Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Its amazing it took you so long to get rid of Mary. Matt, her story was out all over the boards for years. You chose to think with the little head & paid a price. You finally came down to earth, welcome back.
Mary I see you are still at it. You cry like a child when you are punished.You can dish it out,you cant take it. Please grow up.
"informing people, protecting people...from stock scams and fraudulent public companies "
If that's all someone contributes to society their pure existence is a scam.
"I personally don't feel "god" exists
It's just something that we have created in our mind to explain certain things "
Being you brought this up SATAN will deal with you. If you cant take the heat stay out of the kitchen.
What will you be selling? Huuuuuuum
>>We know it will require 20 to 40 employees to have a production line moving. 5 people and 5 cars in the lot means they are finishing some units and wasting time while they try to work out a reorganization plan. >>
How do you come up with the above seems a bit non scientific, off the wall if I may say so. Could mean 5 people came in 1 car not wasting time & building bikes.
Insults Joe, did I say something to offend you? RB thats for Mary, do you post there?
I await your complete report.
Sorry for the double post.
You Moron you say "Look at the bankruptcy filing" so what does that mean they filed ch 11 that's a given. They are still operating, the parking lot is filled. Another thing everyone knows the factory is a long drive from NY yet another thing dingbat, its a long flight from NY. By the way what's with this NY thing with you.
I got it you are waiting for the ASTN suit to be filed in LA, a bit jumpy?
You Moron you say "Look at the bankruptcy filing" so what does that mean they filed ch 11 that's a given. They are still operating, the parking lot is filled. Another thing everyone knows the factory is a long drive from NY yet another thing dingbat, its a long flight from NY. By the way what's with this NY thing with you.
I got it you are waiting for the ASTN suit to be filed in LA, a bit jumpy?
Mary as usual you call people a liar that disagree with you. I was told they are building bikes. The parking lot is full. Now if you have the balls, to call me a liar prove it.
"They are just cleaning up and selling what they can. "
You cant prove that is so. By the above post you admit there is activity you say they are cleaning up selling what they can. I say BS .ASTN will win in CA. YOU are a liar
Could it be she made up the story? Was there a press release? It would be her style. Why don't we ask her to post some pictures & interviews with the remaining employees as she says, see what they have to say.
What a wonder sound UMCC production line in full swing.
Many people there today. Maybe they were hired back. Maybe they were never let go as you say. Hum.
"Also, Mary is right. You are posting about her constantly. Not a stalker are you?"
A little surprised about you Matt. That stalker statement way off base, sounds like you found some honey in LA.
GFYSIS
Typical Mary, don't leave it hanging
"Upset about the email incident"
What???????? incident spit it out.
YES, THE CASE WAS DISMISSED IN PA. ONLY FOR JURISDICTION.
THEY WILL FOLLOW YOU TO CA. & GET IT RIGHT THIS TIME.
"THEY HAVE NO CASE"
ONLY TIME WILL TELL.
I AM NOT BASHING YOU I AM GIVING MY OPINION MY RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH. BOTTOM LINE YOU CAN DISH IT OUT BUT YOU CANT TAKE IT.
IMHO ASTN WILL FILE AGAINST YOU IN CA.
NOW GO GET JOHNNNNNNNNY
"Whyz everybuddy alwayz pickin on me
You have no idea what I don't do or do do. Uh..."
What you do, is to lie, distort, & twist the facts I have seen your posts where your accusations were without proof & lies. I have seen posters post proof of this fact. You were sued by ASTN for libel. The merits of this case was not part of the decision. Mary got off on a technicality ONLY jurisdiction. She was not cleared or exonerated. I believe astn will come after you in California. All in all you do a lot to get yourself in trouble. You brought the topic up, I gave an opinion.
Bashing you, NOT. I am voicing my opinion about you & the lawsuit. I am for free speech that's why I am stating my opinion. I believe when one knowingly makes statements that they know are false then a line has to be drawn in the sand. I notice when someone has an opinion different from yours or criticizes you, you call them a basher.
You could go on & on as you usually do. Sure the judge read lawsuit what do you think she is there for? she never ever said it was a frivolous lawsuit. You say she did. This case was dismiss based on jurisdiction. It is not over LIAR.
That's a lie Mary. The suit was dismissed because of jurisdiction & nothing else."she just read the lawsuit, saw that it was completely frivolous " That was never entered into the record that was not her decision.
Talk is they will be knocking at your door in LA you are not off the hook. Where is Johnny? you are going to need him.
