Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Lets hope Leo puts this $961,540.00 in good use
Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
On July 31, 2014, Leo Motors, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (the "Company") sold three convertible promissory notes (each a "Note") for an aggregate principal amount of $961,540 to two Korean accredited investors pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement"), a form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.1.
Each note has a maturity date which is three years after the date of issuance. Each Note has an interest rate of four (4%) percent per annum. Each note is convertible into restricted shares of the Company's common stock ("Common Stock") at any time on the date that is three months after the date such Note was issued at an exercise price equal to $0.10 per share, which may be adjusted, subject to certain terms and conditions, to a price equal to the greater of (i) par value of the Common Stock, or (ii) seventy-five (75%) of the average trading price of the Common Stock for the 3 months immediately preceding the date of conversion. The Company is permitted to repay the Note at any time after the date that is three months after the date of issuance.
The foregoing description of the Agreement is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Exhibit 10.1, referenced below and is incorporated by reference in its entirety
I click that link and it is a different company and is I think Deans old friend's Co.
Must be news coming out soon! With this price rise.
I am still in AEHI I think the CEO before should have know about LTBR Lightbridge Corp it would be good for this place check it out to see what you think? They had a reverse split I think to get on a larger board. I am not in it because of my age I thought it would take to long for a good out come but they came a long ways since then. Working on nuclear engery that is not so dangerous and cannot make a nucular boom out of it.
news on yhaoo
Seoul, South Korea / ACCESSWIRE / February 20, 2014 / Leo Motors Inc. (LEOM) announced that its affiliate company, Leo Greentier Marines (LGM), finished a successful demonstration of its electric fishing boat in Pokpo City on February 14. The demonstration was organized by the Ministry of Ocean and fisheries of Korea. In the event the Ministry invited potential buyers and e-boat related industry people.
View photo
.
In January, 2014, the Ministry officially announced that it will subsidize up to 40 boats for conversion from internal combustion engines to electric motors. Any conversion volunteer will receive 60 percent of the conversion costs with maximum subsidy of 30 million Korean won (approximately US$ 29,499) from the government.
Leo Motors has contracted to acquire 25% of affiliate company Leo Greentier Marines (LGM) in December, 2013. LGM is the first Korean electric outboard power system developer and producer. There is no known company in the world making E-boats sustainable and marketable. They have developed a fossil fuel alternative to conventional boats that reduce the amount of CO2 and other water pollutants.
LGM developed 30kW electric outboard power system for fishing and leisure boats and 80kW for fishing boats. Mr. Won, CEO of LGM said, "It is in the development of the 300kW power system anticipated to debut in early 2014."
Pokpo Cith is one of the biggest harbor cities located in the southern part of Korea.
This press release includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In addition to statements which explicitly describe such risks and uncertainties, readers are urged to consider statements labeled with the terms "believes," "belief," "expects," "intends," "anticipates," "will," or "plans" to be uncertain and forward looking. The forward-looking statements contained herein are also subject generally to other risks and uncertainties that are described from time to time in the company's reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
from yahoo message board
The world's first INSTALLED stand-alone solar energy ESS, which is Leo Motor's 2kWh e-box Solar PV modules and stand-alone photovoltaic 4.1kWh lithium battery, is to debut in "Haim e house" model house models in Yangpyung, February 2014, and is scheduled to be part of their open house, where Leo's storage device, a stand-alone solar energy equipment in the home will be debuted.
The contract, between e-heim and Leo Motors ( Stock Symbol: LEOM ) called for Leo Motors to produce the initial 100 contracted sets of of our E-box, to start (initial 100 unit sales for the model homes only). This contractual agreement to produce 100 units in three months, to be installed in "Ingelheim's" e Village was penned in November 2013 for use by Ingleheim this February, 2014.
Let's hope the long wait is finally over! If the Korean Article's claim, that this venture will TRULY produce "The world's first INSTALLED stand-alone solar energy ESS (completely off-the-grid)," then either Ingleheim, Leo Motors, OR BOTH, should make international news, regarding the debut.
update to
Last summer when I visited Las Vegas I did not see anything about (HIPP) where you can check out by your phone, signs, posters, or on any advertising monitors and tv screens ect. I also checked around the hotel lobbies and did not see anything related to what HIPP does as stated in HIPP PR ( note: I did not have a room in Aria or Belligio ) I am still holding long to HIPP.
