Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Shareholders of which you are not one, except for the occasional 1-share you periodically tout, do not need to be misdirected by you as that is more manipulation.
Stop it now. You lie and try to deliver a lower pps to satisfy the bad actors
the short sellers and those who sell on every tick. Shareholders are your audience, your employers are.
Shareholders make their own decisions and your archival misinformation is documented. The SEC, nor any bashers Or agents, to deliver their messages or their contact information.
Shareholders also know that certain regulators have the names and full contact info on actual Complaints so that it is transparent. Once again self proclaimed knowledge is laughable as if you have any influence. Bashers create chaos and it is deplorable.
The Company knows exactly what it is doing and it will continue to win and fight multiple monikers and BS from the Basher brigade. Your hand has been overplayed for years.
The bashers handbook needs updating. Shareholders do not need a non-or one share person, often with multiple monikers, telling shareholders what to do.
Shareholders do their own due diligence . Shareholders are also encouraged to go into archives of those whose job is to depress pps and shake shares loose by creating chaos and confirm how many times you and yours have done so.
Over and over you have provided SEC websites and brought in Renee advising shareholders to
Complain or Renee write Company CEO or attorney and ask for revocation ——then a bit later was Dismissed?
Manipulation caused by bashers working in concert is obvious. In every aspect of regulation your interpretation is wrong and is directed to satisfy puppeteers of chaos for employer
Projection is transparent. So is 24/7/365, reinforcing each other bashing same thing over and over for a decade + .
Go DBMM
Come on dude, it’s that pesky chronology again !
Digital Clarity acquired and closed in 2012 and Reaudit 2013 — do you need the chronology again?
Reminder of facts:
1 . Acquisition completed 2012
2. Reaudit (3yrs) required through no fault of DBMM Nov 15,2013.
3. Asher litigation Feb 2014
4. Company completed Reaudit and filed all Amended K’s and Q’s (see EdGAR) seamlessly and chronologically in mid- Sept 2014.
5. Cost of Reaudit $157,300.
6. Mitigating circumstances caused delayed filings starting with 10-K 2015
7. Administrative Proceeding for delayed filings May 16,2017
8. New LTIs cashflow financing Oct 2017 starting with Cure
9. Delayed Filings cured May 31, 2018
10. Settlement with Asher at 50% discount.Their CDs canceled. June 18, 2018.
11. Clearance through sponsoring broker, FINRA, Removal of CE and events below
12. Final Order SEC Dismissal June 2,2023.
13. FORWARD All metrics up , UPLIST to QB then NASDAQ step by step
14. New significant software client in Austin, Texas. Geographic growth in US.
15. Strategic Alliance is win #12, with 1ovmany provides change management and organization design consulting to optimize internal companies with DC external digital marketing to increase ROI for all parties.
16. Representation for DC in Irvine, CA. in April 2024
The Company has never been without the oxen yoke until Final Dismissal. The Basher brigade should take cognitive tests—memory failing.
Go DBMM—long and strong.
Dear BUBE
You got it wrong again, trying to scare shareholders. We have been right with every win, and your blather, name calling and lack of knowledge continues. You guys have never understood securities laws. And then there are the multiple monikers.
Lame try to obfuscate facts. Tip of iceberg in Kramer complaint . So many avenues for regulators to explore et al . Calls and options of unregistered shares , with many more issues to follow.
Best you note from complaint , requiring all unregistered shares , not converted and cleared, be turned over , next act on its way just by SEC and PCAOB kicking over rocks. Then ban from OTC . Did you miss that.
Being called a recidivist because of Consent Decree previous case means settlement highly unlikely.
Spewing a dumb as a rock fictional narrative that a one-dimensional lawsuit proves no NSS is another example of ignorance of financial machinations in a marketplace.
Note the Hope Capital case I have cited for years re turnover and unauthorized PR fraud implications, cited on bottom of page 4 complaint . You ignored , but regulators didn’t. Something may be (seemingly) legal until it is not.
Bashers are the shills . Claiming they are critics, hahahaha , critics without facts, knowledge or financial acumen . NSS can be bad actors insurance .
DBMM more wins on way, one step at a time.
Again Shareholders care about facts. My facts are documented and enumerated .
Purposely once again conflating events without providing chronology which proves my point. JJ was right Settlement, judgment not even updated for interest was invalid as superseded and replaced by a Cash Settlement .
FACTS
1 . Turnover Motion to steal company signed by CK in October,2016.
2. SEC Consent Decree signed by CK two days before Turnover Motion, October 2016.
3. Turnover Jan 2017 without disclosure of Item 2 to civil court judge is fraud .
4. Unauthorized PR May 6,2017, OIP from SEC May 16, 2017
5.Cure of Delayed Filings May 31, 2018
6. DBMM Settlement at 50% June 20, 2018. As stated in Court Papers would have gone to Federal Court if DBMM Settlement not agreed once cure in place.
Note:
Judgment in July, 2015 $122, 801.87, then add in compounded interest through June 20, 2018
7. Hardly “scurrying” dude. After cure as intention stated. You guys never understand legal matters—why you are called Nevers.
Shareholders care about facts. My facts are documented and enumerated .
Purposely once again conflating events without providing chronology which proves my point. JJ was right Settlement, judgment not even updated for interest was invalid as superseded and replaced by a Cash Settlement .
FACTS
1 . Turnover Motion to steal company signed by CK in October,2016.
2. SEC Consent Decree signed by CK two days before Turnover Motion, October 2016.
3. Turnover Jan 2017 without disclosure of Item 2 to civil court judge is fraud .
4. Unauthorized PR May 6, 2018
5.Cure of Delayed Filings May 31, 2018
5. DBMM Settlement at 50% June 20, 2018. As stated in Court Papers would have gone to Federal Court if DBMM Settlement not agreed once cure in place.
