Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
any miracles?
What's the update on this?
I think I still have my actual certificate
nice!
http://seekingalpha.com/article/312267-genesis-biopharma-management-s-troubled-history-of-failed-companies-and-stock-promotion-portends-future-shareholder-pain
Nice post about Mr. Cataldo. Wish I saw something like this before VOIP :(
if only my old voic shares can convert.....
Suit dismissed?
Hey guys.....it's been awhile.....was just looking at my investments the past 7 years and remembered how much $ i lost with voii voic whatever symbol they had....
I came across this while doing a little research on the various lawsuits voip inc. is in:
http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/02162011voip_dismissca.pdf
Any lawyers/paralegal can tell me what this means?
What is the best way I can stay up to date with the status of voip's lawsuits vs. goog? what is the avg time patent disputes get dismissed/settled?
i'm guessing this is a lost hope to recover some of my losses, since there are many creditors in front of a silly uninformed shareholder like me....
Not without you rstatts
down 99%? sounds like bear sterns....and they're not OTC
VoIP, Inc. Eyes Patent Infringers of “USPTO-6501837”
VoIP, Inc. Inks Deal with Top Law Firm to Seek Damages from Fortune 500 Companies for Patent Infringement
ORLANDO, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--VoIP, Inc. (OTCBB:VOIC) announced today it has retained the BALL LAW FIRM, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, and that it intends to protect its patent from being infringed on by some of the nation’s leading Fortune 500 companies.
The Patent:
#6501837 (Telephone call connection)
The Law Firm:
BALL LAW FIRM, LLP, Los Angeles, CA
The Technology:
(Click to Call)-(Pay Per Call)
The patents protect innovations that enable “Pay-Per-Call” advertising and “Click to Call” technology, in addition to call connections between two parties initiated via a web browser. In the lawsuit, VoIP, Inc. seeks an injunction that would prevent these companies from further misappropriating VoIP, Inc.’s technology and infringing VoIP, Inc.’s patents. The lawsuit also seeks unspecified monetary damages arising from the companies’ unauthorized use of the patented technology and the continued willful infringement of VoIP, Inc.’s patents.
Based on information provided from some of the industry’s leading technology experts and the fact that this technology is being implemented at an ultra hyper rate domestically and internationally, Byron T. Ball, attorney at BALL LAW FIRM, LLP, stated, “I believe the current value of the patent could exceed 1.25 billion dollars.”
“We have identified over 100 companies that have willfully infringed on our patents. We intend to stop the infringement and defend our technology and the patents behind it. These patents and the business they represent will be utilized to provide the shareholders with the value they deserve and have long awaited,” stated CEO Anthony Cataldo. “Citing case studies, in reference to Click to Call, from Fortune 500 companies such as Continental Airlines, the ROI was 50x cost of service. The service showed a 35% lead conversion rate twice that of traditional leads and reduced website abandonment by over 25%.”
The research firm Kelsey Group says Pay-Per-Call ad revenue in the U.S. in 2009 will top $4 billion. By comparison, all paid search ad revenue in the U.S. surpassed $4 billion in the first half of this year and is growing at more than a 40% per year clip.
Verizon’s VoIP Patent Game Continues
Om Malik, Monday, February 11, 2008 at 12:14 PM PT Comments (1)
Verizon’s VoIP patents have become a lucrative source of income for the second-largest phone company in the U.S. After squeezing out $120 million from Vonage, the company has been filing patent infringement lawsuits against all comers — from tiny startups to cable giants like Cox. Today Verizon went after Charter Communications.
On the flip side, VoIP Inc., an Altamonte Springs, Fla.-based VoIP provider with a questionable business outlook, is almost out of gas. They owe Verizon about $8 million related to the settlement the two companies agreed to last year. As Fierce VoIP points out.
Unless Verizon believes in fairies, this money is as good as gone because the stock price is now at $0.008, creditors are already in the courts for big debts and VoIP Inc. is admitting it expects to have to write off its only real asset, its network business.
Convicted felon Steve Ivester was involved with VoIP Inc. during its early days when it was making a transition from tea company to Vonage competitor. Over the past 12 months, VoIP Inc.’s stock has tanked — from over $8 a share to less than a penny.
Now why would I do such a thing when I currently have 850 shares of VOIC? :)
Can't sell either since Scottrade doesn't give me free trades :(
i do need some stamps though.....
Question is, how is razrclick not infringing any of Motorola's trademarks?
I'm sure the spelling "RAZR" is unique to Moto and it's not like this voip site is a completely different industry than Motorola's...
New CTO's
VoIP, Inc. Appoints Co-Chief Technology Officers
Print article
Refer to a friend
© Business Wire 2007
2007-12-10 18:44:29 -
- VoIP, Inc. (OTCBB: VOIC) announced today that it has appointed Arthur L. McCabe and Kevin Behanna as Co-Chief Technology Officers. Since November, 2003, Mr. McCabe has been Director of Engineering/Software Development at VoIP, where he was in charge of a team of engineers and programmers responsible for software development and maintenance of the Company's database servers. Prior to his
appointment, Mr. Behanna was Director of Operations for the Company, where he was responsible for coordinating operations which include universal service, intercarrier relations, local competition, consumer issues, and network matters.
"I am pleased to announce the appointment of two seasoned technology officers," said Tony Cataldo, VoIP, Inc.'s Chairman and CEO. "Arthur and Kevin have played integral roles in the development and expansion of our Network. We look forward to the continued role they will play in expanding and support our Network, which is increasingly being recognized by leading companies for its reliability."
Prior to joining VoIP, Mr. McCabe was Manager of Information, where he developed a suite of web-based products from 1999 until 2003. Previously, he held positions as a Project Manager for the Educational Institute of the American Hotel and Motel Association, an Application Developer for Axis Education and a Senior Application Programmer for Gordon Food Service. He was awarded a Bachelor's of Computer Science Degree from Olivet College.
Mr. Behanna has over 20 years' experience within the Telecommunications and IT industry and has a particular expertise which combines strategic insight with operational delivery and achievement of business objectives. Prior to joining VoiceOne, Kevin spent seventeen years with Siemens, where he first directed the ILEC Support team.
Source:http://www.pr-inside.com/voip-inc-appoints-co-chief-technology-officers-r340822.htm
Didn't this company do some business internationally? I remember reading something about Hong Kong couple years ago...
i've been trying to catch up with everything...
question i have is, why would i care for the restricted shares that I haven't received? they won't be available until 2007 right? so why should i DEMAND them when it doesn't affect me? drive the prices higher now when I can't sell them? i'd be mad if i don't receive my shares when the restriction is lifted...but why should I care now? i know that's a selffish thought but everyone only cares about themselves first right?
Thanks Guys! How Long is the Restriction?
I guess this is my last post since I'm using the free version.
Just curious on why the stocks are under restriction? Is it part of the merger deal? How long is the restriction for?
I appreciate all your help.
Serfdom, do you have AIM that I may contact you for more information? You seen to be very knowledgable about the matter.
Thanks again.
HELP! New here...
Just would like more information on what's going on with my JPHC shares. I use Scottrade and so far it doesn't show I have PAIV shares...but it does show it on my GainsKeeper....