Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Point 1. You could be right.
Point 2. You are right.
See link below with a disclaimer and a review that seems to be biased or should I say coached.
https://www.bustle.com/wellness/evie-smart-ring-review
Point 3. Although LQMT’s amorphous metal is harder than titanium, neither one of them are scratch proof. Scratch resistant is very subjective without specifically listing examples of activities that will or will not scratch an amorphous metal formula from Liquidmetal technologies.
If true about the scratches out of the box…someone has a lot of splaining to do (as in explaining.)
Point 4. The last point…a frank discussion, a sit down, Don’t hold your breath. Seriously? When someone owns 46% of a company the only thing they need do is to dictate quietly. Hire and fire.
What’s to discuss…zero new contracts with zero new customers in 26 months? Zero + zero still equals zero. Unless one is into photography, the only progress to discuss are those new pictures of wearables, consumer electronics, medical and auto photos etc., posted on their website blog, some of them courtesy of their partners abroad.
When there are no patterns of contracts, there can never be a when, without the if occurring first. In the case of LQMT anyone understanding the history of contracts and has an understanding of algebra, knows that before a when, happens the if must come first.
For the when has no certain time going forward until the if happens first.
For example: IF LQMT does not add revenues to exceed the cash burn to operate, then LQMT will eventually no longer exist and there never will be a WHEN they find a contract to do so. This is as basic as it gets. And if anyone were to do their DD they would see too, that LQMT, in all of their filed 10K’s and 10Q’s state this fact very clearly. In there caveat section of risks.
Like myself you only bring out what most outside shareholders have been clamoring about…a sincere open, honest and transparent discussion to keep us up to date generically on progress, where NDA’s are concerned and frankly what is going on with their latest product touted on their blog, where an NDA is not of concern.
It is quite obvious to see that the purpose of shining a light on what is negative or perceived to be negative is only trying to elicit a positive response from the executives of LQMT imo.
Good luck to you.
Demonstrate otherwise? I speak for myself. I would not dare until I see more than one new contract per quarter.
It’s everywhere, but in our pockets…
https://education.mrsec.wisc.edu/amorphous-metals/
Tired of eating golf club sandwiches.
Where’s the beef. Will settle for lobster or salmon too. :)
Did LQMT and their shareholders ever get a piece of this pie?
https://www.nasa.gov/technology/metallic-glass-gears-up-for-cobots-coatings-and-more/
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Ok a BLT if I have too!
Another week passes and LQMT’s share price is down 1.1% from 0.054 cents to 0.0534 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
Basically, another boring week imo, for LQMT.
Basically, another boring month imo, for LQMT.
Still no announcement of any new contracts going into 26 months. A reflection on management’s results in not attaining success or increasing shareholder value. Just living off of the (fat) cash burn from the ipo sellouts and partnerships.
Sounds terrible. But if there is anyone out there that can directly link LQMT to some positive progress (not theories) resulting in increasing shareholder value, by all means post it. I have looked. But, perhaps I overlooked something.
So far no replies.
Share price is holding in the low pennies between the 0.05’s and 0.06’s as predicted. Future potential although weak, seems to be the catalyst along with an insider purchase for holding the pps up above 0.040 cents. It’s not FOMO. Otherwise the share price imo, already would have dropped below 0.03 cents.
As stated a gazillion times: with anemic trading volumes the share price means BUBKIS! and so too does another picture of a product using Liquidmetal, without the big long overdue 8K.
Perhaps in 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2024, all in it will be very thankful and glad that they did.
FOMO lives and is probably the main reason why anyone holds on regardless of any other opinion at this time. Not wanting to take a loss at this point may be another.
I try to present a balanced view based on the facts not on the emotions of anyone hyping or bashing LQMT. I believe I nailed it correctly. This board has had it correct past and present from potential to expectations to hope to FOMO.
Unfortunately LQMT can still hit the 02’s. Not my wish. The performance of LQMT will decide that.