This Christmas on monitors at the las vegas casinos I saw you could checkout early without getting in line as per Hipp PR
propert
From their PR
Third quarter bookings (the dollar value of contracts signed during the quarter) were $8.4 million, the highest Q3 bookings in Company histor
If this happen then why this?
their high turnover on the sales team, 10 new hires and 10 exits, resulted in a less efficient sales force.
Was this turnover a C Y A or the sales force did not tell the new clients of the new law?
Last summer when I visited Las Vegas I did not see anything about (HIPP) where you can check out by your phone, signs, posters, or on any advertising monitors and tv screens ect. I also checked around the hotel lobbies and did not see anything related to what HIPP does as stated in HIPP PR ( note: I did not have a room in Aria or Belligio ) I am still holding long to HIPP.
for your info from the web
1) Beginning October 16, 2013, prior express written consent will be required for all autodialed and/or pre-recorded calls/texts sent/made to cell phone and pre-recorded calls made to residential land lines for marketing purposes.
Compliance with the E-SIGN Act satisfies this requirement, meaning that electronic or digital forms of signature are acceptable (i.e., agreements obtained via email, website form, text message, telephone keypress or voice recording).
Consumer consent must be unambiguous, meaning that the consumer must receive a “clear and conspicuous disclosure” that he/she will receive future calls that deliver autodialed and/or pre-recorded telemarketing messages on behalf of a specific advertiser; that his/her consent is not a condition of purchase; and he/she must designate a phone number at which to be reached (which should not be pre-populated by the advertiser in an online form). Limited exceptions apply to this requirement, such as calls/texts from the consumer’s cellular carrier, debt collectors, schools, informational notices and healthcare-related calls.
If a dispute concerning consent arises, the advertiser bears the burden of proof to demonstrate that a clear and conspicuous disclosure was provided and that the consumer unambiguously consented to receive telemarketing calls to the number he/she specifically provided. It is a best practice for advertisers to maintain each consumer’s written consent for at least four (4) years, which is the federal statute of limitations to bring an action under the TCPA. Evidence of Internet-provided written consent includes, but is not limited to, website pages that contain consumer consent language and fields, associated screenshot of the consent webpage as seen by the consumer where the phone number was inputted, complete data record submitted by the consumer (with time and date stamp), together with the applicable consumer IP address.
2) Beginning October 16, 2013, the “established business relationship” exemption for pre-recorded telemarketing calls to residential landlines will be eliminated.
In the past, advertisers could rely on an established business relationship (such as a previous purchase) to circumvent the need to obtain a consumer’s written consent to receive telemarketing calls. That exception to the consent requirement will no longer exist after this year. Advertisers will have to obtain written consumer consent, outlined above, even if they previously had a business relationship with the consumer.
Compared to other stock I watch that stock some how goes up before news comes out.
Lets hope the news is so good that management did not want any one else to know. This is my only hope for this quartet.
Silver I guess I not to bright I am going to hang on to my money and their stock and put my money into my little company if leo hits $0.10 it will hit $10.00 all they need is some one to invest in them with big money before their patents run out or before some company just takes over their patents. and BK them. it is a cruel world out their.
Silver one million shares is only 1/60 of the company right and it fell from $0.40 to $0.02 they did a good job promoting the company and selling their shares so red chip can be the fastest growing privet company. I am ok I only bought it at $1.00!
Hi iheartweimers I put this board up because i invested this stock for my income now As I have been retired sence 1998. I got it around 21.00 at 7% now it looksw like they are paying around 8% on my investment
I made a misstake I just read it over again it just means it goes into effest when someone gets over 5% of the company. I most have been smoking something yesterday when I read it LOL
basspro
What is your take on the shareholder's rights plan? To me it reads if BBX share price gets over $25.00 lets say $30.00 you can pay the co. $25.00 and get a prefered stock that is worth $30.00 and if they are paying dividend on BBX you will get the dividend. The company will take the $25.00 and invest it some whear. It looks like they are going to make money as in yahoo news theym are still going to give to charity. This might be a sleeper.
wakeup anyone makeing any money here besides me.