The defendant has flipped out. Just look at these charges against the Hess poster.
show me links hesh
or should I say David Lee Taylor of New York. dlt@aol.com detourdave@aol.com This guy is user names marykiller on rb. marysvstinkslikehell, marystwatgotrot, marysabortedfetus... He hyped bikr with westergaard from at least $6 all the way down to .02. LOOOOOSER!! Making up posts again I see. You are really obsessed with me you closet homosexual. This guy sends me tons of male gay porn spam. He must love the stuff. I heard that westergaard is gay and you both like in New York. Did you ever do him? How does it feel doing a guy with prostate cancer? Please don't answer.
The posts are real You prove they are not.
Lets look at these wild charges
1- Hyped bikr You have not a clue who I am how could you say that.
2- Obsessed with you a closet homosexual Prove it.
3- I heard that westergaard is gay and you both like in New York. Did you ever do him? How does it feel doing a guy with prostate cancer?
MISS you are the expert does prostate cancer change the equation?
What has NY got to do with anything.
You hear a lot of crap not once ounce of proof.
All this homosexual talk no proof this leads me to believe you are living in the closet. Not able to cope with the hand that was dealt you. Your porn sites shows what you are really about. Your bashing may be a way of getting rid of your guilt of being beaver hunter.
You are a sick bitch seek help
"i never touted bikr"
Back in 60 seconds
by: marycummins (34/F/Los Angeles, CA) 02/13/01 07:14 pm EST
Msg: 6056 of 6056 YAHOO EZR BOARD
It's me, the unknown poster. My user name got bumped because made up some story to yahoo. They will only bump you if you physically threaten someone. I've never done that so don't know what's up.
As my post is gone, the person who bought/got the 2M shares from Joe is Bob Guccione of Penthouse. He is K.C. Publishing
HERE IS THE PROOF LIAR
RE: wbn Ha ha ha ha
by: the_unknown_poster (34/F/Los Angeles, CA)
09/03/00 08:49 pm EDT
Msg: 7624 of 11577
I can't say that anyone deserved it more than that bunch of crooks. I'm soooooo glad Hal
decided to stop working with them as soon as Herm left. That was all Herm's doing. That
is how he "turns companies around." Herm hired liars and manipulators who violated
SEC regulations just to try and artificially make it look like BIKR was turning
around...and he still failed. Hal's approach of actually turning the company around in real
life makes a lot more sense.
purple
by: the_unknown_poster (34/F/Los Angeles, CA) 08/18/00 12:24 pm EDT
Msg: 7309 of 11574
I have spoken to a few BIKR employees, suppliers and the COO at the Long Beach show. I also sense that they are really trying hard to make BIKR succeed. They are very motivated and are open to new ideas. This is a big change from the Herm era. The feel over there was depressing back then. They didn't seem to be a united force. They were almost just waiting to go under. Now they are all united in the common goal of making a good motorcycle. Now they have the drive to do well. I just hope that they also have the financial means and the ability. I really like the fact that the COO not only rides, but rides bad bikes. He's been a rider all his life as per the Long Beach interview. He wants to make a good bike for people. Does anyone here remember what Herm "rode?" I don't want to say. Will someone else say it for me? A hint, it sure as #### wasn't an Ultra or anything close to it. He was obviously no rider. He hated bikes. He'd trailer his "bike" a lot. He just wanted to make money any way he could, by cutting back on R&D and materials, burning his suppliers, stringing out people they owed money to like the Kinnecuts and not properly honoring the warranty claims. He was penny wise and dollar foolish. He almost killed BIKR. He left a nice little mess for BIKR and Hal to clean up. And they have been cleaning it up. They just need to take care of one outstanding small loan, warranty issues, their bad customer service reputation and their cash situation until next June. If they can keep production at least level, costs down and improve their bottom line a little, they should make it to next year. Go BIKR.
good news purple
by: the_unknown_poster (34/F/Los Angeles, CA)
08/21/00 11:44 am EDT
Msg: 7362 of 11574
Thanks for sharing that conversation with us. Yes, Hal does seem to know his stuff when
it comes to bikes. At the Long Beach show he was showing me a few new things on the
Sledgehammer and talking about the technical aspects of motorcycle production. He also
seemed extremely motivated and determined to turn this company around. I've met the
CEO's of other biker related companies and not all of them were as knowledgeable
about the bikes or riding. Hal is also a real rider. He puts miles on his bike, sometimes
hard ones. If you're on a Sledgehammer, there's no other way. Ow.
I saw an Ultra yesterday when I was out riding with friends. I didn't have a chance to
snap a pic of it. It was a Fatpounder with a wild paint job. It looked new as it didn't have
plates on it yet. The guy riding it looked pretty tough like a guy who'd been riding all of
his life. He was about 40 or so. He looked good on it. Then he took off like a bat out of
####. I was down at the bar in Long Beach called Blues I think. You park on this private
walkway area and they make you put a plastic tray under your bike so you won't leak on
the nice tile. There were some old cars there and they were the ones who really needed
those trays. There was a wino who was dancing to the live band. Quite a few other
bikers and then a bunch of tourists. It was a nice day.