Note:
Judgment in July, 2015 $122, 801.87, then add in compounded interest through June 20, 2018
6. Hardly “scurrying” dude. After cure as intention stated. You guys never understand legal matters—why you are called Nevers.
SHAREHOLDER UPDATE — MAY 9, 2024 DBMM
Reggie James gives the opening keynote on the 2nd day of The Emerging Growth Conference in Miami, May 9, 2024.
EmergingGrowth.com is a leading independent small-cap media portal and celebrated its 70th Emerging Growth Conference on May 8 & 9, 2024.
The Emerging Growth Conference identifies companies in a wide range of growth sectors, with strong management teams, innovative products & services, focused strategy, execution, and the overall potential for long-term growth.
By way of public company disclosure, participating companies are invited to attend an investor relations outreach series, and, as such, Digital Clarity was invoiced and paid in cash. This is normal practice for industry conferences.
Below is a transcript of the recording with the host Ana Berry.
A video of the event will be posted for Shareholders shortly.
——————————
Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc. (OTC Pink: DBMM)
Keynote speaker: Reggie James, COO, Sr. VP & Exec. Director, Founder and Managing Director of Digital Clarity.
——————————
Opening Introduction.
Done in the style and mix of Q&A + EG format. Opening by Ana.
————-
Ana:
Today, we have Reggie James, who is the Founder and Managing Director of Digital Clarity a wholly-owned subsidiary of Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group, inc. (DBMM) , a US public, holding company – where Reggie serves as Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer of DBMM.
Late last year, Reggie shared some early remarks at his first Emerging Growth Conference as a framework for the holding company’s return to normal trading and normal business after a daunting list of mitigating circumstances, like a full Covid lockdown in the UK affecting both clients and the operating business itself, to name and a regulatory overhang to name a few. All external, no fault of DBMM.
Given the number of moving parts. there were lots of questions from shareholders, potential investors, and other interested parties. A lot of people wanted to understand you as the operations leader directing everything on the ground from your background, how it has developed from the beginning of the online marketing adventure through 2 successful start-ups and their exit strategies and how that brought you to founding Digital Clarity and its acquisition by Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc a public company.
That of course raised innumerable questions about the actual product offering, the market in which it operates, through the operating flagship brand of the Company, Digital Clarity. Lastly, how will Digital Clarity as the flagship organization drive the growth geographically and ultimately target acquisitions, all of which you have stressed Reggie, change the company’s ultimate size, and eligibility for NASDAQ? Reggie has emphatically stressed this is aspirational but is the Company’s stated intent.
So, welcome Reggie, we are looking forward to hearing your expansion of you expand on your professional background including the DBMM’s acquisition of Digital Clarity and the progress on the geographic growth plans. Then Reggie will be answering some questions, so let’s get to it.
————-
Reggie:
Thanks, Ana. Well, as you say – the objective of this session is to reinforce and educate current and prospective shareholders as to how and why Digital Clarity is well positioned, how my experience and earlier start-up learnings are building blocks to drill down into the product offering and operating engine. Then will answer some questions, about Digital Clarity and why DBMM could be a powerful Investment opportunity for long-standing and new shareholders.
It is imperative that I convincingly convey to DBMM shareholders that the digital industry is extremely complicated and not for the feint hearted. It is also a continuing learning experience to provide a unique carefully designed client-by-client experience to provide the differentiating competitive advantage.
DBMM is not a storefront, it is a management consultancy. So it is not your typical company selling a product. It’s far more sophisticated than that. If volume was the only metric, a commoditized approach like counting clicks represented the early days but the world has changed dramatically.
Some digital marketing agencies do just that. A management consultancy such as DBMM’s operating brand, Digital Clarity, it opens doors to future-facing opportunities, beyond traditional boundaries. Of course, understanding the many avenues of “how,” is the tricky part and it is what gives Digital Clarity the competitive advantage.
The naysayers don’t understand, and though everyone has an opinion, I urge you to heed caution. That means shareholders as decision-makers should use only documented material and public information. Make your own decisions. I’m here to describe the journey and to provide all the rationale to Ignore opinions.
The Over-The-Counter (OTC) market is often misunderstood. It’s not an exchange but a platform – this means where there are opportunities, equally there are challenges abound. Beware of the bad actors – the short sellers and bashers who seek to manipulate the market for short-term gains. Ask yourself why. Rumors and speculation are just that – rumors without basis. Tenuous old examples are constantly brought out by bashers, years old. These practices are legally frowned upon and as mentioned before, they get away with it until one day, they don’t.
DBMM Management has fine-tuned relationships, honed over previous successful ventures and solid outcomes. It has brought the Company long-term investors and gotten us through the toughest challenges until we have eliminated all the hurdles and set forth a blueprint for geographic expansion, focused on the US whose economy is the best in the world.
The key to optimizing results is to make certain the growth is sustainable while expanding at the same time. Each new client takes a combination of resources, both investment in capital, time, and the right professional team member to advise, consult, and execute the unique plan for each new client. There is no template other than the process to put all the individual pieces of the whole, balancing it, and then execute. But not done yet.
Next, you have to measure the results and adjust to maximize the ROI, quarter to quarter. The good news is doing it right starts to build a cadre of satisfied clients who look to us to help them navigate and position all of the changes in the marketplace and business environment pro-actively. Earning a seat at the table is ongoing, but a highly remunerative proposition. The skill set is valuable to the client’s bottom line as the marketing outreach pulls the whole product offering together.
