Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
Spot liquidity moves with access to US order books.
The mhra is swell with nwbo to continue its use of dcvax within its specials program but is unwilling to approve it.
Makes perfect sense to me.
The paper says nothing at all about DC vaccines, or any vaccines. That is just AI generated content based on the "garbage in" AC fed it.
The paper discusses how a better genetic understanding of the GBM lineage allows for proper combination drugs to be selected. Then goes on to describe experiments with a combination of OTX008 (a LGALS1 inhibitor) and Abeaciclib (a CDK4/6 inhibitor) that the analysis predicted should be effective.
This is the exact opposite of -L is.
But whatever. Since this board is willing to believe LSE nonsense and fake SEC quotes that are easy to see are garrbage, I am sure they will believe any AI generated garbage AC feeds them.
But for those who need to supplement with AI, try asking gemini the following question in a clean chat (always start by cllcking the "new chat" button so your old content is not treated as input).
Based on https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.02.21.707071v1.full.pdf, what would be a good treatment for GBM?
Are you still thinking of retiring to Pattaya with your gains?
It makes no sense that the regulatory agency that has known the trial data for more than two years and got it through their CHM in June of 2024, if they had questions about the data would not have issued a rejection or, more likely, the application would have been withdrawn by now.
And most importantly, it showed that it was safe and a viable treatment for further study in ALL solid tumor cancers!
Well this is amazing. I don't how many pancreatic cancer patients used DCVax-D in their treatment. I hope it was more than one.
Yes, If a sponsor submits their package to NICE early enough then NICE will be ready for an opinion when the MHRA approves. Alas, NWBO has not yet submitted, so NICE cannot work on the decision. They will be at least 6 months after a submission, and no indication NWBO has any intent to submit soon.
If anybody cares, the big change with this policy is that the NICE process can now go public prior to an MHRA decision. In the past, the NICE process had to block when they were ready for public comments until the decision.
The ovarian cancer trial demonstrated some positive treatment
I can't believe pseudoprogression is still being discussed.
If NWBO is doomed for failure, why has the company been hiring more employees?
So why has NWBO not reported results on the other cohorts of the trial?
Background: The trial had some additional cohorts outside of the main 233 that were to be analyzed. The most significant group was 80 patients who failed the MRI after radiation and were randomized into their own little trial. They would have no cross-over and OS would be the primary endpoint. In short, a valid, if small, randomized OS trial.
And NWBO buried that data, Why? Even at N=80 I would expect it to be stat sig if the curves looked like the ECA comp. That would be hugely positive news, Even I would say that would make the chance of approval significantly better.
And yet, crickets.
Good points on both fronts Gary. The German enrollment situation is genuinely under appreciated. Ethics committees there don't intervene lightly, and if they blocked placebo enrollment while allowing the treatment arm to continue, that's a meaningful signal about how the data was reading at the time.
CPXX got BO after TLD. (Just 90 days from $1.6 to $30 ).
When JAZZ made the offer, CPXX was trading at $17.5. That made the premium about 80%. https://www.investing.com/equities/celator-pharm
The big jump for CPXX was on release of TLD. For NWBO, they already released TLD and the market crashed in response.
its spoofing. they need to cover their shorts before the AH PR
Your "common effing sense!" is based on thin air and nothing else. As you pointed out there is no evidence that NWBO ever discussed filing with the FDA.
83% of (no longer) contested (2020 alloted) shares go to management. 2.25 million dollars to NWBO from insurer. Clear security count makes non-dilutive debt solutions cleaner to enter.
Nope, but I do remember somebody posting FDA approval must be near because they hired a night janitor.
Unlike Cognate, Sawston’s infrastructure supports autologous cell therapy at a commercial level, including storage, cryopreservation, and logistics which would all likely be needed for gaining approval.
Cognate was always about cellular manufacturing. Even in 2016 it was larger than Sawston is today (and Cognate had significant expansion after that). Cognate has made far more batches of -L than Advent has.
From the 2017 10-K:
Cognate BioServices’ manufacturing facility for clinical-grade cell products is located in Memphis, Tennessee. Cognate BioServices' facility is approximately 80,000 square feet and contains substantial buildout expansion space in addition to the portions currently built out and in use. The current manufacturing facilities are sufficient to produce DCVax for at least several thousand patients per year. The expansion space will allow us to procure significantly increasing capacity when needed for commercial readiness. We are also developing a facility for manufacturing in the U.K. for the European market. It is necessary for us to have manufacturing operations in Europe to meet the logistical requirements for European patients relating to the collection, delivery and processing of the patient’s blood draw containing the immune cells (for which the time window is too limited to reach the US manufacturing facility).
