If it is one of us thats still good news, as long as its 'one of us' and not a momo player.

You are corrected.

I am now a MWM fan. Best post in like a week.

In a word, yes. Happens all the time in pinky land.

That too. A measly 1% of some of the warchests would have huge impact

Recent announcement that IMF will sell gold, happened in 1980 as well when gold was skyrocketing, trying to take some of the heat off this thing, I dont think it will matter

Or that =)

Not supermodels, but shoeshine boys and cabby's.

Supermodels can afford good advice, its when the average Joe is singing gold and silvers praises that its time to get out.

I dont think its wasted lookers, we have enough going right now to show people. From the consumer side of the house, when it gets good enough (movie and content selection) people will refer others. Its all seeds being sown.

What I wish the company did was provide a way for us to refer people on every single webpage, and have a referral button right on the stinking app itself that asks for the email of a friend and sends them an email with reelcash

Just curious, but is anyone aware of any big IPOs or buyouts in the internet/tech space where they grew a subscriber base through traditional advertising prior to buyout or IPO (applications, not hardware or networking)?

Seems to me most all advertising that is done, is AFTER there has been an IPO or buyout, and the subscribers were all generated virally or on the net prior to the big deal.

Anyone have some examples?

Mine are:

Yahoo
Miribalis ICQ
Hotmail
Google
Skype

Asus, vision is something you obviously have.

Vision is something that few possess.

Vision is iron ships - wood floats , metal sinks, dont be crazy...

Vision is the automobile - Cars will never replace horses, are you nuts? Besides, if you go that fast all the air will get sucked out of your lungs and you will die...

Vision is building an airplane - if God wanted man to fly he would have given us wings hahahaha

Vision is building a television set - you mean you plan on sending pictures through the air? Hahahahah

Vision is the Cell Phone - Talk on a phone without wires? Ya right, good luck with that....

Vision is Netflix realizing you could use the internet to order online and instead of having ten thousand rental stores all sucking profits from the bottom line you could have a couple major distribution centers...

Vision is knowing that within the next ten years we will quadruple the internet broadband population with China and India surpassing the US by hundreds of millions of users each, and that all video will be done online - the true race has not even begun yet...

Vision is always called crazy, foolish, stupid, a waste of time and money before it is mainstream, but the visioneers are the ones who are recorded in history, and no one remembers the names of the critics.

Netflix also spent 40 mil on development and got crap for it.

I wouldnt use Netflix as an example of what to aspire to, in fact, I would run the opposite direction.

Has happened every single day that I have watched it. Also, sales occur at higher than the represented ask, all, day long.

My gosh this is almost laughable.

Make a mistake and buy the wrong company? Hahahahaha.

Yes, I am sure companies like Sony waste a million a pop because they dont know the difference between the company in Australia versus the one in Seattle.

I suppose they would have figured it out when the plane landed in Australia?

Hahahahahahahaha

"Sometimes you have to suck monkey butt to know where you want to be in life!"

Quote of the day.

If this were the spongebob show and we were selling krusty krab kakes we would be kicking butt and the stock would be 5 usd a share.

This company sucks in comparison I tell you.

Haha good one Thaiguy

Aww comon pmunch that wasnt an attack it was a friendly reminder cuz its obvious someone forgot =p

Something else thats extremely suspicious is the bid ask according to my brokers is .03/.04 yet trades are consistently going off at higher than the ask. Which means all of the mm's playing here are intentionally not reflecting accurate bids, OR asks

Amazes me how a single trade of 100 shares at .032 can knock loose so many shares at .045

Just goes to show how well shrewd traders and mm's know how to prey on peoples fear

Good deal of volume for 20 minutes after the bell

Bid is not accurately reflected. How surprising.

Someone is trying to shake loose shares. We will see.

What does L2 look this this AM? Number of MM's on bid/ask?

