Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
When I see the asinine “they’ve been working on this for 20 years” used as a negative, it brings up many obvious rebuttals.
Of course, inventing, improving, and integrating new disruptive technology takes time. LWLG has obviously put in the work.
But, let’s play devil’s advocate for a moment and go down the insipid Dan, Ted, NRDC worm hole for a second and suppose this means they have nothing, and have been faking it for 20 years.
After 20 years, wouldn’t some Tier 1 company or multiple competitor technologists call BS on the hoax?
Instead, they ask Dr Lebby for his advice on how to proceed in building this new data center ecosystem.
They give LWLG awards for their new technological advancements.
They ask our CEO to chair their prestigious conferences.
They use our tech to advance their own world record setting innovations (Polariton).
Certainly, if we had nothing, we wouldn’t even be here now.
Anyone with even a scintilla of imagination can fathom the complexity of structuring the “dealzzz$$$” with such a proprietary game changer.
Anyone not buying (if they can afford it) at these price levels will likely regret it, and soon.
There are multiple facts that would support we are much closer than 20 years ago.
How long should a process like this take, in your expert opinion?
Did you and Vein take the same logic classes?
False.
Making money in the stock market involves speculation.
The more speculative, the bigger the money.
The best thing a speculative investor can do is to follow the tech, and ignore the ticker.
Why would Michael Lebby be chosen as the moderator for a discussion on the future of photonics featuring top executives from major companies in the datasphere?
Aren’t you the least bit intrigued…?
LWLG may have been wrong about the timeline, but they are right about the tech.
And many of their peers seem to agree.
Hold your shares.
How do we (will we) know we’ve received a dividend?
Nothing to indicate it yet.
Is it just in the ether?
So, what you seem to be saying re. 20 years is that these guys have put in the work.
How long should this process have taken?
Seems like we’re earning our place in the future of the datasphere.
We’re not selling cars, moron.
This is brand new technology.
And it sounds like it’s going to work.
We are the silicon photonics business.
Just more proof of proof of concept.
Another interesting post from Xena re: this kind of tech.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175060213
I remember at one time (couple years ago) it being reported that Lightwave Logic showed up on a list of “suppliers” to Tesla…
Lebby said: “Watch the news”!
20 years of progress, patents and growing industry recognition.
There’s no shortcut to amassing the hours of required reliability data.
We are obviously moving in the right direction, at the right time, with the best solution.
What kind of deal would you like to see closed?
How would we structure the deal, value our technology for maximum long term growth, capture all the potential verticals etc.
This “closing deals” myopia seems to run counter to the logic of the process.
I’m becoming more inclined to believe X’s prediction that we will be bought out by a behemoth who wants cradle to grave control of the process. The recent hires helping to structure that deal.
Interesting announcement from Mobileye, re. Moving on from Lidar.
“The approach appeared to have been prompted partly by prior silicon photonics research at Intel aimed at fabricating lidar chips featuring both active and passive optical elements”.
https://optics.org/news/15/9/12
MZ simply says what LWLG tells them to…
What is idiotic is your insinuation that MZ are the source of the info.
Interesting article (as much as I can understand it, which isn’t much…)
I did notice they get their wafers from AMF, too…
But, isn’t this still in its infancy?
Are they as far along as LWLG (hours of testing, incorporated into third party devices, etc)?
Also, nothing here seems to suggest what they are working on couldn’t be enhanced even further with active electro-optic polymers.
It certainly in no way suggests that “photonics is solved”, and no one needs polymers; which is what you are hoping to imply.
A third party foundry is not our lab, and we know we’re there (AMF).
It’s also been revealed our polymers are in a device manufactured by Polariton.
Many of the recent patents are derived from the experiences and innovations required to integrate our polymer/polymer modulators into the CMOS production process.
So, you’re obviously, blatantly wrong.
What’s it like to be so wrong?
That’s why new retail investors should stick some LWLG shares in their Roth IRA and let it cook.
Follow the tech, and ignore the ticker!
Yep, all you have to do is fool the smartest engineers and wealthiest CEOs in the world and voila!
You’re on the NASDAQ!
14: Fool every other company in the datasphere into inviting you to their conferences and partnering with you to help build the roadmap to the future of silicon photonics.
If you get invited to this PECC conference as a featured speaker alongside reps from other established and reputable companies; you are probably already recognized, relevant and validated to some degree…
Why else would you be there?
https://www.optica.org/events/industry_events/2024/pecc/program_speakers/
OK, smart guy.
Who is supplying the active electro optic materials Global Foundries is saying will be a game changer?
Certainly you have a name for us…
You know who else never mentions who they are working with on their latest iterations of their most groundbreaking technology?
Everybody.
Nobody mentions anybody, or anything about the latest processes or products they are preparing to release.
So, we’re in good company.
Your hysterical canard suggesting silence = failure is just that, a gross canard.
I think it’s the reference to “active electro optics” they are referring to…
Why won’t Anthony Yu mention anyone they are working with?
He seemed to suggest a vibrant ecosystem with many vying to work with Global Foundries; yet, not one name mentioned….
Is every company a hoax, or just the one helmed by the man who drafted the roadmap to the future of silicon photonics (Dr Lebby)?
We’ve seen new technological successes every year. The reliability data sheets, the patent moat, and number of associated partners have grown along with it.
That obviously must come before full commercialization/contract valuation, which is a long, complex and secretive process.
Notice in Anthony Yu’s video, and recent statements (re. New groundbreaking advances, active electro-optic materials, etc) that he never mentions ANY other company.
Does that mean they are working with NOBODY?
Everyone here is anxious for the big news,
But, only the simpletons (shorters, fakes) think it should be easy, or already have happened….
Follow the tech and ignore the ticker.
That’s what high-risk/high-reward investing requires.
If I had that kind of money to invest, I would certainly consider it!
Correct.
One need only look at the group of speakers we are included with at the upcoming PECC to know what we have is real and significant.
Hoaxes and scammers don’t get invited to these things.
https://www.optica.org/events/industry_events/2024/pecc/program_speakers/
Place your bets, the time to acquire cheep shares is getting shorter….
I didn’t know paying attention was such a crime.
The holdup is in structuring the deal to capture the maximum valuation.
Interesting that Anthony Yu is repeating the same verbiage Michael Lebby uses (similar to things Jensen Huang has been saying, too).
Dr Lebby told us to “watch the news”, and the news sure sounds a lot like our mission statement….
Ted Peele said:
The point is: it’s increasing, not decreasing.
Why hasn’t the total decreased?
Why aren’t they selling?
Good time to buy!
Thank you for the correction!
In this recent interview with Global Foundries CEO Anthony Yu, there are a lot of intriguing tidbits, and excellent context about this painstaking process we are engaged with.
You can decide for yourself if we seem like the kind of company Anthony Yu (Global Foundries) wants to work with.
His description of what he looks for in a partner; the importance of focusing on working within existing CMOS foundry processes, dependable access to material supply, the massive market for optics are the same things Lebby has always stressed and focused on.
Also, notice how careful he is to NOT mention ANYBODY they are working with.
This is the level of discretion many shorts/detractors laugh off as “smokescreen” NDAs.
But, the secrecy is real and disciplined.
They wrap up the interview by saying how exciting it is to hear a major foundry talk about new materials that will soon blow everyone away….
Maybe Yves could’ve said;
“Like John Zyskind, I could have retired very comfortably - my reputation intact, but I decided: why not put some effort into, and tie my legacy up with a failing company, whose inept CEO is actively trying to fool more people out of their money”
NRDC’s ears would have pricked up:
“Hey, that’s the kind of company I like to claim I’m invested long term in”!
.