No matter what anyone’s view is for LQMT going forward. The fundamentals have not changed and every day LQMT’s trading data are reminders of that fact.
Beyond March, there is potential for a contract announcement to correct the southerly direction LQMT has been heading for the past seven years.
There doesn’t seem to be any enthusiasm for the upcoming 10K/10Q1. And with solid unfortunate reasoning. So much for positive thinking.
No theories here. No speculation either.
Perhaps TC might give everyone a pleasant surprise in the next week and announce another end of year conference call or should I say a one way outgoing conference call with no incoming dialogue from outside shareholders. I base this on last year’s performance.
So far TC has not announced an end of year 2023 conference call as he did last year with 2022.
There is a real potential and real probability for the stock to head south again after the 10K to the 0.03’s and then the 0.02’s. Not something anyone would want or like to see happen. A positive PR, can change that outcome or another insider purchase.
The fact of no contracts being announced regarding the ring has already led to plausible theories. On the other hand I don’t believe the ceo is throwing $50 thousand dollars into the abyss for nothing.
My bet is on one present and one former executive who hold at least 1 million shares and I’m not talking about LL, regardless of how low the SP goes.
Will this be the year revenues increase consistently? Only the 2nd, 3D, and 4th Q’s will tell. I’ll be pleasantly surprised if the 1st Q tics up.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Anyone who loves the game Kick the Can from the early 20th century, this could be the investment for you. Over twenty years and still kicking, :)
Would this qualify?
“The patented Liquidmetal molding process also gave design freedom to produce unique contours that are functional and beautiful.”
Both were done the same year.
Ring company hits another all time low. As posted by Bobroo earlier, they are out of stock.
Their website says “All sold out .”
No wonder LQMT started to walk south again.
You only sell about 4000 rings and you can’t deliver?
They should be giving all customers with delayed deliveries 15% off imo!
And LQMT touting the ring on the blog and no contact announcements?
Smells like another LQMT street game of three card Monty to me.
Let’s go folks under which cup is the ring? Anyone?
I can see sold out. But not taking anymore orders? Does that sound right?
And why is LQMT pumping the ring in a product that can’t be ordered.? Where is the value in that?
Too many fricken questions.
And why did two outsiders buy 22% of the outstanding shares combined? At a much higher share price to boot!!
Anyone?
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Can’t blame a nonexistent NDA this time:)
Boilingman: Many companies will have a copyright letter © and year at the bottom of each of their linked pages. Many will also have the registration letter ®. Both will be circled.
I am not talking about the bottom of the linked pages identifying a companiy’s material as copyrighted or trademark registered. I’m talking about the individual article posted by Liquidmetal technologies, when writing about the Evie ring in it’s entirety and leaving out the ® when talking about their patented materials. Also, when reading the article I am carefully reviewing the wording. There does appear to be a new formula being used.
Now amorphous metals are not scratch proof, although at times anyone might get that impression.
Here is an example of what Liquidmetal technologies states in one of their links regarding scratches….
“Wearables?
Improve the quality and durability of your products by switching to Liquidmetal. The molding process allows you to easily create aesthetic and form fitting geometries to get the comfort and style you desire. The elasticity of Liquidmetal will allow you to abuse your product without bending out of shape. If you sit on your headphones or eyeglasses, Liquidmetal will return to its original form. The hardness of the alloy will resist scratching and maintain the cosmetic finish.”
Here is what the Evie ring article states as posted by Liquidmetal technologies in their blog of 02-15-2024; “The patented Liquidmetal molding process also gave design freedom to produce unique contours that are functional and beautiful. The corrosion resistance and hardness of Liquidmetal will stand up to active lifestyles and maintain its beauty.”
I point this out because there was an article and I don’t know how true it is or false about someone who has an Evie ring commented that it scratched easily. Now naturally a competitor or anyone biased would post a bias against their competition.
Being straight forward with the consumer will always result in less dissatisfaction. Just my stupid opinion.