————-
Ana:
Thanks, Reggie.
One of the questions we were asked last time was to try and understand a little more about you and the company, Digital Clarity.
Could you give me some background on you and how your 2 earlier start-ups, and their disposition, which led to founding DC, and the opportunity of a public company by then being acquired by DBMM?
————-
Reggie:
I am a seasoned entrepreneur and businessperson. I started life working in an Advertising and Media company, Ziff Davis.
I then launched the European division of the 1st Singaporean dot com. With C-suite directors from Ericsson in Sweden. Ericsson like Cisco plumbed the internet – so 80—90% of the world’s traffic flowed through their network. I built and exited the company when it was acquired by an Asian Telecoms company.
I then joined AltaVista, where I worked selling marketing and Advertising solutions to brands like Dell and Hewlett Packard – as well as their agencies worldwide.
AltaVista was acquired by Yahoo and is now owned by Apollo Asset Management.
Those skills and contacts were invaluable and expanded my already growing network and all of those was before Google had launched. It also whet my appetite for public company possibilities.
When Google launched in Mountain View, its first office outside the US, like many companies was in London. The first employees for Google were from AltaVista (AV). Why? Because AV knew how to shape business models – many of those are common places too but started back then.
Working with agencies presented an opportunity. They struggled to manage and understand search.
Digital Clarity was born – first as an agency advisory agency and then as a full-service digital marketing agency.
Seeing an opportunity again, with 2 old engineers from AltaVista I helped launch DC Storm. A technology built for analyzing huge data sets and managing ad campaigns on Google.
This led to my second exit with the company being acquired by a Japanese technology conglomerate Rakuten, based in Tokyo.
All good stepping stones leading to Digital Clarity which was acquired in its early days by DBMM. From regulatory hurdles to external environmental issues like Brexit and Covid—none of which were our making— it has tested our mettle and we not only survived we prevailed and it has made us stronger and honed why we can become one of the best in the industry for our sector size. So we are well-positioned to achieve success each step of the way.
————-
Ana:
Reggie that is quite the journey and not dissimilar to many businesses that are household names today.
Can you give us an overview of Digital Clarity and why you are focusing on the B2B Market as the nexus for your growth initiative?
————-
Reggie – Gives presentation –
The B2B Marketing Challenge
The Market
Our Process
Overview of Service
——————————
Reggie Adds: This will be the first of a new series of presentations and podcasts.
——————————
Ana: – thanks, Reggie. That is a compelling proposition in a complex market.
We had several questions as to the learnings from the formidable challenges, particularly those brought about when the acquisition of DC was about to lead a growth initiative, but met with a series of mitigating circumstances. My experience is other companies would have thrown in the towel and walked away. You guys strategized a way to win instead. Tell us about how that happened.
————-
Reggie:
Ana – The future is bright and DBMM has earned it, and will be led by DC as our operating brand and the flagship. I am proud to be part of that solution. DBMM has met every mitigating circumstance and prevailed every time because of its tenacity, and strategy and because we earned the respect of each of the regulator ‘s due diligence of the Company and its Management. The Company got kudos and that kind of acknowledgment is hard to come by. We got it from every single one.
Despite the hurdles we’ve faced, DBMM/Digital Clarity stands tall as a testament to its resilience. Every challenge has been met with determination and innovation, a path that we have always said would be step-by-step. We’ve weathered storms before, and we’ll continue to do so with resolve. Also, we are adamant that we know what we are doing.
————-
Ana:
Again, it seems your tenacity and professionalism have been key during those tough times. Where is the future for DBMM? What is the next stage on this incredible journey?
————-
Reggie:
The next step for DBMM is to Uplist to the QB platform and drill down to make certain we leverage and go up from there. The world is one big digital landscape and we intend to attract new shareholders who understand the industry.
Our path forward is clear – to Uplist to OTCQB and seize the opportunities that await. Many brokers won’t allow trading unless a company is on the OTCQB, so there are manipulators who continue to try to prevent DBMM from meeting the criteria required. We may have taken longer, but we have the support of the decision-makers and we will get there. We are in a world dominated by the digital landscape, so without a doubt, we are poised to attract new shareholders who understand the industry’s potential. The future is bright, and we’re ready to harness its power.
The Principals of the Company. Linda and I have the relationships, the contacts, the access, the complementing skill sets, and the vision. Our long-term investors support us because we have all of the above, and we have been told that we have grit. We are going to develop the Company and position it to continue to increase its options going forward.
Options at the heart of DBMM and Digital Clarity lies a network of relationships built on trust and integrity. These connections, forged over time, have led to long-term investors and a future pipeline of new clients. Together, we are stronger, in our pursuit of growth, shareholder value, and opportunities.
In summary and most importantly, Linda and I have access and consequential relationships. We are a team. This is why we have Long Term Investors and new clients in the pipeline.
————-
Ana:
100 % Reggie – successful business is all about relationships. You said right at the top, that your market is complex and any organization looking to retain DC takes time and investment. How might you continue to educate and inform current and new shareholders?
————-
Reggie:
Indeed, Ana, we have been updating shareholders with regular company updates.
Over the next few weeks, I will be launching a podcast. The podcast will be there to also update, inform, and educate the market as well as be a tool for business development. I will have in-depth conversations with guests, partners, and industry leaders – as well as fireside chats with veterans in the business.
We have begun to identify various external situations to augment our value offering and will be adding more. That approach is the most cost-effective for all parties. Whether it is organization change experts, representation in Southern California, AI in process, and others TBD. The power of a management consultancy that can provide advisory expertise is already being well received because it is proactive and anticipatory. Clients find that kind of support reassuring and it manifests into the ROI metric.