OTCBB Listing Requirements

The OTCBB is not an issuer listing service, market or exchange. Although the OTCBB does not have any listing requirements per se, to be eligible for quotation on the OTCBB, issuers must remain current in their filings with the SEC or applicable regulatory authority. Market Makers will not be permitted to begin quotation of a security whose issuer does not meet this filing requirement. Securities already quoted on the OTCBB that become delinquent in their required filings will be removed following a 30 or 60 day grace period if they do not make their required filing during that time. A fifth character of "E" in a security's trading symbol is used to denote securities that FINRA believes are delinquent in their required filings; securities so denoted will be removed from the OTCBB after the applicable grace period expires. Note that an issuer can request review of the decision to remove the issuer’s securities by an independent hearings panel. Additional information regarding that process can be found in our FAQs. To provide evidence of compliance with the filing requirement, contact the OTCBB Issuer Filings Department. For more information regarding the eligibility requirements for the OTCBB, refer to Rule 6530.

Certification of Disclosure in Companies' Quarterly and Annual Reports
Please be aware that OTCBB issuers are subject to many of the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act"), some of which are now in effect. In particular, please be aware that the certification requirements mandated by Section 302 of the Act are now in effect and issuers that are found not to be in compliance with these requirements subject their securities to removal from the OTCBB on the basis that the issuer is delinquent in its required filings with the SEC or applicable regulatory authority.

As explained elsewhere on this web site, to be eligible for quotation on the OTCBB, issuers must remain current in their filings with the SEC or applicable regulatory authority. Market Makers will not be permitted to begin quotation of a security whose issuer does not meet this filing requirement. Securities already quoted on the OTCBB that become delinquent in their required filings will be removed following a 30 or 60 day grace period if they do not make their required filing during that time. A fifth character of "E" in a security's trading symbol is used to denote securities that FINRA believes are delinquent in their required filings; securities so denoted will be removed from the OTCBB after the applicable grace period expires.

Silvercorp Discovers High Grade Polymetalic Mineralization at the Na-Bao Project, Qinghai, China

Silvercorp Metals Inc. ("Silvercorp") (TSX: SVM) is pleased to provide an update on the establishment of Qinghai Found Mining Co. Ltd. ("Qinghai Found"), a Sino-foreign cooperative joint venture company to explore and develop the Na-Bao Polymetalic Project in the Qinghai Province, and an update on the preliminary exploration results for the Na-Bao Project.

All required government approvals and filings for the establishment of Qinghai Found have been obtained and completed, and a business license was issued to Qinghai Found in September 2007. Silvercorp will acquire an 82% interest in the Qinghai Found by funding exploration and development. Transferring of the three Na-Bao permits of about 320 square km in area (19 km by 16 km) into Qinghai Found from our Chinese partner has been approved by Chinese military, related city and provincial authorities. It is now waiting for the final approval from the Ministry of Land and Resources of China in Beijing.

The limited exploration program was carried out during July to October 2007 to test the mineralization at one of the several regional geochemical anomalies discovered by our Chinese partner, focusing on the area of about 35 square km (7 km by 5 km) at the middle and east portions of the three Na-Bao Exploration Permits. The program consisted of a total of 28 trenches for 13,380 cubic meters, geological mapping at 1:10,000 scale over an area of 30 square kilometres as well as a coincident geochemical soil survey over the 30 square kilometres. Grab samples during the geological mapping process were taken from surface gossans over 65 localities within the area of about 35 square km and their assay results demonstrate widespread lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), Copper (Cu) and Silver (Ag) polymetalic mineralization.

