Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
DarkPulse, Inc. et al v. Crown Bridge Partners LLC et al
Monday, August 19, 2024
ORDER of USCA (Certified Copy) as to41 Notice of Appeal, filed by Redhawk Holdings Corp., Social Life Network, Inc., DarkPulse, Inc. USCA Case Number 23-7550 cv. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, the decision and order of the District Court is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Order. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Certified: 8/19/2024..(nd)
No tweet from the company yesterday? Seems odd, they’ve been consistent with daily tweets. Maybe they are building up suspense for a big announcement?
What is happening in 8-9 days?
IDE Update - the team @VivosIncUSA is carefully reviewing the IDE application to submit to the FDA. An investigational device exemption (IDE) allows the device to be used in a clinical study in order to collect safety and effectiveness data. #Cancer $RDGL
IDE Update - the team @VivosIncUSA is carefully reviewing the IDE application to submit to the FDA. An investigational device exemption (IDE) allows the device to be used in a clinical study in order to collect safety and effectiveness data. #Cancer $RDGL pic.twitter.com/UyazgnH4JJ
— RadioGel™ (@RadioGel) May 29, 2024
Friday morning update! @VivosIncUSA #RadioGel #IDE #IsoPet #NextGeneration #CancerTreatment #KillingCancerousTumorsFromTheInsideOut pic.twitter.com/do68sHxOUU
— RadioGel™ (@RadioGel) May 17, 2024
January was a busy month and we are looking forward to an even busier February with a lot more updates and posts! #vivosinc #isopet #radiogel #newgeneration #cancertherapy $RDGL pic.twitter.com/OhClaU2VE3
— Vivos Inc. (@VivosIncUSA) February 2, 2024
We are dedicated to increasing our presence in the animal sector. We have 7 clinics across the USA using Precision Radionuclide TherapyTM. As we move forward @VivosIncUSA marketing the technology to save animals is another stepping stone in the process.#radiogel #isopet $RDGL pic.twitter.com/VQ2qU8w7vz
— Vivos Inc. (@VivosIncUSA) January 26, 2024
Another update and another step that was taken during the fourth quarter #cancertherapy #newgenerationtherapy #genotoxicity #radiogel #isopet #innovations #cancer $RDGL pic.twitter.com/alvoqEDpXS
— Vivos Inc. (@VivosIncUSA) January 25, 2024
The update you all have been waiting for! More to come throughout the week…#perservance #CancerResearch #Cancer #cancertherapy #nextgeneration #innovations $RDGL pic.twitter.com/FpPtO0V72E
— Vivos Inc. (@VivosIncUSA) January 23, 2024
Awesome, thanks doc! Can’t wait to read it!
Do we know when the next update will be issued?
Radiogel™ Precision Radionuclide Therapy™ Receives FDA Breakthrough Device Designation Vivos Inc. (OTCQB: RDGL), Vivos Inc is pleased to announce that the FDA has granted RadioGel Precision Radionuclide Therapy the designation as a Breakthrough Device pursuant to the FDA’s…
— Vivos Inc. (@VivosIncUSA) December 20, 2023
RESPONSE to Motion re25 MOTION to Vacate Arbitration Award filed by N95 Shield L L C. (aty,Lorrain, Adrien)
N95’s argument:
Respondent's motion is based on the argument that it did not have actual, constructive, and
proper notice of the arbitration. At issue is whether Respondent received proper notice of the
demand for arbitration pursuant to the contract, not whether Respondent breached the Sales and
Purchase Agreement ("Agreement*). As such, the Petitioner's statements regarding the alleged
breach of the agreement are not relevant to this motion.
Unfortunately, I cannot see the full document.
This one is interesting..
• Exhibit U: May 17, 2021 letter from Congressman Pete Sessions to Matt Miller and Michael Zarcovacki of N95 Shield, LLC
Any idea what that’s about?
That is a lot of exhibits!
SNDD was revoked.
For the Arbitration Case:
ELECTRONIC ORDER:A telephone scheduling conference is set for 12/1/2023 at 10:00 AM by phone before Magistrate Judge Carol B. Whitehurst. In preparation for the teleconference, the parties shall exchange initial disclosures and file a joint Rule 26(f) report into the record on or before November 19, 2023. During the teleconference, the parties shall be prepared to discuss the status of the case, any issues requiring the Court's consideration, and the scheduling of pretrial conference and trial dates.
