Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I always thought the longest sentence in the English language was “I do”.
Turns out the word “if” is even shorter.
Of course you are referring to the power reduction within the data centers that is currently attributable to the transceivers that convert the electronic signals into light pulses that depart the data centers through fiber optic cables.
I cannot think of one thing Pumpkin has gotten correct. To be correct 100% of the time, you would have to have predicted Lightwave Logic would have successfully gotten at least two foundries capable of producing their custom designed PICs on 200 mm wafers, poled at the foundry with exceptionally high yields. Thousands of modulators per wafer would have had to be your prediction. 200gbs per lane would have also had to have been your prediction. Did you also predict that three $500 billion market cap data center owners’ technical engineers would be working feverishly with the Lightwave Logic engineers to expedite the process?
Three strikes and you are out, benched, and moved to the little leagues where you always belonged.
You have no information to offer.
As usual you make statements without any credible information to back up your opinion. That’s okay with me because you have no information to back up your statements. Therefore, your statements are just your opinion.
You are a complete scam and anyone with any critical thinking capabilities has known that for what I hear is over 10 years.
Blackwell is electronic transistors making the calculations. Lightwave is in the device that converts the zeros and ones (binary code used in GPUs) into light pulses (on and off) so that light can transmit the data through fiber optic cables.
The more data that is generated on the electronic side means more data that needs to be converted into light pulses to travel to its destination through fiber optic cables.
I didn’t know you when you were duped! History is about to repeat itself just as you predicted. You will be duped again, but nothing is more important than consistency.
1.0000000000% = 1%
100.00000000% = 100%
There is no such thing as giving a 110% effort. That is a common error by coaches who failed math and physics classes.
Light modulation clearly falls in the category of physics. Perkinamine clearly falls in the category of chemistry. In both sciences 1.00% equals 1/100. 100.00% equals 100/100.
If you want to be a con artist along with Ted, you need to be smarter than people with two PHDs.
Even mental midgets know that 1.000% means that you claim to be correct once in 100 attempts. How stupid can you be?
What a complete idiot
Lightwave is ready now! That is how far ahead of the rest of the pack we are today.
I was there and Lebby did not say that.
Lutkowitz will listen to Andy B promoting TFLN and Lewis Johnson promoting polymers. I will assert Jose Pozo put this group together to give polymers additional exposure because he is a big fan of Lightwave Logic’s Perkinamine! (Everyone knows that). It doesn’t hurt that the CTO of Optica is a true believer in polymers!
Mark Lutkowitz is not privy to any of the approximate 40 NDAs that Lightwave Logic has with many companies at all levels of the supply chain.
In a private message with me on LinkedIn, Mark told me he saw Lightwave Logic’s demo at OFC. From other comments in that exchange, it was clear the LW engineers were coached on what they could and could not say.
Tuesday will be interesting and several will be listening.
I predict an Irish exit by Ted very soon.
The 400g upgrade is being leapfrogged by the industry. I have seen slides from Light Counting on this very topic.
For context, I was referring to someone who actually listened to Ted, Pumpkin, etc and sold at $4 being fearful of losing $2 in the short term. Then days or weeks later there is a trading halt before the open pending news. At that point, that individual realizes they have been conned by the short sellers and places an order to get back in at the equilibrium price after the trading halt is lifted. I just pulled $6-$10 out of the air for that first trade after the halt.
Hence the extremely risky advice being offered to shareholders by Ted, Pumpkin, Lurker, Reanimator, and most recently, Chart Reader. I would go as far as to call it irresponsible advice. Why would anyone give up their long term holding period for a potential savings of $2 at the risk of having to get back in at $6 to $10 after the PR announcing mass commercialization.
One question I plan to ask at the ASM is about the first mover advantage vs an exclusive agreement. For example, let’s say Google orders 10 million transceivers to be shipped as soon as available, is that as close to an exclusive agreement as possible?
Confucius say, “when one finds themselves in a hole, stop digging!”
Maybe next Friday!
Zdog, if you PM me with your email address, I can share. I think you can do that after hours on Friday.
To all,
My mistake, I should have said $175 billion. My apologies! I want to be as accurate as possible.
Totally serious
So you think I should sell at $3.80 and hope like hell the stock drops to $2 so I can get back in. This would end my long term holding period for a potential $1.80 paper loss savings.
You probably missed my earlier post today where we verified that LW engineers are working feverishly with the engineering teams from three (3) hyperscale data center owners to get this technology into their facilities. There is a huge sense of urgency because the value proposition is so compelling and the need so great.
Your recommendation carries so much risk even if you are right. This technology is extremely disruptive and a game changer. If you are right and the stock goes to $2.00, i will be buying at least 500,000 more shares.
Vanguard bought 6 million shares at $18. But, they are an index fund so they don’t care.
Chart, are you advising that I sell all my shares now and wait to buy them back after the big money finds out what I know?
Just need clarification before taking your advice. Thanks
Ted,
I am just glad that three majors (market caps of over $500 billion) have engineering teams working directly with Lightwave’s engineering teams.
Oh! You didn’t know that?
I believe the correct statement is: Reliability and Stability of Perkinamine is no longer a concern by the T1 companies who are working feverishly (engineers at both LW and the T1) to get this to market.
Your phrasing makes it sound like there is no longer a concern about the testing procedures.
On YouTube there is a video produced by Jose Pozo of Optica where he interviews several engineers on the topic of heterogeneous integration of hybrid pics. One of the engineers from Global Foundries answered a question about yields. His response was that the components of optical modulators are actually quite large compared to electronic circuits and therefore have very high yields.
This is the only independent information I have found on yields on silicon. BTW, Pumpkin’s posts never include any independent verification.
I remember this video was done this year and was well before OFC.
You are the VERY BEST CON MAN I have ever encountered in my life.
Sure wish that statistic was not shared on this board.
Sucks to be low info!
Time will tell who is the fool.
8,600 transceivers are on track to ship in Q4, 2024.
I only care about what is happening in 2024 and beyond. You and all of the doubters are obsessed with events in prior years. I would label you as “low vision!”
Isn’t the point that the eyes look that good at 120 ghz. Gigoptics was looking good at 10 ghz
He is speaking now
Excellent
Pumpkin would call you a “high information” investor.