————
Ana:
Reggie – Before we conclude, is there anything you would like to round off with?
————
Reggie:
Ana, our sophisticated products have a competitive advantage that sets us apart from others. Offering the full panoply of professional marketing expertise is an immediate step ahead. With a deep understanding of the market landscape, we are primed for growth and success. We do not see ourselves as a short-term investment. Growing the Company, we expect, will allow for gain to balance position or situational events, not to trade on every tick or force short sales. That is our position and the Company will provide those opportunities.
The initiatives thus far have just scratched the surface in a word, lots more to come, so we hope to broaden our shareholder base in the public market. Ideally, those who understand the digital marketplace—the online world which every company needs to grow its market share, is complicated and evolving. If there is not an interest in learning about it, prospective shareholders of DBMM will not be a comfortable place and other issuers might be a better fit . We are looking for like minded shareholders who understand the potential. DBMM and its supporters have been growing since it returned to normal trading and normal business and the challenges met. Our tenacity was rewarded.
It’s now time to keep faith in our vision and our capabilities. Forget the noise and chaos, and be part of our success story. Trust in the information provided by the company itself, or in public information. Ignore the noise as this too will pass. The naysayers and manipulators, so prevalent in the OTC platform, can lie to each other. They are only there until they are not.
The way forward is a bright future. Join us on the journey.
————
Ana:
Reggie thanks so much. Look forward to our next chat to update us on progress next month. In the interim, read our Updates on DBMM’s website, www.dbmmgroup.com/news.
————
Thanks for the opportunity to chat. Appreciate everyone who has participated.
————
Shareholder Update
DBMM Management
Linda Perry and Reggie James
—————–
Safe Harbor Statement
The foregoing contains certain predictive statements that relate to future events or future business and financial performance. Such statements can only be predictions, and the actual events or results may differ from those discussed due to, among other things, those risks described in DBMM’s reports filed with the SEC. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. This document is published solely for information purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any state. Past performance does not guarantee future performance. Additional information is available upon request.
https://www.dbmmgroup.com/shareholder-update-may-9-2024/
BUBE posting the Kramer PR? Wonder if got advance copy? What Company has their attorneys do the PR on their letterhead. Very odd, arms length. Yet attorneys and all Kramer Companies have the same address. Only Outlier is most recent one in Virginia. Best you reserve opinions, or just like revocation opinions which were wrong . The law has evolved and the broker-dealer interpretation is evolving case law.
Shareholders noted in Tuesday’s PR that the case I have been posting for years to counter the unauthorized PR that Kramer fraudulently released. CK motioned to get a turnover order to steal DBMM/Digital Clarity which was fraudulent because he signed a Consent Decree 2 days earlier! The case was Hope Capital and it is footnoted on pg 4 of the most recent Complaint. Karma sounds like , not your “2 sides to any story.”
Suggest you look up the definition of the word recidivism and recidivist from yesterday’s SEC complaint.
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2016/33-10239-s.pdf
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2016/33-10239.pdf
"The SEC’s order finds that Kramer and Hope Capital violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, Kramer and Hope Capital consented to the entry of a cease and desist order, to a prohibition from acquiring any security from any affiliate of an issuer of securities, and to pay disgorgement of $525,603, plus prejudgment interest of $54,144. Kramer also agreed to pay a civil penalty of $100,000."
Likewise try and understand the current interpretation of broker-dealer and lending money just to get shares makes. CK a broker dealer without the requisite licenses that are required.
The NSS is separate and apart and suggest you haven’t a clue nor is there the “ evidence” bashers demand. Until there is. iMO Suggest you let regulators do their job and sequence as they see fit. Conflating as you do not effective. Silence by bystanders is.
Case law and Key phrase: It is legal until it isn’t.
DBMM long and strong. Just like wins, patience always works when documentation in place.
You bashers should do better vetting as you recruit? or put those on the bench into the game. Wrong league dude.
Trying to scare new shareholders? AS in place since 2016. Do your homework as OS increased by less than 10% since then, 2016. Not a very compelling argument.
You guys embarrass yourselves 24/7/365.
SEC Sues Curt Kramer and Three of His Businesses for Acting as Unregistered Securities Dealers
Power Up Lending Ltd., et al.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 25995 / May 7, 2024
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Power Up Lending Ltd., et al., No. 1:24-cv-03498 (S.D.N.Y. filed May 7, 2024)
SEC Sues Curt Kramer and Three of His Businesses for Acting as Unregistered Securities Dealers
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today charges against Curt Kramer of Jericho, New York, and his wholly owned businesses Power Up Lending Ltd., Geneva Roth Remark Holdings, Inc., and 1800 Diagonal Lending, LLC (formerly known as Sixth Street Lending LLC), for operating as unregistered securities dealers.
The SEC's complaint, filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, alleges that since at least January 2018 through at least March 2023, Kramer and his companies engaged in the business of purchasing convertible securities from penny stock issuers, converting those securities into common stock at a large discount from the prevailing market price, and quickly selling the newly issued shares into the market for a profit. The SEC's complaint alleges that the Defendants purchased nearly 2,000 convertible securities from about 325 microcap stock issuers, converted the securities into more than 100 billion newly-issued shares of common stock, rapidly sold the newly issued shares into the market, and generated millions of dollars in revenues and profits. As alleged, Kramer and his companies were not registered as dealers with the SEC or associated with a registered broker-dealer, as their activities required them to do.
The SEC's complaint charges Kramer, Power Up, Geneva Roth, and 1800 Diagonal with violating the dealer registration provision of Section 15(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), and also alleges Kramer is liable as a control person of his companies pursuant to Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The SEC seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, civil penalties, a penny stock bar, and other equitable relief.