Now if you go to the movano website. They are straight forward. Page 2/4 the ring is scratch resistant.
Of course I can always be wrong as my opinions are always worth less than the price of a LQMT share.
The blog was updated about 12 days ago. No comments? It appears LQMT is advertising the Evie ring to increase sales, 🤔.
https://liquidmetal.com/lqm-evie-hsa/
Also there appears to be a new formula involved and the trademark registration circled letter ® is not shown.
The new formula appears to be softer from the wording and may not be scratch resistant. Durable, yes. Scratch proof, no.
What gives??? Anyone?
Not holding my breath waiting for any clarification.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Looks like the .04’s are knocking again at LQMT’s door.
On this day last year.
LAKE FOREST, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 27, 2023-- Liquidmetal® Technologies, Inc. (OTCQB: LQMT), the world’s leading developer of amorphous alloys and composites, will hold a year end earnings conference call on Tuesday, March 14th, at 4:30 p.m. Eastern time. Liquidmetal Technologies CEO Tony Chung will host the call.
Source LQMT.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Tic tic tic tic tic tic.
Sad that we have to think that way. I would love to say ; Wow another million dollar contract plus. Or another $5 million dollar quarter. Hasn’t happened in over a decade from product sales.
Perhaps the stock will hit $100 dollars a share if the can perfect the bond of a Liquidmetal formula on a reusable paper shopping bag to make it last a long long time and satisfy both the consumer and those promoting a safer cleaner environment.
Some in amorphous metals have been working on it for over a year for different reasons and different uses.
No CE required. Just paper that will last a long time and fold itself up after each use to be stored.
One can only dream.
I even hate to speculate on any deal they have reached based on how many times the have had to compromise or bend over to nail down a contract of any size recently.
Good luck to you.
Spot on. No one knows who or when the tech. will be approved. A lot of competition out there attempting to do it. And if they rush through it. One can see lawsuits coming. Not something a company wants to be involved in.
Blood oxygen should be approved if claims and testing satisfy the FDA.
I think blood pressure approval would be a huge factor in upping sales as well.
The bigger picture will be what kind of deal LQMT has agreed to. Will it be all hype like the golf deal or will it be an actual per product part ordered?
I’m leaning towards a more favorable outcome right now. In the meantime since no impacting 8K has been released from any new deal, I can see LQMT after the upcoming 10K heading south again. Could be an opportunity to add or for non investors to buy in, in lieu of the potential for later this year.
Good luck to you.
They’re working on sugar levels as well.
As of today you are spot on. All should read this article as it was released January 2022
https://www.healthline.com/diabetesmine/non-invasive-diabetes-technology#early-attempts
I have been an investor in both DexCom and Tandem as noted in one of my much earlier posts
I think the article will help all understand eventually it might happen. It takes $$$$ to make $$$$.
https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2024-02-21/fda-warns-against-smartwatches-and-rings-that-claim-to-measure-blood-sugar-without-needles
Another week passes and LQMT’s share price is up 3.847% from 0.052 cents to 0.054 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
Basically, another boring week imo, for LQMT.
Still no announcement of any new contracts going into 26 months. A reflection on management’s results in not attaining success or increasing shareholder value. Just living off of the (fat) cash burn from the ipo sellouts and partnerships.
Sounds terrible. But if there is anyone out there that can directly link LQMT to some positive progress (not theories) resulting in increasing shareholder value, by all means post it. I have looked. But, perhaps I overlooked something.
Share price is holding in the low pennies between the 0.05’s and 0.06’s as predicted. Future potential although weak, seems to be the catalyst along with an insider purchase for holding the pps up above 0.04 cents. It’s not FOMO. Otherwise the share price imo, already would have dropped below 0.03 cents.
As stated a gazillion times: with anemic trading volumes the share price means BUBKIS! and so too does another picture of a product using Liquidmetal, without the big long overdue 8K.
