Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Why the big up volume Monday and nice volume yesterday and down? Sunday a story came out from Stock News.com., StockNews.com Initiates Coverage on RiceBran Technologies and a couple of sites pread the news on Twitter.
https://www.americanbankingnews.com/2023/08/06/stocknews-com-initiates-coverage-on-ricebran-technologies-nasdaqribt.html
But, it initiated a "sell"
But then it listed new institutional trading>>>
A number of institutional investors and hedge funds have recently modified their holdings of RIBT. UBS Group AG increased its position in shares of RiceBran Technologies by 1,828.1% during the second quarter. UBS Group AG now owns 38,561 shares of the company’s stock valued at $26,000 after acquiring an additional 36,561 shares during the last quarter. Virtu Financial LLC bought a new position in RiceBran Technologies during the fourth quarter valued at $32,000. LPL Financial LLC bought a new position in shares of RiceBran Technologies in the fourth quarter worth $43,000. Jane Street Group LLC boosted its holdings in shares of RiceBran Technologies by 112.9% in the second quarter. Jane Street Group LLC now owns 69,811 shares of the company’s stock worth $47,000 after acquiring an additional 37,014 shares during the period. Finally, State Street Corp bought a new position in shares of RiceBran Technologies in the first quarter worth $69,000. 3.37% of the stock is owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.
But all of that was BS old news. All the institutions have sold since the Q4 report. One little new one now holds and that is only 376 shares, lol.
https://fintel.io/so/us/ribt
My guess, is the story created a bunch of buying Monday and yesterday some of them sold. So, a net neutral.
How AI Is Breathing New Life Into Oil And Gas Operations
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/How-AI-Is-Breathing-New-Life-Into-Oil-And-Gas-Operations.html
Snippet:
AI is projected to significantly grow in the oil and gas sector between 2022 and 2027, with 92% of companies planning investments.
Leading energy companies, including Shell, BP, and ExxonMobil, are pioneering AI applications, enhancing everything from drilling processes to safety measures.
Despite the transformative potential of AI, its adoption in the energy sector lags behind its pace of development in other industries.
Scheffler
Hovland
Tom Kim
Si Woo Kim
Grillo
Im
An
Poston
Young
Matsuyama
Thanks for your work Eli's
URA, Global Uranium ETF is the way to go?
US Certifies First Small Modular Nuclear Reactor Design --- site wants my email
URA chart
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=URA&p=D&yr=5&mn=0&dy=0&id=p47054114064
Speaking of China and coal, where is Gretta when you need her?
https://ifunny.co/picture/the-last-thing-you-see-before-being-hunted-for-sport-GCGmeATDA
I did reply to a recent post to you asking "I am not an expert on nuclear, but some countries expanding it, your thoughts on nuclear santefe?" Those Advanced Small Modular Reactors do sound possible.
So you agree it might be the future, in smaller reactors?>>>>>
Your post>>>
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172363853
My reply>>>>
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172364658
Got any good small reactor stocks to buy?
$RIBT So far today, this is the first day in a while that the trading and volume makes me think either someone knows something good is coming, or THINKS they know something.
EVS ON A COLLISION COURSE WITH REALITY
Just food food for thought, not saying I agree or not, but future technology not factored in, nor the possibility of reduced population in the future?
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2023/08/evs-on-a-collision-course-with-reality.php
The alleged transition to “green” energy is destined to crash and burn. A modern society can’t meet its needs for electricity with wind and solar sources that produce nothing a large majority of the time, supplemented by wholly notional “batteries.” The race to disaster is being accelerated by government-mandated use of electric vehicles, which will put impossible burdens on an already-inadequate grid. So it becomes a question of where the “green” dream will break down first.
EVs may turn out to be the green Waterloo. Numerous jurisdictions around the world have purported to ban gasoline-powered vehicles by some date in the not-far-off future, a dictate that cannot and will not be met. Rather than flying off dealers’ car lots, EVs are accumulating there in growing numbers. At Heartland, Ronald Stein explains some of the reasons why. Stein itemizes the numerous factors that cause buyers to be wary of EVs, and adds this:
Another problem for the automobile industry is convincing the buyers that its ethical, moral, and socially responsible to buy an EV, especially since most of the exotic mineral and metal supplies to build the batteries are being mined in developing countries with limited environmental regulation nor labor regulations.
EVs are terrible for the environment, and their supply chains raise serious moral issues. But probably most consumers have more personal concerns:
The problem is that manufacturers are loading up the “supply chain” with EV’s on dealer lots, but they’re not seeing the “demand” for EV’s coming from the public. The current EV ownership profiles of the elite owners are that they are:
* highly educated.