The SEC's investigation was conducted by Stephen LeBlanc and supervised by Lisa Deitch and Stacy Bogert. The litigation will be led by Suzanne Romajas, Daniel Lloyd, and Stephen LeBlanc, and supervised by Christopher Bruckmann.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr-25995
All public info $DBMM
Do you not get that the SEC has advised that a Company should not respond anyway but publicly.
Once again, ignorance of SEC guidelines is no excuse.
FD Guidelines are public information through filings and Updates are required so all receive info the same way.
The company has responded with regulators with great results. They obviously knew the real deal and not bashers Inc.
Aren’t you embarrassed about 20,000 - negative posts from a non-shareholder? How do you and cadre of recruits explain another 25,000–pauly has the exact numbers . Paid bashing —what a way to make a buck.
Telling people how to trade is manipulation as you have no licenses to advise anyone on anything.
One thing bashers do regularly is insult shareholders, shareholders who do their own due diligence. Strident statements about their opinions without expertise or facts.
Shareholders know that DBMM has advisors with credentials like attorneys, CPA’s, licenses of various sorts who review all actions and reports and this moron thinks he can lie about requirements and new investors will be frightened away.
And then there are multiple handles the bashers have—there is a list— and shareholders know Idiot Mayor well named.
Ignore white noise ands is all manipulation.
Once again, ignorance of SEC guidelines is no excuse.
FD Guidelines are public information through filings and Updates are required so all
receive info the same way.
Aren’t you embarrassed about 20,000 - posts from a non-shareholder? How do you and cadre of recruits explain another 25,000–pauly has the exact numbers . Paid bashing —what a way to make a buck.
More intended tries at “gotcha.” Never works
I speak for supportive shareholders who know that proper due diligence done to provide chronology and documentation every time.
No Consent Decrees at DBMM or Management ever. No charges for DBMM ever but delayed filings . CDs for cease and desist are for Sec 5 violations. Must be disclosed and carried under Legal section of filings. No action ever but delayed filings at DBMM. Defamation again and attempt at misinformation.
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2016/33-10239-s.pdf
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2016/33-10239.pdf
Kramer signed on his behalf as officer/CEO of network of 10 Kramer companies like Hope Capital. Do I have to post the SEC docs yet again? I am proving the Undertakings which does not allow them to go after shares or other public companies and/or their subsidiaries. Read the summary last paragraph and undertakings section of Cease & Desist. That means their Turnover Motion was fraudulent .
Another example of attempts to damage the Company by false inference.
DBMM long and strong.
Bashers have no credentials and no expertise. 22,000+ nasty decade+ of misinformation from one alone.
All accurate independent auditors ensure accuracy or they lose their gig. Ask Trump Media . Bashers afraid of losing their gig and use multiple handles.
DBMM wins every time .
What supportive shareholders have is tens of thousands of distortions and deceptions from bashers in living color. Literally and figuratively .
NSS are illegal and patterns of behavior are admissible. Why would they sign a Consent Decree with the SEC which covered all their companies?
Omissions, out of context BS, upside down chronology and conflation says it all. All the basher group to each other .
DBMM will win over and over and over.
All arrangements with third parties are subject to audit. PRs and Updates are reviewed .
Public companies have independent Auditors and certainly would be remiss in knee jerking to bashers who have no clue as no experience in public companies Instead knowing there is no disclosure requirements when privacy laws in place, use inference and misinformation to scare new shareholders. But a little bit of due diligence shows deception from the naysayers group 24/7/365.
DBMM long and strong, wins coming.
As a shareholder I am correcting your basher’s BS without context of a Dismissed case. Shareholders have read entire litigation file and the deception by bashers is defamation. The Statute of Limitations is over and manipulation is defamation by all alter egos.
The multiple monikers and insidious attempt at damage.
KEY WORD—DISMISSAL
Shareholders are calling you out and correcting attempts at misinformation . The SEC dismissed the case TWICE. Check the law Dude.
Paid by post?
Try and keep up 7 years later— trying to deceive new shareholders obvious. Again it's defamation when corrected
-“the Division” is DOE, not the Commission . Part of overreach is blurring lines of authority
-case Dismissed
-brilliant strategy on the part of DBMM and Management
-testimony in doc Sept 2017, full LTI funding Oct, 2017, Confidential Release of Evidence SEC Release Jan 2018 , and cashflow financing continuing for growth
-rolled out to Case Dismissed
-Done and dusted.
-Bashers Game over. Get a proper job.
Posted for 6th or more time from 7 years ago from DOE, parties long gone from agency says what about you except a Dismissed Case . Company won with Management tenacity and mitigating circumstances. Try howling at the moon .
Repeat: Shareholders know me and know I have done extensive due diligence and cite documentation. Definitely not Management , but like the wins. Do not like manipulation.
Bashers also use several phony monikers. , shareholders know. Include Public info 7 years later , Sept 2017, Motion from DOE is NOT the SEC. DOE one of 5 divisions. Try and keep up. Case Dismissed Dude , but keep whining. No one cares, case dismissed.
The reason shareholders like me have no regard for bashers is what kind of man children are on a chatroom 24/7/365, including weekends with multiple monikers with out of context crap from 4 obvious monikers/2bashers/non-or negligible shareholders. Repeat: BS 7 years later from DOE , division sanctioned for overreaching many times. You guys are so Pathetic!
Also OJ died a couple months ago—he like all non-shareholders never keep up. That is why they bash on the OTC. No proper job.
