies(!)
I would expect some forward looking statements as to where we are at the moment in light of what was written in the 12/4 letter. At least there has to be some follow up on that as this is the way to make public announcements.
Well at least next week we will know what is going on and whether or not the BOD was overoptimistic back in December and if they are still trustworthy. For me personally their credibility is at stake when we get a PR on the 10K’s that brings no news, as the opposite in my view was announced. I believe till then we have to accept that the PPS will stay under pressure as the shorts use this momentum. I am curious how many shares they threw down today to bring it to where we are now at $4.25 (you probably have the details, if not provided already). Anyway as my average is very low, I hold my position for the coming years, but I hope the BOD delivers as promised in December as otherwise it will be difficult to take them on their word, which for a listed company is not desirable.
Any info on shorts vs buy/sell in light of the enormous drop in shareprice?
In other words does your theory still holds ?
Voor wat het waard is, maar je lijkt wat bevestiging te zoeken voor je investering. Ik ken vele Vlamingen en Nederlanders, die gezamenlijk miljoenen aandelen bezitten en niet verkopen voorlopig. Velen zijn al jaren aandeelhouders en hebben vooral gekocht onder de $1, toen er nog geen Nasdaq listing was. Wat een goede prijs is zal blijken als de BOD omzetverwachtingen publiceert. Tot die tijd wachten we rustig af. ML heeft het over Ubiquitous ofwel alomvattend vertegenwoordigd/aanwezig. Als je daar vertrouwen in stelt zoals velen die ik ken, dan is het slechts een kwestie van tijd. Vergeet niet dat ML een paar jaar geleden zei dat 2024 het jaar van de ramp up wordt, dus laten we daar dan maar op vertrouwen. Een CEO van een beurs genoteerde onderneming, is gebonden aan strenge regels en zegt niet zomaar iets. Aansprakelijkheid in de US is niet misselijk. O ja en zet al die paniekzaaiers en onzin verkondigers op ignore, ze voegen niets toe! Ik denk dat jezelf prima kunt filteren, maar een aantal posters heb je wel iets aan. X, KCCO, Walter, Jeunke, Steve Schiets etc. Helaas zijn ook een aantal techneuten met verstand van zaken vertrokken van Ihub omdat ze geen zin meer hebben in alle nonsense van zoals andere het noemen de “ paid clowns en bashers”.
Finally they started to provide cheap shares again, around this time. So benefit from their generosity.
Any details on the buys vs sells at the moment? Shorts digging deeper or quietly returning? As said before highly valuable info . Tia
Look at the calculations X has been providing us with. This would lead to a PPS of $225 only when shorts try to cover. Imagine what happens when news hits the wire. Besides we have a perfect example in GME how this might unfold. At least most European shareholders I know will not sell below $100, most of us have average prices below $1.
I have fives on the meter here in Aruba????? And I don’t mean the temperature.
X, I like this info so much you know and how exciting is it when they throw down so many shares to keep the price down. This is going to be even better then the movie Dumb Money. Do follow the long calls out of the money, that is how someone said they try to keep their losses to a minimum extent possible. Do hope longs are not selling those long calls for cheap (e.g.$ 0.10 or so) when there is a major chance this will hit $100 once the shorts are forced to cover. They might simply miss out on $85 looking at the call Jan 25 @ $15. Hope every long understands that. But please keep sharing these number, although the shorters don’t like you. Cheers S
X, can you explain once more please. Volume 135k momentarily and price up 8 cents, does that mean we have 8k more buys then sells out of the 135k volume?
I thought the dark pool was for professional institutions to trade shares at large quantities, without influencing the PPS. When this pool is used for manipulating the PPS, I assume that is illegal, even under US law. However I am not convinced the rules in the US are being maintained to have a level playing field for all investors. But, you know I am Dutch and shorting is not possible here. I saw the movie Dumb Money on GME and it still puzzles me that the DOJ and SEC simply decided not to go after the market manipulators or as Jeunke last said, when they make billions through illegal practices and you only fine them a couple of million dollars, these practices will never stop!
Has anyone ever thought of the idea to keep the PPS in the $4-6 range to make longs sell once it hits $10? So that institutions can acquire more shares, knowing the PPS will have the potential to go much higher, and make use of the impatience of many longs as demonstrated here?
How can I ignore the reply’s to TP and other posters I am not interested in?
Don’t you think the remarks made by ML were to encourage the shareholders to not sell for tax reasons before YE as he expects this will financially hurt them, from what he expects will happen in the next couple of weeks? Although I am not a US tax payer it still puzzles me why an individual is willing to take such a risk, and not wait and keep those shares for a while.
X, small question. At Interactive Brokers (IB) at the beginning of the trading day there were almost 400k shares available for shorting. After 30 minutes trading there is not one single share available any longer. What does this tell us from your perspective?
X, you know I am always interested in your opinion. But why would you explain this Bernabeu person the logic behind it. If he would have done some research, he would have found GME and what happened to the SP when shorts tried to cover. LWLG is financially in a much better situation than GME was. So I do not understand why you take a factor of 10 off from your SP calculation, I believe it will be worse than your math, as there will be short covering, but also forced purchases due to margin calls, fomo and accumulation by institutions.
F2, I cannot agree more, but what I really meant to say is that the ones with the unlimited pockets dictate the share price for the time being.
F2, I cannot agree more, but what I really meant to say is that the ones with the unlimited pockets dictate the share price for the time being.
The boyz will not let that happen
Ruud if you continue piling up like this you can buy the golf course, rather then rent it for the LWLG tournament