Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
They seem to be starting to be more active across all boards with potential that have been in holding patterns while the OTC has been quiet. I think this is a sign of expectations for money to come back into micro caps with rate drops?
Makes sense, piss all over your bed because you are pissed...
The 3rd case does seem effectively closed pending the filings of the other case. They are essentially one in the same in regards to claims. It is all in regards to payment of the original settlement. I did upload all of the files to the shared folder, but the last file 24-00196__0035.0 is the conclusion of that case.
No problem. I just did the 2 week free trial and downloaded all of the docs allowed that I could for current cases. I also, have the perception that this case was settled in VA and for some reason the plaintiff is trying to file in CA now.
There are 3 open cases per Pacer. Two are from Atlantic Wave. Anyone, without paying, can search Pacer and see that for themselves. I will add the other for review.
Active businesses have lawsuits, it happens. I was an exec for a distribution company for 13y and managed about $100M/yr. in total business at the max, averaging $50M/yr. We were almost constantly in a suit or two either as plaintiffs or defendants. I just searched Tesla and they are a party in 121 cases filed just this year...
If anyone wants to review all of the active court case docs they are shared at the Google Drive link below. I suggest reading all of the docs to base your opinion instead of a couple selected clips posted by a short seller on X.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18mMDM80aAHxxoshyGSEjpcmb0yEqtuuW?usp=drive_link
Issuing at artificially depressed values. Maybe this is what Brett is bent about?
There is only one scenario I see where Cyberlux benefits by intentionally keeping the publicly traded stock in CE while they are doing so well in revs. At some point they want to benefit from offloading some shares they all own into the market. So, the one case this may be beneficial is if they know there are bigger and better things in the future and they want to keep it CE to somehow collect shares at the resulting suppressed pricing. At some point they need an exit and they aren't doing that at current value.
How does anyone know that was even a real profile for the person associated with TONR? It could have very well of been any random person looking to manipulate the stock. The complete disappearance supports this assumption.
Elon Musk must be the most unprofessional CEO in history then. It really shows is his companies performance too.
Correct, these are not meant to fulfill the role of sacrificial Kamikaze drones. I do not recall where I got this, but I have been under the impression these are recon drones used for surveillance with the RED camera systems. Payload would likely be exceed carrying both hi res video systems and munitions while the drone unit is still small enough to be stealth from human sound and sight detection within required operational distances.
I forgot about the smaller contract being fulfilled via ADS. Cyberlux already has an existing relationship with another very large GSA supplier they could shift to IF there was a disagreement with HII voiding the partnership.
It isn't just about the number of posts. I can not imagine any reasonable motivation for someone to create an account and then post negatively about an investment. It is something I have never been able to see justification in spending time on. A poster is either invested and would not want to spread negative theories that could impact their investment, or they are not invested and have ulterior motives in bashing the stock to impact sentiment. If you ever have evidence of claims I am certainly open to accepting them for face value.
Where are you getting your stats from regarding the supply specs on the drones? The website does not spec what was contracted to be supplied as it is a custom build.
I am not saying that the current situation is favorable, but I am not buying into any claims from random actors on the web good or bad without evidence.
Can you post documentation for that investigation so we know who at the SEC to contact as point person? No? Oh, I see.
If it wasn't advance payment which we agree it wasn't for several reasons, it was payment for delivery meeting contract terms. Where do you think the funds spent came from?
Do you actually not realize the vastly differences in a $1K drone and what Cyberlux was contracting to deliver? The RED camera systems alone are like $10-15K retail.
Your 2 post history makes you sus AF.
Prime vendors are just that, logistics/distribution managers for manufacturers and service providers. They are there so government purchasing agents do not have to deal directly with every source. That being said there are still other vendors such as SDVOSBs who get preference and are happy to facilitate the access. The organizations have obligations to purchase from VOSB/SDVOSB beyond the Prime vendor. There are options. All of that being said it has nothing to do with the prior contract status and fulfillment of such. I have never seen any entity operating under GSA advance pay for anything, but it has been a decade since I have been in the mix.
Having participated in the supply process to GSA I can say IF the Ingalls agreement fell through it is not the end of the deal. The purchasing decision makers selected the vendor of Cyberlux for the needed drones and Ingalls was simply acting as a preferred vendor for logistics. They are hardly the only option. There are countless approved vendors happy to push some paper and throw some extra pallets on their next outbound shipment for a 10% or whatever cut.