Speaking of lying. There was no lying by the Company as #1 below and the 10-K for 2014 and thereafter. That made subject moot. The clarification was missing from earlier TopJetFuel smoke which I corrected. Never mentioned again . Case Final Order of Dismissal to close Standing Order of Dismissal of Nov 12 2019. Cannot do revisionist history —case won. Chronology always bashers weak points.
Repeat : multiple monikers trying to twist irrelevancies. FYI—Company used as example of enforcement overreach 7 years ago following the Motion and it went away. Never mentioned again.
FYI—Regulations state Full transcript not available to public, only to parties in action. Extracts available in DOE Motion which are public information as are 10-Ks and 10Q’s. But bashers waste everyone’s time with nonsense that was actually positive in final result. Made Company’s point of DOE overreach. Are there any adults here? Only defamers and liars. DBMM always prevails.
FACTS:
1. Officers of DBMM have never traded /sold any shares.
2. Late filings overreach add on by Enforcement in Motion only one time . Moot and ignored by Dismissal and Judge.
3. Never mentioned again, repeat never by SEC , the Commission, nor Judges.
4. Contained in 2014 DBMM 10-K public info thereafter Company files so what is point?
5. No one cares. No one, judge new evidence from DBMM under Confidential Cover in Jan 2018 and he announced such in SEC Release.
6. LTIs funding of cashflow financing Oct 2017 and continuing to growth since Dismissal
6. Bashers embarrass themselves desperate for the gotcha that never comes.
7. Yet still here whining, chasing new investors with defamation. Dicey thin ice, IMO.
While DBMM just gets one win after another .
Repeat: Shareholders know me and know I have done extensive due diligence and cite documentation. Definitely not Management , but like the wins. Do not like manipulation.
Bashers also use several phony monikers. , shareholders know. Include Public info 7 years later , Sept 2017, Motion from DOE is NOT the SEC. DOE one of 5 divisions. Try and keep up. Case Dismissed Dude , but keep whining. No one cares, case dismissed.
The reason shareholders like me have no regard for bashers is what kind of man children are on a chatroom 24/7/365, including weekends with multiple monikers with out of context crap from 4 obvious monikers/2bashers/non-or negligible shareholders. Repeat: BS 7 years later from DOE , division sanctioned for overreaching many times. You guys are so Pathetic!
Also OJ died a couple months ago—he like all non-shareholders never keep up. That is why they bash on the OTC. No proper job.
Speaking of lying. There was no lying by the Company as #1 below and the 10-K for 2014 and thereafter. That made subject moot. The clarification was missing from earlier TopJetFuel smoke which I corrected. Never mentioned again . Case Final Order of Dismissal to close Standing Order of Dismissal of Nov 12 2019. Cannot do revisionist history —case won. Chronology always bashers weak points.
Repeat : multiple monikers trying to twist irrelevancies. FYI—Company used as example of enforcement overreach 7 years ago following the Motion and it went away. Never mentioned again.
FYI—Regulations state Full transcript not available to public, only to parties in action. Extracts available in DOE Motion which are public information as are 10-Ks and 10Q’s. But bashers waste everyone’s time with nonsense that was actually positive in final result. Made Company’s point of DOE overreach. Are there any adults here? Only defamers and liars. DBMM always prevails.
FACTS:
1. Officers of DBMM have never traded /sold any shares.
2. Late filings overreach add on by Enforcement in Motion only one time . Moot and ignored by Dismissal and Judge.
3. Never mentioned again, repeat never by SEC , the Commission, nor Judges.
4. Contained in 2014 DBMM 10-K public info thereafter Company files so what is point?
5. No one cares. No one, judge new evidence from DBMM under Confidential Cover in Jan 2018 and he announced such in SEC Release.
6. LTIs funding of cashflow financing Oct 2017 and continuing to growth since Dismissal
6. Bashers embarrass themselves desperate for the gotcha that never comes.
7. Yet still here whining, chasing new investors with defamation. Dicey thin ice, IMO.
While DBMM just gets one win after another .
Your late night and weekend missives are particularly repugnant. Bashers post for fear of losing their gig. So tedious to finger wag the same false and/or old, superseded events to shake shares loose for the paying puppetmasters.
Shareholders tell new and supportive shareholders to do their own due diligence. Barber ignores the fact that DBMM is a fully reporting company with auditors and LTIs cashflow financing is brilliant and a favorite for growth and acquisitions.
Just show stupidity that can’t keep up with what the proper investors find very attractive.Again, learn how to read financial statements. Demand loans since 2017, always due, , but mutual agreement, so will be out of future earnings as stated in Updates. Key word mutual—relationships are everything.
Bashers just bash and blah, blah, nasty blah. Everyone knows it.
FYI-they also know I am not Management dude. I’m just a very supportive shareholder. Shareholders also know RS’s were 2013 and 2015– 11 and 9 years ago. Desperate much?
Why post crap all weekend long?
Shareholders know.
Answer to 2can post 344486 query about unauthorized PR. Actual facts required:
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2016/33-10239-s.pdf
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2016/33-10239.pdf
Bashers omits and contorts info to try and damage company is always full of false info.
The unauthorized PR was part of the Kramer plan to steal the non-US subsidiary Company. Didn’t work did it? It referenced an action which was fraudulent as CK signed a Consent Decree with Hope Capital and for all their network of companies with the SEC in Oct 2016 and two days later tried to steal the Company via Motion to turnover. See Hope Capital case “Undertakings “ above ordering them not to seek any shares because of Consent Decree.
It was Fraud not to notify the Civil Judge that a Consent Decree was signed by CK Hope Capital covering all Kramer Companies. They thought DBMM would have been unaware .