All 28 trenches are distributed within the area of 3 km on Northeast by 2 km on Northwest, where 21 of the 28 trenches have exposed zones of mineralization of either oxidized/weathered gossans materials or primary sulfides by channel sampling. Based on these trenches, three inter-joint mineralized structures, F3, F2 and F1, were identified. The F3 structure strikes along the near north-south orientation for over 3 kilometres. From north to south, Trenches TC9, TC8, TC7, TC5, TC4, TC1, and TC2 all intercepted the F3 structure over a 2 kilometre strike length, with intercepts at the TC5 and TC1 close to the true thickness. F2 structure is over 3 kilometre length but orientates in northeast direction. From northeast to southwest, trenches TC13, TC14, TC12, TC11, TC6, and TC17 intercepted the F2 structure, with intercept at the TC17 close to the true thickness. F1 structure extends along an east-west strike for over 2 kilometres. From east to west, trench TC21, TC18 and TC22 have intercepted the F1 structure. Some significant assays from the trenches and surface gossans grab samples include the following:

1. Trench TC1 has intercepted F3 structure with two wide mineralization zones about 15 metres apart wide, Zone I, is a 20 metre wide zone of massive galena (lead sulfide) with average grades of 16.18% Pb and 45.9 g/t Ag including 10 metres grading 30.61% Pb and 80.1 g/t Ag. Zone II is oxidized/weathered (gossanous) materials of 43.5 m wide grading 0.54% Pb, 1.53% Zn, and 20.1 g/t Ag.

2. Trench TC8 has exposed 3.0 m mineralization zone of primary sulfide along F3 structure with grades 20.99% Pb, 11.58% Zn and 45.7 g/t Ag.

3. Trench TC9 has intercepted 39 m wide mineralization zone (gossans) grading 0.34% Pb and 2.51% Zn on the F3 structure.

4. Trench 5 intercepted 114 m wide mineralization (gossans) grading 0.35% Pb and 0.62% Zn on the F3 structure.

5. Trench TC22 has intercepted 3.0 m mineralization zone of gossans grading 6.64% Cu on F1 structure.

6. Trench TC17 has intersected 40.5 m wide mineralization zone (gossans) grading 1.44% Pb and 1.71% Zn on F2 structure.

7. Grab samples outside the trenches also returned significant results: Sample D706H1 grades 1.07% Pb, 0.87% Zn, 9.05% Cu and 4,080 g/t Ag; Sample NB006 grades 0.33% Pb, 1.1% Zn, 7.03% Cu, and 1,537 g/t Ag; Sample DHPM1H1 grades 1.38% Pb, 0.76% Zn, 6.55% Cu and 3,640 g/t Ag; Sample DHPM1H2 grades 0.79% Pb, 0.78% Zn, 4.39% Cu, and 1,620 g/t Ag; Sample D718H1 grades 9.56% Pb, 36.38% Zn, and 298 g/t Ag; Sample NB002 grades 84.57% Pb 0.39% Zn and 172 g/t Ag.

Except the Zone I of the Trench TC1 and TC8, all other trenches only exposed oxidized/weathered materials (gossans) due to heavy overburden. These trench results indicate that multiple, wide mineralization zones of up to 114 m exist in this project area. The weighted average grades of assay results of selected trenches and their intervals are set out in the table below.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inter-
val Ag
Trench Mineralization Zone (m) Pb% Zn% Cu% g/t
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone I: Weighted average grade 20.0 16.18 0.54 0.011 45.9
---------------------------------
TC1 Including 10.0 30.61 0.15 0.008 80.1
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone II: Weighted average grade 43.5 0.54 1.53 0.01 20.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TC2 Weighted average grade 15 0.65 1.46 0.126 60.7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TC4 Weighted average grade 10.0 0.44 7.90 0.034 6.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone I: Weighted average grade 38 0.17 0.47 0.003 1.0
TC5 -------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone II: Weighted average grade 114 0.35 0.62 0.004 4.9
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TC6 Weighted average grade 1.5 1.13 0.11 0.017 46.8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TC7 Weighted average grade 3.0 0.06 4.65 0.002 0.05
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TC8 Weighted average grade 3.0 20.99 11.58 0.009 45.7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone I: Weighted average grade 28.5 0.38 3.23 0.014 3.7
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone II: Weighted average grade 12.0 0.18 0.43 0.027 1.7
TC9 -------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone III: Weighted average grade 12.0 0.15 0.27 0.064 5.2
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone IV: Weighted average grade 3.0 0.13 4.37 5.20 10.7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TC4 Weighted aaverage grade 10.0 0.44 7.90 0.034 6.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone I: Weighted average grade 4.0 0.06 0.08 0.338 126.1
TC11 -------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone II: Weighted average grade 2.0 0.01 0.01 0.12 45.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone I: Weighted average grade 3.0 0.58 1.36 0.008 13.5
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TC12 Zone II: 1.5 0.01 0.02 0.14 66.45
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone III: 1.0 0.09 0.04 0.12 80.3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TC13 Weighted average grade 7.0 0.02 0.017 0.081 25.8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone I: Weighted average grade 2.0 4.29 0.013 0.142 167.8
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TC14 Zone II Weighted average grade 1.5 5.75 4.6 0.034 90.5
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Zone III: Weighted average grade 7.5 0.79 0.78 0.004 10.8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TC17 Weighted average grade 40.5 1.44 1.71 0.009 5.4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TC18 Weighted average grade 18.0 0.01 1.79 0.003 0.9
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TC20 Weighted average grade 3.0 0.73 1.36 0.016 19.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TC21 Weighted average grade 3.0 4.28 0.35 0.006 27.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TC22 Weighted average grade 3.0 0.21 0.22 6.635 2.4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


