Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Gotinearly.. Dont jump at me.. You explain what is so obvious to you ? Whats so obvious that most people cannot figure it out? it couldent be that obvious ... have you been involved in class action suits before? Do you have any formal knowledge about them? Becuase if you did it wouldent be so obvious. And just a hint.. I do not have to leave and will not leave.. how about you leave if you dont like my posts or dont read them .IMHO!
Well good luck to ya... If you need to go through that much trouble to see the company that you own a piece of ...You should be proud.. whats with the question period between 5 and 6? why not the whole dam meeting? You think a question and talking to rich will take lets say 10 minutes so 6 people maximum can ask a question... woopee.... sounds like a ceo alright... IMHO!
Bull you are speaking from both sides of the fence.. You absolutly agree to a new ceo..great... agree to some new fresh bodies ..great then you want everyone to join a lawsuit set up by the old ceo and we dont even know who the law firm is or any details.. why is this? Then the real names of shareholders are put to the public threads ike RB... and this is from a ceo many believe should be replaced... But to join "his" lawsuit when we have no info about this is absurd ... It should be published the firm in california who rich claims has been selected, why they were selected and how they were selected.. Is this a "buddy" of our CEO? A total stranger? why california lawyer anyways? This is what quirks me... I have no faith in McBride after what i have seen and heard for the past year and a half and now see .... The lawsuit thing just dosent add up... This mystery lawyer ... I have never seen a mystery lawyer for a class action suit not being named immediatly.. Has Mcbride answered the question who the mystery firm is in email questions yet? Not that i am aware of... This is all my opinion but hey Bull I agreed with some of your points at least. IMHO!
Personally i do not believe MCBRIDE... I believe he is Miluky..Isnt it funny how all the posts on RB directly point towards him.. and his knowledge of the PR firm , SEVU and the other companys RlMcbride Pr Firm represtented or worked with?..Thats my opinion.. He dosent want to resign that is obvious... Whats the difference if we pay a CEO 150k a year? Like if we have millions upon millions in sales , whats 150k for a reliable honest and straight forward CEO? Again my opionion.
I thougt it was an open house? Now i read that you must RSVP and no one will be admitted without RSVP? Thats not an open house..sounds like a meeting without any info to me.
sorry for getting worked up in the question... mind races.. but im sure someone here can shed some light on it
Even if MCBride stepped down, there is still the uneasy feeling which he has planted here. Even if a new ceo took over, there would need to be some pain done.. meaning he /she would need to straighten out some facts and show some sales ... this stock was being priced towards the sales forcasted which cannot possibly happen for the year 2000 obviously and now we are into 2001 and would think without some quick work... production may not be at full peak until end of 1st quarter perhaps... Things need to progress rapidly of first and formost of building back investors ease then with some real production ... harc to say if SEVU can evfen meet the numbers they forcasted , maybe the demand is not that high? perhaps higher... But just a new ceo alone wont help the healing until many other things are answered and clarified...A very important step is the proxy statement.. with rich's info already out in public, why hasnt thins been filed yet as promised? Obviously Mcbride is sticking around till at least the open house as it seems.. With the cancelation of the shareholders meeting , it would be tough to pursue some of these important steps.. New ceo as one... IMHO!
Matt... When I add a person mark.. for example Bernard.. of course.. It shows as 1300 new messages.. how do I get this to goto 0? so I can read the ones i havent seen before instead of all the way back to the beginning? So in other words, show only messages from this point forward?
Thanks
Bernard.. This was a good message.I like it.. Is this what is in your chairmail? Would love to see these plays in a chairmail.. but oh my which chairmail do i sign up for to see them?
Francois.. How about upfating the outstanding shares etc also in the iBOX?
Impartial poster on RB has done an about face.. Complete turn around.. first says A@P has sent out un authorized email of his..and now has sided with him... Saying SEVU has harraaaed and tried to keep him quiet... kinda strange... First he punds SEVU then he Pounds A@P .. now he Pounds SEVU again? Multiple personalities is a possibility...? IMHO!
http://www.ragingbull.altavista.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=SEVU&read=19920
By: printmail01 $$$
Reply To: None Monday, 15 Jan 2001 at 9:16 PM EST
Post # of 19926
a@p is right on the money
I have been threatened & Harassed for the last time. I posted some info that a@p was a liar. I will admit openly here, or in court under oath, that it is not true. I was threatened in my job because SEVU stiffed me on a job! I was told I would be brought to court & sued for posting my opinion, for posting in favour of a@p. The truth be told, I was screwed by SEVU. I have proof they are liars & most of all I know have proof that they harrass & threaten to keep PEOPLE QUIET!
My opinion will stay true! SEVU is a bunch of thugs who when challenged make threats to keep people quiet!
My personal opinion!