FYI Purple, Hal reads this board every day. Hope he liked the pic of him on the Whizzer
"BIKR is not doomed" by: Mary 9/19/00
by: the_unknown_poster (34/F/Los Angeles, CA)
09/19/00 10:07 pm EDT
Msg: 7879 of 11944
BIKR is not currently doomed. BIKR is very different than BIGX, TMOT, Polaris and Indian.
BIGX and TMOT had bad management. They were both run by families, families with
no experience running a motorcycle company. They refused to delegate to talented and
experienced individuals. They lied on their reports. There was insider trading. They fired
most of the staff over time before finally coming to a complete halt. BIGX and TMOT
also had plans which were way too big. They should have started smaller and gradually
increased market share.
BIKR is run by people picked for their talents not their familial relationships. BIKR
knows how to go out and find the people they need. BIKR is not overextended. BIKR is
profitable. BIGX and TMOT never really were. BIKR is taking it slower. They didn't
take out huge loans which they knew they could never pay back.
Polaris has an ugly bike though it is cheaper. For just a few grand more anyone would
rather have a HD. It runs and sounds cheap too.
Indian is just a name and some big fenders and an emblem slapped on a CMC bike.
They don't have their proprietary engine yet. They just want a big pop on their IPO. The
market for Indian is big in my area but it isn't that big in other states like HD is. Indian is
for rich boys that already have a HD. I don't see the point to the scout at all. It looks like
a regular old bike with an indian fender ornament, definitely not worth the bucks they're
asking.
I used to think that of all of the after market companies that Titan had the best chance.
BIGX bike was also ugly though unique. What I didn't know at the time was their true
financial situation. I also thought BIKR was doomed when Herm was there trying to save
pennies on the bikes and using the fake analyst. Now that they've got a new guy, have
put out the immediate fires of the lawsuit and past due bridge loans, I think they have a
much better chance. They are profitable and only owe what $4M to FINOVA which is
due in June? If they can make it through the slow season by not doing any crazy
expansion or upping production, they have a good chance at a refi. in June. BIKR is not
out of danger yet with the delisting issue still at hand but they are doing much better. If
they can keep up the good work, they may be the last man standing...besides HD of
course. Best wishes to bikr.
The 4Q is out too.
just say no to Mary
Mary what do you do for a living? Bash & Bash all day. The overwhelming power of the sex drive was demonstrated by the fact that someone was willing to father you.
Just say no to Maryfraud
Mary what's gray & comes in quarts?
>>. Always wanting more and more of beautiful intelligent successful me. Well...you can't have me. Now get back to your loser existences. >>
Beautiful-That is in the eyes of the beholder. Seems you are the only one with that opinion.
Intelligent-Succeessful Being you brought this up I will comment. If you were all of that, you would not be on the message boards all day posting nonsense. You would not be sued for libel by ASTN & lord knows how many more. IMHO you are a sick person in need of a psychological evaluation. Seek help you may be helped.
May I also suggest get married, have some kids get out of the house throw the computer out.
>>They are basically in contempt of court for not sending me copies of what they file or responding to my issues .
>>
If they were in contempt you would have pounded that fact. When you say basically in contempt IMHO that means you are
still up to your nose in the libel suit.
>>thrown out of commerce court
look at first few entries. Thrown out of commerce. >>
Civil Docket Report
11-MAY-2001
02:07 PM CLTMN - TRANSFERRED TO MAJOR NON-JURY SHEPPARD, JR., ALBERT W
Docket Entry: AFTER A REVIEW OF PLAINTIFF'S(S') PLEADING AND THE COMMERCE PROGRAM CASE CRITERIA, IT IS ORDERED THAT THIS CASE IS INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE COMMERCE PROGRAM BECAUSE IT DOES NOT INVOLVE A DISPUTE BETWEEN OR AMONG TWO BUSINESS ENTERPRISES. ADMINISTRATIVE DOCKET 01 OF 1999 IN RE: COMMERCE CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, B.1.2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CASE IS TRANSFERRED TO THE NON JURY PROGRAM AND PLACED IN A WAITING TO LIST STATUS CONFERENCE STATUS. BY THE COURT....SHEPPARD J 5/11/01
Mary Mary the above explains it all.
Here is where you are as of this moment still in deep dodo.