The assay results for Grab samples listed below.
--------------------------------------------------
Location Sample Pb% Zn% Cu% Ag g/t
--------------------------------------------------
Current D706H1 1.07 0.87 9.050 4080.0
trench area D718H2 0.37 0.73 1.200 345.0
D1009H1 0.84 0.80 0.100 37.1
D1183H1 0.19 0.08 0.580 202.0
D1184H1 1.69 0.71 0.026 72.8

D1185H1 4.90 1.28 0.029 144.0
D1186H1 0.21 0.22 1.250 508.0
D1198H1 0.52 2.17 0.026 6.8
D1205H1 2.85 0.43 0.001 12.6
D1208H1 0.95 0.31 0.001 6.2
D1210H1 0.19 0.62 0.009 3.0
D1658H1 10.46 1.50 0.730 43.2
D1665H1 13.46 29.98 0.068 44.0
D1668H1 0.51 1.46 24.830 8.0
D1668H2 0.48 0.54 1.170 12.0
D1681H1 0.45 1.60 0.078 2.8
NB001 12.18 13.62 0.010 31.9
NB002 84.57 0.39 0.008 172.0
NB003 1.68 1.72 0.008 4.5
NB004 0.69 0.68 4.030 998.0
NB005 0.96 6.93 0.066 35.6
NB006 0.33 1.10 7.030 1537.0
NB007 0.45 0.06 0.035 19.6
NB008 0.79 1.15 0.460 8.3
NB009 0.36 1.94 18.250 14.4
NB010 2.27 3.85 0.059 32.4
--------------------------------------------------
Out of DHPM1H1 1.38 0.76 6.550 3640.0
current DHPM1H2 0.79 0.78 4.390 1620.0
trench area D114H1 0.02 0.04 6.370 21.6
D511H1 0.36 0.38 0.081 10.1
D550H1 8.65 2.70 0.017 26.9
D608H1 1.08 0.73 0.015 14.6
D695H1 0.02 0.02 1.350 10.3
D718H1 9.56 36.38 0.110 298.0
D724H1 0.74 0.34 1.270 289.0
D1110H1 2.89 0.63 0.014 26.6
D1203H1 0.62 0.26 0.004 20.4
D1203H2 12.21 0.08 0.450 273.0
D691H1 0.04 0.08 0.170 63.1
DHPM2H1 0.03 0.05 0.094 29.6
DHPM2H2 1.57 2.85 5.600 400.0
D1570H1 0.65 0.24 0.110 3.9
D1579H1 0.37 0.15 0.001 1.8
D1633H1 4.18 0.75 0.290 11.2
D1636H1 0.38 0.41 0.026 26.6
D1638H1 0.12 0.85 0.160 3.3
D1641H1 0.19 0.30 1.700 384.0
D1654H1 0.58 1.30 0.052 9.5
--------------------------------------------------
D163 means No 163 grab site