Nice 8k news out should help in the cash flow break even in aug
I missed this one but I am in BBX
On February 5, 2013 Augme Technologies, Inc. ("Augme") entered into a settlement with AOL, Inc. (together with its affiliates, including, but not limited to AOL Advertising Inc. and Tacoda LLC, "AOL"), pursuant to which Augme and AOL have settled the two pending lawsuits as between each other, namely (i) Civil Action No. 12-cv-5439, originally filed on September 10, 2008, as Civil Action No. 08-cv-5914 in the Central District of California and previously part of Civil Action No. 09-cv-4299 in the Southern District of New York, and (ii) Civil Action No. 11-cv-5193, originally filed on April 29, 2011, as originally filed as Civil Action No. 11-cv-282 in the Eastern District of Virginia and now pending as Civil Action No. 11-cv-5193 in the Southern District of New York. (collectively, the “Lawsuits”).
Pursuant to the settlement, (a) Augme has granted AOL and its customers a paid-up license in any patent owned or controlled by Augme for the life of those patents in return for a lump sum payment of $650,000, (b) Augme has covenanted not to sue AOL on those patents that Augme owns or controls, (c) Augme and AOL have dismissed the Lawsuits as to each other with prejudice with each side to bear its own costs, and (d) Augme and AOL have released each other as to the subject matter of the Lawsuits with AOL making no admission of liability.
How come this co has a q at the end of its symol ASIQ in its 10Q their is no leagle procedings?
I found this on another board
Back to nuclear power
http://ibankcoin.com/flyblog/2013/02/06/rumored-new-energy-secretary-nuclear-bull/
Did anyone see the interview on the tv? Somehow I do not trust Red Chip.
Thanks kimble1
I am holding freebes which is most of them and went to the casino a couple of times on imgg on what I sold. I envy what you had.
Kimble1
Have you add any more Imgg since before the last time they tried to get FDA approvl?
Some news on BBX
I just pick up some BBX a couple of days a go
Not in this yet. If the deal goes theough does shareholders get any moneyh
A group of corporate debt investors of BankAtlantic, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp Inc. (BBX), filed a lawsuit against the firm to stop it from selling its loans, deposits and branches to BB&T Corporation (BBT). These investors believe that this sale infringes the terms of their creditors’ agreement.
Earlier on November 1, BB&T had announced about its plan to acquire BankAtlantic. Under the terms of the deal, the company would acquire $2.1 billion in loans and $3.3 billion in deposits (90% core and low-cost funds) for $301 million premium, representing 9.05% of the deposits at BankAtlantic on September 30, plus the net asset value of the bank. However, deposit premium could rise or fall, based on the amount of deposits at BankAtlantic prior to the closing of deal, not exceeding $315.9 million. The agreement excludes BankAtlantic's nonperforming and other criticized assets.
Charges Against the Deal
In the first opposition to the deal, the plaintiffs accused both BB&T and BankAtlantic of structuring the transaction in such a way that the acquirer can evade the trust preferred securities (TruPS) obligations. They charged the parent company, BankAtlantic Bancorp, of breaching an agreement, stating that transfer or sale of majority of its assets will not happen without ensuring that the acquirer will also assume TruPS.
However, BB&T deal would transfer nearly 83% of BankAtlantic assets, without assuming TruPS. Hence, the plaintiffs want either TruPS to be included in the agreement or the deal to be blocked.
The plaintiffs also stated that following the closure of the transaction, BankAtlantic Bancorp would become a holding company with no branches and will own a large amount of nonperforming loans and foreclosed real estate assets. Therefore, the company will no longer resemble its present operations.
The lawsuit against BB&T-BankAtlantic transaction was filed in Delaware Chancery Court by Hildene Capital Management and Alesco Preferred Funding. Both Hildene and Alesco are indirect beneficiaries to BankAtlantic’s TruPS.
Similar Opposition Before
Earlier in 2010, BankAtlantic faced similar opposition related to its TruPS. At that time, the company had tried to repurchase nearly $230 million of these securities at a discount to boost its capital levels. However, the offer was withdrawn following strong oppositions from certain section of investors.
Our Viewpoint
The BB&T-BankAtlantic deal will be highly advantageous to both companies. For BankAtlantic, the agreement will likely resolve some of its balance sheet and higher operating expense related problems.
For BB&T, the transaction will allow it to speed up its expansion strategy in Florida region. Also, the deal would add 78 branches to BB&T’s 64 branch network in Florida region. Besides substantially increasing BB&T’s market share and footprints, the acquisition would also improve the company’s top line over the medium term.
However, investors’ interest should also be taken into consideration and a solution that maximizes all the parties profit should be taken.
BB&T currently retains a Zacks #3 Rank, which translates into a short-term ‘Hold’ rating. Considering the fundamentals, we are also maintaining our long-term “Neutral” recommendation on the shares.