It’s a reflection imo, in the confidence of TC and others operating LQMT imo. Otherwise that ring pic and the forward worded commentary if any should have been worth raising the asking price somewhere above 10 cents. Never made it past .08 and change. The volumes too would have sustained above one million shares trading daily with new interest.
Perhaps in 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2024, all in it will be very thankful and glad that they did.
FOMO lives and is probably the main reason why anyone holds on regardless of any other opinion at this time. Not wanting to take a loss at this point may be another.
I try to present a balanced view based on the facts not on the emotions of anyone hyping or bashing LQMT. I believe I nailed it correctly. This board has had it correct past and present from potential to expectations to hope to FOMO.
Unfortunately LQMT can still hit the 02’s. Not my wish. The performance of LQMT will decide that.
No matter what anyone’s view is for LQMT going forward. The fundamentals have not changed and every day LQMT’s trading data are reminders of that fact.
As stated before; From looking at events upcoming, the share price should hold from the 0.04’s and higher for the next two months. Beyond that point there is potential for a contract to correct the direction LQMT has been heading for the past seven years. Without it or new sources of revenues found from other endeavors, the trend south again can continue. Cash burn is a factor. Although right now LQMT has the cash to burn.
There doesn’t seem to be any enthusiasm for the upcoming 10K/10Q1. And with solid unfortunate reasoning.
Perhaps TC might give everyone a pleasant surprise in the next two weeks and announce another end of year conference call or should I say a one way outgoing conference call with no incoming dialogue from outside shareholders.
So far TC has not announced a end of year conference call as he did last year.
In any event with rings being shipped and no news of $$$ being received there is a real potential for the stock to head south again after the 10K to the 0.03’s and then the 0.02’s. Not something anyone would want or like to see happen.
The fact of no contracts being announced regarding the ring has already led to plausible theories.
Got an idea. Since LQMT is a contract company. Why not go on QVC and show the TV world the new ring made with Liquidmetal’s trade mark? And while they’re at it they can throw in the knife, the golf clubs, and all of the other great ideas they have:)
What a sad joke. Tout manufacturing capacity, new partnerships and just about zero new product to manufacture in five years.
Again, doesn’t sound too enticing to invest in, even at these low prices.
However, my bet is on one present and one former executive who hold at least 1 million shares and I’m not talking about LL, regardless of how low the SP goes.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC and all of the executives luck.
Looks right now like 10Q2 will be the tell.
Sounds again and again like playing the 20th century game of kick the can. Hope I am wrong.
Does TC have eyebrows?
🤔 hmmm. :)
And if he does…can he be trusted to bring LQMT to success?
I don’t particularly like some people. But she is successful.
So which would you rather have success or eyebrows?
Being in LQMT for two plus decades leads me to conclude all in LQMT would rather have a successful outcome regardless of their appearance.
Good luck to you.
The answer to that question might rest with FDA’s approval. However there are a lot of grey areas since most other rings combined claim to perform in the same manner without FDA approval.
There are several advantages for FDA approval and no disadvantages. Also, like some pharmaceutical drugs. All are not approved for insurance reimbursement. But that would be a great advantage in selling and buying the ring if Medicare and insurance companies added the ring to the list of covered products.
I don’t see that happening anytime soon. Not unless the organization AARP and prominent people puts pressure on insurance companies.
That too will not happen anytime soon.
Now specifically getting back to your question.
What you are really asking is the use of LQMT’s Liquidmetal trademark and formula a violation to any part of the Apple/LQMT agreements?
There are no grey areas there. So let’s play devils advocate. Let’s say the answer is 1000% yes!
Then Apple has 9 months in which to file a lawsuit. Otherwise it will become very difficult to fight the law of precedence, since none of the parties involved are hiding anything. It’s public knowledge to the extent of each party knowing what the other is doing.
It’s not a question of whether large sums of $$$$ or frivolous sums of $$$$ are at stake. It is a question of in your mind according to what you know. Is LQMT violating an agreement or not.
