Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not sure if Mitsubishi Kokusai Asset Management is related, but they own 292,034 shares of LWLG as of 6/30/2024.
A short squeeze happens when almost all of the trading volume is shorts capitulating (buying) at the same time new shorts are establishing new positions (selling).
When the buyers are covering their short position and the sellers are less sophisticated short sellers establishing new positions, the price can rise while the short interest stays very high. Usually this happens when smart money is also buying and covering a short position becomes increasingly difficult. Buy stop orders are triggered causing short sellers to drive the price higher as they try to limit their losses. Because the buyers/owners strongly believe in the integrity of the management, they are not willing to sell. As the price of the stock vaults higher, the only way for the shorts to limit their losses is to buy at the market which drives the price even higher. It becomes a frenzy!
Pumpkin and Ted are helpful if you are accumulating shares prior to the sales ramp. EOM
“My motivation was to balance the overall message so that the market could see the reality and perhaps the price would drop to a level that I could consider as a reasonable speculative buy.”
As I always suspected! Thank you for finally being honest. Your substantial efforts have always been to drive the price down so you could join the “Penny longs club.”
The September 6th article in EE Times posted by Think1st today talks about how corrosive Lithium is in a CMOS foundry.
At the very end of Anthony Yu’s interview with Optica he states, “I have to be very careful not to shut down the Fab.” I believe he was referring to TFLN issues in this statement.
It will not surprise me if GFS ports the PDKs from their R&D lines to their full production 300mm wafer lines. Probably a 2026 event.
Interesting that it took Universal Display Corp five years to sign their first licensing deal. I imagine they solved quite a few issues during that time while working with a list of potential customers.
I wonder what the naysayers were saying on the message boards when they were a pre-revenue company?
That’s the plan, X!
The Optica interview with Anthony Yu was recorded at OFC in late March as were the interviews with Coherent and OpenLight. Optica chose to publish these “old” interviews in August ahead of the ECOC convention. This is curious to me. I expect Optica is building up excitement for the coming conventions in the EU. Time to open the kimono, Dr Dr!
I really liked Optica’s interview with Anthony Yu. How about you!
Effective July 1st, 2021, the SEC approved our filing for a $100 million shelf. This three year shelf expires on July 31st. Marcelli was so tight with the budget that Lightwave only raised $60.8 million over the last three years.
This second shelf is also for a three year period and for $100 million. The unsourced $39.2 million is cancelled and replaced with the new shelf.
The only interesting question for me is whether or not Lightwave will continue using Lincoln Park Capital and Roth Capital to raise working capital. This may turn out to be the company's window to elevate their investment banking associations. Remember that "analysts" and "investment bankers" have visited and toured the production and lab expansion.
To be clear, I do not know if the
LPC and Roth agreements are cancelled or just rolled over into the second shelf.
It is not surprising how you interpreted Lebby’s response to MY question. You simply cannot accept any comment that is positive. The interest from major industry players in Perkinamine and the proprietary PIC design has increased dramatically after the OFC demonstrations. That was the correct interpretation.
1. Point blank question:
Are we ready to go. I mean..if they gave us an order tomorrow can you fill it? We've got a Foundry.
After a very noticeable pause Dr Lebby said some things and finally said: "Obviously I can't answer that question for you".
Could you go back and listen again to this question. Lebby responded immediately saying “that’s true” and right after that what was it that Lebby said?
I always thought the longest sentence in the English language was “I do”.
Turns out the word “if” is even shorter.
Of course you are referring to the power reduction within the data centers that is currently attributable to the transceivers that convert the electronic signals into light pulses that depart the data centers through fiber optic cables.
I cannot think of one thing Pumpkin has gotten correct. To be correct 100% of the time, you would have to have predicted Lightwave Logic would have successfully gotten at least two foundries capable of producing their custom designed PICs on 200 mm wafers, poled at the foundry with exceptionally high yields. Thousands of modulators per wafer would have had to be your prediction. 200gbs per lane would have also had to have been your prediction. Did you also predict that three $500 billion market cap data center owners’ technical engineers would be working feverishly with the Lightwave Logic engineers to expedite the process?