A soil sampling survey with a grid 200 m by 20 m was completed, demonstrating very high geochemical background of Pb, Zn, Ag, Cd and Cu. A total of 8,723 soil samples were taken with average values of Pb 254.9 ppm and maximum 24,526.0 ppm; Zn 284.1 ppm and maximum 82,108.4 ppm; Ag 0.416 ppm and maximum 44.5 ppm; Cd 1.44 ppm and maximum 231 ppm and Cu 25.1 ppm and maximum 1,198.6 ppm.

Based on these encouraging preliminary exploration results, Qinghai Found has planned a significant exploration program for 2008, including 30,000 meters drilling, tunneling and metallurgical study with an intention to define a resource base that satisfies the Chinese government's minimum requirement to apply for a mining permit for silver/lead/zinc mine, that is, 1,000 tonne per day mining/milling capacity with a mine life of 10 years.

Quality Control of Assay results

The samples were collected by QGS, a Qinghai Provincial government agency in charge of exploration of mineral resource in the Province, supervised by Qinghai Found. The samples were assayed in Qinghai Assay Center of Nonferrous Metals (ISO9001 certified), Qinghai Chaidamu Lab of Geological Exploration Team (ISO9001 certified) and Langfang Lab, Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical (IGGE-LAB, ISO9001 certified).

The sample preparation consists of drying, crushing, splitting of samples to 150 grams, then the samples are pulverized to 200 mesh. Silver, lead, zinc, and copper were analyzed by a 3-hour hot aqua regia digestion on 10-gram samples with an AA/ICP finish.

Mike Hibbitts P.Geo., is the Qualified Person on the project under NI 43-101.

Announcement of Release Date for Third Quarter Results

Silvercorp will release its financial results for the 3rd quarter ended December 31, 2007 on Thursday, February 14, 2008 after market close.

About Silvercorp Metals Inc.

Silvercorp Metals Inc. is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver related mineral properties focusing in the People's Republic of China ("China"). Currently, the Company is operating and developing four Silver-Lead-Zinc mines at the Ying Mining District, Henan Province, owned through its 77.5% and 70% Chinese subsidiary companies, respectively and is also exploring the Nao-Bao Polymetalic Project in Qinghai Province, China.

The Company is on the S&P/TSX Composite Index, the S&P/TSX Global Gold Index, and S&P/TSX Global Mining Index.

CAUTIONARY DISCLAIMER -- FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements in this press release other than purely historical information, including statements relating to the Company's future plans and objectives or expected results, constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions and are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties inherent in the Company's business, including risks inherent in mineral exploration, development, and mining. Production and revenue projections are based not on mineral reserves but on mineral resources which do not have demonstrated economic viability. As a result, actual results may vary materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that such forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on such statements. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements that are incorporated by reference herein, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements. We seek safe harbour.

Contacts:
Silvercorp Metals Inc.
Rui Feng
Chairman & CEO
(604) 669-9397

Silvercorp Metals Inc.
Lorne Waldman
Corporate Secretary
(604) 669-9397
(604) 669-9387 (FAX)
Email: info@silvercorp.ca
Website: www.silvercorp.ca


Source: Marketwire (January 21, 2008 - 9:00 AM EST)

The 325k shares traded so far today, no one bought those.

Thats just the aliens inserting forged data packets into the time and sales data stream.

You may all don your tin foil hats now.

To be mentioned in the company of Apple, netflix, sony, viacom, is huge credibility.


01/23/2008 10:14:46 AM EST
M2 PRESSWIRE

RDATE:23012008

LOS ANGELES - This morning's Industry-specific highlighted companies include, Reeltime Rentals Inc. (OTC: RLTR), Sony Corp. (NYSE: SNE), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL), Netflix Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX), Blockbuster Inc. (NYSE: BBI), Viacom Inc (NYSE: VIA).