11/19 news
Beacon Power Settles with Department of Energy Loan Programs Office
PrintAlert
Beacon Power Corp (QB) (USOTC:BCONQ)
Historical Stock Chart
1 Month : October 2011 to November 2011
Beacon Power Corporation (OTC: BCONQ) reached an agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office (LPO) at a second Delaware court hearing on November 18, 2011, in the Company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding.
Since filing for bankruptcy protection on October 30, 2011, Beacon Power and its advisors had engaged in ongoing discussions with LPO advisors as to the Company’s use of cash collateral and resolution of its loan obligation. Beacon requested that LPO support its restructuring efforts to preserve Beacon as an organization, maintain the value of the Company’s 20 MW flywheel plant in Stephentown, New York, and enable Beacon to complete its reorganization as quickly and efficiently as possible. However, LPO’s highest priority was to recover as much of the $39.1 million loan balance as soon as possible. This led to an agreement to conduct the sale of the Stephentown facility by January 30, 2012.
The court also approved Beacon’s request that it be allowed to list its other assets for sale, although the Company may choose not to do so, or only sell some individual assets, if it is able to raise sufficient new capital by the end of January. Beacon is in preliminary discussions with several strategic investors and private equity firms that have expressed an interest in making a significant investment in the restructured company.
Beacon Power is confident that the recent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Order No. 755 on pay-for-performance for energy storage resources (like the Stephentown plant) will have a significant revenue-enhancing impact and increase the value of the flywheel facility when it takes effect in New York later in 2012. Further, Beacon believes that its singular expertise in developing, operating and maintaining grid-scale flywheel systems also adds unique value to the plant.
Also at the hearing, LPO’s objections to Beacon’s use of approximately $3 million in cash collateral to fund the Company’s business operations were resolved. Beacon will have full access to that cash to fund its weekly operations at an agreed-upon reduced budget. In addition, Beacon’s bankruptcy counsel and financial advisors have agreed to defer their fees, enabling the Company to allocate more of the cash collateral toward operations.
Bill Capp, Beacon Power President and CEO, said, “Our goal was to reach a settlement agreement with the DOE Loan Programs Office and we have done that. We will now focus on attracting new capital to reorganize our company.”
The settlement is subject in all respects to the terms of the court’s order, available at: http://dm.epiq11.com/BPE/docket/Default.aspx?rc
Dominion already has FDA approval to distribute the Dominion VI Scanner under FDA (IDE) regulations. Can't remember what it means exactly it way to long ago as it was on the I h u b introduction with the 3D imaging award That Dean won. I think FDA (IDE)is you are allowed to use the Dominion VI Scanner if you sign a waiver form to be a test subject. But dont quote me on that you better ask someone at Imaging 3 Inc.
Things happen how much money and time did Dean and Imaging 3, Inc. waste on the first FDA Team and the FDA moved the First Team to I believe it was China at the last second. Is their a law suite there? The farthest away you can get put some one and probably the remotest. How much money the TAXpayers lost here as they could send the Second FDA team to China. Or did some one got paid under the table to financely ruin IMGG so they could get their patent?? Just like the Supreme Court reopen the case of the FDA WISTLEBLOWERS about a couple of years back who stated they were forced to pass highly radiated machines by their Supervisor. I myself think Dean has grounds to ask the Supreme Court for review if FDA supervisors get paid by anybody to pass the highly radiated machines and to give Imaging 3 a hard time because his machine has practically no radation. Remember alot of the Original Manufactures had to sign a nondisclosure so they knew what Dean had and what they had. That should be enough reason to investigate. Plus RSNA puts Dean IMGG next to the Big Dogs in RSNA. RSNA has a reputation they not going to stick anybody there. Just my thoughts.
I dont have time but if anyone can sign up to PACER you could follow that Court procedure. A lot of the longterm shaerholders would have remember these incidents as it was posted at that time. I follow a American company thats imports food products into China and the Chinese FDA equivalant does their food Import qualification in China not the other way around and it takes them about 3 to 6 months to approve one item to protect the Chinese people. So something is odd when they got rid of the first FDA Team from Dean DViS IMGG at the last second.
stockmasterflash Thanks for takeing off the pictures. I still have faith in Imaging 3. I got in along time ago at 0.05 rode it up nearly $2.00 Took some off going up around 0.40 to go to the casino and some at 0.40 on the way back. I am not sorry that I did not unload all of it as it was not the price I expect it to go to, it may be not to Jefferson but at least I was aiming for it still I expect imgg to go to Lincoln after FDA even with all the stock dilution
As a long time share holder of Imgg, these pictures of him partying ect and the other people partying is degrading this stock!! Not very professionl take these pictures off!!!