After November 2024 you will have your answer. No lawsuit and you can conclude either LQMT was granted a waiver per the agreement or there is no violation. To presume that there was a violation of the CE agreement and Apple did not want to pursue a lawsuit definitively would not be in Apple’s shareholders interest as it would be cause for encouraging more violations and loss of perceived revenues.
In the latter case, the shareholders could then sue Apple. Not a place to be as a ceo of a mega cap.
Now either way a company can call this type of product a medical device without FDA approval.
They just have to add a disclaimer. That’s all.
Good luck to you.
I think and as always, I could be wrong. But I believe, believe it or not. LQMT’s timeline might be a little sooner than the timeline of solid state EV battery and then the graphene EV battery.
An outsider becomes an insider in move. Buys 10% plus.
How do we know? Simple…
The legal answer…
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1734750/000121390022005510/ea154845-13gweiho_movano.htm
The www. answer…
https://www.gurufocus.com/insider/177071/william-tai-wei-ho
Another example of understanding what it means about a large insider purchase and the correlation to the direction of the share price.
But it does mean it is a bullish signal. It just takes longer for the seeds of start ups to grow and bare fruit 🍎.
Companies like LQMT and Movano are not mega caps. They are not even small caps. They are high risk reward micro dice rolling caps. The former with a long record for disappointing outside shareholders in my opinion.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Another too bad. Too bad he didn’t buy 11% in LQMT. That would have been at least a 45 million share day. :)
Not interested in what you buy in any company.
Paragraphs 4,5,6&7…
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1734750/000121390023090755/ea189141ex99-1_movano.htm
Iron out the kinks now. Because if those paragraphs are approved by the FDA. Sales will explode and exceed everyone’s expectations in the ring.
Now as far a LQMT is concerned since they have remained silent regarding $$$$.
What the heck did you do, accept shares of MOVE for cash at a later date???? Or charged a small fee in lieu of outsourcing manufacturing????
A good time for the LQMT COO, to speak up would be now.🤫 I’m not holding my breath :)
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Another take. Anything is possible.
https://www.reddit.com/r/eviering/comments/1asy8wy/some_comments_on_the_important_evie_ring_shipping/
There is a lot to blame on movano from the story. But it in no way if true, does it excuse the COO in LQMT, if there is one from coming clean and separating the facts from the fiction. Especially, when there are a sheet load of more selling the stock then buying the stock and LQMT barely finished the week above the 0.04’s.
It is obvious movano has problems.
Those who do not know the difference between bashing and reality obviously have not a clue if they are in Kansas or the land of Oz.
Good luck to all in LQMT
Wish TC luck.
Another week passes and LQMT’s share price is down 10.4066% from 0.05804 cents to 0.052 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
Still no announcement of any new contracts for 25 months. A reflection on management’s results in not attaining success or increasing shareholder value. Just living off of the (fat) cash burn from the ipo sellouts and partnerships.
Sounds terrible. But if there is anyone out there that can directly link LQMT to some positive progress (not theories) resulting in increasing shareholder value, by all means post it. I have looked. But, perhaps I overlooked something.
The only hints of LQMT breathing right now come from a couple of new blog posts. An industrial invite and a trade show on the west coast. I think that is great. But we don’t get follow ups. No stories of the fish taking the bait not even a goldfish let alone a whale.
Share price is holding in the low pennies between the 0.05’s and 0.06’s as predicted. Future potential although weak, seems to be the catalyst along with an insider purchase for holding the pps up above 0.04 cents. It’s not FOMO. Otherwise the share price imo, already would have dropped below 0.03 cents.
Although the volumes are still extremely anemic there was a lot of selling. The share price just barely holding above the 0.04’s by less than a hair
As stated a gazillion times: with anemic trading volumes the share price means BUBKIS! and so too does another picture of a product using Liquidmetal, without the big long overdue 8K.
It’s a reflection imo, in the confidence of TC and others. Otherwise that ring pic and the forward worded commentary if any should have been worth raising the asking price somewhere above 10 cents. Never made it past .08 and change. The volumes too would have sustained above one million shares trading daily with new interest.