Sign-up for our FREE Micro Cap Stock Picks, Trading Ideas, Commentary and Alerts at http://www.microcapopportunity.com

Commentary

Hollywood-at-large is reeling. Over and above occasional A-list tragedies such as the mysterious passing of Brokeback Mountain' star Heath Ledger yesterday, Hollywood studios such as Sony and Viacom, writers and traditional bricks-n-mortar rental players such as Blockbuster are grappling with the impact of the emerging online on-demand content distribution industry players ala Reeltime Rentals, Netflix and others. Now with Apple's recent announcement that it is entering the game, it seems like a foregone conclusion that this new way of distributing content - downloading and/or streaming mainstream content over the internet - will make all other distribution channels obsolete.

This kind of game changing' phenomenon is assured to create opportunity for investors. Consider today's industry-specific highlighted companies. The companies embracing this new channel have a chance to benefit while those that don't, well, wont. You decide.

REELTIME RENTALS INC (OTC: RLTR) Up 8.33% Yesterday

Detailed Quote: http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=RLTR.PK

ReelTime Rentals' mission is to deliver diverse programming, for rental or by subscription, over its online broadband network, enabling viewers to watch whatever they choose, anytime and anywhere they want to see it -- all they need is a broadband connection. ReelTime offers the first DVD quality "Point, Click, and Watch" user experience available on the World Wide Web. ReelTime is providing the public the next generation of online viewing technology, designed with the built in capacity for unlimited growth. ReelTime Rentals can be found on the internet at www.reeltime.com.

Its not a slam, its what he did. I didnt say it was a bad thing.

If I am not mistaken, Jesus spent most of his time in the company of thieves, liars, prostitutes and tax collectors, so at least its consistent.

You can search by sony, just type sony into the search box at upper right

Seller is out of ammo, nice try. Time to go up.

This thing is going to bounce

You want to foot that bill?

Go back and look at the feeble amount of money raised by RLTR to date, you think they are not bootstrapping the crap out of this thing and squeezing the most from every single penny?

They do it when they HAVE to do it, which is now.

There are different types of genius when it comes to technology.

The genius it takes to envision how a certain kind of design that could disrupt entire industries is different than the kind of genius that might actually program said software, which is different than the genius it takes to envision the hardware scaling plan required to preceed growth.

RLTR has publicly advertised for NOC and Network engineering experts for some time, which indicates to me they are lacking in that area.

Dont flip out over growth, its a good thing, even IBM underestimates demand requirements on server farms (I have witnessed one project that shut IBM's servers down due to unanticipated demand).

Remember, apps that eventually sold for hundreds of millions started on some kids computer in a colleage dorm (hotmail for example).

I noticed this as well, which indicates to me the current market action is not reflective of the market sentiment as a whole, but of one or perhaps two disgruntled or pissed off large players.

If a toxic funded deal demanded certain things and Barry was unwilling to submit to those demands, perhaps they might be so stupid as to try and crush the share price.

Based on this mornings sales I think the buying demand has met the ammo available, and the seller is unwilling to try and push it down farther.

The advantage in all of this, is once this jerkoff is out of ammo, the market will push it right back up.

All IMO and pure speculation on my part.

I agree Smooth, just because a market is launching does not mean there is zero maneuvering room for competitors.

How long was Microsoft kicking butt before Apple got a piece? Even though MSFT is the market giant, does this mean Apple can command no share?

In a multi billion dollar industry, the crumbs that fall from the table of the largest providers will still be worth hundreds of millions.

I would be happy with one million as well, but I would be happier with 10 million =)

I am opposed to a buyout at this time, for the simple reason that the market valuation is so low. The most we can command without substanial subscribers to validate our model is a comparison to what netflix recently paid to develop a competitive (also failed) technology at $40 mil.

$40 mil divided by 200mil shares comes to .20/share, and is pretty weak in comparison to what we could get if we only had 10 mil subscribers.

Some people are a waste of oxygen.