Dosent sound too impartial to me? He sent info to Anthony..and when you send info it clearly states at his website that sending info from the site gives anthony the right ti use it any way he sees fit or something to that meaning.... he sent it through this method unfortunatly... Anthony used it ... so be it.
Bernard the directors I put here were just some fun... a@p is a litte bit strong minded or otherwise...? for being a director here
BBGOLD.. there is a good resource for shorting... Goto the F.Gems thread.. and Francois is touting a bubch of stock... If he says hes long , you should short that position... thats my opinion since The things i see him pumping and touting all seem to fall.. SCRO.. XNET... SEVU!!!... IFTP... ETC ETC ETC there are many ...
Just my observations
Francois you doing some damage control to your reputation? hrmm.. I think its already gone though..but good luck restoring it..
Sevu Releases Email Addresses.. Is there a possibility that Sevu did this on purpose for some reason or another? I cannot see how a mistake like that can be made so easily... it dosent make sense to me.. Even A person not involved with IT should see this happening and change it... I dont get it... Is there a reason SEVU is trying anything to get attention off of them or off of other things ? this email fiasco and the apparent break in dosent make sense to me... Just dosent add up..and then Francois clearly suggesting it was shorters..... Dosent make sense.. IMHO!
Francois maybe you should also relinquishes Your Director Position of this thread and appoints a well seasoned and Credible director in your place
Francois.. We are on a moderated thread.. I have asked specific questions.. you are the moderator.. you are the king.. well down with the King mr bigshot.. time for you to see the light.. Your right to imply my posts are not as important as yours or anyone elses is a insult to the whole board at IHUB.. I like Ihub...but the problem is I have heard too many times, that you Francois.. Goelo, slash-it , pumper .. as you have all been describe, Has given this Site a Blackeye..and have put it down on a lower level than it should be.. Do you feel proud? And you will not bar me from posting on this thread... You have shown no patience... you have shown that you do not own nor control Me ..or any other posters on this thread.. Do not threaten me again... Next.. prove your points.. Show me the personal attacks I have posted? I will address whoever i want on a public thread.. your ignorance of that fact shows lower than expected intelligence..
What was this message removed?
In Reply To 'My Portfolio Sucks' on 'SEVU: VIDEO SECURITY in a LIGHT BULB'
Who really gives a s**t what his education level is?
Do you need a MD to run a company? Nope, end of discussion. I can't believe how low people will go to try and bash a company, it's friggin' pathetic!
Francois you will respond to A@P when he puts posts something about you and you respond and promptly delete it, but when I question you about somthing you ignore it? Great Director you are... Do I no longer fit your agenda?
Francois..Im confused.. or I gave you too much credit ..
your post http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=36507
Your stated... "However, the damage was done before that, when the Office was broken in and Documents copied or stolen... It's very likely that the Shorters now has a complete list of SEVU Shareholders and other assorted Information... It's also likely that the Feds are going nab the culprits, eventually"
How would this become a fed matter??
And This.... "the Office was broken in and Documents copied or stolen... It's very likely that the Shorters now has a complete list of SEVU Shareholders "
Why would SEVU have a complete list of Shareholders in their office and other information? And why would this be Shorters breaking into these offices?
Further... What makes you think this "break-in" happened? Could the possibility that Sevu or its Ceo has certain information they would like to claim was stolen..?? I have this thought... And is my own opinion and a possibility...
This is all my own opnion and no facts to back this up are presented by me ..but questioning our dear director of this thread as to his wild accusations.
Francois your breaking your own Thread rules AGAIN!... Give us factual infoor some backup for your claims of "In addition, I have heard that a certain Group is trying to make contact with large shareholders to cover 500,000 shares, for what it's Worth... If that's true, you may want to watch the share price carefully..."
Im anxiously awaiting.!
CView.. That isnt your choice.. Close your eyes now... Its the bets you will get
hrmm.. good answers... Well i will set up a feeding trough in my front yard if i can get a few of those pigs eating over here...
Thread.. I notice when i ask very important questions like my last few posts.. i get no replies... Why is that.... ? Do you not feel these are important questions... ? Do you not want the truthful answers? or is there no answers to these questions?
Bernard...how did a bowling company get 61% rise? I didint even know bowling was still around
FRANCOIS Why has post 4488 not been deleted.. it is obviously a persanal attack.
Has McBride given any indication of replacing himself as a CEO of this company ? Would it help the company to have a new CEO with fewer skeletons in the closet, and that can be more aggresive in putting out PR's which give facts without the hype and apparently ficticious reports we have been hearing latly? I am questioning this only because I still have not gotten answers with facts to the claims of the SEVU report by insidetruth.com. I have only seen a small attempt at putting info on the SEVU site.. nothing shows real hard facts but instead captions and copies of emails which always speak of what they feel or think will happen and not what has happened and what sales are really there. IMHO!