Basher’s false and withdrawn doc posted was Jan 2017, so what it did is give DBMM leverage to threaten Federal Court. All documented. See dates on Hope Capital case of Oct 2016. DBMM settled the case in June 2018 with 50% discount.
Bashers always twist events and turn chronology upside down to damage the Company. Never works.
All of us preparing for the Emerging Growth Presentation next week.
All of us preparing for the Emerging Growth Presentation next week. #dbmm $dbmm @EmergingGrowth1 #emerginggrowth pic.twitter.com/qe4WyYZfEL
— DBMM Group Inc. (@dbmm_group) May 3, 2024
You guys will do anything to depress pps. Cannot omit key information.
Back to omissions which make charting irrelevant 2019-2024. eg Covid lockdown in UK, regulatory and litigation overhang which was Dismissed in 2019 but Final Order not until 2023.
Give it a rest, the last 5 years has no impact on the future of DBMM’s organic growth and acquisitions with capital infusion.
DBMM long and strong.
Perfect example of not understanding legal proceedings. The early revocation is totally different from the Dismissal. There is no comparability
The Nov 2017 was remanded and vacated 2 weeks later by SCOTUS. It could not be cited or referenced in any legal matter. New evidence provided by DBMM starting in Feb 2018.
The Nov 12 2019 Dismissal became the Standing Order and was concluded by the Final Order of Dismissal on June 2, 2023. In no legal sense was Judge Foelak’s Order remanded or vacated.
DOE overreach of a PFR is an internal matter and had no legal standing .
Conflation is both dangerous and deceptive.
Another daily attempt at chaos.
And here is basher asking other bashers, on a chatroom and calling it a BOD?
Now that is laughable, Hahahah
Same old same old every day. Just chaos with no facts .
No wonder bashers stay on the OTC. Hahaha
DBMM well in hand and knows exactly what it is doing.
Isn’t it coincidental that when one gets called out, a new person suddenly appears to change the
subject? The lies never stop. OTC is a platform, not an Exchange.
Just like 2 months before the CE was removed , Renee appears telling shareholders to write to the Company and accept being revoked? Following your insistence that the CE would never be removed, and the Compsny would be revoked.
Ask Alpine how they short? No silly $2.50 rule, clear in Europe through shell companies or keep depressing pps , and sell on upticks.
Stop the crap, the breadcrumbs are in 21,000+ negative unintelligible attempts to shake shares loose.
Merry band of con artists left lots of evidence. So very obvious.
DBMM always prevails
The lies cannot be denied as you did so it is important for it to be clear. Always chaos , always lie and then say that it not what you said or not what you meant: Shareholders deserve to know the truth as there is no credibility.
In Post 344165 you posted defamatory lies at 11pm and stridently called out by me,in Post 344170 a shareholder and certainly not management. Repeat— A real shareholder.
All Falsehoods to try and scare shareholders 24/7/365 Full time job.
DBMM long and strong and growing step by step.
Your post below #344165
"How do we know that many pumpers claiming to be shareholders here aren't employees of a certain Digital Marketing Company promoting their stock?
Actually... we have EVERY REASON to suspect that IS true!
Seeing as the primary source of revenue for the company over the last 20+ years has been share sales... doesn't that make sense?"
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174334567
As a shareholder, false statements are defamatory to DBMM, and evidence of total ignorance of financial reporting /statements and SEC guidelines required in a fully reporting public company.
It would be contrary to SEC guidelines for a public company to direct employees or independent contractors to post on a chatroom. Disclosure is required of any paid outside intervention, and the SEC has written white papers and taken action with manipulation .
Shareholders have stated many times that bashers are oblivious and uninformed regarding financial reporting, but the astonishing statement that DBMM/DC “… revenues come from share sales,” is the most ignorant statement I have ever heard!
Share sales are NOT EVER considered revenues, revenues are defined by “Revenue Recognition” of product/service sales to a client /purchaser which are audited against SEC regulations directly confirmed via invoices and bank statements by independent Auditors approved by the SEC before their appointment confirmed by an 8-K.
Repeat: Shares sales are not booked as revenues ever. The Company is not selling shares in the public market . The public market has a buyer and a seller and the Company is not a party.
The stupidity of dangerous statements is further evidence of lies to damage the Company. As a shareholder I resent the deluge of misinformation every day, and to post malicious crap at 11pm at night says it all. IMO, it will not be tolerated by shareholders.
Projection is a tell.
No paid awareness in DBMM . Not needed. Shareholders do their own due diligence. And part of that DD is that the majority of Shareholders take no time at all to suss out the multiple moniker bashers who employ the very transparent other moniker(s) on other chatrooms.
Idiot is —you know who. How well named. The omission of facts and conflation of upside down chronology is laughable because it is the Basher template and no matter how many times corrected, continues. But the omissions and accurate chronology are all documented. Also, all the Updates are on DBMM website . (https://www.dbmmgroup.com/news) Have a read all.
The fact that the Company is executing its growth plan since the Final Order of Dismissal for delayed filings was June 2, 2023. The bashers have no executive public company experience or expertise so they have no clue as to sustainability. Their job is to write fictional narratives 24/7/365 to just create chaos. Then bashers spew the lies to each other to cheer each other on and not screw up their respective gigs.
They do not know how to analyze financial statements . Bashers focus on point in time numbers which mean nothing like net loss. Or like Sapient acquired by Publicis for a multiple of 48, Then moved off OTC to global exchange. It is a sophisticated way forward.
Good perspective one of the best run companies in the world, Warren Buffett’s , Berkshire Hathaway had a Net Loss of $22billion in 2022, (very few shares were shaken loose) and then made a $97billion net gain in 2023. Net loss or gain is irrelevant as it is the Company’s strategy is what matters.Bashers try to infer it is a liability to be repaid .