Three strikes and you are out, benched, and moved to the little leagues where you always belonged.
You have no information to offer.
As usual you make statements without any credible information to back up your opinion. That’s okay with me because you have no information to back up your statements. Therefore, your statements are just your opinion.
You are a complete scam and anyone with any critical thinking capabilities has known that for what I hear is over 10 years.
Blackwell is electronic transistors making the calculations. Lightwave is in the device that converts the zeros and ones (binary code used in GPUs) into light pulses (on and off) so that light can transmit the data through fiber optic cables.
The more data that is generated on the electronic side means more data that needs to be converted into light pulses to travel to its destination through fiber optic cables.
I didn’t know you when you were duped! History is about to repeat itself just as you predicted. You will be duped again, but nothing is more important than consistency.
1.0000000000% = 1%
100.00000000% = 100%
There is no such thing as giving a 110% effort. That is a common error by coaches who failed math and physics classes.
Light modulation clearly falls in the category of physics. Perkinamine clearly falls in the category of chemistry. In both sciences 1.00% equals 1/100. 100.00% equals 100/100.
If you want to be a con artist along with Ted, you need to be smarter than people with two PHDs.
Even mental midgets know that 1.000% means that you claim to be correct once in 100 attempts. How stupid can you be?
What a complete idiot
Lightwave is ready now! That is how far ahead of the rest of the pack we are today.
I was there and Lebby did not say that.
Lutkowitz will listen to Andy B promoting TFLN and Lewis Johnson promoting polymers. I will assert Jose Pozo put this group together to give polymers additional exposure because he is a big fan of Lightwave Logic’s Perkinamine! (Everyone knows that). It doesn’t hurt that the CTO of Optica is a true believer in polymers!
Mark Lutkowitz is not privy to any of the approximate 40 NDAs that Lightwave Logic has with many companies at all levels of the supply chain.
In a private message with me on LinkedIn, Mark told me he saw Lightwave Logic’s demo at OFC. From other comments in that exchange, it was clear the LW engineers were coached on what they could and could not say.
Tuesday will be interesting and several will be listening.
I predict an Irish exit by Ted very soon.
The 400g upgrade is being leapfrogged by the industry. I have seen slides from Light Counting on this very topic.
For context, I was referring to someone who actually listened to Ted, Pumpkin, etc and sold at $4 being fearful of losing $2 in the short term. Then days or weeks later there is a trading halt before the open pending news. At that point, that individual realizes they have been conned by the short sellers and places an order to get back in at the equilibrium price after the trading halt is lifted. I just pulled $6-$10 out of the air for that first trade after the halt.
Hence the extremely risky advice being offered to shareholders by Ted, Pumpkin, Lurker, Reanimator, and most recently, Chart Reader. I would go as far as to call it irresponsible advice. Why would anyone give up their long term holding period for a potential savings of $2 at the risk of having to get back in at $6 to $10 after the PR announcing mass commercialization.
One question I plan to ask at the ASM is about the first mover advantage vs an exclusive agreement. For example, let’s say Google orders 10 million transceivers to be shipped as soon as available, is that as close to an exclusive agreement as possible?
Confucius say, “when one finds themselves in a hole, stop digging!”
Maybe next Friday!
Zdog, if you PM me with your email address, I can share. I think you can do that after hours on Friday.
To all,
My mistake, I should have said $175 billion. My apologies! I want to be as accurate as possible.
Totally serious
So you think I should sell at $3.80 and hope like hell the stock drops to $2 so I can get back in. This would end my long term holding period for a potential $1.80 paper loss savings.
You probably missed my earlier post today where we verified that LW engineers are working feverishly with the engineering teams from three (3) hyperscale data center owners to get this technology into their facilities. There is a huge sense of urgency because the value proposition is so compelling and the need so great.
Your recommendation carries so much risk even if you are right. This technology is extremely disruptive and a game changer. If you are right and the stock goes to $2.00, i will be buying at least 500,000 more shares.
Vanguard bought 6 million shares at $18. But, they are an index fund so they don’t care.
Chart, are you advising that I sell all my shares now and wait to buy them back after the big money finds out what I know?
Just need clarification before taking your advice. Thanks