* highly compensated.
* multi-car families.
* low mileage requirements for the families’ second car, i.e., the EV.
Current EV owners are dramatically different from most of the vehicle owners.
Something else that I hadn’t previously focused on is the used car market, which is vast:
Historically, internal combustion engine (ICE) car sales in America are upwards of 55 million annually with about 15 million or 27 percent being new and 40 million or 73 percent being used car sales.
That is astonishing! 73% of auto sales are used cars. And yet:
To date, the EV industry has virtually no used car market! In addition to the constant EV charging challenges, who wants a used EV that may soon need an expensive battery replacement?
With about 73 percent of all car sales being that of used combustion engine cars, the lack of a resale market for EV’s may be a major problem for the auto industry.
Another thing that is different about EV drivers is that they largely–40% of them–live in California:
Since most states lack the year-round temperate climate that Californians enjoy, the distribution of EV ownership throughout the nation should be a concern to the auto industry. With 40 percent of the EV’s in America being in California, that leaves the other 60 percent being among the other 49 States, or approximately 1+ percent per State.
So, how does California supply the electricity to charge all of those EVs?
1. To support the State’s EV growth, California imports more electricity than any other US state, more than twice the amount of Virginia, the second largest importer of electricity. California typically receives between one-fifth and one-third of its electricity supply from outside of the state.
2. The other 49 states have virtually non-existent EV charging infrastructures, and a few of them may be exporting their electricity to California!
So where does the electricity come from if all 50 states are requiring use of EVs?
There is no place on Earth–not even a demonstration project, not even a village–where energy needs are met entirely through “green” sources. This is not coincidental. The U.K. is ahead of the U.S. in trying to drive usage of EVs, so their experience is revealing:
With the supply of electricity not keeping abreast of the growing demand, the UK is ahead of most of the world, protecting its grid with Smart Chargers, and setting up Separate Meters for the EV charging users to pay for a new grid!
* As of May 30, 2022, in the UK, new home and workplace chargers being installed must be “smart chargers” connected to the internet and able to employ pre-sets limiting their ability to function from 8 am to 11 am and 4 pm to 10 pm.
* In addition to the nine hours a day of downtime, authorities will be able to impose a “randomized delay” of 30 minutes on individual chargers in certain areas to prevent grid spikes at other times.
* The UK Electric Vehicles (Smart Charge Points) Regulations 2021 came into force on June 30, 2022. All home installed electric vehicle chargers are required to be separately metered and send information to the Smart meter data communications network. Potentially this legislation allows the electricity used for charging EVs to be charged and taxed at a higher rate than domestic electricity. The technology enacted also enables the rationing of electricity for EV charging because the government can decide when and if an EV can be charged, plus it also allows the EV battery to be drained into the grid if required.
Will any of this be acceptable to freedom-loving Americans? Well, after the covid shutdowns, maybe Americans aren’t as freedom-loving as we thought. Too, we already have “smart meters” for electricity in many American homes. How are they smart? Much like the “smart chargers” for EVs in the U.K., they allow the utility to control your thermostat to reduce demand for electricity.
It is impossible to overstate the damage that has been done, and will be done, by the crazed drive toward “green” energy that has gripped Western elites.
I thought they'd have more foreign tourneys.
Raising the bid most of the morning to entice sellers.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/NASDAQ/ricebran-technologies-RIBT/trades?_ga=2.256236424.2012683222.1554897425-334505475.1554897425
What gets me is the powers that be think thy have to trick us, lie to us, put up a fake President and VP and this WOKE stuff is just pain off the charts. If they really are the smartest people in word history, why can't that come up with a one world order plan that most will want. Why put us through all this chit to be manipulating into wanting it? Once they are in power, they can do the same thing, reduce population, crime etc. the same way they already have planned. As it is going, they are not the smartest people, but they are proving to be the most evil people in world history. They keep saying :For the greater good", that should no be to destroy lives to get there.