Shareholders know that cashflow financing in Silicon Valley is very successful. Grow and acquire , payback out of increased revenues or even exit strategy. Long term investors have cash flowed $2.5+ million from the cure of delayed filings to growth which is in process now.
Just like the wins which came after the Nevers said never would , as a supportive shareholder, know that the Company knows exactly what it is doing, and as Updates have stated, the bashers will—well you can figure out the rest. “ Bashers are not long for this world.”
Ignore the white noise.
Your question is a good one as to the motivation of bashers who post 24/7/365 to depress the pps for short sellers, bad actors and people who sell on every uptick. Wash, rinse and repeat. Make your own decisions as motivation from non shareholders —-20, 000+ negatives from one party ? Obvious isn’t it?
Welcome to DBMM. I’m one of many supportive shareholders .
Shareholders have been advised by the Company to do their own due diligence. That means, with documented information, shareholders have a responsibility to correct false statements and flat out lying by bashers which is intended to damage the Company to depress pps and shake shares loose. That is protecting their investment.
The Company follows the instructions of the regulators, particularly Disclosure of Financial Information regulations. For years bashers have ranted about information to which they are not entitled. It is not public information . Spinning fictional narratives has never stopped.
Bashers can’t call themselves critics without business experience and expertise— certainly not opinions never right. Supporters call them Nevers
It doesn’t take new shareholders long to wonder why vitriolic, nasty bashers are here. Most are not even shareholders, and have so stated. Adults make their own decisions and surely do not need people who have no executive experience or expertise with opinions based on nothing more than a directed attempt to damage the Company as they have for years
Anyone , particularly in public companies , know segmentation is everywhere or comparisons or surveys mean nothing. Industry awards, of which DC has won many, are always for emerging or small companies or the giants like Publicis or WPP or Omnicom.
Opinions with no expertise are worthless , yet never stopped your conflation and misinformation. Nevers who are never right.
More inane opinions with no facts and no credibility.
The conflation to try and deceive shareholders is utter stupidity. Shareholders are far too smart for that BS.
To try and compare companies who are divisions of top 10 media companies like WPP, Omnicom and Publicis practices regarding NDAs, is not comparable. The industry sector is divided by size and privacy is key for smaller companies. Management Consultancies and clients always have NDAs.
In earlier Update, Publicis acquisition of Sapient has been a model for DBMM and its acquisition of DC. Publicis is a behomoth .
The SEC is clear in instruction to platform companies that audited 10-Ks and reviewed 10-Qs are where results belong . Plans are private until executed. For years you want details you are not entitled to. The regulators were very supportive and instructive to the Compsny.
Just like DBMM provided SEC with data and evidence under Confidential Cover agreed and ordered by the Judge in Jan 2018 for private information while the cure taking place. Private information .
DBMM/DC knows exactly what it is doing.
Sure dude, 24/7/365 all day , every day as a non-shareholder or at best 1 share for decades. And you do it for free? Sure you do.
Name call, trash with band of merry men to support short sellers, bad actors and those who sell on every tick . Shareholders not allowing shares to shake loose.
Shareholders know.
You certainly proudly acknowledged you have one (1) share .
Yet posted 21,000+ negative posts .
And that says it all. Blah, blah, blah.
Most of 23 bashers are not shareholders, some have multiple monikers, and you know as Chief Recruiter.
DBMM will prevail every time.
Again Shareholders are really bored with your daily vitriolic rantings as a non-shareholder basher.
The fact that you do not have any understanding of digital businesses, management consultancies or privacy regulations and instructions from the regulators. You always know better according to you.
From the cure and return to normal trading and normal business you ranted about what you wanted to know and what would never happen. Thus the moniker Nevers. Never right.
You do not tell a Company what to do. No experience and no expertise. The regulators approved DBMM’s responses and actions from the Judge’s approval of Confidential evidence relating to DBMM ‘s mitigating circumstances in an SEC Order. Private information.
Shareholders make their own decisions and do not need a Basher ‘s negative rantings daily.
Get a life or rake the compost pile, you simply are clueless. Study and try to assimilate the new world.
Shareholders have been advised by the Company to do their own due diligence. That means, with documented information, shareholders have a responsibility to correct false statements and flat out lying by bashers which is intended to damage the Company to depress pps and shake shares loose. That is protecting their investment.
24/7/365 ranting , conflation and upside down chronology is basher’s template. The puppetmaster’s direction of short sellers, bad actors, paid bashers and multiple monikers say it all.
Bashers can’t call themselves critics without business experience and expertise— certainly not opinions never right.
Shareholders are really bored with your daily vitriolic rantings as a non-shareholder basher.
The fact that you do not have any understanding of digital businesses, management consultancies or privacy regulations and instructions from the regulators. You always know better according to you.
From the cure and return to normal trading and normal business you ranted about what you wanted to know and what would never happen. Thus the moniker Nevers. Never right.
You do not tell a Company what to do. No experience and no expertise. The regulators approved DBMM’s responses and actions from the Judge’s approval of Confidential evidence relating to DBMM ‘s mitigating circumstances in an SEC Order. Private information.
Shareholders make their own decisions and do not need a Basher ‘s negative rantings daily.
Get a life or rake the compost pile, you simply are clueless. Study and try to assimilate the new world.
Shareholders who make their own decisions don’t need people like you who try to tell us you know better. So we care. That is why bashers only support other bashers. Bullies in the playground and exactly the pejorative name calling you use because we do not agree.
So we care, what we don’t care about , is that you do not.
DBMM is long and strong