I get the feeling CHSO might go to them too. Just a gut feeling

Or a buyback, which these buyers have a history of. They have voting control, but they don’t have majority ownership. I am guessing that they will want that like they did with TKSI. They got it with a buyback… not a RS

The valuation will be greater than their actual income or holdings due to the multipliers added for SAAS companies. A company with this age and client diversification will most likely be valued with between a 10x to 25x multiplier. These multipliers take into account many different aspects and can be researched for a greater understanding. Panshi also has a very valuable lending business that would increase the company value, but that is only if the full company was to go public.

https://flashalert.me/?symbol=ACCR&source=SEC&referer=https://stocktwits.com/&url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1041588/000155736121000006/xslF345X03/primary_doc.xml&s3=ACCR/2021-07-20/14-15-20_000000/4/A/ac29b5e59f060974b658180a3848917a/primary_doc.xml

How is he flourishing?!? His new stock price has plummeted. He has no distribution for his vodka. Show me a cocktail menu or a retail store that sells his products. Just one! That is my industry. I know the liquor business. He is failing. I will produce more today than he will all year.

The previous owner of ACCR is trying to scheme Xu, and brought a lawsuit against him in small claims court… and lost. On the other hand, Xu is suing him in multiple courts for what he has pulled

BMW is a $55 BILLION company! No one is buying them. Especially not a startup EV company.

Thanks for the update Xu

Will not be done and posted by open. It is 9 am Pacific, and usually takes a day or two for the minutes to be posted. They are usually scheduled for “in chambers” which means it is not actually a hearing, and will be done at whatever time the judge gets to it and finishes reviewing paperwork

I use TD on all my Moody plays. $6.95 OTC fee per trade, but worth it for the right play

A few others on another board have gotten through and put in tech orders too

Called... escalated up a few people... got a manager to look at it and find the issue... change order submitted with the tech team. No idea of the repair timeline

It is being fixed now. Got red flagged by the system thinking it was the previous CPSL.

If it is Hanergry like you just said then stepped back from... for good sakes and the sake of all investors, let that happen! That is a $30 BILLION company!

You do understand that there is no way to pull this off legally. Right?!? Controlled substances require a person to person identify verification. Per federal standards. And drones in most areas require a registered flight plan. You get this. Right?!?

Seriously... get a lawyer.

“Catapult Solutions, Inc. has no subsidiaries and no affiliation of any kind with any other entity, or with any other entity that may share a similar name. Catapult Solutions, Inc. is a blank check shell company.”

From the website

https://www.corporaterevivalservices.com/status-updates

There with you on that. I deep dived into them and Catapult is a member of the advocacy group. That is the only thing I see.

Nothing that I have seen. Not saying there isn’t, but I am here to ride for awhile. It could just be a random connection based on an available ticker from FINRA and Moody and team just picking words to match the letters. It could be a direct connection. Previous mergers from Moody don’t seem to have any connection between the name of the second ticker and the final ticker. I think that any discussion of a definitive answer at this point is wrong. None of us know. For me, I am just trusting in their team till we see actual information on a legal form... not internet conjecture. I am extremely positive on this ticker though.

Alberta Enterprise Group is not a company, it is an advocacy group for regional companies near Alberta. They do not own any of the companies listed, those companies are just members.

This is neither new nor evidence of fraud. This shows that you didn’t do your due diligence or read the contract, or get a lawyer. Now you want a better deal, so you are screaming till the give you one. If you wanted them to pay for outstanding bills, it has to be in the contract. That isn’t fraud, it is business 101.

I’m not on their side... but none of this is clear or frankly coherent. I just want to know exactly what the fraud is in terms of the company, beyond the money. And I want to see the proof he says he has

But you said that before, then recanted. Show us something that proves that they are not bringing in a merger. I really do want to be on your side, but talk on a public forum is weird enough... but not backing it up is even weirder

So no new info...

If you actually have something of that great concern, and you want help from this board, then post what you have. Otherwise, you are just trying to scam everyone here... again

Very true! Excited to see what is happening next

He actually increased the AS again yesterday to 5.3 billion. This isn’t necessarily bad. If it is actually RockySaaS, this would make since.

Merger appears to be confirmed... no R/S as of now... but AS increased by 2.3B

https://mobile.twitter.com/rockettrade007/status/1370192485415272448

You have to pay for it. It is $2 I think. Can’t do it from a phone though and I am stuck at work.... otherwise I would

Has anyone pulled that report yet to see what it is? Not to be Debbie Downer here, but that is where R/S’s come from.