Old news but what happen
CSMG Technologies Receives Approval of Third U.S. Patent for Live Biological Tissue Bonding/Welding Technology
0
0
0
My news for Investors AtLeast one of the check box should be selected You are following news about Follow the latest news about CTUM
CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas, March 1 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- CSMG
Technologies, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: CTUM) announced today that it has
received notice from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office that its U.S.
Application No. 10/310,203 has been allowed for "Bonding of Soft Biological
Tissues by Passing High Frequency Electric Current Therethrough" (Method
Divisional of U.S. patent number 09/022,869) for the company's live-
biological-tissue bonding/welding platform technology.
Don Robbins, CEO of CSMG Technologies, said, "The divisional patent
approval continues to reinforce our intellectual property position for the LTC
platform tissue bonding/welding technology as we begin regulatory processes to
bring the technology to commercial world markets."
The tissue bonding device bonds through radiofrequency fusion and
reconnects living soft biological tissue (organs) without the use of foreign
matters or conventional wound-closing devices such as sutures, staples,
sealants or glues. The technology leaves little or no scar visible to the
naked eye after a few months. Unlike other tissue coagulation methods, CSMG's
patented technology bonds and reconnects incised tissue and avoids charring,
searing and necrosis using a patented low-heat delivery method while providing
a leak-proof, smokeless and bloodless reconnection.
Five Ukraine hospitals are using the technology daily for open and
laparoscopic surgical procedures and techniques. The procedures so far have
involved the bonding and reconnecting of incised or separated human tissue in
various body areas -- nasal septum, intestine, stomach, skin, gall bladder,
liver, spleen, lung, blood vessels, nerves, alba linea, uterus, gynecological,
fallopian tube, ovary and testicles -- while restoring the normal function of
the organ or tissue.
United States and Australia patents have been issued, and other U.S. and
foreign patents are pending. CSMG maintains a team of academicians,
professors, researchers, surgeons, engineers, technicians and clinical test
facilities in Ukraine and has offices in Corpus Christi, Texas; Oklahoma City,
Okla.; Washington, D.C.; Atlanta, Ga.; and Kiev, Ukraine.
CSMG owns the technology and exclusive world rights to a medical device
through Live Tissue Connect, Inc., a subsidiary corporation formed for the
development and exploitation of the platform technology. The technology, owned
by CSMG, was invented and developed at the E.O. Paton Institute of Electric
Welding, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine at Kiev, Ukraine headed by
Professor B.E. Paton.
CSMG's stock is quoted on the Internet at http://www.otcbb.com . Its
website is http://www.ctum.com , and its e-mail address is
publicrelations@ctum.com .
you might want to up date I box outstanding shares 213,791,418
MICRO IMAGING TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California 33-0056212
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.)
970 Calle Amanecer, Suite F, San Clemente, California 92673
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 485-6001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes o No ý .
At March 22, 2011, 213,791,418 shares of the Registrant’s stock were outstanding.
Hey does any one want a suprise? Just click on the quotes for cptc Then click on the news tab. I have been in this a long time did not know that this was the second time chapter 11.
Aliangel do you have any other hot stock to put on my watch list?
I do not know if you still have imgg3 on your watch list. But keep track of it as the stock is back down to .10. Still waiting for fda. Theyare going to have their portable dominon on money tv to show the share holders how it workers. Also watch NWBO it has a couple of years beform it explodes UNLESS THEIR IS A BUY OUT. It has a drug that extends the live expectency from 18 mo to over 36 mo.and some are still living.
thanks
aliangel I just put this on my watch list why is their a Q at the end of the symbol no. It looks intrested but the Q scares me.
I am new here. What is it with the new wind mills. You would think that every state would want to have the old wind mills replace with these new vertical wind mill It is real sad to go down a road in the foot hills of the adrondack mt. and see these old wind mills just sitting their.Kind of ugly.A new wind mill farm is pland near Hopkinton N.y. They have to lease the land and do a 1 year study before they build. What is the hold up here.
Did anyone get a date when NWBO is on Monney Channel?
Suezia someone is trying to contact you on CTGI yahoo message board.
Up 17% and still in the hole. I have been watching this for a long time. I fell for them during the last bunch of prs.