MLEC, yes government promoting plants and less meat has a big influence on the future. Mercola tries to even tie in less animals to pandemics. I would not post this at Dew's board as Mercola is an enemy of the left and his board leans that way a bit. Still not in MLEC
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/08/02/report-predicts-next-pandemic-from-meat.aspx?ui=cb65499db52abec6a9a590992872244905bf545afdb5f24bd660a43f2e592f19&sd=20150424&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20230802&foDate=false&mid=DM1443942&rid=1872267089
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The idea that pathogens will jump species and kill humans is a useful scare tactic, and it’s now being pushed like never before under One Health — a global agenda that will allow unelected bureaucrats at the World Health Organization to centralize power and make decisions relating to diet, agriculture and livestock farming, environmental pollution, movement of populations, health care and much more, for the entire world
A report from Harvard Law School and New York University predicts the next pandemic is likely to emerge from the U.S. meat supply — or the fur trade, or a petting zoo, or from pets. It reviews all the different areas of life and commerce that involve animal and human contact and the subsequent hypothetical zoonotic transmission chains. One Health documents are repeatedly referenced in this report
Incontrovertible evidence has emerged showing that the scientists who wrote “Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” intentionally misled the public. In “Proximal Origin,” the authors insisted natural evolution was the most likely scenario, but in private, they thought a lab leak was the most likely origin
Correspondence shows the conspiracy to misdirect the public was driven by obedience to higher-ups within the U.S. and UK governments, including, potentially, the intelligence community
Based on the evidence now in the public domain showing that the authors of “Proximal Origin” did not believe their published conclusions, Biosafety Now! has launched a petition calling on Nature Medicine to retract the paper
24K buy and 10K sell. and the stock closes down. There has been some "interesting" trading lately . One a couple of weeks ago and on last week, In both the sell volume was 10 time the buy. But, the stock rose both days, with thanks to the bid being raised by someone wanting to buy. I believe somone or group with a lot of money is quietly buying RIBT stock. I hope whatever the reason that he/they are right.
12 of the top 15 ETF's today were Chinese>>>>
Why? No story.
https://www.barchart.com/stocks/performance/percent-change/advances?screener=unleveraged_etf&orderBy=percentChange&orderDir=desc
12 of the top 15 ETF's today were Chinese>>>>
Why? No story.
https://www.barchart.com/stocks/performance/percent-change/advances?screener=unleveraged_etf&orderBy=percentChange&orderDir=desc
STKH, Nice move, and that is the kind of move that would get me into MLEC, hopefully the first day move.>>>>>
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=STKH&p=D&yr=0&mn=8&dy=0&id=p79999531196
OT, iHub has relaxed some of it's rules. Where they limited you to one post at the one board, it the past they probably have made it "paid". The dull market has hurt them and other sites that do stocks maybe hurts them too. I can't mention which, they don't like other sites mentioned. I hope they hang on, I got here in like 2006 and have logged a lot of hours here since then.
I agree with most of what you said. The wild card is we a losing our country to the same people who love vaccines, GMO's, and are concerned with so called global warming. Part of their plan is getting rid of meat. MLEC could get a surprising amount of action and financial support and better press as the Deep State grabs more power. I am just watching now. But any new deal and it could get me in for a long term hold.
Every stock I sold a month ago got wacked today. You mentioned LAND, CDE really went red
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=CDE&p=D&yr=0&mn=8&dy=0&id=p96247580590
$MLEC gfp, I am still watching MLEC. Once the insiders are done selling and a new product PR and this stock could rocket.. The powers that be will be behind this same as with EV's and A.I, and that is the investing place to be? Doubt this happens like tomorrow, however.
Ankle injury forces Tom Kim out of Wyndham Championship title defence
https://sports.yahoo.com/ankle-injury-forces-tom-kim-174513191.html
South Korean Tom Kim won't defend his title at the US PGA Tour Wyndham Championship next week as he recovers from the ankle injury he played through on the way to a runner-up finish at the British Open.
Kim, 21, used a cast along with ice therapy and other treatment to make it through the Open Championship at Hoylake last week after injuring his ankle when he slipped at his rental house after the first round.
After deciding not to withdraw, Kim shot three straight rounds in the 60s to tie for second with Jason Day, Jon Rahm and Sepp Straka behind runaway winner Brian Harman.
"I am very gutted to not be able to defend my first PGA TOUR win," Kim said in a statement released by Wyndham organizers on Wednesday.
"I am still having a hard time with my ankle so I am getting the treatment I need to heal completely."
Kim produced a stunning nine-under par 61 in the final round to earn his first PGA Tour title at Sedgefield Country Club last year.
He went on to win a second title at the Shriners Children's Open, becoming the first player since Tiger Woods to win twice on tour before turning 21.
He also starred for the International Team at last year's Presidents Cup.