Nope. If NWBO used actual patient level data then the comp will be to those patients who match the -L P3 inclusion criterion, not all patients.
Did you not see that in patients with MRD (same as near total resection) the ECA had a MOS of 20.4 months? Given that -L required "intent for near total resection" that would be a closer comp than including biopsies and partials.
More importantly, the RAs can perform a proper analysis only if they have actual data. The idea of trying to read a KM plot and recreating the real data is funny.
Of course there is no way to prove that a pre-BLA meeting occurred or what the FDA said if it did. But it would be insane to not have the meeting. Unless LP already knew what the FDA would say and did not want to hear it for some reason.
If LP does actually plan to submit to the FDA, then the meeting could raise issues that might take months or years to resolve. Why would they not want to know those issues? They could have started resolving some issues back in 2020.
That LP has gone into radio silence on the issue would concern most investors in this space. But, better just to have faith.
I already bought 2 first class tickets to Europe. Told the wife to stop complaining since we're already rich. Told her to just call me at 1:30pm
Yes. Due to DCVax-L being a very personalized cell therapy with manufacturing and handling in Sawston UK, location would play a huge role in seeking first approval. Why not the FDA first? well that's the reason.
AK, I think NotSure2 was calling BS on the post you were fact checking. I.E., he agrees with you.
While it's true that unexercised options aren't "shares," Market Makers (MMs) under Regulation SHO use the existence of these management options as "Locates." They point to the 2020 grant pool and tell the SEC: "There is potential supply here, so we have a 'reasonable belief' we can settle our short sales."
Fact: As I've established, these 2020 grants have served as "Locates" for synthetic short positions. When 17% of that pool is deleted by the Delaware Court of Chancery, the MMs lose their legal cover
The 10K, due by 3/30, will be as of 12/31.
Other than antihama, I am not sure who is mocking this ILT insanity and who actually thinks it is possible.
The company has already run a P1 for Direct. Why on earth would they have to run another one?
Any one have any comments about the FDA ruling,
Doubt they’re capable at this point of a big dilution event given the level of distrust and lack of trading. Was thinking more like jettisoning L to pursue other endeavors announcement?
FWIW, your pals at Mimivax are indicating they could have top line very soon of the SuvaxM P2B. The clinical trial was updated last month to indicate estimated completion on Mar. 2, 2026
At least it will be something to discuss.
Cancel that, blindly followed a link and it was to the P2A. Looks like Mimivax is still in the LP radio silence mode.
Kfa, I would look up who is the company's Transfer Agent (it will likely be Compu Share as they are the largest). You can find this on the OTC market site under security details. https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/NWBO/security shows NWBO's agent.
They can help you. I suspect you will have to send the Transfer Agent your cert, it will then be back in electronic form and you can then transfer to a broker.
The process for handling paper certs is very strict, make sure you understand them and follow exactly.
You do realize that is a UCLA patent application, not NWBO's?
There's a lot we don't know but too bad he only got three vaccine doses.
My opinion is pneumonia brought on sepsis which over ran
Which dendritic vaccine did he take and when did he take it?
Also, was he still on chemo, and if so why?
Thanks
Darn. DCVax-L failed to prevent pneumonia. Who knew? The failure is your arguments against DCVax-L.
I also think that another likely factor in the delay is the nefarious actors spammed the proverbial crap out of the MHRA in response to the request for public comment on the use of ECTs. This mountain of - no-doubt well-crafted - spam will have taken the MHRA considerably longer to sift through than what they are accustomed to in this regard. Besides this public request for comment I have heard that they have been absolutely inundated with FOIA requests and ICOs almost certainly from shorts trying to derail/ slow things down
Comments on Potential New MHRA Policies.
In the UK, the MHRA issued a draft Guideline of important potential new policies under which clinical trials would be allowed to use external controls instead of within-study placebo arms, especially for severe or rare diseases, and the MHRA called for public comments during the second quarter. The Company worked together with physician collaborators, patient groups, statisticians, academics and political representatives to help mobilize public comments.
Settlement Rules.
4. Do I need to do anything?
In 99% of cases: Nothing. Your broker handles the back-end routing. You just wake up on Monday morning (Jan 19) and notice that the "Bid/Ask" is being driven by the London Main Market instead of the OTC market makers.
I respect what you write but this may not be true though. I remember seeing a few companies, who had overseas manufacturing units. FDA inspect them as a part of the application process.
In other words, he may not be crazy