Never happened. Could be a good thing too as LQMT never offered up any hard fluff to entice new interest. No outside PR.
Perhaps in 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2024, all in it will be very thankful and glad that they did.
FOMO lives and is probably the main reason why anyone holds on regardless of any other opinion at this time. Not wanting to take a loss at this point may be another.
I try to present a balanced view based on the facts not on the emotions of anyone hyping or bashing LQMT. I believe I nailed it correctly. This board has had it correct past and present from potential to expectations to hope to FOMO.
Unfortunately LQMT can still hit the 02’s. Not my wish. The performance of LQMT will decide that.
No matter what anyone’s view is for LQMT going forward. The fundamentals have not changed and every day LQMT’s trading data are reminders of that fact.
As stated before; From looking at events upcoming, the share price should hold from the 0.04’s and higher for the next two months. Beyond that point there is potential for a contract to correct the direction LQMT has been heading for the past seven years. Without it or new sources of revenues found from other endeavors, the trend south again can continue. Cash burn is a factor. Although right now LQMT has the cash to burn.
There doesn’t seem to be any enthusiasm for the upcoming 10K/10Q1. And with solid unfortunate reasoning.
Perhaps TC in the next two weeks might give everyone a pleasant surprise in the next two weeks and announce another end of year conference call or should I say a one way outgoing conference call with no incoming dialogue from outside shareholders.
In any event with rings being shipped and no news of $$$ being received there is a real potential for the stock to head south again after the 10K to the 0.03’s and then the 0.02’s. Not something anyone would want or like to see happen.
The fact of no contracts being announced regarding the ring has already led to plausible theories.
However, my bet is on one present and one former executive who hold at least 1 million shares and I’m not talking about LL, regardless of how low the SP goes.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC and all of the executives luck.
Looks right now like 10Q2 will be the tell.
Sounds again and again like playing the 20th century game of kick the can. Hope I am wrong.
More crickets 🦗 🦗 🦗.
It’s like the point of view which many may have, when an insider in LQMT buys shares in LQMT the share price must be going up up and up. It could not ever possibly go down first, only because I said so will a few disagree, even when proven wrong. Well, from .0301 to .083 to .0501 is not up! And in the case of TC believe it or not it is barely down from his purchase price. Not quite the same with LL from .061 to .44 to .0501 he is not up! He is down. Two big insiders buying and where is LQMT now?
Do not let a few skew you from reality. There is the past performance of management and the present performance of management. But neither performance can guarantee success. Both have failed to this day and although past and present management have a factual dismal record imo., it doesn’t mean success cannot be achieved. It is just harder to believe it can be with what the company has become and who is left. The material is the constant and the difficulties to become adopted by many are real.
The facts which matter unfortunately right now are the claims of amorphous metal expansion, amorphous metal contracts, amorphous metal growth from those other companies competing for a piece of the future amorphous metal pie.
The hope in LQMT are: are the options worth something? Will the insiders shares ever go up up and up? Will LQMT insiders ever get a slice of the pie big enough to share with the outside shareholders.
I did not coin the acronym but it (LQMT ) defines it. FOMO!
Fear Of Missing Out!
It’s the only correlation I see right now between buying and holding.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
There has been too many too bads since the ipo.
All need just one too good to be true to come through.
Now that is funny. I needed that.
Not that I give much credence between any correlations between the more popular stock markets and LQMT. Never had. Some do. But take a look at the three month chart of LQMT, when shareholders noticed the Liquidmetal trade mark and use in the Evie ring as reported on the LQMT blog and then the insider purchase as filed with the SEC. The share price almost tripled and then…
You will notice a clear trend in which direction the share price is leaning. Keep in mind all the while both liquidity and volumes are low.
Remember it started, when LQMT was in the 0.03’s and possibly headed towards the 0.02’s.