Tom Kim has that strong "Tiger Woods" desire to win. I just noticed the other day that he is only 21and has 2 PGA wins under his belt and 4 international wins already. Tiger got his first PGA win at 21, Kim last year at age 21. Scheffler did not win his first until he was 24.
https://www.pgatour.com/player/55182/tom-kim
Thanks everyone for the "Congrats". I heard a poker player say that to win a big tourney, one needs to be good, but very very very lucky too. Well, I was just lucky. I was trying to beat the LIV stars and everyone one of them laid turds, the only way I could win with my picks. My original thought was to play the top 4 LIV's with McIlroy. So I won by trying not to win?
I guess the last 5 days trading was market maker hanky panky. Shake out some chickens an buy stock lower. Just guessing and hoping for the best.
I guess I had it upside down, it seems Tree did the impossible.
Yup, Eli's even made a illustrated graph of it.
I will never forget the Tree YOYO where you were near last the first day, the lead the 2nd day, then near the bottom day 3.
26th place after round 3 and I win? wow_happened. That has got to be like a hole in one on a par 4. I watched the last 2 hours and had no idea I was in contention. I did not see this til this morning. More fun to win from behind than have the lead after round 3 like I did another one this year, then finished 2nd. I guess I used up all my good luck for a few years now. You are overdue Tree, you are next to get lucky.
jbog, so many large mammals that only eat plants can live as long as us humans, w/o GMO's cultured food, etc. An article below, is true says men live 10 years longer on a vegetarian diet than meat eaters and women 6 years longer. It does not take much imagine that vegetarian's probably do other good things associated with living longer, such as no smoking, alcohol, drugs, exercise and weight control. Animals we eat consume a lot more grains than we do to grow up. So, I am making a case to quit eating meat. IMO, meat replacements with added whatever's' is more about who controls the food system, than our health.
Can eating a vegetarian diet really help you live longer?
https://www.sanitarium.com/au/health-nutrition/vegetarian-eating/eating-a-vegetarian-diet-can-help-you-live-longer
Who controls most food now>>>>>
This Infographic Shows How Only 10 Companies Own All The World’s Food Brands
https://www.good.is/Business/food-brands-owners-rp
Dew did respond to me at his board, not very positive. I forgot I posted it there last year. Looks worse this year
Key negative: insiders are cashing out now that the post-SPAC lockup period has expired
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172397896
Thanks for the follow-up post on MLEC. For investors, there are two big financial problems and (IMO) one business-model problem.
The financial problems are: 1) the company is currently being funded via a $50M ATM (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/moolec-science-secures-50-million-025500400.html ); and 2) insiders are cashing out now that the post-SPAC lockup period has expired (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1937737/000121390023057495/ea181693-424b3_moolecsci.htm ).
The business-model problem is as I posted in #msg-168998634.
p.s. MLEC’s corporate slide deck (which was used for promoting the SPAC merger) is at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1825437/000121390022067259/ea167761-425_lightjumpacq.htm .
LOL, I had forgotten I had posted on it previously. My fear is that with the plant based burger dudes, Impossible and BYND failing miserably that not many will invest in this offshoot.
Nice info about the cashing out.
I am waiting on the little pill coming out that the Star Trek crew ate for a meal.
I have not bought yet. Two days ago I was going to buy it was falling a the time, so held back. I feel the meatless meat failure with Impossible and BYND that this Moo Poo stuff might be a harder sell? And speculators less likely to put it up?
My initial post I mentioned we don't need meat. Many plants have a lot of protein. My problem is grains, being I am type 2 diabetic. Other fruit and veggies have a lot of protein/
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/protein-for-vegans-vegetarians#chia-seeds
Moolec is a nice play on pertinent words. " Molecular", Moo Lec, then
Piggy Sooy', combining animals and plants, is what they do. Yahoo fits "calling somebody", I don't know what a Google is, lol. These Moolec guys are clever.
We used to think Google and Yahoo were odd?
MLEC is a start up.
Dew , you understand the science much better than I do. It makes sense to me that man does not need to eat meat to survive. Some of the biggest mammals don't eat meat, Elephants, Hippos, Rinos, Bison, and Sperm Whales to name a few. If Moolec can enhance other foods like soy, peas, tomatoes, apples, etc that have already been improved with just cross breeding, who knows.