NOTICE OF APPEAL from36 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Document filed by DarkPulse, Inc., Redhawk Holdings Corp., Social Life Network, Inc.. Form C and Form D are due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit..(Benzenberg, Eric)
Posted October 23rd
Thank you! Much appreciated! Hopefully the arbitration confirmation in the court is smooth. Really looking forward to hearing from the company in another formal setting.
Yes, I was aware of that 8k. Thanks!
For anyone who has communicated with Klug recently, care to share what was said? With limited updates coming our way I’d love to know whats going on!
There is another company that was ordered under the same section of the Exchange Act whose last updates from both April and May of this year show they are engaged in continued Settlement Discussions with the SEC.
Its not an automatic revocation.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/ap-3-20981.xml
Based on what I’ve seen, I agree. Looks like those outlined timeframes in the order aren’t always held tight by either the respondent or the SEC.
If I see any movement I’ll try to post.
Playing the long game here anyway so personally as long as the outcome is positive I’m okay.
There is another company that was ordered under the same section of the Exchange Act whose last updates from both April and May of this year show they are engaged in continued Settlement Discussions with the SEC.
Its not an automatic revocation.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/ap-3-20981.xml
I did some digging into some other open litigations here:
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/ap-open-fileno-asc.xml
and clicked into a bunch of them. I found some that show a file called “Respondent’s Answer” and others that so not have it.
I’m not sure if some are not made public or if those particular respondents just did not submit Answers.
Tough to say, as I am also not very familiar with the process. I will try to share any info I can gather in my research.
Agreed, the five days I was referencing is that once Redhawk submits the response electronically (which hopefully they did within the 10days in the Order) we should be able to see if online here within 5 days of when they submitted it to the SEC.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/ap-3-21456.xml
Once documents become public, should be able to see them here:
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/ap-3-21456.xml
Right now it just shows to original Order.
“Filings that are made available online generally are posted within five business days. If you wish to review filings that are not online, or you want to request information that has been redacted, you can submit a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request.” Here is the exact language from https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments.shtml
I believe the deadline was Monday. However, according to the SEC FAQs I believe theres at least a 5 day delay in seeing electronically submitted responses.
I’m more than familiar but like I said, whether saying certain things have or have not gotten done in the past few weeks is pure speculation… from both sides.
Call a spade a spade. Mirrors are trippy!
When you say currently, does that mean at the very moment of your post? Or does it mean as of the last update from Vivos, meaning almost a month ago?
The point of monthly updates is to show progress over the course of each month. Meaning since the last update, plenty COULD have been accomplished. Its just as speculative for someone to say they don’t have info into the FDA for review as it is to say that they do.
At this point, I’m really not sure what people are even arguing about. We are three weeks after the last update and a week from the next.. I’m not sure about anyone else but I get a lot done in 3 weeks at work..
In regards to the Crown Bridge Lawsuit:
Defendants' Reply is now due by May 16, 2023. SO ORDERED.
Looks like they have engaged an independent accounting firm to audit their financials for the past 2 years. Isn’t that one of the first steps to being able to trade again?
ah, sorry, I missed that before
Is there any DD to support that they are connected?
According to twitter, Darkpulse just won this case:
Darkpulse Inc, (DPLS) files Complaint in the Southern District of New York alleging Dealer registration and RICO violations against EMA Financial, LLC. DarkPulse, Inc. v EMA Financial LLC, Case No. 1:22-cv-00045 (SDNY).?
Redhawk is a Plaintiff with Darkpulse on this similar case with the same representation:
DarkPulse, Inc. (DPLS), Social Life Network, Inc. (WDLF) and Red Hawk Holdings, Inc. (SNDD) file RICO class action against Crown Bridge Partners, LLC in Souther District of New York. Darkpulse, Inc, et al. v Crown Bridge Partners LLC, Case No. 1:22-cv-08163 (SDNY).
?
One definition for the word dissolve is “to bring to an end.”
Therefore, stating that it dissolves (brings to an end) the growth (the process of increasing in physical size) of a treated tumor is a fair statement..
“The SANDD™ is eligible for cost reimbursement through Medicare Advantage programs, managed care programs and through Third Party Administrators.”
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/redhawk-medical-launches-sandd-tm-130000677.html
Link to the reddit post?
If anyone is interested, here is a link to a list of filings/motions. I can’t open any of the documents without an account.
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/46217080/DarkPulse,_Inc_et_al_v_Crown_Bridge_Partners_LLC_et_al