Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[Researchfyi]

Point 1. You could be right.
Point 2. You are right.
See link below with a disclaimer and a review that seems to be biased or should I say coached.

https://www.bustle.com/wellness/evie-smart-ring-review

Point 3. Although LQMT’s amorphous metal is harder than titanium, neither one of them are scratch proof. Scratch resistant is very subjective without specifically listing examples of activities that will or will not scratch an amorphous metal formula from Liquidmetal technologies.

If true about the scratches out of the box…someone has a lot of splaining to do (as in explaining.)

Point 4. The last point…a frank discussion, a sit down, Don’t hold your breath. Seriously? When someone owns 46% of a company the only thing they need do is to dictate quietly. Hire and fire.

What’s to discuss…zero new contracts with zero new customers in 26 months? Zero + zero still equals zero. Unless one is into photography, the only progress to discuss are those new pictures of wearables, consumer electronics, medical and auto photos etc., posted on their website blog, some of them courtesy of their partners abroad.

When there are no patterns of contracts, there can never be a when, without the if occurring first. In the case of LQMT anyone understanding the history of contracts and has an understanding of algebra, knows that before a when, happens the if must come first.

For the when has no certain time going forward until the if happens first.

For example: IF LQMT does not add revenues to exceed the cash burn to operate, then LQMT will eventually no longer exist and there never will be a WHEN they find a contract to do so. This is as basic as it gets. And if anyone were to do their DD they would see too, that LQMT, in all of their filed 10K’s and 10Q’s state this fact very clearly. In there caveat section of risks.

Like myself you only bring out what most outside shareholders have been clamoring about…a sincere open, honest and transparent discussion to keep us up to date generically on progress, where NDA’s are concerned and frankly what is going on with their latest product touted on their blog, where an NDA is not of concern.

It is quite obvious to see that the purpose of shining a light on what is negative or perceived to be negative is only trying to elicit a positive response from the executives of LQMT imo.

Good luck to you.