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/MLEC/?p=MLEC
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=MLEC&p=D&yr=0&mn=4&dy=0&id=p51062414880
About Moolec Science SA
Moolec Science is a science-based food ingredient company focused on producing animal proteins in plants through Molecular Farming, a disruptive technology in the alternative protein landscape. Its purpose is to upgrade the taste, nutrition, and affordability of alternative protein products while building a more sustainable and equitable food system. The company's technological approach aims to have the cost structure of plant-based solutions with the organoleptic properties and functionality of animal-based ones. Moolec Science's technology has been under development for more than a decade and is known for pioneering the production of a bovine protein in a crop for the food industry. The company's product portfolio and pipeline leverages the agronomic efficiency of broadly used target crops, like soybeans and peas and Moolec Science has a growing international patent portfolio (23, both granted and pending) for its Molecular Farming technology. The company is run by a diverse team of Ph.Ds and Food Insiders, and operates in the United States, Europe, and South America. For more information, visit www.moolecscience.com.
The father of one of the Phd cofounders (Henk Hoogankamp Jr)., is Henk Hoogenkamp Sr. , a pioneer in plant protein, not involved, so he says, lol.
https://henkhoogenkamp.com/Articles
gfp, It makes sense to me that man does not need to eat meat to survive. the biggest mammals don't eat meat, Elephants, Hippos, Rinos, Bison, and Sperm Whales to name a few. My problem is I don't believe in GMO's. But if Moolec can enhance other foods like tomatoes, apples, etc that have ben improve with just cross breeding, who knows. I will post at Dew's board.
I have NOT bought yet. Yesterday scared me a bit on the timing. I won't buy much until the RIBT divesture is done. I emailed "Dad" and he thought I was looking for advice and said he was too involved to say anything, lol. I got to know "Dad" through RIBT. A while back he was on their Board.
Rory
Clark
Burns
Homa
Tom Kim
272
alternate Koepka
I know, a bit long shotish, I get a bit of "Tree" in me every once in a while. We both have played a lot of dog racing in our pasts. Favorites don't win as often as in horse racing.
MLEC is a start up. One of the co founders is Henk Hoogankamp Jr. His father, Henk Hoogankamp is like one of the fathers of plant protein. I have communicated with Henk Sr. for a few years, so I have a little emotional interest, so I may buy a token starter. The chart is of interest.
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/MLEC/?p=MLEC
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=MLEC&p=D&yr=0&mn=4&dy=0&id=p51062414880
About Moolec Science SA
Moolec Science is a science-based food ingredient company focused on producing animal proteins in plants through Molecular Farming, a disruptive technology in the alternative protein landscape. Its purpose is to upgrade the taste, nutrition, and affordability of alternative protein products while building a more sustainable and equitable food system. The company's technological approach aims to have the cost structure of plant-based solutions with the organoleptic properties and functionality of animal-based ones. Moolec Science's technology has been under development for more than a decade and is known for pioneering the production of a bovine protein in a crop for the food industry. The company's product portfolio and pipeline leverages the agronomic efficiency of broadly used target crops, like soybeans and peas and Moolec Science has a growing international patent portfolio (23, both granted and pending) for its Molecular Farming technology. The company is run by a diverse team of Ph.Ds and Food Insiders, and operates in the United States, Europe, and South America. For more information, visit www.moolecscience.com.
The father, not involved directly involved(maybe, LOL)>>>
https://henkhoogenkamp.com/Articles
MLEC is a start up. One of the co founders is Henk Hoogankamp Jr. His father, Henk Hoogankamp is like one of the fathers of plant protein. I have communicated with Henk Sr. for a few years, so I have a little emotional interest, so I may buy a token starter. The chart is of interest.
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/MLEC/?p=MLEC
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=MLEC&p=D&yr=0&mn=4&dy=0&id=p51062414880
About Moolec Science SA
Moolec Science is a science-based food ingredient company focused on producing animal proteins in plants through Molecular Farming, a disruptive technology in the alternative protein landscape. Its purpose is to upgrade the taste, nutrition, and affordability of alternative protein products while building a more sustainable and equitable food system. The company's technological approach aims to have the cost structure of plant-based solutions with the organoleptic properties and functionality of animal-based ones. Moolec Science's technology has been under development for more than a decade and is known for pioneering the production of a bovine protein in a crop for the food industry. The company's product portfolio and pipeline leverages the agronomic efficiency of broadly used target crops, like soybeans and peas and Moolec Science has a growing international patent portfolio (23, both granted and pending) for its Molecular Farming technology. The company is run by a diverse team of Ph.Ds and Food Insiders, and operates in the United States, Europe, and South America. For more information, visit www.moolecscience.com.
The father, not involved directly involved(maybe, LOL)>>>
https://henkhoogenkamp.com/Articles
Chernobyl was 37 years ago. Three mile Island exaggerated and we learned from it. Fukushima was built way to close to the ocean and should never have been built there and we learned from it. Oil and Coal interests had to support the negative news from the accidents.