They requested the partner upgrade and then received an unpublished requirement from CISCO to accomplish before approval. He was transparent as this developed. What do you think should have been done differently?
Thanks for sharing. Have you screenshot and posted that doc anywhere?
My guess, and this is just a theory that makes sense to me, is Rosen is filing the suit for discovery to reveal the full details on CE. He probably wants transparency like all of us and has lost patience. Filing a suit based on some terms in their contract could force CYBL and/or OTC to reveal the details.
Believe it or not I am still holding some here. I too figured that Ahole didn't go through all of that for nothing.
Or call him at work like I did and was chastised for, lmao
When I see a company being quiet and not diluting I ask "why do nothing to pump, or at least trickle news to stabilize the stock?" The only logical reason is they are working on the objectives, but haven't achieved material events YET. Also, why push the share price up before things are happening when the company, principals, employees, partners and F&F may still want to pickup shares?
No, because I do not follow boards where I am not bullish and invested. That is simply a retarded thing to waste valuable time on.
Man I blocked these parasites that followed you here, but I can't escape their litter on the board because you keep responding.
It sounds like you are talking about Elon Musk and Tesla. Ya, total failure. 🙄
Is this our girl? Merger with Juniper? 😆
I would assume a lot of the delay time on any process not automated can be attributed to OTCM itself. I am sure that, like me, you have dealt with your share of agencies who take way longer than what seems reasonable to complete a task on their plate. OTCM has a monopoly and there are no consequences to them being slow or incompetent.
Melvin made an early announcement revealing a customer company name that mucked up the contract in the past when they were merging with JPEX. He said he would never announce such details again until the deal was completed. Withholding the name can prevent any concerns coming up for in process deals.
How about quoting the whole statement?
Well, you are like 1 of 5 with a few tweet exceptions that have up to 10 or so.
Everyone here bitches about exposure, yet I see so few likes on the Veemost posts. It should take about 1 minute to scroll through and like every tweet for YTD. Like and retweet that shit, it cost you nothing.
It certainly does. What you need to consider is that not everyone realizes, or is consciously aware of that when they are making their trade. If they were the emotion/manipulation factor would not exist.
The whole market runs on emotion and manipulation, what’s new?
I will tell you what I do know that isn't a guess.
1. The transfer agent is paid fees and controls all requests of the company to OTC. I do not know how they set their fees or if they are regulated, but I do know the fees are negotiable and not standardized. On the latest report you can see TA fees are due from Veemost.
2. The transfer agent, Securitize, is also a broker/dealer who may be in bed with other broker MMs who make profits off of retail selling low and buying high.
3. I am aware of a situation where the TA for an OTC company had tried to convince the CEO to not request a name change. No logical reasoning was given beyond the complexity of the action. The assumption was that the name change damages the TA in some way, either directly or indirectly through back door relationships. Why wouldn't be motivated to close on the additional fees for the services?
4. OTC MMs are almost always short shares as they skim $ while manipulating emotions of retail shareholders while OTC companies are in periods of uncertainty.
5. Lack of communication creates uncertainty. People react emotionally when uncertain. Emotional people are easy to manipulate.
Now you can make your own guess given those details.
To anyone with experience with psilocybin it is evident this report it totally blown out of context. Yes, temporary nausea is common for some at higher doses - no big deal and it can be managed. Seizures and depression are very uncommon and are likely a result of dosage abuse and state of mind of the user pre usage. Abnormal heart rates also uncommon at concerning levels for psilocybin, but are frequently a side effect from chocolate for those sensitive to caffeine. My wife can only eat a small amount of dark chocolate and never in the evening or she gets heat racing/anxiety feeling.
My opinion on that is meaningless, as is anyone's who is not an insider.
MM algos are programmed to create liquidity. If nobody is selling/buying they will try to create fear selling. The algo has no idea about the OTC status preventing normal exchange of shares in the market.
You do know the definition of a "few" I assume? If yes, please list the few tickers you mention...
The difference here is the CEO and his circle will run this without OTC X pumpers help. When you have such people involved like ICE Cube all of his people, and their friends... will grab shares. Now multiply that by all of the players. There is a lot of money connected here.
Um, get out of my head. I better get royalties...