19-JUL-2001
10:52 AM CLSHD - STATUS HEARING DISPOSED TERESHKO, ALLAN L
Docket Entry: It is hereby ORDERED and DECREED as follows: 1. Development of Joint Statement of Uncontested and Contested Facts. (a) Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Legal Issues for Trial. By 1/18/02, plaintiff shall provide the Court with a narrative statement listing all facts proposed to be proved by him or her at trial in support of his or her claim(s) as to liability and damages. Additionally, plaintiff shall provide the Court with all relevant conclusions of law based upon his or her proposed findings of fact and any and all legal issues presented thereto. (b) Defendant's Response and Proposed Facts. By 2/18/02, defendant shall provide the Court a statement: (1) indicating the extent to which defendant contests and does not contest the plaintiff's proposed facts: (2) listing all additional facts proposed to be proved by defendant at trial in opposition to, or in special defense of, the plaintiff's claim(s) as to liability and damages; (3) listing all facts proposed to be proved by defendant at trial in support of any counterclaim(s), and/or third-party claim(s) if such claims exist; (4) listing any and all conclusions of law which arise from all contested and uncontested facts as proposed by the plaintiff; and, (5) listing for the Court all legal issues presented based upon proposed facts and conclusions of law. (c) Statement of Uncontested Facts. By 1/18/02, the same date as that listed in paragraph 1 (a) of this order, the parties shall submit a joint statement of uncontested facts. This statement is separate and distinct from any other submitted. As such, agreement or disagreement, which terms are defined below, with any proposed fact by a defendant does not obviate the requirements of this paragraph. 2. Identification of Witnesses and Exhibits. (a) Plaintiff's Witnesses. By 1/18/02, plaintiff shall provide the Court with a list of all possible witnesses, including a brief narrative of each respective witness's expected testimony. (b) Plaintiff's Exhibits. By 1/18/02, plaintiff shall provide the Court with a list of all possible exhibits which he or she may use during the course of trial. (c) Defendant's Witnesses. By 2/18/02, defendant shall provide the Court with a list of all possible witnesses, including a brief narrative of each respective witness's expected testimony. (d) Defendant's Exhibits. By 2/18/02, defendant shall provide the Court with a list of all possible exhibits which he or she may use during the course of the trial. 3. Definitions. (a) Narration of Proposed Facts. In stating facts proposed to be proved, counsel shall do so in simple, declarative, self contained, consecutively numbered sentences. In a case with multiple parties, if a fact is to offered against fewer than all parties, counsel shall indicate the parties against which the fact will (or will not) be offered. (The facts to be set forth include not only ultimate facts, but also all subsidiary and supporting facts except those offered solely for impeachment purposes.) (b) Agreement and Disagreement. Defense counsel shall indicate that he or she does not contest a proposed fact if at trial they will not controvert or dispute that fact. In indicating disagreement with a proposed fact, defense counsel shall so set forth those disagreement(s) as explained above. (c) Objections. Objections to the admissability of a proposed fact (either as irrelevant or on other grounds) may not be used to avoid indicating whether or not the party contests the truth of that fact. (Counsel shall, however, indicate any objections, both to the facts which they contest and those which they do not contest.) (d) Individual Positions. To the extent feasible, counsel with similar interests are expected to coordinate their efforts and express a joint position with respect to the facts they propose to prove and to the facts other parties propose to prove. Subject to the time limits above, each party may, however, list additional proposed facts to cover positions unique to it. 4. Annotations. For each proposed fact, the parties shall, at the time of proposing to prove the fact, list the witnesses (including expert witnesses), documents, and (with line-by-line references) any depositions and answers to interrogatories or requests for admissions that they will offer to prove that fact. In his or her response, defense counsel shall, if he or she objects to any such proposed fact or proposed proof, state precisely the grounds of their objections and, if they will contest the accuracy of the proposed fact, similarily list the witnesses, documents, depositions, interrogatories, or admissions that they will offer to controvert that fact. Except for good cause shown, a party will be precluded at trial from offering any evidence on any fact not so disclosed and from making any objection not so disclosed. 5. Effect. (a) Preclusion of other facts. Except for good cause shown, parties shall be precluded at trial from offering proof of any fact not disclosed in their listing of proposed facts (except purely for impeachment purposes). 6. Sanctions. Unjustified refusal to admit a proposed fact or to limit the extent of disagreement with a proposed fact shall be subject to sanctions. Excessive listing of proposed facts (or of the evidence to be submitted in support of or denial of such facts) which imposes obvious burdens on opposing parties shall also be subject to sanctions. BY THE COURT: Allan L. Tereshko, Supervising
Right Joe
I am who I am.
Just say no to Mary
Not yet, it will happen.
MMMARY you sure are up on your fish.You post a lot of fish storys. Are you the old woman of the sea?
JUST SAY NO TO MARY.
How Mary can change a story!Sara looks like you are too smart for her.