Without communications from LQMT, announcements of what they are doing. (aside from a couple of blogs about an industrial invite and a trade show two or three times a year.) shareholders deserve updates not silence.
The point is the share price will continue to head south after March without any news of progress, let alone a new contract and back into the 0.03’s. Unfortunately, based on reality that revenues from new sources seem to be the only catalyst that can sustain a bump up longer than 6 months.
Potential of a contract and theories of an insider purchase, which normally works with most stocks. Just doesn’t seem to be working with LQMT.
As always I could be wrong and my opinions are always worth less than the price of a LQMT share. But these observations are based on fact not a theory. But like I often refer to the share price moving up and down on very little volumes means nothing. So too do my observations. Even when they are spot on.
Not that I want LQMT to head south. But just what the heck are they doing to make it head north based on reality aside from trying to land a whale and increase shareholder value with adding small contracts for over two decades?
Anyone?
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Thank heavens for making us lower than the angels. Without it we would not have FOMO. :)
I truly hope your wife is happy with ring and the accuracy of features as advertised. I see that they have a very friendly and easy return and or exchange policy as well as an interest free purchase plan policy.
Good luck to you and your wife.
Not sure what it means Dept. That ring company hit a new all time low today.
Shipping problems? New orders? Delay in answering FDA requests.
Why is this important? Because for awhile everyone was a buzz about a possible future deal.
It is part of the reason why LQMT is holding too in the nickels since not many are expecting a 10K revenue increase.
Good luck to all in LQMT
Wish TC luck
Just my opinion. There is not enough liquidity to give any credence to share volumes up down or sideways. It has been this way for a long time now. Take away all of the wash rinse and repeat cycles and LQMT has no volumes trending, whether the share price goes up or down.
One might say someone or anyone or many or few have been accumulating since it hit 0.44 cents. While someone or anyone or many or few have been selling.
The liquidity. Is it trending up or down? That’s the ticket.
A simple example of this: 10,000 shares trading at 10 cents the liquidity = $1,000 dollars.
10,000 shares trading at 6 cents the liquidity = $600 dollars.
You can always buy. But without liquidity there is no advantage to sell. To use a poor metaphor, Sort of like the Eagles, iconic song, Hotel California.
One thing is for sure. Someone is buying, for the stock still is hanging on.
Sell positions out number buy positions 2 to 1. Not a vote of confidence out there no matter what the future looks like to many.
We can say whatever we want to believe from reality to manipulation to scam to the greatest opportunity in a lifetime. But in the end the trading and the interest in LQMT are a true reflection on what management has done are doing and what buyers think they are going to do. Holders have zero impact on the share price.
Trading in the low pennies with what holders think is some potential does not bode well. The ask should have gone through ten cents a month ago.
Never made it. Even it does happen on a contract announcement. It’s a realistic sign of what new buyers are showing; caution!
As always my opinions are always worth less than the price of a LQMT share.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Gee Wiz, what happened to all of those pumping correlations and yahoo excitement over Eontec?
Wow look at the volumes 50 million shares trading up up and away. Like Superman.
I’ll tell you what happened. They’re below the LQMT abyss trading at a nine year low almost hitting an all time record low last week and today.
Opening at $3.85 moving up a little.
If anyone is pissed off about the timing of investing in LQMT. I got news for you sunshine. You would be more pissed right now if you were allowed to invest in Eontec.
Now neither scenario makes things better. But LL must have known something when he decreased his $$$$ in Eontec and parked it somewhere else.
Just on speculation, maybe it’s a good thing LL left his $$$$ in LQMT. Seems like it’s the only reason LQMT is still around based on revenues.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
You don’t have to buy in to get the picture…
https://www.insightaceanalytic.com/report/bulk-metallic-glass-market/1521
But if market gurus were always correct about things, we would all be millionaires a 1000 times over.
Distant relatives?
RS Alloys
https://www.bulkmetallicglass.it/en/bulk-metallic-glass-blog/bulk-metallic-glass-watches/
There is a connection to eutectix
Might take a little time to load.
che succede?