Will there be a correction to the forcasted sales coming out? Perhaps somthing with some facts of how they will arrive at some obtainable numbers ? I can only see some obviously blatent attempts at wild projections with no reasonable way of achieving the sales forcasted. IMHO!
Has McBride Givenm any otehr information about Home Depot and all other retailers he has mentioned? or retracted that info as of yet?
Francois wheres my post?
Well Matt I may not want to be part of that environment that I describe but i have no choice but to goto that paticular thread if I still have an inerest in that stock, because there is only one thread allowed on each stock.
I would like to see the same things you do on thread:
No personal attacks, But in this I would like to inlucde no personal attacks by the chairman and the director... not just by us posters, which I have witnessed and still exist and not deleted.
No Spam.. Of course
No factless bashing or pumping.. Agreed... Bashing posts get delted in a hurry it seems, 98% of the other posts are factless pumping, wild price projections from users and directors and they seem to exist without facts.
Civil thread I agree is good.. Civil in my opinion meaning because someone questions aspects of a company , they do not get attacked and constantly attacked because they want some answers and question the director or chairman.. These people should not be made out to be the devil there.. But a questioning investor ..
But then again this is just my opinion and I would never think to know more or less that anyone else, And while in an active thread would think I wouldent be praised one moment when I agree with directors and chairman, then ousted and targeted when I disagree with their agendas..
Otherwise yes these would be good suggestions ...
Facts are all that really matter.. either good or bad against or for a company.. if there are questionable actions they should also be discussed and not feared to meantion .... I really dont believe that these threads are just for longs, but also shorts... shorting is a normal thing... Not that I do it... but I may not be a long or a short ...perhaps just an investor who wants the right answers which have a base , not guessing...
Again... Happy to be here... wish I had more time.. but I think I take enough time out of the workday to watch and read already...
What were your ideas about a "second level director"? I caught somthing in a past message here about that ?
Crookk
Thank you Matt... I will behave the best I am capable of.. I donno if that is good enough, But I will not mention names.. I believe if there is a facist type thread being run here by someone who has pumped the crap out of a stock and made alot of money off of little investors, that person would be obvious without naming names, and if they care to run their board in the same manner to meet their agenda, so be it.. I would never divuldge names, it just dosent seem right.. Anyhow, that person if such a person existed of course, would have already lost all credibility with the one position they touted. taking this in account, they would still have a very weak following of some of the less informed, which still have a dream left... unfortunatly for the facist pumper, these sheep left will be of no help since they have lost their investments to the tune of lets say 80% as an example, and do not have anything else left to re invest... If such a person did exist , I absolutly agree , names should not be used, and this would only be my opinion of such a person existing if I did think this.
Now, we can get onto the business of not talking about people who may or may not exist... And we can share our gripes, feelings and outlook to a great website here at IHUB.
Crookk
Now this is a good thread... Am I able to post here without having to worry about paying the price for my humble words when I go back and attempt to post on another thread here? I unfortunatly belong to certain threads I have intrest in but just do not agree with the Chairman or the director.. But As Ihub admin is clear , one thread for each stock.... So i must take my lumps and go to there to talk about the stock.
So the quetion remains.. When posted here about my dislike of certain aspects of a somewhat facist thread, will I then be "Voted off the island" when I go back to that thread?
Please do not ask me which thread Im referring to, I would like to keep that top secret, I belong to many so it would be hard to guess I am sure.
Crookk
Unfortunatly daytrader I cannot answer your question... I just read Matt's post here and feel i should follow his request since its his board.. I do not agree with some longs on this board and their pumping of the stock and wild guesses at the outcome they have posted for the past year..But thats not suppose to be discussed so i will refrain now..
Francois it looks like your trying to build support to keep away posters who have legitimate questions which never get answered and pumpers who are attempting to build their credibility back up which was last in the last round of events with SEVU.. But i am sure you will consider this post as a bashing for SEVU because you will not agree with it.
FRANCOIS.. I have pointed out to you personal attacks made by your own Chairman... and you let it go... You yourself have made personal attacks wether it be bashers or pumpers... Show me the personal attacks I have made to warrant you to give me threats? What gives you the right to believe you are above other users here? Because you started this thread?? Do not personally attack me again.
Francois is this a threat or a promise? Are you now proving your true intentions here publicly? Show me the rules I have breached .... Explain!... I have already accused you and Bull of breaching rules and you disregard this .. Why Because it didint suit your agenda here obviously... IMHO!
Bull.. Dont tell me how to post and what to post.. I will post ..pass along and share anything I recieve publicly or privately.... Now go away
bernard you caught XRMD... gasp! 22 %