Another week passes and LQMT’s share price is down 3.588% from 0.0602 cents to 0.05804 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down. Still no announcement of any new contracts for 25 months. A reflection on management’s results in not attaining success or increasing shareholder value. Just living off of the (fat) cash burn from the ipo sellouts and partnerships.
Sounds terrible. But if there is anyone out there that can directly link LQMT to some positive progress (not theories) resulting in increasing shareholder value, by all means post it. I have looked. But, perhaps I overlooked something.
The only hints of LQMT breathing right now come from a couple of new blog posts. An industrial invite and a trade show on the west coast. I think that is great. But we don’t get follow ups. No stories of the fish taking the bait not even a goldfish let alone a whale.
Share price is holding in the low pennies between the 0.05’s and 0.06’s as predicted. Future potential seems to be the catalyst along with an insider purchase for holding the pps up above 0.04 cents. It’s not FOMO. Otherwise the share price imo, already would have dropped below 0.03 cents.
As stated a gazillion times: with anemic trading volumes the share price means BUBKIS! and so too does another picture of a product using Liquidmetal, without the big long overdue 8K.
All focus is on one expectation known. While other expectations lie dormant. As the former executive BB once alluded to, a one off. A one off can make the difference for LQMT.
Perhaps in 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2024, all in it will be very thankful and glad that they did.
FOMO lives and is probably the main reason why anyone holds on regardless of any other opinion at this time. Not wanting to take a loss at this point may be another.
I try to present a balanced view based on the facts not on the emotions of anyone hyping or bashing LQMT. I believe I nailed it correctly. This board has had it correct past and present from potential to expectations to hope to FOMO.
Unfortunately LQMT can still hit the 02’s. Not my wish. The performance of LQMT will decide that.
No matter what anyone’s view is for LQMT going forward. The fundamentals have not changed and every day LQMT’s trading data are reminders of that fact.
From looking at events upcoming, the share price should hold from the 0.04’s and higher for the next two months. Beyond that point there is potential for a contract to correct the direction LQMT has been heading for the past seven years. Without new sources of revenues the trend south again can continue. Cash burn is a factor. Although right now LQMT has the cash to burn.
There doesn’t seem to be any enthusiasm for the upcoming 10K/10Q1. And with solid unfortunate reasoning.
Perhaps TC in the next two weeks might give everyone a pleasant surprise in the next two weeks and announce another end of year conference call or should I say a one way outgoing conference call with no incoming dialogue from outside shareholders.
In any event with rings shipped and no news of $$$ being received there is a real potential for the stock to head south again after the 10K to the 0.03’s and then the 0.02’s.
The fact of no contracts being announced regarding the ring has already led to plausible theories.
However, my bet is on one present and one former executive who hold at least 1 million shares and I’m not talking about LL, regardless of how low the SP goes.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC and all of the executives luck
Thank you so much.
I thought they were doing a decent job of research.
Good luck to you.
This too is part of the LQMT website. It has been around for over a year now, but very rarely discussed. A former poster of this board posted it on another www. A couple of months ago and it received very little traction.
I saw it while researching the LQMT website and thought very little of it about 16 months ago.
https://liquidmetal.com/main-xxyyzz/
Scroll down.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish tc luck.
O.T. I got a reply…
From that : https://stocktwits.com/r/LQMT_STOCK
Website.
Not exactly explaining anything asked. Seemed to be more angry and definitely pissed off at me then could offer any explanation for why the site may have been terminated.
I didn’t see any articles on the www as to why this one LQMT site would be removed.
Does anyone know why? Without the bias or anger?
Nothing like updating a blog until after the fact…or a few days before the fact….
Feb. 01 2024. Give me a break.
Nothing like planning for the future.
https://liquidmetal.com/liquidmetal-mdm-west-2024/
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC Luck.
Guess they didn’t want too many outsiders showing up.
And the website still shows materials copyright 2023 and not 2024. 🤔